Look, Kim, you are the one who insists that a couple who is mutually sterile and unable to engage in mating behavior cannot have a full marriage.KiMare wrote:
I didn't dictate classic morality. Nor did any one religion.
It is far more basic than those things.
Honesty and responsibility would cover most of what I am saying.
If I birth a child, I take care of that child.
If I make the marriage vow, I keep the marriage vow.
If I don't qualify for marriage, I don't manipulate a fraudulent fake.
If I have a sexual disorder, I face it honestly, and certainly don't demand that others deny it with me.
What would happen if GLBT's admitted with honesty and responsibility that they represent a confused crossover point of gender and sexuality?
I do nothing more than point out reality. And look at your hate. Do you ever stop and think about that?
1. Other than being your typical hateful ad homoan gay twirl attack, what does your post have to do with mine?
2. You lie. That isn't my definition.
3. My definition fits my marriage perfectly.
The only thing you did was prove your immorality.
That describes every marriage in which a couple, gay or straight, is unable to produce children.
You also claim that the essence of marriage is to tie a man to a wife so that he can provide resources for his family--so that the doesn't just mate with a woman and wander off to find another woman to impregnate, leaving his family in the lurch.
You have done your duty. You and your wife have raised your children to maturity. They no longer need your resources as parents. They are on their own and independent--or they should be at their age.
This being the case, by your own logic, you should move on. You and your wife no longer possess the essence of marriage. You no longer need the benefits and protections of marriage.
These are your words, Kim. You don't like having them turned against you. That's why you claim that they are an attack.
I'm simply trying to show you that your own ideas and beliefs about marriage are clearly incorrect.
"There is none so blind as he who will not see."