Sorry, gay pride, you are so you lie. The 2 gay boys on the 9th Circuit Court only applied there decision to the fact that the CSSC had allowed flaming marriages and then they interpreted that Prop 8 denied them this right they were given.<quoted text>
Sorry, it doesn't work that way. But if you had paid attention in civics class, you would know that.
although the Constitution permits communities to enact most laws they believe to be desirable, it requires that there be at least a legitimate reason for the passage of a law that treats different classes of people differently. There was no such reason that Proposition 8 could have been enacted.... 9th Circuit Court
Since, you failed "civics class" because you were slobbing on a knob, this ruling will be overturned, read the dissenting opinion. The reason you lose again is that the CSSC was required to give the Prop 8 proponents enough time to come up with signatures for an initiative and stay the same sex marriages until then.
The 9th Circuit Court understands this, since they stayed Gay Walker's decision to allow same sex marriage. Did you forget, well is you did, remember that there have been no same sex marriages ever in California except for a brief hick-up in time.