Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,368

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#213466 Aug 30, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
How are you not a bad person for attempting to marginalize people who are merely wary of this tremendous social change?
"They are not homophobes. They are not scared. They are just a bunch of a$$h0les.-Jn Gnarr. Mayor of Reykjavk, Iceland
They are not bad people. Do you support 3 brothers marrying? Don't be a bad person now! Do you support me marrying my sister? Don't be a bad person about it!
what do your idiotic scenarios have to do with SSM?

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#213467 Aug 30, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
How are you not a bad person for attempting to marginalize people who are merely wary of this tremendous social change?
"They are not homophobes. They are not scared. They are just a bunch of a$$h0les.-Jn Gnarr. Mayor of Reykjavk, Iceland
They are not bad people. Do you support 3 brothers marrying? Don't be a bad person now! Do you support me marrying my sister? Don't be a bad person about it!
it is no larger of a social change that legalizing inter-racial marriages, and we certainly know to call those that were against that bigots, don't we?
kookaa

Long Beach, CA

#213468 Aug 30, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You wouldn't make fun of my disability if I was gay.
That issue has already been addressed multiple times, gimp.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#213471 Aug 30, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>it is no larger of a social change that legalizing inter-racial marriages, and we certainly know to call those that were against that bigots, don't we?
Attacking and marginalizing people is counter productive. You are getting angry already. There is no need. Tell them why SSM is good, don't tell them they are bad.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#213472 Aug 30, 2013
kookaa wrote:
<quoted text>
That issue has already been addressed multiple times, gimp.
You still haven't admitted it, even though you know it's true. You wouldn't call me gimp if I was gay. You are dishonest. Why? Are you ashamed of yourself? Own it.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#213473 Aug 30, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>what do your idiotic scenarios have to do with SSM?
What do your idiotic and angry responses have to do with SSM?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#213474 Aug 30, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>it is no larger of a social change that legalizing inter-racial marriages...
Yes it is.

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#213475 Aug 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes it is.
in what way?

how is it any larger than allowing married women to inherit property or wealth? how is it any larger than outlawing polygamy?

see? so many real world issues about marriage you just can't seem to counter with your narrow view of wanting to block ssm...

if you actually had a true understanding of what marriage is, and you might not sound so foolish.

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#213476 Aug 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Attacking and marginalizing people is counter productive. You are getting angry already. There is no need. Tell them why SSM is good, don't tell them they are bad.
not getting angry at all...you make poor assumptions.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#213477 Aug 31, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>in what way?
how is it any larger than allowing married women to inherit property or wealth? how is it any larger than outlawing polygamy?
see? so many real world issues about marriage you just can't seem to counter with your narrow view of wanting to block ssm...
if you actually had a true understanding of what marriage is, and you might not sound so foolish.
Did you ever take an introductory sociology class or cultural anthropology class? Obviously not. I understand what marriage is.

I see no compelling reasons SSM shouldn't be allowed. I also see no reason why we need it. Be real. It's about the government perks. I will never get them, as I have no plans to marry again. How is that fair? Those tax breaks etc. are for children. Not for playing house.

Do you support me marrying my sister? My brother? Both of them? Don't forget, if you don't, you are a bad person.
kookaa

Long Beach, CA

#213478 Aug 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You still haven't admitted it, even though you know it's true. You wouldn't call me gimp if I was gay. You are dishonest. Why? Are you ashamed of yourself? Own it.
It is not true and you are still incorrect, gimpyboi. Are we clear now? You seem to be getting way too mad over a silly gay thread on Topix, gimpy. Try to calm down.
kookaa

Long Beach, CA

#213479 Aug 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Attacking and marginalizing people is counter productive. You are getting angry already. There is no need. Tell them why SSM is good, don't tell them they are bad.
So why are you attacking and marginalizing people all day every day on Topix? And you seem to be getting angry a lot lately. Calm down. Maybe if gay discussion threads make you so mad you should find some other interests, gimp.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#213480 Aug 31, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>not getting angry at all...you make poor assumptions.
"idiotic scenarios"? "so foolish"? You're angry. SSM was considered an "idiotic scenario" not very long ago. What harm would a loving marriage of three consenting adult brothers cause you?

The bottom line is I support marriage equality (SSM, polygamy and incest marriage) and you do not. You call other types of marriage "idiotic scenarios". Who is the bigot here?

Why are you a hypocrite?

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#213481 Aug 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
"idiotic scenarios"? "so foolish"? You're angry. SSM was considered an "idiotic scenario" not very long ago. What harm would a loving marriage of three consenting adult brothers cause you?
The bottom line is I support marriage equality (SSM, polygamy and incest marriage) and you do not. You call other types of marriage "idiotic scenarios". Who is the bigot here?
Why are you a hypocrite?
not angry at all.. again, you are very bad at making assumptions.

then you just call SSM an idiotic assumption...are you angry? see how that works?

being homosexual has nothing to do with some silly religious cult mandate to marry three wives or people that want to marry their brothers for some silly-assed reason...

being homosexual is a normal part of our species. to deny them the basic civil right of marriage to the gender they are naturally and normally attracted to is the issue here, not your idiotic scenarios, and yes, they are idiotic.

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#213482 Aug 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you ever take an introductory sociology class or cultural anthropology class? Obviously not. I understand what marriage is.
I see no compelling reasons SSM shouldn't be allowed. I also see no reason why we need it. Be real. It's about the government perks. I will never get them, as I have no plans to marry again. How is that fair? Those tax breaks etc. are for children. Not for playing house.
Do you support me marrying my sister? My brother? Both of them? Don't forget, if you don't, you are a bad person.
yes, you have given me this exact spiel before, is your memory that lame?

if you have issues with the tax laws, take that up with the IRS. that is a totally seprerate issue.

you really need to take a logic course, instead of the community education sociology courses you took. it would help you steer a clear and cogent argument.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#213483 Aug 31, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Some do. Some don't. Some heterosexuals do. Some don't.
It has no bearing only any marriages license, unless you can provide proof otherwise.
A marriage license is a piece of paper.

A marriage is the reunion of two genders who consider the other more than themselves. Who unite in a complimentary blend.

You assert that an inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning behavior has "no bearing"?????????

You only expose not just a lack of understanding marriage, but your deprivation.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#213484 Aug 31, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Your first sentence is a point blank lie. Especially since I delineate major distinctions in my post.
Your second is a whine based on a false victim claim.
Your third sentence is so stupid, you contradict your own claim by making a distinction.
SS couples are half a marriage based on the facts I state.
Your post represents the degree of denial it takes to attempt imposing a impostor relationship on marriage.
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh yes... I forgot... Your major distinctions... Venus and Mars... Your pathetic little poem is the biggest load I've come across in years. Opposite-gender relationships are so "unique" and "distinct" that only several billion people on the planet become involved in them each year. I had no idea they were so sacred.(sarcasm)
You say that you offer facts... You don't offer facts, you offer canned snippets that you're too stupid to realize should embarrass you.
You trot them out so regularly nobody even knows what they mean anymore. They're like a word that you repeat over and over again until it becomes a meaningless sound.
Once again,

Gay troll scoffing is not an rational response.

Can you show that ss couple equate to marriage at any of the levels I noted?

No?

That's why a ss couple will only ever be a mutually barren duplicate gendered half of marriage.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#213485 Aug 31, 2013
Viva Las Vagas wrote:
Pink-Head Bill O'Reilly has apologized for incorrectly stating that no Republicans were invited to participate in a ceremony this week.
Which marked the 50th anniversary of the human March on Washington for civil rights and Martin Luther King Jr.'s first spoke about "I Have a Dream" speech.
Billy Bong smoking stunted idiot, O'Reilly is a runt above whale dropping's.
Ah, the rest of the story...

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/08/
gop-official-march-on-washingt on-organizers-ignored-suggesti ons/
Mike Howard

Dallas, TX

#213487 Aug 31, 2013
If I were Druish, I'd sukk off the flaggott ggaayy judges, then take a biggun in the ash for the nigguhh Omaha.
Gustavo

Harbor City, CA

#213488 Aug 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't have a good argument for existing. GET A JOB!
lol you homo, I don't need another job, I'm semi retired o t his one and have a great life debt and worry free. How a bout you?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 7 hr rabbee yehoshooah... 71,553
Ask the Auto Doctor (Mar '06) Feb 23 Joe Balls 1,528
Beware of Monterey Audi. Feb 4 Dave 1
Multiple suspects in custody for Seaside shootings Jan '15 Anonymous 1
Peninsula high school students arrested in 'fig... (Sep '09) Jan '15 trey 108
Other border states shun Arizona's immigration law (May '10) Jan '15 colton case 9,053
Kristen Scannell Saratoga Springs NY Adds New H... Dec '14 Kristen Scannell ... 2
Monterey Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 10:59 pm PST