Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,179

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#216764 Sep 16, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Your marriage is a "mutually sterile, pointlessly opposite gendered half of marriage". And since you believe "marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior" you have no business being married.
You can't reproduce.
Hand in your marriage license and dissolve your union.
You can remain partners by setting up any legal needs through an attorney. But you have no reason to continue calling your union "marriage".
See how that works?
You don't make sense.

I have two sons.

Epic fail.

Smile.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#216765 Sep 16, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You thought that was a poem? That's funny, so did a lot of other people. I was just stating some if the monumental distinctions between marriage and SS couples.
It's working out fine exposing an fraudulent relationship trying to be imposed on marriage.
Smile.
Whatever it is, it sure stirs up the fruitloops!

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Flounders

Monrovia, CA

#216770 Sep 16, 2013
The tide must be low this morning, no flounders posting yet?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#216773 Sep 16, 2013
Gustavo wrote:
<quoted text>
WTF does all of that mean? what is your point you idiot
Dan probably had a point when he started typing his post but forgot what it was so started rambling on about forest fires and mad cow disease. He's a moron. Good jarhead material, recruit him!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#216774 Sep 16, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Every ignorant rant you spew infers that those couples who cannot conceive their own offspring should not be able to get married.
Pretty STOOPID.
And what about those couples who don't want kids? Should they be banned as well??
In either care you're impotent. Gays have been getting married and will continue to do so despite your twisted reasoning.
So get lost limp dick and accept the label.
LOL!!!!
ignorant rant!
spew!
STOOPID!
impotent!
twisted reasoning!
get lost limpdick!

YUK!YUK!YUK!~Whoop!~Whoop! Ah good times.

LOL!!!!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#216775 Sep 16, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
'Duplicate gendered'....LOL!!!
Is that like "unmarried"???
How about "default families"???
LOL!!!
LOL!!!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#216776 Sep 16, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Monumental distinctions between marriage and same sex couples???
-Well sister...here's some of your monumental fails;
1) Gays HAVE been getting married. And guess what genius...they're of the same sex.
LOL!!!
2) Your main premise in your freakish rants is that members of a same sex couple are infertile. Guess what EINSTEIN....they're no less infertile than the heterosexual population, they can still have kids of their own. The only distinction is that they wouldn't be able to do so amongst themselves which by the way Oh Mighty Dumbass happens to many heterosexual couples as well.
3) The is the best "monumental" fail yet. You can't do JACK and SHIT about the FACT gays are getting married NOW. TODAY. TOMORROW and in TWO WEEKS.....LOL!!!!
Get bent you limp dicked idiot. You're about as worthwhile as a used condom.
monumental fails!
sister!
genius!
freakish rants!
Einstein!
oh mighty dumbass!
Jack Sh!t!
limp dicked idiot!
used condom!

YUK!YUK!YUK!~Whoop! Ah good times!

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#216777 Sep 16, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
They can also marry someone of the same sex in a growing number of states, and once married be recognized as such by the federal government as married in all 50 states
There's only so many states, and thirty have constitutional amendments defining marriage as union of one man and one woman.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#216778 Sep 16, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Agreed! 2 men, 2 women, or one of each!
Happily, legally married here and it frosts your cookies that your opinions can't change that reality.
And coming soon, one man and two women or three or four. Kody Brown and the Sister Wives thank you for your support.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#216779 Sep 16, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Given they're your sons...
...at what age were they weened? Twenty TWO??
Because of your teachings do they still think Channel 4 is the work of Satan, the Clint Eastwood we see now is not the old Clint given aliens from Pluto took over his body on April 3rd, 1997, making $10,304 and 57 cents a year is a damn good living, that those who live in homes rather than trailer parks can only do so because they pimp out their bodies at night and that gays are second class citizens whom are responsible for power outages???
LOL!!!!
What the hell are you talking about?

LOL!!!!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#216780 Sep 16, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Nah......most of us saw it for what it was.
An ugly bumpersticker.
Oh yeah? I got your ugly bumpersticker right here...

LOL!!!!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#216781 Sep 16, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Gus...
...I doubt 29 of your closest living relatives would willingly want to be within 50 yards of your anti-social sorry ass.
You sure? I'd say maybe they'd get closer. Say 49 yards. And there's only 28 of them.

LOL!!!!

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#216782 Sep 16, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
If the freedom for gays to marry did not hold water as a basic liberty you would not have seen certain states adopt the idea gays could marry there.
Those states altered the requirements, changed the rules, dropped conjugality as the foundation of legal marriage in the state.
The bigger question now is if we're to allow this segment of the American population, gay citizens, the freedom to marry in some states then why not in every state given that action simply represents a basic civil right?
Because each state sets their own marriage laws, and marriage as a basic civil right is based on the union of one man and one woman as husband and wife, not the two person spouses for life regardless of gender composition.

If conjugality is expendable, why not monogamy too? Where is the line drawn?
The tide

Monrovia, CA

#216784 Sep 16, 2013
Was this another religious crazy Muslim gone off the deep end?

Dressed in his religious holy garb of all black.

A man brandishing an assault rifle, shotgun and handgun opened fire Monday inside a building at the Washington Navy Yard.

Killing at least four people and wounding at least seven more, including two police officers.
laughing man

Pulaski, TN

#216785 Sep 16, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Get bent you limp dicked idiot.
There's nothing quite like the zingers and the "LOL's" from pimple herders.

I stand in awe.
BeenThr

Paradise, CA

#216786 Sep 16, 2013
Your all insane!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#216787 Sep 16, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
There's only so many states, and thirty have constitutional amendments defining marriage as union of one man and one woman.
Does not change the fact that once married legally in any state that allows same sex marriage, they will be fully recognized as married on the federal level in all 50 states. Regardless of any state constitutional amendment.
Gustavo

Highland, CA

#216788 Sep 16, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Gus...
...I doubt 29 of your closest living relatives would willingly want to be within 50 yards of your anti-social sorry ass.
Did I touch a nerve? How can you look at yourself in the mirror each day. Oh and 'm not anti-social.
Gustavo

Highland, CA

#216789 Sep 16, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Dan probably had a point when he started typing his post but forgot what it was so started rambling on about forest fires and mad cow disease. He's a moron. Good jarhead material, recruit him!
You and Dan are in the same boat "silor boi"

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#216790 Sep 16, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
What the hell are you talking about?
LOL!!!!
How does he go into a Clint Eastwood rant to justify his thinking? LOL!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 4 min JOEL 71,121
Carmel River diverted to allow dam removal, pre... Dec 16 Clint 1
Calif. cop may be fired for giving suicidal stu... Dec 13 John Smith 1
Kristen Scannell Saratoga Springs NY Adds New H... Dec 12 Alex Montgomery 1
Who do you think is the MOST corrupt Monterey C... Dec 9 montereyusedtobenice 1
where can I find heroin in monterey? Dec 9 montereyusedtobenice 5
Help! In need of opiates preferably boi Dec 5 Njp9080 1
Monterey Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Monterey News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Monterey

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 7:51 am PST