Messianic Jews say they are persecute...

Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel

There are 72043 comments on the Newsday story from Jun 21, 2008, titled Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel. In it, Newsday reports that:

Safety pins and screws are still lodged in 15-year-old Ami Ortiz's body three months after he opened a booby-trapped gift basket sent to his family.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#60158 Oct 11, 2013
HughBe wrote:
<quoted text>
1. I believe that there is merit in your "grow up" comment. Those who are children either physically or emotionally, as he is, ought to play with other children. His game is one of make believe and is appropriate for people of his mental and emotional age.
2. There is no longer any fun as I realize that honest discussions are NEVER a part of his agenda. What are ALWAYS on his agenda are LIES and DECEPTION. I am not joking.
3. To most decent persons he would be a riff-raff because of his lack of integrity.
You remind me of a spoiled child who cant deal with the word "no".

Hughbe, the only people who remotely have areas of common agreement with you also have obvious personality pathologies. What does that say about your views? Think about that.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#60159 Oct 11, 2013
Voluntarist wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow I have allowed you to side step the question.
The question was, cant people be moral and ethical without government?
straw position

No one here has stated that government is necessary to provide morality or ethics.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#60160 Oct 11, 2013
Voluntarist wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow I have allowed you to side step the question.
The question was, cant people be moral and ethical without government?
Some can, some can't.

Those who would be moral and respectful of others will, under normal conditions, most likely be moral and respectful with or without religion and, most likely, with or without Government.

Those who would NOT be moral and respectful of others under normal conditions, will most likely still NOT be moral and respecful with religion or Government, BUT, with government, they will be physically dissuaded from causing harm to others.

Government should be there to prevent those who can't be moral or ethical from hurting those who can.

e.g.
When people line up outside of Walmart for a Black Friday deal, tell me what happens when rules and security are lax.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#60161 Oct 11, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
straw position
No one here has stated that government is necessary to provide morality or ethics.
Correct. At a minimum, they are there to provide protection "from aggression, theft, breach of contract, and fraud" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Minarchism]. That is indisputable to any sane person.

All of the rest of the services that Government offers is up for fair discussion. As a progressive, I happen to think there is more they can offer. Libertarians, naturally, feel differently.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#60162 Oct 11, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
straw position
No one here has stated that government is necessary to provide morality or ethics.
Unfortunately, social conservatives base their entire ideology on that...Perhaps that's who Mike should be arguing against.

"Social conservatives argue that the state should maintain a moral outlook and legislate against behavior commonly regarded as culturally destructive or immoral; that, indeed, the state cannot survive if its citizens do not have a certain kind of character, integrity and civic virtue, and so ignoring the state's role in forming people's ethical dispositions can be disastrous."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minarchism#Criti...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#60163 Oct 11, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
straw position
No one here has stated that government is necessary to provide morality or ethics.
Tangentially, on this topic, have you been hearing the bat-shit crazy stuff coming from Michelle "End-of-times" Bachman and Justice Antonin "the-devil-is-a-real-pers on" Scalia?

JOEL THUMBS UP

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#60164 Oct 11, 2013
HughBe wrote:
<quoted text>

I have learnt to deal with people of all levels of intelligence even those at Eric's level.
Eric is very low down the intelligence scale and lacks class and has very little decency.

He's also a born fanatic and a rabid Zionist - a foul subhuman type.

But, what Eric fails to understand is that in an open debate his arguments will easily be blown to bits and all his cult beliefs exposed as sheer nonsense and his talk about future Messiah shown as bullshit in view of the evolutionary movement of nature and being.

Yes, one should interact with all kinds of people - refined, unclassy, genetically normal, eugenically abnormal, possessed, un-possessed, straight, gay, bisexual, intelligent, pseudo-intellectual, theistic, atheistic, mystical, wealthy, poor, educated, illiterate, moral, immoral, fanatical, sensual, decent, tribal and crass.

Though unity in variety is the universal law, it does not mean that everyone and/or everything is on an equal footing.

It's a hierarchy with each element occupying a place on the ladder depending on its worth.

Talk to Eric more on secular matters but don't encourage talk on his observant Jewish bull shit.

Treat him like an out-caste fit to be derided and laughed at considering what he is - a filthy, brainless, fanatical rat of perverse genetic makeup.

To put it bluntly - Eric is not fit to polish my shoes.

Anyway, let the riff raff do as he pleases since nothing is gonna change him....he's in self-destructive mode. LOL.

JOEL THUMBS UP

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#60165 Oct 11, 2013
Voluntarist wrote:
<quoted text>

How do you know?
It's a logical conclusion.

How do you know whether a society without government will work better?

What would happen in the absence of government?

How would society look after its affairs in such a case?

A society sans government would imply a bordlerless world with no nations and no geo-political boundaries.

How would you deal with this?

Tell me - is nature and sentience arranged horizontally or hierarchically or in any other pattern?

JOEL THUMBS UP

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#60166 Oct 11, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>

No one here has stated that government is necessary to provide morality or ethics.
Illogical argument.

I would say that it's an evil statement.

People look up to their leaders for sound guidance based on lofty values and to set good examples for them to follow or to emulate.

If the leaders are criminals, immoral, fanatical, tribal, aggressive and untrustworthy, the entire system gets corrupted and people are left floundering for public role models and what results is that an era of perversion sets in - since the herd is sooner or later influenced by their leaders.

Such a society goes to the dogs as we see happening everywhere in the world.

Think before you post.

JOEL THUMBS UP

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#60167 Oct 11, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>

Thats more an insight to your inner psychology than an objective accounting of reality
Stupid reply.

Expected.

JOEL THUMBS UP

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#60168 Oct 11, 2013
Voluntarist wrote:
<quoted text>

The question was - cant people be moral and ethical without government?
Yes and no.

The individual worth depends on genetic makeup and employment of the limited free will but at the same time the individual is influenced by his surroundings - the people he meets, his rulers, the government policies, the national culture, the religious ethos, peer pressure, temptations, financial needs, security, the lifestyle trends and so on.

So, personality effulges due to genes and environmental impulses - it's an entanglement.

The natural tendency of lifeforms/people is to form hierarchies in accordance with the laws of nature and their inborn instincts and so a governing body will either consciously or unconsciously take form in the presence or in the absence of government though the problems will be exacerbated in the absence of a formal government. if not a government, a leader or an oligarchy will take its place. But, nature and sentience act according to the law of hierarchies/gradations.

A person is good when his genes are sound and are supported by lofty environmental impulses.

JOEL THUMBS UP

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#60169 Oct 11, 2013
PRUNED VAGINAS:

Miley Cyrus was photographed panty-less in public. Was it coincidence? I doubt it. Flashing vagina could become as acceptable as showing cleavage. With so many young women displaying their "pruned privates" at public events, it is inevitable that it'll soon turn into a global meme. LOL.

JOEL THUMBS UP

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#60170 Oct 11, 2013
Humo,

Where are you, Mon?

(smiles)
Voluntarist

United States

#60171 Oct 11, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
Thats more an insight to your inner psychology than an objective accounting of reality
Really now, you are claiming that people accept government ruling over them by choice?

JOEL THUMBS UP

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#60172 Oct 11, 2013
A person is good when his genes are sound and are supported by lofty environmental impulses.
Voluntarist

United States

#60173 Oct 11, 2013
Cult of Reason wrote:
<quoted text>
Some can, some can't.
Those who would be moral and respectful of others will, under normal conditions, most likely be moral and respectful with or without religion and, most likely, with or without Government.
Those who would NOT be moral and respectful of others under normal conditions, will most likely still NOT be moral and respecful with religion or Government, BUT, with government, they will be physically dissuaded from causing harm to others.
Government should be there to prevent those who can't be moral or ethical from hurting those who can.
e.g.
When people line up outside of Walmart for a Black Friday deal, tell me what happens when rules and security are lax.
So people need government through force to be moral and ethical but people dont need religion.

Would you agree that some people need religion?

Isn't it a religios principle in general to not harm others?

JOEL THUMBS UP

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#60174 Oct 11, 2013
India's coastal south-eastern states, Odisha and Andhra Pradesh, brace for a super-cyclone named Phailin that's presently centered some 300 km off the coast in the Bay of Bengal with wind speeds reaching 315 kmph. Landfall expected by Saturday evening. If the intensity doesn't weaken, it's gonna be a major disaster in terms of mass destruction of life and property. It's raining in Mumbai.

JOEL THUMBS UP

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#60175 Oct 11, 2013
Voluntarist wrote:
<quoted text>

Isn't it a religious principle in general to not harm others?
Most religions except Buddhism and Jainism teach their followers to deride, fight and harm the followers of other faiths.
Voluntarist

United States

#60176 Oct 11, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
straw position
No one here has stated that government is necessary to provide morality or ethics.
But government supports morality and ethics through laws , rules and regulation.
Voluntarist

United States

#60177 Oct 11, 2013
Cult of Reason wrote:
<quoted text>
Correct. At a minimum, they are there to provide protection "from aggression, theft, breach of contract, and fraud" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Minarchism]. That is indisputable to any sane person.
All of the rest of the services that Government offers is up for fair discussion. As a progressive, I happen to think there is more they can offer. Libertarians, naturally, feel differently.
I dont have a problem with what they offer but how they offer it, they wouldn't have to point a gun if people willingly accepted their services.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
where can I find heroin in monterey? (Oct '14) Fri FordEracing123 85
Where can I find legit black in Salinas asap!? Nov 27 Cjay22 8
News A cold case revisited: The night Dolly Evans di... Nov 21 HD vacaville 2
News Ask the Auto Doctor (Mar '06) Nov 16 Helen Banks Curry 1,549
News Marina mayora s race: Incumbent Bruce Delgado v... Nov '16 Seattle Doug 1
News Editorial: Yes on Measure E Oct '16 Kelly Sorenson 1
News Dual language immersion program offered for kin... (Jan '10) Sep '16 Leong 31

Monterey Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Monterey Mortgages