<quoted text>Correct. She WAS the sec of st "who cooked up the whole pile of BS " about a "video" while Americans were being killed. Talk about "moot". "you can't recognize that fact",.
#53327 May 14, 2014
The video explanation was a theory about why. With 23 other middles Eastern cities experiencing simultaneous riots because of the video, a reasonable person might initially think there was a connection. Suppose you explain exactly why the Terrorist attacked at Benghazi.
#53328 May 14, 2014
The real reason our people died at Benghazi was because of inadequate security. Lets see here: What political party had only months before drastically cut funding for embassy security?. There is plenty of blame to go around, so why not give credit where credit is due?
#53329 May 14, 2014
I.C.E, at the direction of the president of the United States of America, has released 36,000 illegal aliens from custody.
These people had a total of 87,000 felonies, including 200 for murder.
That is here, and now.
Not ten years ago.
Not twenty years ago.
#53330 May 14, 2014
If I were the Democrats on the committee, I would make a big poster listing all of the attacks and the number of people killed during Bush II's administration. Ole Trey would have a meltdown. Love to see that.
If Mitt had won the righties wouldn't being talking about alternative UE figures. They'd be saying Look how the numbers are coming down!!
#53331 May 14, 2014
Victoria is right that the abuse of our LAW regarding US citizens became common practice during the Bush II years. Before that, even back in the Regan days
foreign nationals who were dangerous to the USA occasionally got
mysteriously dusted by lone snipers working from 600+ yards
#53332 May 14, 2014
Clinton had the authority to increase security at Benghazi.
She was the Secretary of State.
The man, Stevens, had requested this aid repeatedly.
Clinton did not respond.
There are questions as to whether her assistants actually forwarded the requests to Clinton.
In any event, saying that there was no money in the budget for Stevens and the others to be protected is disingenuous.
My own feeling is that Clinton never read the pleas for help.
Bureaucracy is a terrible thing.
I might point out that the man the liberals love to hate, Bill O'Reilly, has said that he finds no evidence whatsoever that either Clinton or Obama was to blame for Benghazi itself.
#53333 May 14, 2014
I'm pretty sure we could make a nice little poster with Clinton (Bill}, and Carter, and Reagan and the Bush guys as well.
What's your point?
None of the aforementioned presidents tried to deflect the facts regarding the attacks they experienced .
#53334 May 14, 2014
With no vision, no plan and no solutions, the right wingnuts have no political platform . So their only hope is generating paper tiger issues for a fall campaign. Its a continuation of the last 6 years of "his ass is blacker than mine" ploy. Only idiots will buy that.
#53335 May 14, 2014
When budgets are cut, managers try to find ways to save.
It works that way in any organization which budgets by departments and
in departments which budget by line item. Knowing that
republikans are to blame. Clinton's department failed to get the requested aid.
The State department is at fault.
The main persons at fault here are the TERRORIST.
Republikans siding with terrorist against America in this issue
is as stupid as republikans siding with Putin against America
Betraying the USA in an attempt to improve republican party politics
looks like treason to me.
#53336 May 14, 2014
TSF this post is for you, since you're the closest thing to a fair person among the anti-republicans.
California election committee has fined democrats for putting up a fake picture of gay republican DeMaio standing next to a drag queen.
Sounds a little wing-nutty to me!
What's your take?
#53337 May 14, 2014
Putting aside all the spin noise, the only actual
disputed issue here is WHY the TERRORIST killed our people
So one theory put forth here is the video theory.
If you can prove what the actual reason/s the TERROTRIST
did this, and if you can prove that someone in the state department knew that
then you have an issue. Otherwise, it is a paper tiger.
#53338 May 14, 2014
TSF your depiction of Republicans as "terrorists" is in line with the most inflammatory statements I've ever made, wouldn't you say?
#53339 May 14, 2014
Sound like standard dirty politics. I didn't know he was gay.
Who is the drag queen?
#53340 May 14, 2014
TSF you should calm down.
This is Topix,
this is politics.
You sound a trifle drunk yourself, tonight!:-)
#53341 May 14, 2014
By the way TSF, I'm still of the opinion that the Reagan tax cuts were a disaster for this country.
Moderates and liberals warned of repercussions down the road.
Do you agree?
#53342 May 14, 2014
Then it's time to address a problem initiated by one administration, and continued by another.
Both of these presidents have exceeded their mandate, I fear, in an attempt to gain power for the executive branch at the expense of the legislative branch.
What are your feelings on this?
#53343 May 14, 2014
The only thing that was verifiable was that the picture was fake.
It is standard dirty politics, my point exactly.
Both parties do it!
I do not believe the majority of democrats are liars and cheats because of one incident.
I would hope that you would not apply those labels to all republicans, either, when crap like this surfaces.
#53344 May 14, 2014
I can see where republikans would believe my perspective
to be inflammatory. What I can not see is why republikans
cannot understand that they are encouraging the terrorist
by giving them exactly what they were seeking when they
committed this atrocity.
Encouraging terrorist who have committed these crimes
against our own country in order to attempt creating a domestic
election campaign issue is just insane.
Interesting that your perspective is so slanted as to
believe anyone with my line of reasoning is drunk.
No, I am not drunk. But I have been there and done that--
before. Hopefully, that will never happen again.
#53345 May 14, 2014
Since 911, this country, republicans and democrats alike, have given away our rights in fear of "terrorists".
An erroneous invasion of Iraq.
Diminution of legal rights as well.
Have the'terrorists" not already won?
#53346 May 14, 2014
I was joking about you being drunk.
Hence the"smiley face ".
Add your comments below
|Cruz wants seized drug money for Wall||23 min||southern at heart||18|
|Did Robert, the original racist, die?||46 min||southern at heart||79|
|Trump encourages inbreeding to Make America Gre...||1 hr||southern at heart||13|
|Trump Wants to End the Tax that Affects Him||1 hr||southern at heart||3|
|Trump: A Fake and a Fraud||5 hr||ardith||87|
|Trump Has Dementia||5 hr||ardith||42|
|Obama to get 400, 000 for Wall Street speech||10 hr||Rock||11|
Find what you want!
Search Morganton Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC