California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legalization Initiative

[Big3ers]

The Battle over the 'Big 3" appears to be underway, but we can always add another

[Big D]

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>Yes let's take religion out of schools...great idea. How is that working, we want God out of our schools but when something bad happens we ask where was God? Why don't we impeach Obama for praying at a school? Did that hurt your feelings mr bigot man? Are you for plural marriage?

I don’t want my children worshiping your religion any more than you want your children kneeling on prayer rugs facing mecca and praying to Allah 5 times a day

You keep your religion out of the schools of my children and grandchildren and I will help keep other religions out as well.

You can go believe in Santa-Jesus all you want, I have no problem with people choosing Christianity, or Islam, or Scientology or Wicca or worshiping a volcano god on their own, but you won’t preach it to my children from a position of authority ( like a teacher )... Not going to happen.

[Mike DiRucci]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
...And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate...

Impeachment is the sole power of the House.(Art 1 sec 2 U.S. Constitution).

An impeachment cannot "fail the votes" in the Senate. The Senate does not have that power.

You are wrong. Clinton was impeached. It did not fail.

[Big D]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
Impeachment is the sole power of the House.(Art 1 sec 2 U.S. Constitution).
An impeachment cannot "fail the votes" in the Senate. The Senate does not have that power.
You are wrong. Clinton was impeached. It did not fail.

I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying

[Mike DiRucci]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying

You continue to insist Clinton's impeachment failed. You are wrong. It did not. Clinton was impeached. It's history.

The "intent and objectives" may have failed to be realized, but the impeachment DID NOT FAIL. He was impeached.

You are arguing semantics and doing it poorly. You didn't know what impeachment means. Now you do. Man up, admit it and move on.

[Big D]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
You continue to insist Clinton's impeachment failed. You are wrong. It did not. Clinton was impeached. It's history.
The "intent and objectives" may have failed to be realized, but the impeachment DID NOT FAIL. He was impeached.
You are arguing semantics and doing it poorly. You didn't know what impeachment means. Now you do. Man up, admit it and move on.

I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying

[Mike DiRucci]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
....And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.

Perhaps you'll tell us what the "objectives written in the Impeachment" were.

[Mr Anderson]

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>Yes let's take religion out of schools...great idea. How is that working, we want God out of our schools but when something bad happens we ask where was God? Why don't we impeach Obama for praying at a school? Did that hurt your feelings mr bigot man? Are you for plural marriage?

exactly, religion doesnt belong in public schools.

you knows this from being non religious?? right?/

Obama gets to pray anywhere he likes.....he is after all the president.

but making KIds from secular families, pray manditorily ,is what pushing prayer in school is all about..

it is what the religious reich wants....and what parents of still sane(secular) children, dont want.

I dont blame them.

[Big3ers]

Brought to you by nit wits from out of town.

[Big D]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
Perhaps you'll tell us what the "objectives written in the Impeachment" were.

I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying

[GMR crash]

Once again and right in there back yard, another roll over and down the hill crash on Glendora Mountain Road. Could raceing be a prblem?

Glendora patch is under strict orders from Glendora City Hall and City Council not to publish or mount anything on their electronic news board that is negative or shows the truth as to whats reaslly happening in Glendora, California.

But do let poster who are friendly to the coucil members to post rants or racists comments.

[Mike DiRucci]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying

You've dishonestly changed your original assertion "Clinton's impeachment failed" to "...the intents and objectives failed" Those are two very different things.

You have been dishonest in this argument, I have not.

[Mr Anderson]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
Impeachment is the sole power of the House.(Art 1 sec 2 U.S. Constitution).
An impeachment cannot "fail the votes" in the Senate. The Senate does not have that power.
You are wrong. Clinton was impeached. It did not fail.

still banging your head against that same old wall??

eh rainmikey.

go to Kmart much??

[Big D]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
You've dishonestly changed your original assertion "Clinton's impeachment failed" to "...the intents and objectives failed" Those are two very different things.
You have been dishonest in this argument, I have not.

I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying

[GMR crash]

Over the side and take a slide.

[Mike DiRucci]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying

You've dishonestly changed your original assertion "Clinton's impeachment failed" to "...the intents and objectives failed" Those are two very different things.

You also dishonestly imply that I supported his impeachment. You have been very dishonest in this argument, I have not, yet you call me a liar but give no evidence.

Clinton was impeached. It did not fail. You are wrong and dishonest.

[Mike DiRucci]

Mr Anderson wrote:

<quoted text>
still banging your head against that same old wall??
eh rainmikey.
go to Kmart much??

Anyone know what this dopey post is supposed to mean?

old walls? rainmikey? Kmart?

Nevermind. Who cares?

[Mike DiRucci]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
... the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment

Please tell us what objectives were "listed in the impeachment".

We won't wait.

[Big D]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
Please tell us what objectives were "listed in the impeachment".
We won't wait.

I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying

[Mike DiRucci]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
I am going to stop writing new replies as it now seems I can just copy and paste my last reply to everything you say as you have no new information to add, and cannot contradict what I am and have been saying

You've dishonestly changed your original assertion "Clinton's impeachment failed" to "...the intents and objectives failed" Those are two very different things.

Why is that?