Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Jonah1]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Every single time a state has voted on equating gay unions with marriage it has been rejected.

Um, no, the state hasn't voted, the people have. And we aren't governed by mob rule. And just like Prop H8, these "votes" will be ruled unconstitutional. Not much you can do about that except gloat on the current victory you've acheived for the moment. It seems to give you comfort.

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Apparently your definition of 'normal' is as accurate as your definition of 'marriage'...

I don't remember defining "normal". Where did that occur Ms. Deceitful? Which post?

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
And that would apply to the rest of your post.
Smile.

Aw, poor KiMare, the bitch still has nothing!

[DYI wrom bin]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm begging you, list the studies they base that assertion on!!!
Waiting....(ad nauseum)

Hey freak, Are you to busy "researching" the "Little Black Book" and perusing 'rent boy' ads to click the links he already provided?

PS: Try staying in character when you move between persona's.

[Jonah1]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
I posted a study that exposed the lack of proper method in previous studies (all the ones you referred to but wouldn't specify because you knew they were bogus).
I also posted a study that showed the real, long term results of every family type they could list. There were so few gay couples that were in permanent relationships, the results were statistically insignificant. Most gay relationships are fractured. THAT is why more study is needed.

And the "danger" and "harm" that you continually post was where?

[Jonah1]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
'fundamentalist'?
Why do you keep bring up religion? Logic failing you so you want to focus on your bigotry subject?

I didn't bring up religion, I called you a fundamentalist. There's a difference. You aren't a religion. Although from your posts it does seem evident that you think yourself to be a god.

[KiMare]

Jonah1 wrote:

<quoted text>
I wasn't talking about some. I was talking about all. After all, that's what you were talking about in relationship to gays being married. Why so decietful?
Oh, and you didn't answer the question...."so what"?
<quoted text>
It is obvious that you need to invest in a dictionary. You might want to look up the word "shooling" because it's obvious you don't know how to employ it.
GLTB has been 4% throughout history? Prove it. Sounds to me again like your just pulling percentages out of your rotundous ass.
Why would your scenerio be "expected"? Nope, just more made up bullshyt. Oh, and you might want to read Penguin Boy's original quote again. He specifically was asking why all the straight people aren't entering into SSM, an entity that doesn't even exist.
Oh, and "marriage" hasn't "always existed". In your fantasy land of Adam an Eve it may have, but here in the real world it was an institution created by man late into his exitence. It was meant to keep property within a family and the wifes were property of the husband.
Since you seem to like distinctions though, here's one for you. Marriage still exits, and gays are entering into them. They have been for over a decade now. The exact same institution that straight people enter into. Not a damned thing you can do to change that.

Honey, I never used the word 'shooling'. Don't think I ever have...

Marriage is simply the human formalization of evolution. The survival of our genes. Your explanation is simply more idiotic gay twirl.

I don't want to needlessly annoy you, so I won't repost it unless you want me to, but you might refer to my "If You" list of clear, factual distinctions between marriage and gay unions.

I really enjoy schooling you tonight. You still have fun too?

[Bruno]

The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:

<quoted text>Like a lot of issues in this country, some take time to correct. Up until the early part of the last century women did not have the right to vote. Until the 1860's slavery was common. Until the 1960's segregation was normal. Yet all have been corrected. Have a nice day.

There is nothing wrong with a heterosexual marriage, therefor nothing hs to be corrected. Got it ???

[KiMare]

Jonah1 wrote:

<quoted text>
No hon, DOMA changed the definition of marriage. If marriage had been already defined as "solely between a man and a woman" then DOMA wouldn't have been needed. Damn you are stupid. There WAS NO LAW THAT ALREADY DEFINED MARRIAGE AS SOLELY BETWEEN A MAN AND A WOMAN!!!! I love that you are getting snitty!! So fundie of you!!
<quoted text>
Yawn. Did SCOTUS limit marriage to only those that procreated? Pssssst, that's a "yes" or "no" question!!!!!
<quoted text>
Yes, you fundies all have the same responses. You are nothing new or special. What you are too though, is a deceitful piece of shyt who STILL (sorry had to break through the fog) can't establish a valid argument to deny gays marriage!!! Let us know when you can do that. Heck, for that matter, let us know when you can provide a reason that gays shouldn't have children. You certianly do like harping on that one!!!! Oh, and also, let us know when procreation is a mandate for marriage!!!!
You still got nuthin'!!!

You are slow...

DOMA was simply keeping the definition from changing.

Gays wouldn't be excluded from marriage if the definition already allowed them...

This isn't even kindergarten logic...

[DYI wrom bin]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
You are right, I have smarmy comebacks.

The review by Dr. Loren Marks from Louisiana State University finds that much of the science that forms the basis for the highly

“The jury is still out,” says Loren Marks titled author of DISCREDITED bullshit article,“Same-sex parenting and children’s outcomes”a "study DISCREDITED and mouth piece for the FRC and other known hate groups.

Can you find just ONE unbiased source that give this homophobic idiot's OPINION credence?

You can't becasue NONE exist.

PS: Everything you read on the internet isn't true.

[KiMare]

Jonah1 wrote:

<quoted text>
I didn't bring up religion, I called you a fundamentalist. There's a difference. You aren't a religion. Although from your posts it does seem evident that you think yourself to be a god.

Now you are just getting silly stupid.

Go to bed.

[Bruno]

The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:

<quoted text>Do you mean like slavery, and segregation. One caused a war the other mass demonstrations and civil unrest. It seems that some issues must be brought to light and then fought for. Reminds me of 7/4/1776, we had to stand up to the King and tell him to shove it where the sun don't shine. Looks like the Gay community is telling you where to shove it Bruno.

Naww you and the gay community are second class and that's just the
way it goes, that's how th Feds see it anyway !!!!

[Bruno]

The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:

<quoted text> You Asked the question Bruno, I supplied the answer. And yes they can be compared, its called discrimination. Now do we need a history lesson on marriage? Why Bruno its been posted many times that same sex marriage is found all through the history of written mankind. I would guess that homosexuals can and would be found through out the entire age of man kind.

lol, if that was the case you wouldn't be knocking on the courts doors begging to be accepted, sorry Slym Clyde

[ELH]

KiMare wrote:

I don't want to needlessly annoy...

Your very much like a gnat or too much bass on a CD player. Annoying is the perfect word for your mindless blathering.

KiMare wrote:

I really enjoy schooling you tonight.

Yes, Your nightly lessons in azzhattery are the high point of this thread.

[RiccardoFire]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Now you are just getting silly stupid.
Go to bed.

He's a very angry gay man.

[Cookie Gate]

Give a hoot, give Willard Mitt Romney the BOOT.

[Bruno]

Jonah1 wrote:

<quoted text>
I see. Not neccessarily the right thing to do. Got it. Please be specific. Of the two items that were being presened, which in your opinion were not the right thing to do? Allowing women to vote, or abolishing slavery?
Which of these changes were not good when forcedon society? Please do educate the room.

Quit playing games you Fkn idiot. You queers do so much double talking here no wonder the gay community is screwed up. You are mixing up black and white heteros with man and man-woman and woman marring

[KiMare]

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>He's a very angry gay man.

He's too smart to live with that kind of denial.

Too afraid to face reality.

[KiMare]

DYI wrom bin wrote:

<quoted text>
“The jury is still out,” says Loren Marks titled author of DISCREDITED bullshit article,“Same-sex parenting and children’s outcomes”a "study DISCREDITED and mouth piece for the FRC and other known hate groups.
Can you find just ONE unbiased source that give this homophobic idiot's OPINION credence?
You can't becasue NONE exist.
PS: Everything you read on the internet isn't true.

You may want to read the article in Slate about gay twirl hysteria and the study...

[ELH]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Now you are just getting silly stupid.
Go to bed.

It's not dark out yet, but base on how your characters are blurring together I'd say YOU could probably benefit from a nice nap. Though not as much as you would benefit from a few rounds of ECT.

PS: Yes, I am fully qualified to make this recommendation.

[KiMare]

ELH wrote:

<quoted text>
Your very much like a gnat or too much bass on a CD player. Annoying is the perfect word for your mindless blathering.
<quoted text>
Yes, Your nightly lessons in azzhattery are the high point of this thread.

You are welcome.

[ELH]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Honey, I never used the word 'shooling'. Don't think I ever have...

But you sure do shool the shit every time you post. Smile. ;< )