Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,794

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#223452 Nov 3, 2013
Gustavo wrote:
<quoted text>Fantabulous thanks for asking how was your evening?
Really nice...We just went to dinner
and came home and watched SNL!

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#223453 Nov 3, 2013
chance47 wrote:
<quoted text>
If you
think your straight marriage is weak enough to be influenced when
total starngers to you get married (gay or straight
If you
are ignorant enough to believe that marriage is somehow
tied to your personal religious affiliation
If you
are stupid enough to think parental love and guidance comes from the genitals of parents
Then, you too are a dolt of the highest order, the KiMare level.
Fact is, if your God didn't want there to be gays - there wouldn't be any!
Fact is, gays exists as a natural poart of human evoltion - in fact they are made by staright people!
Fact is, there are tens of thousands (million?) married gay couples and they have yet to be the end of my staright marriage or anyone else's.
You. Are. Ignorant. Offensive. Stupid. And. Mean.
You addressed none of the distinctions I note, and made numerous assumptions on things I have never said.

Moreover, you made numerous false assertions.

I stated simple facts. If you have a direct reasoned response to any of those, please do so.

Just a couple of notes on your post;

1. There are many types of handicaps that God allows. Sexual defects like homosexuality are included.

2. Evolution is a constant sequence of mutations. Only in that sense is homosexuality 'natural'. However, in the primary method of evolution, mating behavior, homosexuality is a defective failure. You may want to look up 'epigenetic marker mistakes' as a current theory on the possible cause of homosexuality.

3. The fact of the matter is, GLBT has existed for all of human history. The acceptance of homosexuality has occurred in societies at different periods many times before. However, calling ss couples has NEVER survived in a single culture from start to finish. Not one single time has it survived and spread. This current event is still a blip in time. If I were you, I'd be very concerned about the rise of Islam.

I am a redeemed cynic who remains barbarian. I love to sink the knife of reality to the hilt into the belly of denial and twist it with a smirk. You said 'ouch'.

Judged:

12

12

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Get it right”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#223454 Nov 3, 2013
Cali Girl 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hi Chance-
How's your weekend?
Just so you are aware...Kimare "says"
he is a hermaphrodite with three
nipples,and very perverted thinking!
ie.......A nut! My opinion... But have
fun!!
Hola! Took a quick trip up to Tahoe, very nice get away, you?

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#223455 Nov 3, 2013
chance47 wrote:
<quoted text>Hola! Took a quick trip up to Tahoe, very nice get away, you?
Oh that sounds great....
Mine was good went out for a
really nice dinner date with my bf..
Tahoe is gorgeous!!

“Get it right”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#223456 Nov 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You addressed none of the distinctions I note, and made numerous assumptions on things I have never said.
Moreover, you made numerous false assertions….
I don’t know how to respond any more like you, to you, about what you posted than what I did. Pretty direct response in my opinion. Maybe calling you a dolt was a more than you deserved and if you would forgive that indulgence of mine…, but pretty much the rest of it fits perfectly.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I stated simple facts. If you have a direct reasoned response to any of those, please do so.
….
No you most certainly did not. Every ‘fact you presented’ was a tainted and opinionated personal belief. Crap like “…condemn some children to parents of only one gender..”. Seriously, that is your bias and not a fact at all. Admit it. Or how about your non-science babble “…violate evolution's law of reproduction…”? There is no such law and even if there were then gays wouldn’t be violating it because they aren’t reproducing – how can you be so ridiculous? Beside, gay people ARE part of the species of human, and part of the animal kingdom on Earth. They belong as much as you or me or anyone else, so get over yourself already. You are not high and mighty dropping the wisdom of King David….
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Just a couple of notes on your post;
1. There are many types of handicaps that God allows. Sexual defects like homosexuality are included.
...
Gay is not any type of handicap whatsoever. But, regardless,s if your God is lets be so, you really ought to be okay with it too!
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

2. Evolution is a constant sequence of mutations. Only in that sense is homosexuality 'natural'. However, in the primary method of evolution, mating behavior, homosexuality is a defective failure. You may want to look up 'epigenetic marker mistakes' as a current theory on the possible cause of homosexuality.
….
My friend, we are all here due to thousands of centuries worth of genetic mutations. We are who we are and that is not something to be feared or loathed or treated with any different degree of dignity and respect. And suppose you had been the one in ten (or whatever the ratio is() that happened to be attracted the members of the same sex. Do you think your life and ability to marry the one you loved should be up to the decision of people unwilling to tolerate others?
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

3. The fact of the matter is, GLBT has existed for all of human history. The acceptance of homosexuality has occurred in societies at different periods many times before. However, calling ss couples has NEVER survived in a single culture from start to finish. Not one single time has it survived and spread. This current event is still a blip in time. If I were you, I'd be very concerned about the rise of Islam.
I am a redeemed cynic who remains barbarian. I love to sink the knife of reality to the hilt into the belly of denial and twist it with a smirk. You said 'ouch'.
I don’t follow your thoughts here, honestly.

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#223457 Nov 3, 2013
chance47 wrote:
<quoted text>I donÂ’t know how to respond any more like you, to you, about what you posted than what I did. Pretty direct response in my opinion. Maybe calling you a dolt was a more than you deserved and if you would forgive that indulgence of mineÂ…, but pretty much the rest of it fits perfectly.

KiMare wrote, "<quoted text>
I stated simple facts. If you have a direct reasoned response to any of those, please do so.
Â…."

No you most certainly did not. Every ‘fact you presented’ was a tainted and opinionated personal belief. Crap like “…condemn some children to parents of only one gender..”. Seriously, that is your bias and not a fact at all. Admit it. Or how about your non-science babble “…violate evolution's law of reproduction…”? There is no such law and even if there were then gays wouldn’t be violating it because they aren’t reproducing – how can you be so ridiculous? Beside, gay people ARE part of the species of human, and part of the animal kingdom on Earth. They belong as much as you or me or anyone else, so get over yourself already. You are not high and mighty dropping the wisdom of King David….

KiMare wrote, "<quoted text>
Just a couple of notes on your post;
1. There are many types of handicaps that God allows. Sexual defects like homosexuality are included.
..."

Gay is not any type of handicap whatsoever. But, regardless,s if your God is lets be so, you really ought to be okay with it too!

KiMare wrote, "<quoted text>
Â…
2. Evolution is a constant sequence of mutations. Only in that sense is homosexuality 'natural'. However, in the primary method of evolution, mating behavior, homosexuality is a defective failure. You may want to look up 'epigenetic marker mistakes' as a current theory on the possible cause of homosexuality.
Â…."

My friend, we are all here due to thousands of centuries worth of genetic mutations. We are who we are and that is not something to be feared or loathed or treated with any different degree of dignity and respect. And suppose you had been the one in ten (or whatever the ratio is() that happened to be attracted the members of the same sex. Do you think your life and ability to marry the one you loved should be up to the decision of people unwilling to tolerate others?

KiMare wrote, "<quoted text>
Â…
3. The fact of the matter is, GLBT has existed for all of human history. The acceptance of homosexuality has occurred in societies at different periods many times before. However, calling ss couples has NEVER survived in a single culture from start to finish. Not one single time has it survived and spread. This current event is still a blip in time. If I were you, I'd be very concerned about the rise of Islam.
I am a redeemed cynic who remains barbarian. I love to sink the knife of reality to the hilt into the belly of denial and twist it with a smirk. You said 'ouch'."

I donÂ’t follow your thoughts here, honestly.
Well said!
I would expect a person who claims
to be a Hermaphrodite,mutant,and a
Barbarian to have a soft heart toward
diversity.Especially for Gay people,
who are born they way they are like
him.That is why I don't believe him.
He also says he gets mistaken for
Bruce Willis,and his wife,actress Ann
Margaret...I've seen their picture and
unfortunately,it's not the case....LMAO

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#223458 Nov 3, 2013
chance47 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don’t know how to respond any more like you, to you, about what you posted than what I did. Pretty direct response in my opinion. Maybe calling you a dolt was a more than you deserved and if you would forgive that indulgence of mine…, but pretty much the rest of it fits perfectly.
<quoted text>
No you most certainly did not. Every ‘fact you presented’ was a tainted and opinionated personal belief. Crap like “…condemn some children to parents of only one gender..”. Seriously, that is your bias and not a fact at all. Admit it. Or how about your non-science babble “…violate evolution's law of reproduction…”? There is no such law and even if there were then gays wouldn’t be violating it because they aren’t reproducing – how can you be so ridiculous? Beside, gay people ARE part of the species of human, and part of the animal kingdom on Earth. They belong as much as you or me or anyone else, so get over yourself already. You are not high and mighty dropping the wisdom of King David….
<quoted text>
Gay is not any type of handicap whatsoever. But, regardless,s if your God is lets be so, you really ought to be okay with it too!
<quoted text>
My friend, we are all here due to thousands of centuries worth of genetic mutations. We are who we are and that is not something to be feared or loathed or treated with any different degree of dignity and respect. And suppose you had been the one in ten (or whatever the ratio is() that happened to be attracted the members of the same sex. Do you think your life and ability to marry the one you loved should be up to the decision of people unwilling to tolerate others?
<quoted text>
I don’t follow your thoughts here, honestly.
1. Classic avoidance ploy. Play dumb with a backhanded troll attack. In other words? You have no reasoned response.

2. It is a 'personal opinion' that children in a ss household are deprived of either a mother or father? Admit what? Normal people will admit that someone who does such a thing to a child is evil.

3. As to violating evolution's law of reproduction, "While evolution is the foundational force of biology, sex is the mortar that holds that foundation together. So advantageous is sex that despite the high biological cost of sex most macroscopic animals, including 99% of all vertebrates, reproduce sexually" (Sites, 1993).

4. Where did I say homosexuals are not a part of the human race? Why do defensive??? It is making you stupid.

5. Sorry, but homosexual couples are a defective failure of mating behavior. Unless you have proof of a purpose???

6. Where have I indicated a fear or loathing of homosexuality? I do hate denial, something you are steeped in. You revert to the classic fall-back of gays when they have no argument, fear and hate. How childish and what a victim mentality!

7. You can have any relationship you want. However, calling ss couples married is an oxymoron.

8. You don't understand the history (or lack thereof) of homosexuality and calling ss couples married? I think you understand perfectly, just playing dumb again.

Man up dude or change your picture!

Judged:

11

11

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Get it right”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#223459 Nov 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Classic avoidance ploy. Play dumb with a backhanded troll attack. In other words? You have no reasoned response…
What are you talking about? I responded directly to your numbered bullet points, one after another. Just like this reply. Are you willing blind of that or just don’t get it? I will not continue to fetch for your entertainment value if you refuse to any see the directness of my replies.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
…2. It is a 'personal opinion' that children in a ss household are deprived of either a mother or father? Admit what? Normal people will admit that someone who does such a thing to a child is evil.…
And children in a straight marriage are deprived of having two dads or two moms. Exactly where that becomes ‘a condemnation’ lies wholly in your personal perspective. It is not a fact that there is any condemnation at all with any particular combination (M+W, M+M, W+W). You should admit that it is solely opinion that some of these parenting combinations must be bad.

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
…3. As to violating evolution's law of reproduction, "While evolution is the foundational force of biology, sex is the mortar that holds that foundation together. So advantageous is sex that despite the high biological cost of sex most macroscopic animals, including 99% of all vertebrates, reproduce sexually" (Sites, 1993)…
Hello? Nowhere in your wonderful quote do I see the word “Law”. There is no Law of Reproduction. And, you ignore that fact that even if there were some such law, gay sex would NOT be violating it in any way because gays aren’t EVER trying to reproduce when they do it.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
...4. Where did I say homosexuals are not a part of the human race? Why do defensive??? It is making you stupid…
You implied that somehow gays are faulty and you cited the word evolution to back yourself up. Re-read what I wrote now and you should get it.

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>…5. Sorry, but homosexual couples are a defective failure of mating behavior. Unless you have proof of a purpose???...
Isn’t that like a double negative? Defective failure of mating behavior = successful mating behavior? At the lowest level you are confusing reproduction with mating.

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>…
6. Where have I indicated a fear or loathing of homosexuality? I do hate denial, something you are steeped in. You revert to the classic fall-back of gays when they have no argument, fear and hate. How childish and what a victim mentality…
Your words are steeped in loathing. Maybe not fear, though. I will gladly retract that one for you. But, you are in no way being supportive, encouraging or accepting of gays or their human right to marry one another if they desire. So, that is where you indicate pretty clearly where your mind is.

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>…7. You can have any relationship you want. However, calling ss couples married is an oxymoron.,,
What make you think I need you to consent to my relationships? And no, an oxymoron is a phrase combining words that contradict each other. Clearly, SSM is no oxymoron.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>…8. You don't understand the history (or lack thereof) of homosexuality and calling ss couples married? I think you understand perfectly, just playing dumb again.
Man up dude or change your picture!
Exactly why does ANY history about SSM matter in this discussion?
You’re going to live the rest of your life in the future – that is what matters.

“Get it right”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#223460 Nov 3, 2013
Cali Girl 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well said!
I would expect a person who claims
to be a Hermaphrodite,mutant,and a
Barbarian to have a soft heart toward
diversity.Especially for Gay people,
who are born they way they are like
him.That is why I don't believe him.
He also says he gets mistaken for
Bruce Willis,and his wife,actress Ann
Margaret...I've seen their picture and
unfortunately,it's not the case....LMAO
What actress do you look like?
laughing man

Pulaski, TN

#223461 Nov 3, 2013
Poofter wrote:
Just checking in, yep Frankie is still the biggest asshat on topix.
No, that would be NAMBLA sewage.

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
laughing man

Pulaski, TN

#223462 Nov 3, 2013
chance47 wrote:
<quoted text>
You’re going to live the rest of your life in the future – that is what matters.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#223464 Nov 3, 2013
chance47 wrote:
<quoted text>What actress do you look like?
None that I can think of....Blondish
hair, light brown eyes.I posted my
picture.....These guys made fun of
me....They thought I was really Frank!
at the time though LMAO!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#223465 Nov 3, 2013
chance47 wrote:
<quoted text>
What are you talking about? I responded directly to your numbered bullet points, one after another. Just like this reply. Are you willing blind of that or just don’t get it? I will not continue to fetch for your entertainment value if you refuse to any see the directness of my replies.
<quoted text>
And children in a straight marriage are deprived of having two dads or two moms. Exactly where that becomes ‘a condemnation’ lies wholly in your personal perspective. It is not a fact that there is any condemnation at all with any particular combination (M+W, M+M, W+W). You should admit that it is solely opinion that some of these parenting combinations must be bad.
<quoted text>
Hello? Nowhere in your wonderful quote do I see the word “Law”. There is no Law of Reproduction. And, you ignore that fact that even if there were some such law, gay sex would NOT be violating it in any way because gays aren’t EVER trying to reproduce when they do it.
<quoted text>
You implied that somehow gays are faulty and you cited the word evolution to back yourself up. Re-read what I wrote now and you should get it.
<quoted text>
Isn’t that like a double negative? Defective failure of mating behavior = successful mating behavior? At the lowest level you are confusing reproduction with mating.
<quoted text>
Your words are steeped in loathing. Maybe not fear, though. I will gladly retract that one for you. But, you are in no way being supportive, encouraging or accepting of gays or their human right to marry one another if they desire. So, that is where you indicate pretty clearly where your mind is.
<quoted text>
What make you think I need you to consent to my relationships? And no, an oxymoron is a phrase combining words that contradict each other. Clearly, SSM is no oxymoron.
<quoted text>
Exactly why does ANY history about SSM matter in this discussion?
You’re going to live the rest of your life in the future – that is what matters.
1. You lie. I listed 13, you gave 3 twisted generalizations.

2. You threw your own mother and father under the bus to equate an unnatural distortion. A really childish, silly stupid attempt at avoidance.

3. You don't need to see the word 'law' to have it implied as a principle of evolution. Again, a childish silly stupid game of avoidance.

4. Everyone has defects of some degree. I accurately pointed out the failure of homosexuality to fulfill mating behavior. That is not a choice, but a birth defect. Why are you taking responsibility for something you did not choose?

5. No, not a double negative. Failure refers to the end result. Defect refers to why it failed. I confuse nothing. Mating's purpose is reproduction as the quote indicated.

6. As I stated, I loath denial. Ss couples have no 'right' to impose an imposter relationship on marriage. They simply are not the same.

7. I never indicated you needed my consent. I simply pointed out that ss couples fail at the most basic level of equating to marriage. They fail so completely, that calling ss couples married is an oxymoron. Your denial of that failure does not change reality.

8. History is the best predictor of the future. But you also have science against you, not to mention that even a child can tell the difference between a ss couple and marriage.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Number 9

Azusa, CA

#223466 Nov 3, 2013
More time spent riding the rails too!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#223467 Nov 3, 2013
Cali Girl 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
None that I can think of....Blondish
hair, light brown eyes.I posted my
picture.....These guys made fun of
me....They thought I was really Frank!
at the time though LMAO!
I think a stocky Phyllis Diller.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Gustavo

Westminster, CA

#223468 Nov 3, 2013
Mikey wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll try and remember princess.
Dudette, you are a mean sourpussy homo . Take your anger somewhere else, like back the ER ... Blahahaha
Gustavo

Westminster, CA

#223469 Nov 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I think a stocky Phyllis Diller.
Blahahahaaa ... just kidding nothing wrong with thick women, they can be sexy and hot.
Doss XX Man

Westminster, CA

#223470 Nov 3, 2013
I find them irresistible . . .
Dos XX Man

Westminster, CA

#223471 Nov 3, 2013
imposter !
Gustavo

Westminster, CA

#223472 Nov 3, 2013
I guess frankie is at his estate in brooklyn . .

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
where can I find heroin in monterey? Fri Rosiedosie 7
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Thu scirocco 71,697
News Homicide suspect Victor Cabrera has long histor... (Oct '08) Mar 24 mando 12
News Carmel waste broker accused of bribery (Dec '08) Mar 20 Gary 16
Review: Salazar Auto Repair (Sep '13) Mar 10 fed up 3
News Ezekiel Lopez-Figueroa at his sentencing this m... (Dec '11) Mar 5 Carlos Slim 14
News Ask the Auto Doctor (Mar '06) Mar 3 Joe Balls 1,530
Monterey Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]