Gay Bar in Morehead
shirley

Chapmanville, WV

#63 Jan 23, 2013
ok then

Since: Jan 13

Morehead, KY

#64 Jan 23, 2013
first customer will be from charleston w va b,b, he deseves screwed
Jim

Cleveland, GA

#65 Jan 23, 2013
deray wrote:
I've never seen a red neck gay bar, red necks generally don't like gays.
Cheer up. They got gay red neck bars, you just need to go to a bigger city.
Person

Richmond, KY

#66 Jan 23, 2013
Pastor wrote:
Moreheand does not need a bar period..gay or straight. And we will protest it if another one tries to open. We need to be spreading the gospel not the liquor.
This is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. How about you preach your gospel while I get drunk at the bar.

Since: Dec 09

Falls of Rough, Kentucky

#67 Jan 24, 2013
Jim wrote:
<quoted text>
Cheer up. They got gay red neck bars, you just need to go to a bigger city.
I've been to bigger cities, New York even. The gays are outside the bars in the streets having sex in broad daylight. That is not the kind of thing we need in our communities. New York don't even need anything like that going on. That kind of thing is not normal, it is perverted, filthy, behavior, but that is what goes on in the so called bigger cities, the media say in larger cities like California it is even worse and New Orleans, has a reputation for all kinds of lewd people. You think we want that kind of thing going on in our small towns and cities, I don't think so...
Jim

Hillsboro, KY

#68 Jan 24, 2013
deray wrote:
<quoted text>
I've been to bigger cities, New York even. The gays are outside the bars in the streets having sex in broad daylight. That is not the kind of thing we need in our communities. New York don't even need anything like that going on. That kind of thing is not normal, it is perverted, filthy, behavior, but that is what goes on in the so called bigger cities, the media say in larger cities like California it is even worse and New Orleans, has a reputation for all kinds of lewd people. You think we want that kind of thing going on in our small towns and cities, I don't think so...
I got no problem with any of it. I just wish you people would realize Topix isn't a dating site.

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#69 Jan 24, 2013
deray wrote:
<quoted text>
I've been to bigger cities, New York even. The gays are outside the bars in the streets having sex in broad daylight. That is not the kind of thing we need in our communities. New York don't even need anything like that going on. That kind of thing is not normal, it is perverted, filthy, behavior, but that is what goes on in the so called bigger cities, the media say in larger cities like California it is even worse and New Orleans, has a reputation for all kinds of lewd people. You think we want that kind of thing going on in our small towns and cities, I don't think so...
"cities like California"? I'll just let that marinade for a minute.

I got news for you deray, all kinds of people are having sex in public. While we're on that, sex is not perverted or filthy behavior. Just because you don't allow it in your narrow view of how the world should be doesn't make it perversion. You are always so big on the freedoms the founding fathers had in mind at the founding of this nation and yet you are always so quick to revoke those freedoms when they aren't the same freedoms you enjoy. You do know the founding fathers were in favor of drug use based on individual freedom right? Shhhh, don't tell anyone but they were also in favor of interracial relations. Everyone deserves to be happy as long as that happiness doesn't harm anyone or anything else. Who is anyone to say others shouldn't be happy?

Since: Dec 09

Falls of Rough, Kentucky

#70 Jan 24, 2013
Sex in public anywhere is perversion by anyone, regardless of orientation. Sex in public was not in the founding fathers minds when the written groundwork of this nation was put in place. I challenge you to show me a reference by any of the signers of the constitution that they believe people should be able to have sex in public on the streets of any city, town, ect of this nation.
Many try to force the drug thing with what you are saying, freedom, but the fact of the matter deaths resulting from drug dealing are murder that will not change, from a legal perspective it is becoming recognized by the state justice systems now, the federal system has for many years for bulk dealers and has sentences up to and including death, do a web search they are convictions for dealers, overdose is being recognized as murder. From a religious standpoint, God has always condemned drug dealing that results in death to a otherwise healthy person, it is murder plan and simple.
Interracial relations I don't care about one way or the other, the lives of the children do concern me and their treatment by others. The reason for that is I went to school with multiracial children when I was a youth, I witnessed their mistreatment for what their mother and father had chosen to do. The bible says from one man and woman all of us came into being.
As far as the country founding fathers that could be debated, Abraham Lincoln for example in public said the war was about slavery, but in his private and government correspondence at the time shows it was about taxes / levies and other money making schemes against the South by northern bankers and governmental officials of the time. That really if you think about it has not changed very much. The same attitude against the Southern people of this country still exists.

Since: Dec 09

Falls of Rough, Kentucky

#71 Jan 24, 2013
I am not surprised by many peoples reaction, for the Bible says.

God’s Wrath Against Mankind partly because of this very reason.

Romans 1

New International Version 1984

18 The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.

21 For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles.

24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.

26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.

28 Furthermore, since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done. 29 They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, 30 slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; 31 they are senseless, faithless, heartless, ruthless. 32 Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.
Jim

Hillsboro, KY

#72 Jan 24, 2013
deray wrote:
Sex in public anywhere is perversion by anyone, regardless of orientation. Sex in public was not in the founding fathers minds when the written groundwork of this nation was put in place. I challenge you to show me a reference by any of the signers of the constitution that they believe people should be able to have sex in public on the streets of any city, town, ect of this nation.
Many try to force the drug thing with what you are saying, freedom, but the fact of the matter deaths resulting from drug dealing are murder that will not change, from a legal perspective it is becoming recognized by the state justice systems now, the federal system has for many years for bulk dealers and has sentences up to and including death, do a web search they are convictions for dealers, overdose is being recognized as murder. From a religious standpoint, God has always condemned drug dealing that results in death to a otherwise healthy person, it is murder plan and simple.
Interracial relations I don't care about one way or the other, the lives of the children do concern me and their treatment by others. The reason for that is I went to school with multiracial children when I was a youth, I witnessed their mistreatment for what their mother and father had chosen to do. The bible says from one man and woman all of us came into being.
As far as the country founding fathers that could be debated, Abraham Lincoln for example in public said the war was about slavery, but in his private and government correspondence at the time shows it was about taxes / levies and other money making schemes against the South by northern bankers and governmental officials of the time. That really if you think about it has not changed very much. The same attitude against the Southern people of this country still exists.
Quit beating yourself up, God made you and God loves you!

Since: Dec 09

Falls of Rough, Kentucky

#73 Jan 24, 2013
aka will wrote:
<quoted text>
"cities like California"? I'll just let that marinade for a minute.
I got news for you deray, all kinds of people are having sex in public. While we're on that, sex is not perverted or filthy behavior. Just because you don't allow it in your narrow view of how the world should be doesn't make it perversion. You are always so big on the freedoms the founding fathers had in mind at the founding of this nation and yet you are always so quick to revoke those freedoms when they aren't the same freedoms you enjoy. You do know the founding fathers were in favor of drug use based on individual freedom right? Shhhh, don't tell anyone but they were also in favor of interracial relations. Everyone deserves to be happy as long as that happiness doesn't harm anyone or anything else. Who is anyone to say others shouldn't be happy?
Cities like in California, they carry everything to extreme in that state under the guise of freedom. Really freedom in this sense is an old principle in a new guise, sinful conduct. Sorry if that is politically incorrect, but it is what it is.

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#74 Jan 24, 2013
deray wrote:
<quoted text>
Cities like in California, they carry everything to extreme in that state under the guise of freedom. Really freedom in this sense is an old principle in a new guise, sinful conduct. Sorry if that is politically incorrect, but it is what it is.
"is what it is"? maybe but it is most definitely NOT what you say it is. I'm not "forcing" anything. The founding fathers believed in freedom in every aspect of a persons life. Freedom to choose for one's self, who they should be with, what medications(drugs) a person can take and what people do with one another. To you it is sinful conduct based on your faith and your moral compass but that doesn't make it fact for anyone but you. Others may or may not share your point of view but that doesn't make them right or wrong. You are talking about issues that are moral. It is perfectly natural for one person to be attracted to another, it is perfectly natural for one person to have sex with another. It may be socially unacceptable or immoral to have sex in public but it isn't perversion. An example of perversion is necrophilia, that is not just immoral but is in fact a perversion of a normal healthy sexual action. The only way sex in public might actually be a perversion is if one or both participants are unable to perform unless they are in public or have an audience. Do you understand that distinction now?

Since: Dec 09

Falls of Rough, Kentucky

#75 Jan 25, 2013
It is perversion, sex between unmarried persons is called fornication. Sex with a married person that is not your own mate is called adultery. Sex with the same sex is called unnatural, abomination, and other words.

Acting like animals is no excuse, they have no hope for a future, we do.

All these things during the time of the founding fathers of this nation in most places were punished, people were ostracized, sometimes executed. They did not call that kind of thing freedom, it was the furthermost thing from their minds, most were religious men during that time.

Since: Dec 09

Falls of Rough, Kentucky

#76 Jan 25, 2013
1 Corinthians 6:18
Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a man commits are outside his body, but he who sins sexually sins against his own body.

1 Corinthians 6:9 Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders
2 Corinthians 12:21 I am afraid that when I come again my God will humble me before you, and I will be grieved over many who have sinned earlier and have not repented of the impurity, sexual sin and debauchery in which they have indulged.
Galatians 5:19 The acts of the sinful nature are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery;
Ephesians 5:3 But among you there must not be even a hint of sexual immorality, or of any kind of impurity, or of greed, because these are improper for God's holy people.
Colossians 3:5 Put to death, therefore, whatever belongs to your earthly nature: sexual immorality, impurity, lust, evil desires and greed, which is idolatry.
1 Thessalonians 4:3 It is God's will that you should be sanctified: that you should avoid sexual immorality;
Hebrews 13:4 Marriage should be honored by all, and the marriage bed kept pure, for God will judge the adulterer and all the sexually immoral.

New International Version ©1984 by Biblica

Since: Dec 09

Falls of Rough, Kentucky

#77 Jan 25, 2013
It sounds like many have practiced sexual sins so long that their very conscience have become seared / Scared, for all know these sins are perversions of what is right and true, all these things end up in hardship and pain for the ones practicing them. Reducing mankind to a mere animal, cattle, horse, pig, dogs behave this way, not humans.

Ephesians 4:19 Having lost all sensitivity, they have given themselves over to sensuality so as to indulge in every kind of impurity, with a continual lust for more.

1 Timothy 4:2 Such teachings come through hypocritical liars, whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron.

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#78 Jan 25, 2013
deray wrote:
It is perversion, sex between unmarried persons is called fornication. Sex with a married person that is not your own mate is called adultery. Sex with the same sex is called unnatural, abomination, and other words.
Acting like animals is no excuse, they have no hope for a future, we do.
All these things during the time of the founding fathers of this nation in most places were punished, people were ostracized, sometimes executed. They did not call that kind of thing freedom, it was the furthermost thing from their minds, most were religious men during that time.
put a sock in it deray, in the founding father's times it was widely accepted that men, especially men of influence kept mistresses. Thomas Jefferson, does he ring a bell? Illigitemate children didn't just start popping up?

Since: Dec 09

Falls of Rough, Kentucky

#79 Jan 25, 2013
What one or a few did can not be compared to all. His slaves at that time were considered his property, many considered slaves as nothing but animals, so to them it would be closer to say he was practicing bestiality, mistress indeed if you believe the stories, I doubt he had love for the woman, he may have but for the time I doubt it.

In many of the colonies far less than this would be punished by shunning, stocks, whipping, execution. Jefferson and some of the others would probably be called a atheist this day and time.
I know

Olive Hill, KY

#80 Jan 26, 2013
Pastor wrote:
Moreheand does not need a bar period..gay or straight. And we will protest it if another one tries to open. We need to be spreading the gospel not the liquor.
you're an idiot. keep your gospel crap to yourself. ain't nobody got time for that.
Simply me

Morehead, KY

#81 Dec 11, 2013
I love the idea. But if other people don't like it, oh damn well. If straight guys (homophobes in particular) dont like gays, then hell...why not make a gay bar? They don't have to look at us and we don't have to look at them.
Simply me

Morehead, KY

#82 Dec 11, 2013
I know wrote:
<quoted text>
you're an idiot. keep your gospel crap to yourself. ain't nobody got time for that.
Ain't nobody got time for that :3
Fabulous :D

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Morehead Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
unpeaceful Protests 57 min Thomas 4
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 1 hr Shane 158,110
I love older men......... 2 hr From a far 12
Trump's List of Promises 2 hr Demorat 23
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 3 hr carter county res... 24,026
Thank god Obama is gone 4 hr Don 1
A New America 6 hr catfish59 4

Morehead Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Morehead Mortgages