Is America on the Brink.....
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#24 Dec 28, 2012
You're including a lot of people in that 1% bracket.
Eric

Lisle, IL

#25 Dec 28, 2012
madcola wrote:
You're including a lot of people in that 1% bracket.
Top 1% have an AGI of over $360,000 per the National Taxpayers Union.
Eric

Lisle, IL

#26 Dec 28, 2012
Sorry, that's over $340,000
Johnny Appleseed

Melrose Park, IL

#27 Dec 28, 2012
Eric wrote:
<quoted text>
American Express Publishing and The Harrison Group found that 67 percent of the top one percent of American earners support higher income taxes.
The names of these companies alone doesn't attest to the validity of the polls taken.
All these company names signify is that they're well known companies. The owners of the companies and their CEOs political affiliations would have to be confirmed in order to determine if there was a political bias favoring one political party and its agenda.
If G.E. or Bill Gates, for instance, were to commission a poll to be taken,we would know that there was a bias in favor of the leftist democrat parties agenda.
Eric

Lisle, IL

#28 Dec 28, 2012
Johnny Appleseed wrote:
<quoted text> The names of these companies alone doesn't attest to the validity of the polls taken.
All these company names signify is that they're well known companies. The owners of the companies and their CEOs political affiliations would have to be confirmed in order to determine if there was a political bias favoring one political party and its agenda.
If G.E. or Bill Gates, for instance, were to commission a poll to be taken,we would know that there was a bias in favor of the leftist democrat parties agenda.
You got better info?
Johnny Appleseed

United States

#29 Dec 28, 2012
Eric wrote:
<quoted text>
You got better info?
These polls are meaningless unless we know which political party the poll takers belonged to and where the location where the poll was taken,perhaps it was taken in such locations as Hollywood or Chicago in Obama land.
Eric

Lisle, IL

#30 Dec 28, 2012
Johnny Appleseed wrote:
<quoted text>These polls are meaningless unless we know which political party the poll takers belonged to and where the location where the poll was taken,perhaps it was taken in such locations as Hollywood or Chicago in Obama land.
Then I guess the poll cited is the best that we have. You may attempt to prove it incorrect by citing a poll of your choosing.
Johnny Appleseed

Melrose Park, IL

#31 Dec 29, 2012
Eric wrote:
<quoted text>
Then I guess the poll cited is the best that we have. You may attempt to prove it incorrect by citing a poll of your choosing.
Your the one touting this poll,its up to you to prove that the poll wasn't bias favoring the democrats placing more and more taxes on people thus allowing Obama to have more money to grease the tracks with, ie, buying votes.. "Obama money."
As one woman standing in line was asked, wheres the money your standing in line for coming from, she said I don't know, its Obama money, and we're going to get some.
Eric

Lisle, IL

#32 Dec 29, 2012
Johnny Appleseed wrote:
<quoted text>Your the one touting this poll,its up to you to prove that the poll wasn't bias favoring the democrats placing more and more taxes on people thus allowing Obama to have more money to grease the tracks with, ie, buying votes.. "Obama money."
As one woman standing in line was asked, wheres the money your standing in line for coming from, she said I don't know, its Obama money, and we're going to get some.
Absolutely not. Don't ask me to prove a negative. You are attacking two respected organizations without proof of any wrongdoing. So YOU show that their procedures were biased.

This poll has been widely reported this week without criticism--including wsj.
Johnny Appleseed

Melrose Park, IL

#33 Dec 29, 2012
Eric wrote:
<quoted text>
Absolutely not. Don't ask me to prove a negative. You are attacking two respected organizations without proof of any wrongdoing. So YOU show that their procedures were biased.
This poll has been widely reported this week without criticism--including wsj.
All we have is the fact that two companies took a poll, thats the evidence you offered. You are the one who signified that the poll taken by these two companies were valid. What are we to take away from the fact that you won't or can't defend your presentation or that the polls weren't tainted by political bias.
You are making a blanket statement about two companies which you again don't provide any evidence to back up your statement about them with.
Eric

Lisle, IL

#34 Dec 29, 2012
Johnny Appleseed wrote:
<quoted text> All we have is the fact that two companies took a poll, thats the evidence you offered. You are the one who signified that the poll taken by these two companies were valid. What are we to take away from the fact that you won't or can't defend your presentation or that the polls weren't tainted by political bias.
You are making a blanket statement about two companies which you again don't provide any evidence to back up your statement about them with.
This is why nothing gets done when we have to deal with people of your ilk. You are in a constant state of denial. You have no grasp on reality. Your sole mission in life is to obstruct.
Johnny Appleseed

Melrose Park, IL

#35 Dec 30, 2012
Eric wrote:
<quoted text>
This is why nothing gets done when we have to deal with people of your ilk. You are in a constant state of denial. You have no grasp on reality. Your sole mission in life is to obstruct.
I don't know what to make of your sudden change of character, from the Eric that we all were beginning to think had turned the page from the virulent vilification of anyone who disagreed with him or were conservative,to the new bipartisan Eric which you've always advised the republican party to adopt in order for all to be able to work together in perfect harmony, you know, that reach across the isle thing.
Alas,I must face the reality that you were perhaps attempting to pull off a charade and hadn't changed at all,Oh, say it isn't so!
You can't imagine the disapointment when I read your post and seen such hurtful words that you used, such words as,( Ilk, and "obstruct"-ionist.) This can't be the same Eric that in the spirit of the "Holidays" wished me a " Merry Christmas."
Your Holiday is over I know, but I wish you, to be politically correct, a Happy Holiday/A Happy Hanukkah past.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Montgomery Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Former House Speaker Dennis Hastert to plead gu... (Oct '15) Thu Meow Meow Meow 7
Anybody know what Happened to Franz gym? Aug 15 !!! 2
News After confrontation, pickup truck drives throug... Aug 14 Bowlingball4u 3
Poll What restaurant do you want to come to town? (Jan '08) Aug 4 Theresa Branstone 84
News Metra scrutinizing Hastert earmark for Oswego e... (Jun '15) Aug 4 Sheila B 2
Review: iLoveKickboxing - Aurora (Feb '15) Aug 4 Sheila B 47
News Should backyard chickens be allowed in Wauconda? Aug 4 row row the boat 5

Montgomery Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Montgomery Mortgages