First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Is it true

Yaphank, NY

#1 Nov 20, 2010
Can someone tell me WTF that idiot Maura Sperry is talking about in her letter to the SSP? She claims that Ed Hughes is lying about collecting 200 signatures for the petition. I wasn't sure if she was making it up but he claimed it (again?) in the Friday edition of the Press of Manorville and Moriches. Has anyone seen the petition and what is she talking about. Did he collect the signatures or not? And why does is matter if he signed at the bottom of the page.
HUH

AOL

#2 Nov 20, 2010
Couldn't it be that people went as a team collecting signatures and only one person had to sign the peitions and someone else did? Maura is just plain desperate and trying any thing to get people not to look at the facts. She just makes up lies all the time and thinks just because she says them, they are true.

“Location: Inc. Village of MB”

Since: Feb 10

Location hidden

#3 Nov 20, 2010
At this point, does anyone really pay attention to her?
extra extra

Bronx, NY

#4 Nov 20, 2010
Is it true wrote:
Can someone tell me WTF that idiot Maura Sperry is talking about in her letter to the SSP? She claims that Ed Hughes is lying about collecting 200 signatures for the petition. I wasn't sure if she was making it up but he claimed it (again?) in the Friday edition of the Press of Manorville and Moriches. Has anyone seen the petition and what is she talking about. Did he collect the signatures or not? And why does is matter if he signed at the bottom of the page.
he IS lying. you can foil the petition at town hall if you want. ed hughes did not collect ANY signatures.

only the person who collects the signatures is allowed to sign the bottom of the page which is an affidavit stating that they collected such signatures. it would be illegal to collect signatures and then have someone else sign. i have seen petition and his name is nowhere on it. the reason this is important is that either mr. hughes is a liar, or someone else has been writing articles to south shore press with ed hughes name on them.
yoda

Trenton, NJ

#5 Nov 20, 2010
extra extra wrote:
<quoted text>
he IS lying. you can foil the petition at town hall if you want. ed hughes did not collect ANY signatures.
only the person who collects the signatures is allowed to sign the bottom of the page which is an affidavit stating that they collected such signatures. it would be illegal to collect signatures and then have someone else sign. i have seen petition and his name is nowhere on it. the reason this is important is that either mr. hughes is a liar, or someone else has been writing articles to south shore press with ed hughes name on them.
liars they are
Really

Bridgeport, CT

#6 Nov 20, 2010
extra extra wrote:
<quoted text>
he IS lying. you can foil the petition at town hall if you want. ed hughes did not collect ANY signatures.
only the person who collects the signatures is allowed to sign the bottom of the page which is an affidavit stating that they collected such signatures. it would be illegal to collect signatures and then have someone else sign. i have seen petition and his name is nowhere on it. the reason this is important is that either mr. hughes is a liar, or someone else has been writing articles to south shore press with ed hughes name on them.
I know the petition takers went out in groups and only one person needs to sign the affidavit that he or she saw the signature being taken. Perhaps Maura believes that she has a loophole, but her argument is invalid and the point is moot.

One of their Article 78 arguments was there was nobody named Todd Sacoccia living on Overlook Drive. She even got Carol Bissionette to swear out an affadavit that says she knows he did not live there because she couldn't find his name using an internet search engine.

Perhaps, if either one of them had just knocked on the door, they would have been able to say hello to FATHER TODD of St Jude's Church. I swear I am not making this up!
Fed up with the lies

Tenafly, NJ

#7 Nov 20, 2010
We went out as teams, only one signature was needed as a witness. Go ahead and foil away!!!
extra extra wrote:
<quoted text>
he IS lying. you can foil the petition at town hall if you want. ed hughes did not collect ANY signatures.
only the person who collects the signatures is allowed to sign the bottom of the page which is an affidavit stating that they collected such signatures. it would be illegal to collect signatures and then have someone else sign. i have seen petition and his name is nowhere on it. the reason this is important is that either mr. hughes is a liar, or someone else has been writing articles to south shore press with ed hughes name on them.
Hugh

Miller Place, NY

#8 Nov 20, 2010
go to honest frank's website. He has the copies of the signature pages posted to his website.
TheATeam

Bronx, NY

#9 Nov 20, 2010
Hugh wrote:
go to honest frank's website. He has the copies of the signature pages posted to his website.
So now we're relying on Honest Ferank to back up Mad Maura's phony charges?
Get out and Vote Row A All The Way on Monday!!
What

Bridgeport, CT

#10 Nov 21, 2010
Hugh wrote:
go to honest frank's website. He has the copies of the signature pages posted to his website.
Honest Frank is still delusional thinking he can get elected using a write-in ballot. He did post the petition on his website, which was his attempt to discredit it. Honest Frank C is not getting my vote.
Oh NO

Bridgeport, CT

#11 Nov 21, 2010
What wrote:
<quoted text>Honest Frank is still delusional thinking he can get elected using a write-in ballot. He did post the petition on his website, which was his attempt to discredit it. Honest Frank C is not getting my vote.
I liked Honest Frank better with the white, Santa beard. Now that he shaved his head and face only leaving a mustache (that looks glued on), I am afraid of him.
Priceless

Stamford, CT

#12 Jul 17, 2013
Really wrote:
<quoted text>I know the petition takers went out in groups and only one person needs to sign the affidavit that he or she saw the signature being taken. Perhaps Maura believes that she has a loophole, but her argument is invalid and the point is moot.
One of their Article 78 arguments was there was nobody named Todd Sacoccia living on Overlook Drive. She even got Carol Bissionette to swear out an affadavit that says she knows he did not live there because she couldn't find his name using an internet search engine.
Perhaps, if either one of them had just knocked on the door, they would have been able to say hello to FATHER TODD of St Jude's Church. I swear I am not making this up!
I love history.
YUP

Stamford, CT

#13 Jul 17, 2013
Priceless wrote:
<quoted text>I love history.
yup. like 500,000 dollar budgets. volunteer village. not taking over highway.
everyone will work for free and Gary didnt want a cell tower.
Best one: WE DONT WANT THE CLUB HOUSE OR MARINAS
If you give it, you have to take it too.
Priceless

Stamford, CT

#14 Jul 17, 2013
It's great not having Carol.
interesting

Mastic, NY

#15 Jul 17, 2013
Really wrote:
<quoted text>I know the petition takers went out in groups and only one person needs to sign the affidavit that he or she saw the signature being taken. Perhaps Maura believes that she has a loophole, but her argument is invalid and the point is moot.
One of their Article 78 arguments was there was nobody named Todd Sacoccia living on Overlook Drive. She even got Carol Bissionette to swear out an affadavit that says she knows he did not live there because she couldn't find his name using an internet search engine.
Perhaps, if either one of them had just knocked on the door, they would have been able to say hello to FATHER TODD of St Jude's Church. I swear I am not making this up!
"Perhaps Maura believes that she has a loophole," Isn't that always the case with her? Always looking for that loophole. One very, very angry individual.

Good Idea

Mastic, NY

#16 Jul 17, 2013
It is time wrote:
At this point, does anyone really pay attention to her?
Good question. Trying to ignore her though, makes her work harder for attention. Good attention, bad attention, it doesn't matter. ANY attention keeps her going like the eveready bunny.
ur a sheeople

Stamford, CT

#17 Jul 17, 2013
Priceless wrote:
It's great not having Carol.
I bet the DA doesnt say that.
Compulsive Fellatio

Springfield, NJ

#18 Jul 17, 2013
Honest Frank is the only responsible person mixed up in this mess. A vote for him is well spent.
Priceless

Stamford, CT

#19 Jul 18, 2013
Compulsive Fellatio wrote:
Honest Frank is the only responsible person mixed up in this mess. A vote for him is well spent.
it tasted like rubber.... Thats what frank said about sucking Sal's dick. Is this why you changed your name to "compulsive fellatio"? Reality check. You live in a village you don't like. Trying to make the village do what you want, or else. Your vendetta is thinly rooted, drop the lawsuit or else you won't stop lying.
Compulsive Fellatio

Springfield, NJ

#20 Jul 18, 2013
Compulsive Fellatio was your mothers nickname back in high school.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Moriches Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Where is really Bradys 'lie a day' segment? Com... 17 min Really Brady 162
Dans Horse dead farm (Aug '13) 23 hr Bugsy 461
Fence installation Sun 11951Ratdog 6
Fugarino takes his merry band of screechers to ... Sun Its over 16
mastic village being dissolved (Apr '16) Nov 30 Busted 288
Mastic Village to Dissolve Results: 1,922 to 1,... Nov 28 just me 16
Lots of people want the village more then anti ... Nov 26 Get help 117

Moriches Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Moriches Mortgages