Messianic Jews say they are persecute...

Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel

There are 72043 comments on the Newsday story from Jun 21, 2008, titled Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel. In it, Newsday reports that:

Safety pins and screws are still lodged in 15-year-old Ami Ortiz's body three months after he opened a booby-trapped gift basket sent to his family.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#62153 Nov 7, 2013
yehoshooah adam wrote:
<quoted text>
rabbee: and a standard accepted from the lying devil, only makes you true to the devil. it's still, a false bias point.
and how did you derive food, from that definition of poison? there was no mention, of food there. you do not have to eat, all poison for it to harm you.
the term secular is nothing more, than a deception. there is nothing in this physical totality, that is derived with secularism from G-D. even freud stated, man is a religious creature of habit.
as i gave plenty of qualifiers, for the reasoning from G-D. and it is not my private definition, since i got this from G-D.
HughBe---Dictionaries provide what is called STANDARD or accepted meaning. Where the problem is in when someone has a PRIVATE meaning that no one else accepts or knows about.

Let us use poison as an example.
Dictionary--Poison= something that can kill or make you sick.
A private -- poison=food.
Do you see the problem?

rabbee: and a standard accepted from the lying devil, only makes you true to the devil. it's still, a false bias point.

HughBe--- noted

rabbee---and how did you derive food, from that definition of poison? there was no mention, of food there.

HughBe--- The point is that definitions must be standardized in order to ensure proper communication. That aside, you can get food from poison.

For example, poisonous foods like ;MUSHROOMS, pufferfish and castor beans which make castor oil.

Adam--the term secular is nothing more, than a deception.

HughBe--- Really? If I have nothing to do with any god I am SECULAR. Tell me the meaning of irreligious.

Tell me which god would I be worshipping if I reject all of them in this world.

Adam-- there is nothing in this physical totality, that is derived with secularism from G-D. even freud stated, man is a religious creature of habit.

HughBe--- His opinion is noted and dismissed as BS that it is.

I have a habit of washing my face and brushing my teeth the first thing in the mornings. This HABIT has nothing to do with any religion or god.

Some people have a habit of using the toilet meaning #2 before going to work or school and that HABIT has nothing to do with any god or religion.

The only god that would be involved in the above would be the god of #2 and oral hygiene.
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#62154 Nov 7, 2013
yehoshooah adam wrote:
<quoted text>
rabbee: i said inversely proportional, not proportional. inversely proportional, results in the square of the distance. twice the distance, decreases flux by a factor of 4.
Adam--- the degree of insanity, is inversely proportional to your actual distance from G-D here in TheTorah.

HughBe--- Effectively you have said that as the distance from God increases the insanity decreases. Think about it.

rabbee: i said inversely proportional, not proportional. inversely proportional, results in the square of the distance. twice the distance, decreases flux by a factor of 4.

HughBe--- Reread my words and ask someone with sense. Note, that would rule out Frijoles. Try Joel and it is a pity that Dovid is no longer here as I have confidence that he would know.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#62155 Nov 7, 2013
HughBe wrote:
<quoted text>
HughBe --Psychotherapy and depending on the severity of the disorder it is coupled with medication.
Liam---And just how is that supposed to change their genetically determined sexual orientation? Or is it just to teach them to be ashamed and hide who they are?
HughBe--- Give me the link that supports your claim that the disorder is genetically based. Is this position generally accepted in the scientific community?
The genetic connection is becoming more widely accepted as the evidence continues to come in.

Direct study of genes:
Part 1 of 2

Dean Hamer, and his colleagues at the National Cancer Institute collected family data from the families of 114 gay men. 15 They found out which, if any, of their siblings, parents, cousins, uncles etc. were also gay. They quickly determined that homosexuality runs in families. By itself, these results show nothing. They might indicate that homosexuality is genetically caused, or might show that it is caused by upbringing, by some hormonal levels in the womb or some other environmental factor that appears in some family lines more than other.

Further studies showed that "There were increased rates of gay people among family members genetically related to each other even when raised apart in different households." This reinforced the possibility that genetic factors might cause people to become gay. However, these observations were not conclusive; they were merely suggestive.

What proved the genetic nature of "gayness" was a pedigree test. This type of study examines the sexual orientation of the ancestors of many gay adults - both on their father's and mother's side. Some possible results from a pedigree study on Hamer's sample of gay adults would be:

1. An approximately equal number of gays might be found on the mothers' side of the family, when compared to the fathers' side. Some gays may have many gay ancestors on their mother's side, whereas other gays may see the same effect on their father's side. But when all the results were lumped together, if the total numbers would be about equal, then the results could point to:
* "Gayness" being caused by environmental factors, or
* "Gayness" being caused by some gene on a chromosome other than the X chromosome.
2. A much larger number of gays might be found on the mother's side of the family. This would show conclusively that not only was the gene passed genetically, but that it is located somewhere on the X chromosome - since men always get their X chromosome only from their mother. This is called the "maternal effect." It is well known in genetics.

The researchers found that the second result was observed. A gay male from the population that Hamer studied would notice that more of his mother's brothers will be gay than his father's brothers; so too with the various classes of maternal cousins when compared to his paternal cousins. Thus, much male homosexuality is caused by a gene on the X chromosome. Hamer went on to find the approximate location on the chromosome where the gay-causing gene was located. He found that many of his subjects had an identical sequence on the Xq28 region of their X chromosome. This shows the approximate location of the "gay gene." Researchers speculated that a group of interacting genes (including one in this region) might be found to determine sexual orientation in males. This prediction came to pass. The statistical "p" value is a measure of the significance of a test: the probability that it could have happened by chance. P values less than 0.01 (1%) are considered very significant. The Hamer study had a P factor of 0.00001, and so is considered extremely reliable.

The DNA of 36 pairs of lesbian sisters were also studied; no corresponding pattern has yet been found.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#62156 Nov 7, 2013
Direct study of genes:
Part 2 of 2

The Hamer group's results on gay males must be regarded as tentative:

* Dr. Alan Sanders, professor of psychiatry at the University of Chicago attempted to replicate the results on 54 sets of gay brothers. He announced at the American Psychiatric Association's annual conference in 1998-JUN that he was unsuccessful. "No [genetic] marker data reached statistically significant criteria." The results of the pedigree test on Sander's subjects is not known.
* George Rice's selected subjects from carefully selected families in which the pedigree test was the reverse of Hamer's: gays were found in the father's line, not the mother's line. As expected, the markers that Hamer found were not found by Rice. 16 One might conclude that:
o Some gays have many gay ancestors in their mother's line but not in their fathers' line. This was the group from which Hamer drew his subjects. They share genes on their X chromosome that apparently can cause a gay orientation.
o Other gays have the reverse pedigree pattern: they have many gay ancestors in their father's line but not their mother's. One would not expect them to have gay-causing genes on their X chromosome. Rice was unable to find any.

15 Mike Haley, "Straight Answers: Exposing the myths and facts about homosexuality," Focus on the Family, Love Won Out series,(2000), Page 9.

16 Kerby Anderson, "Homosexual Theology," at: http://www.probe.org/docs/homotheo.html
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#62157 Nov 7, 2013
Liam R wrote:
<quoted text>
The genetic connection is becoming more widely accepted as the evidence continues to come in.
Direct study of genes:
Part 1 of 2
Dean Hamer, and his colleagues at the National Cancer Institute collected family data from the families of 114 gay men. 15 They found out which, if any, of their siblings, parents, cousins, uncles etc. were also gay. They quickly determined that homosexuality runs in families. By itself, these results show nothing. They might indicate that homosexuality is genetically caused, or might show that it is caused by upbringing, by some hormonal levels in the womb or some other environmental factor that appears in some family lines more than other.
Further studies showed that "There were increased rates of gay people among family members genetically related to each other even when raised apart in different households." This reinforced the possibility that genetic factors might cause people to become gay. However, these observations were not conclusive; they were merely suggestive.
What proved the genetic nature of "gayness" was a pedigree test. This type of study examines the sexual orientation of the ancestors of many gay adults - both on their father's and mother's side. Some possible results from a pedigree study on Hamer's sample of gay adults would be:
1. An approximately equal number of gays might be found on the mothers' side of the family, when compared to the fathers' side. Some gays may have many gay ancestors on their mother's side, whereas other gays may see the same effect on their father's side. But when all the results were lumped together, if the total numbers would be about equal, then the results could point to:
* "Gayness" being caused by environmental factors, or
* "Gayness" being caused by some gene on a chromosome other than the X chromosome.
2. A much larger number of gays might be found on the mother's side of the family. This would show conclusively that not only was the gene passed genetically, but that it is located somewhere on the X chromosome - since men always get their X chromosome only from their mother. This is called the "maternal effect." It is well known in genetics.
The researchers found that the second result was observed. A gay male from the population that Hamer studied would notice that more of his mother's brothers will be gay than his father's brothers; so too with the various classes of maternal cousins when compared to his paternal cousins. Thus, much male homosexuality is caused by a gene on the X chromosome. Hamer went on to find the approximate location on the chromosome where the gay-causing gene was located. He found that many of his subjects had an identical sequence on the Xq28 region of their X chromosome. This shows the approximate location of the "gay gene." Researchers speculated that a group of interacting genes (including one in this region) might be found to determine sexual orientation in males. This prediction came to pass. The statistical "p" value is a measure of the significance of a test: the probability that it could have happened by chance. P values less than 0.01 (1%) are considered very significant. The Hamer study had a P factor of 0.00001, and so is considered extremely reliable.
The DNA of 36 pairs of lesbian sisters were also studied; no corresponding pattern has yet been found.
Time is against me now but I shall read your posts and check the link.

I know where you are going and IF you are correct in your claims then it underscores the fact that these people are suffering from an abnormality and need help.
yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#62158 Nov 7, 2013
HughBe wrote:
<quoted text>
HughBe---Dictionaries provide what is called STANDARD or accepted meaning. Where the problem is in when someone has a PRIVATE meaning that no one else accepts or knows about.
Let us use poison as an example.
Dictionary--Poison= something that can kill or make you sick.
A private -- poison=food.
Do you see the problem?
rabbee: and a standard accepted from the lying devil, only makes you true to the devil. it's still, a false bias point.
HughBe--- noted
rabbee---and how did you derive food, from that definition of poison? there was no mention, of food there.
HughBe--- The point is that definitions must be standardized in order to ensure proper communication. That aside, you can get food from poison.
For example, poisonous foods like ;MUSHROOMS, pufferfish and castor beans which make castor oil.
Adam--the term secular is nothing more, than a deception.
HughBe--- Really? If I have nothing to do with any god I am SECULAR. Tell me the meaning of irreligious.
Tell me which god would I be worshipping if I reject all of them in this world.
Adam-- there is nothing in this physical totality, that is derived with secularism from G-D. even freud stated, man is a religious creature of habit.
HughBe--- His opinion is noted and dismissed as BS that it is.
I have a habit of washing my face and brushing my teeth the first thing in the mornings. This HABIT has nothing to do with any religion or god.
Some people have a habit of using the toilet meaning #2 before going to work or school and that HABIT has nothing to do with any god or religion.
The only god that would be involved in the above would be the god of #2 and oral hygiene.
rabbee: the word standard and truth are not necessarily synchronous. jews have a standard, christians have a standard, muslims have a standard, russians have a standard, chinese have a standard, that does not mean any of them are the truth.

i do not see where you connected, food with the standard of poison. by the way, most all foods do have poisons in them. even things like potato, eggplant, tomato, have poisons of the nightshade family. even eating a raw wild potato, will kill you. flowering fruits, have cyanides.

and you cannot live, without at least a g-d. you would be an inanimate object, without at least a g-d.

and from whom, did you get your religious habit of washing your teeth with a brush and, brushing your face with a rag? some g-d if not G-D is involved in your doing that. or at least the tooth fairy, for your teeth.

and if you reject all g-ds and G-D, then hasatan, the more subtle beasts, baal hamolech, or halooseefer would be your only choices. because you denounce all g-ds, does not mean you have not been appointed one.
yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#62159 Nov 7, 2013
HughBe wrote:
<quoted text>
Adam--- the degree of insanity, is inversely proportional to your actual distance from G-D here in TheTorah.
HughBe--- Effectively you have said that as the distance from God increases the insanity decreases. Think about it.
rabbee: i said inversely proportional, not proportional. inversely proportional, results in the square of the distance. twice the distance, decreases flux by a factor of 4.
HughBe--- Reread my words and ask someone with sense. Note, that would rule out Frijoles. Try Joel and it is a pity that Dovid is no longer here as I have confidence that he would know.
rabbee: the law of inverse proportion, is a well known law. which states, the further you move from a radiating point source the less is its effect. nor has everything you have accepted as true, is actually true according to G-D.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#62160 Nov 7, 2013
HughBe wrote:
<quoted text>
Time is against me now but I shall read your posts and check the link.
I know where you are going and IF you are correct in your claims then it underscores the fact that these people are suffering from an abnormality and need help.
If it was an abnormality, there would be broad reaching problems affecting many areas of their lives. However, what can be seen is that gays are normal and average in pretty much every way except for their position on the spectrum of sexual orientation. This is why homosexuality was removed from the list of psychiatric disorders back with the printing of DSM-III.

The only one who needs help is you, so you can get over your homophobia.
Voluntarist

United States

#62163 Nov 7, 2013
Liam R wrote:
<quoted text>
If it was an abnormality, there would be broad reaching problems affecting many areas of their lives. However, what can be seen is that gays are normal and average in pretty much every way except for their position on the spectrum of sexual orientation. This is why homosexuality was removed from the list of psychiatric disorders back with the printing of DSM-III.
The only one who needs help is you, so you can get over your homophobia.
Oh yeah and bestiality is normal to, a man and his horse can lead a normal life.
Pedophilia is normal to, a little or boy has a rigjt to choose.

“Act Interdimensional ly”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#62164 Nov 7, 2013
Voluntarist wrote:
<quoted text>Oh yeah ... a man and his horse can lead a normal life...
If it was good enough for John Wayne ...
Voluntarist

United States

#62166 Nov 7, 2013
Gay Activist Calls For Mandatory Abortion
“There’s too many people on the planet!”
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
November 7, 2013
During an appearance on an Australian television show, a prominent gay activist called for abortion to be made
mandatory for 30 years in order to reduce global population.
Author and media pundit Dan Savage was asked by an audience member,“Which so-called dangerous idea do you each
think would have the greatest potential to change the world for the better if it were implemented?”
“Population control. There’s too many god—- people on the planet!” responded Savage as the audience applauded.
“And I don’t know if that’s a – you know, I’m pro-choice. I believe that women should have the right to control their
bodies. Sometimes in my darker moments I’m anti-choice.”
He continued:“I think abortion should be mandatory for about 30 years. That’s a dangerous idea. She wanted a
dangerous idea. So throw a chair at me.”
Savage’s previous exploits include vowing to inseminate his husband for God, wishing that “the Republicans were all
fucking dead,” and expressing the desire that a political candidate “should be dragged behind a pickup truck until
there’s nothing left but the rope.”
Savage’s favored policy of mandatory abortion is already in place in Communist China, where women who flout the
country’s infamous one child policy and cannot pay huge fines are kidnapped off the street by government goons,
beaten up,dragged off to state hospitals and subjected to horrific forced abortions.
A recent case which attracted media attention involved a woman who had her home raided in the middle of the night
by government officials, before she was abducted, taken to a hospital and forcibly injected with an abortion-inducing
drug, terminating her baby which was just three months from being born.
Babies are even forcibly aborted at 9 months old , dying in the arms of their mother, while others are thrown in
buckets while they are still alive. Activists who speak out against forced abortion in China are also persecuted by the
government.
Voluntarist

United States

#62167 Nov 7, 2013
News network CNN , in addition to billionaire Ted Turner and other elitists, along with a whole host of pressure groups
committed to pushing for population control, have all advocated the one child policy.
In his 1977 book Ecoscience, current senior White House science advisor John P. Holdren floated the idea of forced
abortions and compulsory sterilization, amongst a raft of other draconian population control measures, all of which
would be carried out by a “Planetary Regime”.
During a 2011 speech at Sichuan University, Vice President Joe Biden told an audience that he “fully understands”
China’s one child policy.
Aside from Savage’s call for draconian policies of forced abortion, the supposed threat posed by overpopulation itself
is a myth. The UN’s own figures clearly indicate that population is set to stabilize in 2020 and then drop dramatically
after 2050.
As the Economist reported,“Fertility is falling and families are shrinking in places— such as Brazil, Indonesia, and
even parts of India—that people think of as teeming with children. As our briefing shows, the fertility rate of half the
world is now 2.1 or less—the magic number that is consistent with a stable population and is usually called “the
replacement rate of fertility”. Sometime between 2020 and 2050 the world’s fertility rate will fall below the global
replacement rate.”
Warnings about the threat posed by overpopulation are fundamentally flawed. In reality, underpopulation will be
seen as the biggest danger to human prosperity in the latter half of the 21st century.
As Slate’s Jeff Wise documents, due to falling fertility rates, the population of Western Europe is set to shrink from 460
million to just 350 million by the end of the century. Meanwhile, Russia and China could lose half their population.
Germany’s birthrate has sunk to to just 1.36, with Italy’s at 1.4 and Spain at 1.48, thanks to a natural phenomenon
called “demographic transition,” which is the shift from high death rates and high birthrates to low death rates and
low birthrates.
Human population is expected to peak at 9 billion from 2050-2070 and then it will start its decline.“In the long term
—on the order of centuries—we could be looking at the literal extinction of humanity,” writes Wise, pointing to a 2008
IIASA report.
Not only is Dan Savage’s call for mandatory abortion completely offensive and an insult to women in China and
other countries who have been subjected to the horror of forced abortion, it’s justification – to reduce global
population – is factually and scientifically bankrupt.
Voluntarist

United States

#62168 Nov 7, 2013
Liam R wrote:
<quoted text>
If it was an abnormality, there would be broad reaching problems affecting many areas of their lives. However, what can be seen is that gays are normal and average in pretty much every way except for their position on the spectrum of sexual orientation. This is why homosexuality was removed from the list of psychiatric disorders back with the printing of DSM-III.
The only one who needs help is you, so you can get over your homophobia.
Is this what you call normal and average?

Statistics on sexual promiscuity among homosexuals
by Matt Slick
1. Promiscuity
A. 28% of homosexual men had more than 1000 partners: "Bell and Weinberg reported
evidence of widespread sexual compulsion among homosexual men. 83% of the
homosexual men surveyed estimated they had had sex with 50 or more partners in
their lifetime, 43% estimated they had sex with 500 or more partners; 28% with
1,000 or more partners. Bell and Weinberg p 308." ( exodusglobalalliance.org/
ishomosexualityhealthyp60.php)
B. 79% of homosexual men say over half of sex partners are strangers : "The survey
showed 79% of the respondents saying that over half of their sexual partners were
strangers. Seventy percent said that over half of their sexual partners were people
with whom they had sex only once. Bell and Weinberg pp.308-309."
( exodusglobalalliance.org/ishomosexualityhealt... )
C. Modal range for homosexual sex partners 101-500 : "In their study of the sexual
profiles of 2,583 older homosexuals published in Journal of Sex Research, Paul Van
de Ven et al. found that "the modal range for number of sexual partners ever [of
homosexuals] was 101–500 ." In addition, 10.2 percent to 15.7 percent had
between 501 and 1000 partners. A further 10.2 percent to 15.7 percent reported
having had more than 1000 lifetime sexual partners. Paul Van de Ven et al., "A
Comparative Demographic and Sexual Profile of Older Homosexually Active Men,"
Journal of Sex Research 34 (1997): 354." ( exodusglobalalliance.org/
ishomosexualityhealthyp60.php)
D. 1978 study, 78% of gay men ad more than 100 partners, 28% more than 1000: "A
far-ranging study of homosexual men published in 1978 revealed that 75 percent of
self-identified, white, gay men admitted to having sex with more than 100 different
males in their lifetime: 15 percent claimed 100-249 sex partners; 17 percent claimed
250- 499; 15 percent claimed 500-999; and 28 percent claimed more than 1,000
lifetime male sex partners. By 1984, after the AIDS epidemic had taken hold,
homosexual men were reportedly curtailing promiscuity, but not by much. Instead of
more than 6 partners per month in 1982, the average non-monogamous
respondent in San Francisco reported having about 4 partners per month in
1984." ( catholiceducation.org/articles/homosexuality/... )
E. There is an extremely low rate of sexual fidelity among homosexual men as
compared to married heterosexuals. Among married females 85% reported sexual
fidelity. Among married men, 75.5% reported sexual fidelity. Among homosexual
males in their current relationship, 4.5% reported sexual fidelity.(Sources:Laumann,
The Social Organization of Sexuality, 216; McWhirter and Mattison, The Male
Couple: How Relationships Develop (1984): 252-253; Wiederman, "Extramarital
Sex," 170. This is extracted from http://www.frc.org/get.cfm... )

http://carm.org/statistics-homosexual-promisc...
Voluntarist

United States

#62169 Nov 7, 2013
Study Indicates Gays and Lesbians
Prone To Psychological Symptoms and Substance Abuse
--But School Harassment Rates
Not Higher for Gay Males
By Roy Waller
The findings of a study published in the British Journal of Psychiatry (December
2003) suggest higher incidences of illegal drug usage, alcoholism, psychological
problems, and violence in the gay community than in the general population.
"Gay men and lesbians reported more psychological distress than heterosexual
women, despite similar levels of social support and quality of physical health,"
the researchers reported (p. 556).
The controlled, cross-sectional study was conducted in both England and Wales.
No European study in mental health, according to the researchers, has ever
before recruited over a thousand gay and lesbian participants.
Surveying a total of 1,161 men (656 self-identified gay, 505 self-identified
heterosexual) and 1,018 women (430 self-identified as lesbian, 588 self-
identified as straight), the researchers said their main goal was "to compare
psychological status, quality of life and use of mental health by lesbians and gay
men with heterosexual people."
The researchers found that homosexual males and females both tended to score
higher on scales of psychological distress than did their heterosexual
counterparts. Further, they were found to be more likely to have used
recreational drugs and to have inflicted deliberate harm upon themselves. Gays
of both genders were also found to have consulted mental health professionals
more frequently than the straight participants.
Additionally, the researchers found that the lesbian participants were the most
frequent victims of physical intimidation and violence. Lesbians were also
found to be "more likely than heterosexual women to drink excessively."
http://www.narth.org/docs/symptoms.html

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#62170 Nov 8, 2013
Voluntarist wrote:
Gay Activist Calls For Mandatory Abortion
“There’s too many people on the planet!”
.
Before Topix, I would never consider the case for mandatory abortion/ population control.

Now I am not so sure.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#62171 Nov 8, 2013
HughBe wrote:
<quoted text>
In other words you are a DUNCE load of faeces.
Why do you persists to speak as if all Jews are alike?
Why do YOU persist to DISRESPECT the Jewish people?
Why do you persist with your INSULTS of Jews?
Why do persist to INSULT the INTELLIGENCE of Jews?
Why do you LOVE to tell LIES?
I have told you that I have worked with Jews as colleagues. They were regular Jamaicans. At that time I had no interest in RELIGION and so I did not ask any of them if they were Orthodox Judahites, Christians or otherwise. We spoke about work and had normal everyday conversation. Note, none of them were LIARS like you.
Do you feel that any of my Jewish relatives are half-witted CRUFFS like you?
If a Jew says he is an atheists, RESPECT him and his rights.
Once again ,what is your obsession with Orthodox Judahites?
Again , is the sect of Orthdox Judahites the largest group of Judahites?
Give the percentage of the Orthodox in terms of the Jewish population and also in terms of adherents to Judaism and state the your point that you are yet to make about Orthodox Judahites.
Did you ever discuss your "ideas" with your Jewish acquaintances? If you did, I bet they would tar and feather you.

I know I am skirting on thin ice with this next comment - since a few posts back in a fit of sarcasm I previously ceded credibility to you regarding all things Jamaican Jewish - but the last time I googled your community it was pretty clear to me that there were no orthodox there - your island lacked most of the religious institutions that the orthodox require.(You know, the institutions that follow the teachings that you commonly rant against).

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#62172 Nov 8, 2013
Voluntarist wrote:
<quoted text>
What do you know about jacks turds have you been pushing them?
What do you think about your liar in chief now?
Have you been drinking and texting again?

Didnt we warn you about this?

“Act Interdimensional ly”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#62173 Nov 8, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>Before Topix, I would never consider the case for mandatory abortion/ population control.

Now I am not so sure.
If Thomas Jefferson and John Adams had spent five minutes on Topix they would have grabbed the next boat back to England and smooched George III's royal arse.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#62174 Nov 8, 2013
Rick Moss wrote:
<quoted text>
If Thomas Jefferson and John Adams had spent five minutes on Topix they would have grabbed the next boat back to England and smooched George III's royal arse.
I think I would have to agree on that.

JOEL THUMBS UP

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#62175 Nov 8, 2013
Voluntarist wrote:
<quoted text>

Is this what you call normal and average?

Statistics on sexual promiscuity among homosexuals

1. Promiscuity

A. 28% of homosexual men had more than 1000 partners: "Bell and
So, what if most gay men have had hundreds of partners?

Morality is a frivolous mental construct that has variable meanings under different contexts.

In what way is promiscuity damaging to a person whether gay or straight. Give the logic and supporting evidence.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
where can I find heroin in monterey? (Oct '14) Fri FordEracing123 85
Where can I find legit black in Salinas asap!? Nov 27 Cjay22 8
News A cold case revisited: The night Dolly Evans di... Nov 21 HD vacaville 2
News Ask the Auto Doctor (Mar '06) Nov 16 Helen Banks Curry 1,549
News Marina mayora s race: Incumbent Bruce Delgado v... Nov '16 Seattle Doug 1
News Editorial: Yes on Measure E Oct '16 Kelly Sorenson 1
News Dual language immersion program offered for kin... (Jan '10) Sep '16 Leong 31

Monterey Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Monterey Mortgages