Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel

Full story: Newsday 71,275
Safety pins and screws are still lodged in 15-year-old Ami Ortiz's body three months after he opened a booby-trapped gift basket sent to his family. Full Story

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#58479 Sep 19, 2013
yehoshooah adam wrote:
<quoted text>

rabbee: cheap! they would cost you, over $10,000 today.
Not much.

The high end haute stuff costs much more....

Go away.

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#58480 Sep 19, 2013
yehoshooah adam wrote:
<quoted text>

and come on newton's law of force = mass x acceleration. is far too well universally known.
How do you derive the relation, F = ma?

Show me all the working steps, Grad from Caltech?

Fool.

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#58481 Sep 19, 2013
yehoshooah adam wrote:
i really do no want to brag, but Joel's arrogance just pisses me off.
You have nothing to brag about.

Go away.
Eric

Roselle, IL

#58482 Sep 19, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
And by the way, did you notice how "True Christians" showed their "respect to our prophet"?
And what "Honor and Respect" they showed there?
So there should be two gallows, one for Muslims disrespecting "Biblical Jesus" and another for Christians "Disrespecting the LAst and Final Prophet"?
Do you agree?
No, because it is your premise that people should be put to death for disrespecting the prophets of others; not mine.

However, it is good to see that you are in favor of a death sentence for people who disrespect "Biblical Jesus". SO, when are you going to commit suicide for your disrespect of "Biblical Jesus"? You have to admit that you have disrespected "Biblical Jesus" on the Who is Allah thread. It matters not that you do not accept "Biblical Jesus" as a prophet. The Christians don't accept Muhammad as a prophet, and you advocate their death when they disrespect him. So, therefore, your non-acceptance of "Biblical Jesus" is irrelevant. "Biblical Jesus" is their prophet and anyone who disrespects "Biblical Jesus" therefore subject to death. YOU, Alex, BMV, etc.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#58483 Sep 20, 2013
Rick Moss wrote:
<quoted text>
If you were talking about an event that happened hundreds of miles away from the public was only viewed by a few government-controlled witnesses then I might actually be skeptical of a governmental account. For example. I'm almost certain the Tunguska Event was a crashed spaceship.
The collapse of the World Trade Centres was, however, an event witnessed first hand by thousands and on TV by millions. Investigated by agencies both public and private and the official explanation squares fully with what I and the rest of the world saw.
Furthermore, those on whom the government laid blame freely admitted to doing it. Boasted in fact.
Despite the expert metallurgical testimony of Rosie O'Donnell, I have no reason to doubt that a crash of a jet plane full of fuel was able to structurally weaken the towers enough to collapse without a secret government conspiracy.
What I do find incredible is the absolute trust you have in your government to not only pull a conspiracy involving literally millions of people but to do it efficiently and keep it a perfect secret.
I don't even trust them to deliver the mail.
Oh stop being logical

You do realize that Volunteerist lives within 35 miles of the event, and as such undoubtedly either saw it live on TV and/or probably knew someone involved, making his views even more outlandish. But then again, whats the point of being mental if you cant do it in a grand style?

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#58484 Sep 20, 2013
Rick Moss wrote:
<quoted text>
Then he's achieved his objective.
In actual fact, most find it amusing, like the self-satisfied swagger of a toddler who has almost mastered the potty.
Best strategy to deal with a toddler like that is to ignore.
MUQ

Jubail, Saudi Arabia

#58485 Sep 20, 2013
Eric wrote:
<quoted text>
No, because it is your premise that people should be put to death for disrespecting the prophets of others; not mine.
However, it is good to see that you are in favor of a death sentence for people who disrespect "Biblical Jesus". SO, when are you going to commit suicide for your disrespect of "Biblical Jesus"? You have to admit that you have disrespected "Biblical Jesus" on the Who is Allah thread. It matters not that you do not accept "Biblical Jesus" as a prophet. The Christians don't accept Muhammad as a prophet, and you advocate their death when they disrespect him. So, therefore, your non-acceptance of "Biblical Jesus" is irrelevant. "Biblical Jesus" is their prophet and anyone who disrespects "Biblical Jesus" therefore subject to death. YOU, Alex, BMV, etc.
You do not understand the difference between not believing and in abusing and cursing any one.

No Non Muslim will be put to death, if he says, I do not believe in Prophet Mohammad or do not consider him a true prophet of God. Because it is his right as a Non Muslim.

But to start abusing prophet, and start lampooning him and start making fun of him, is totally different and does not come under "non belief".

The same is with Jesus, if we say he was not God and not Son of God, and there is nothing called Trinity, we are not insulting Jesus in any way.

But if we say, as Jews say, that Jesus' mother was a whore and she conceived Jesus from an illicit sexual relationship, this is certainly abusing Jesus and his mother and is punishable.

No Muslims lays any blame against personal character of Jesus, we only have "Theological differences" with them and this is OK.

How come you missed this simple point?

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#58486 Sep 20, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
You do not understand the difference between not believing and in abusing and cursing any one.
No Non Muslim will be put to death, if he says, I do not believe in Prophet Mohammad or do not consider him a true prophet of God. Because it is his right as a Non Muslim.
But to start abusing prophet, and start lampooning him and start making fun of him, is totally different and does not come under "non belief".
The same is with Jesus, if we say he was not God and not Son of God, and there is nothing called Trinity, we are not insulting Jesus in any way.
But if we say, as Jews say, that Jesus' mother was a whore and she conceived Jesus from an illicit sexual relationship, this is certainly abusing Jesus and his mother and is punishable.
No Muslims lays any blame against personal character of Jesus, we only have "Theological differences" with them and this is OK.
How come you missed this simple point?
If I called your prophet a donkey, would that be blasphemy or kindness to animals?

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#58487 Sep 20, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
You do not understand the difference between not believing and in abusing and cursing any one.
No Non Muslim will be put to death, if he says, I do not believe in Prophet Mohammad or do not consider him a true prophet of God. Because it is his right as a Non Muslim.
But to start abusing prophet, and start lampooning him and start making fun of him, is totally different and does not come under "non belief".
The same is with Jesus, if we say he was not God and not Son of God, and there is nothing called Trinity, we are not insulting Jesus in any way.
But if we say, as Jews say, that Jesus' mother was a whore and she conceived Jesus from an illicit sexual relationship, this is certainly abusing Jesus and his mother and is punishable.
No Muslims lays any blame against personal character of Jesus, we only have "Theological differences" with them and this is OK.
How come you missed this simple point?
Why are you so down on wh_ores?

Chances are you have at least two in your family.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#58488 Sep 20, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
But if we say, as Jews say, that Jesus' mother was a whore and she conceived Jesus from an illicit sexual relationship, this is certainly abusing Jesus and his mother and is punishable.
No Muslims lays any blame against personal character of Jesus, we only have "Theological differences" with them and this is OK.
How come you missed this simple point?
Virgin birth is Christian theology, not Jewish.

Jews do not have any theological interest in this. Its not our story nor our scriptures.

Why are you so idiotic?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#58489 Sep 20, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Jews are good at "cleaning your till"!!
You still did not get it!!
And Asians are good at cleaning you shirts...

And Greeks are good at feeding your bellies...

And Muslims are good at blowing up innocent people...

You still did not get it!!!

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#58492 Sep 20, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>

Why are you so down on wh_ores?
Your Mom was a wh-re, wasn't she, you demon worshipper with a zero brain?

You call yourself a Ph/D. but have a vacuum in your head.

My friends keep laughing at you when they learn about your extremely poor understanding of math/science and retarded logical skills and they spit on you for being a sick Zionist and a demon-worshipper.

Get lost, homo.

Crawl back into bed with your husband, sexually perverted bastard.

I'm disgusted with your habit of forming cliques, ridiculing your dissenters, boycott and turning posters against those who oppose you or against those who are far better than you.

Only homos with a massive inferiority complex behave like you do.

I expected better ethical standards from you despite you being a complete failure and a retard.

I wish the best for you, but, take care of your karma, otherwise a mountain of calamities will suddenly crop up in your relationships, health and business and will destroy you.....

I am serious about this warning.

Best Regards.
Voluntarist

United States

#58493 Sep 20, 2013
Rick Moss wrote:
<quoted text>
If you were talking about an event that happened hundreds of miles away from the public was only viewed by a few government-controlled witnesses then I might actually be skeptical of a governmental account. For example. I'm almost certain the Tunguska Event was a crashed spaceship.
The collapse of the World Trade Centres was, however, an event witnessed first hand by thousands and on TV by millions. Investigated by agencies both public and private and the official explanation squares fully with what I and the rest of the world saw.
Furthermore, those on whom the government laid blame freely admitted to doing it. Boasted in fact.
Despite the expert metallurgical testimony of Rosie O'Donnell, I have no reason to doubt that a crash of a jet plane full of fuel was able to structurally weaken the towers enough to collapse without a secret government conspiracy.
What I do find incredible is the absolute trust you have in your government to not only pull a conspiracy involving literally millions of people but to do it efficiently and keep it a perfect secret.
I don't even trust them to deliver the mail.
Flawed.

Please source the private investigation.

We all saw planes hit 2 buildings and 3 buildings go down.

And those eye witness accounts of explosions in the buildings were spot on!

Impeccable witness Barry Jennings and Rodriguez.

And the countdown to building 7's demolition, priceless!

I agree witnesses were great.
Voluntarist

United States

#58494 Sep 20, 2013
Rick Moss wrote:
<quoted text>
If you were talking about an event that happened hundreds of miles away from the public was only viewed by a few government-controlled witnesses then I might actually be skeptical of a governmental account. For example. I'm almost certain the Tunguska Event was a crashed spaceship.
The collapse of the World Trade Centres was, however, an event witnessed first hand by thousands and on TV by millions. Investigated by agencies both public and private and the official explanation squares fully with what I and the rest of the world saw.
Furthermore, those on whom the government laid blame freely admitted to doing it. Boasted in fact.
Despite the expert metallurgical testimony of Rosie O'Donnell, I have no reason to doubt that a crash of a jet plane full of fuel was able to structurally weaken the towers enough to collapse without a secret government conspiracy.
What I do find incredible is the absolute trust you have in your government to not only pull a conspiracy involving literally millions of people but to do it efficiently and keep it a perfect secret.
I don't even trust them to deliver the mail.
Top down compartmentalization, clearly you aren't this dumb?

Its hidden in plain site, like the PNAC document calling for a new pearl harbor, isn't that what people were calling it?

Manhattan project?
Voluntarist

United States

#58495 Sep 20, 2013
Poll: More Americans Believe World
Trade Center 7 Was Demolished On
9/11 than Believe the Government’s
Explanation
Posted on September 11, 2013 by
WashingtonsBlog
What Do You Believe?

But do Americans think that the government
lied about 9/11?
A new poll shows that they do. At least
about World Trade Center Building 7.
We’re not talking about the Twin Towers …
although Building 7 was part of the same
complex. No planes hit Building 7, no one
was killed when Building 7 fell, no wars were
launched on the basis of Building 7, and no
civil rights were lost because of the
destruction of Building 7.
In other words, Building 7 is a “safe topic”
we can discuss without heated emotion. And
numerous high-level architects and engineers
have already debunked the government’s
claims.
Following is a press release from ReThink911
and Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
– a group of more than 2,000 architects and
engineers – concerning a new poll by
YouGov.
How would you answer the poll questions?
On the 12 anniversary of 9/11, a new
national survey by the polling firm YouGov
reveals that one in two Americans have
doubts about the government’s account of
9/11, and after viewing video footage of
World Trade Center Building 7’s collapse,
46% suspect that it was caused by a
controlled demolition. Building 7, a 47-
story skyscraper, collapsed into its own
footprint late in the afternoon on 9/11.
The poll was sponsored by ReThink911, a
global public awareness campaign launched
on September 1. The campaign includes a
54-foot billboard in Times Square and a
variety of transit and outdoor advertising in
11 other cities, all posing the question,“ Did
you know a third tower fell on 9/11?”
Among the poll’s findings:
38% of Americans have some doubts about
the official account of 9/11, 10% do not
believe it at all, and 12% are unsure about
it;
46%, nearly one in two, are not aware that
a third tower collapsed on 9/11. Of those
who are aware of Building 7’s collapse,
only 19% know the building’s name;
After seeing video footage of Building 7&#8242;s
collapse:
46% are sure or suspect it was caused by
controlled demolition, compared to 28%
who are sure or suspect fires caused it,
and 27% who don’t know; [in other words,
more people think controlled demolition
than believe the government's narrative]
By a margin of nearly two to one, 41%
support a new investigation of Building 7&#8242;s
collapse, compared to 21% who oppose it.

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/09/poll-m...
Voluntarist

United States

#58496 Sep 20, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh stop being logical
You do realize that Volunteerist lives within 35 miles of the event, and as such undoubtedly either saw it live on TV and/or probably knew someone involved, making his views even more outlandish. But then again, whats the point of being mental if you cant do it in a grand style?
Coming from someone who didn't even read the commission report.

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#58500 Sep 20, 2013
MAGNETIC EFFECTS ON BODY DURING SLEEP & AFTER DEATH:

The earth's magnetic south pole lies in the geographic north and the human body's magnetic north pole radiates outwards from the head region. Unlike magnetic poles attract. Sleep with head facing the geographic north. This simple act aligns the body's magnetic lines of force thereby strengthening them and bring them in greater harmony with the terrestrial magnetic field. Similarly, bury a corpse with the head facing the geographic north since the residual forces that remain within the dead body for at least 7 days after clinical death get better aligned on account of attraction between opposite magnetic poles and they tend to quit the body on the 7th or 8th day after death in a more harmonious state.

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#58501 Sep 20, 2013
A COMPARISON - SUBLIME JAINISM VERSUS SATANIC JUDAISM:

1) JAINISM:

Mahavira, the Jain patriarch, surpassed the morality of the Bible with a single sentence: "Do not injure, abuse, oppress, enslave, insult, torment, torture, or kill any creature or living being." Imagine how different our world might be if the Bible contained this as its central precept.


- Sam Harris (atheist and neuroscientist), in Letter to a Nation (2006), p. 23, ISBN 0-307-26577-3

2) JUDAISM:

RICHARD DAWKINS CONDEMNS YHVH:

A) "Yahweh: The God of the Old Testament (Tanakh) is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser, a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully."

B) "What makes my jaw drop is that people today should base their lives on such an appalling role model as Yahweh - and even worse, that they should bossily try to force the same evil monster (whether fact or fiction) on the rest of us."

C)"Moreover, this G-d, Yahweh, breaks into a monumental rage whenever his chosen people flirted with a rival god," resembling "nothing so much as sexual jealousy of the worst kind. Add to this the killing of the Canaanites-an 'ethnic cleansing' in which "bloodthirsty massacres" were carried out with 'xenophobic relish.' Joshua's destruction of Jericho is 'morally indistinguishable' from Hitler's invasion of Poland, or Saddam Hussein's massacres of the Kurds and the Marsh Arabs."

Richard Dawkins, The G-d Delusion

ROFL

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#58502 Sep 20, 2013
WORDS OF MAHAVIRA:

"All breathing, existing, living, sentient creatures should not be slain, nor treated with violence, nor abused, nor tormented, nor driven away."



- Acharanga Sutra, Book 1, lecture 4, lesson 1, as translated by H. Jacobi, quoted in The Boundless Circle : Caring for Creatures and Creation (1996) by Michael W. Fox, p. 262

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#58503 Sep 20, 2013
WORDS OF MAHAVIRA:

"Non-violence and kindness to living beings is kindness to oneself. For thereby one's own self is saved from various kinds of sins and resultant sufferings and is able to secure his own welfare."

- As quoted in Religion and culture of the Jains (1975) by Jyotipras&#257;da Jaina, p. 187

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Kristen Scannell Saratoga Springs NY Adds New H... Dec 23 Kristen Scannell ... 2
Carmel River diverted to allow dam removal, pre... Dec 16 Clint 1
Calif. cop may be fired for giving suicidal stu... Dec 13 John Smith 1
Who do you think is the MOST corrupt Monterey C... Dec 9 montereyusedtobenice 1
where can I find heroin in monterey? Dec 9 montereyusedtobenice 5
Help! In need of opiates preferably boi Dec 5 Njp9080 1
the music thread (Apr '12) Dec 2 Musikologist 18
Monterey Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Monterey News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Monterey

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 8:08 am PST