Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201881 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

laughing man

Luton, UK

#202486 Jul 14, 2013
Rocky Hudsony wrote:
<quoted text>
Used Crisco...
And re-used.

And regurgitated....
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#202487 Jul 14, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
--Oh God... Here we go again... "Marriage is the basic unit of our society! There has never been and will never be a more important and key idea with regards to the entire human race." Please, you drama queen... Marriage is a manmade construct. Any two people can fall on top of one another and spit out a child. That's been happening since the beginning of time.
Spare me the histrionics.
--LGBT people were not enslaved, unless they were gay slaves. But neither were women, religious minorities, or the disabled. Yet we extend civil and equal rights to each one of these populations.
--Stop playing with semantics... Marriage has always been and will always be a manmade social and legal union between two or more people; depending on when your lived and where you lived. The way it has looked has varied widely over the eons. Allowing same-sex partners to benefit from the laws that protect married couples in this country is yet another rendition of marriage. Denial of marriage between same-sex partners has been based on the false and long held belief that homosexuals are disordered. We no longer hold those beliefs--at least those in the medical, psychiatric, biological, and other scientific communities.
Laws are based on facts. And the facts clearly show that openly gay individuals do not suffer "personal angst or social disability"--the basis for determining if a human characteristic is a mental or physical disorder.
OMG, You're calling HIM a drama queen? That's laughable...
" Any two people can fall on top of one another and spit out a child. That's been happening since the beginning of time." This is meant to demonize heterosexuals? I fail to see how... However, I will point out that it takes 1 man and 1 woman to conceive a child.

"Spare me the histrionics." precedes "LGBT people were not enslaved, unless they were gay slaves. But neither were women, religious minorities, or the disabled. Yet we extend civil and equal rights to each one of these populations."? Priceless. "Women" are not a minority based upon sexual predilection, nor are "religious minorites" or "the disabled", which are all groups that are defined by qualities that are not based upon sexual predilection, as previously pointed out as per women. their fight is not your fight, you dishonor them all by attempting to cozy up to them and insinuate similarity.

"Stop playing with semantics" followed by " Marriage has always been and will always be a manmade social and legal union between two or more people" which is semantic deception. It has not. It has always been between 1 man and 1 woman, you have not yet been given license to re-writwe history, which is something that you have no respect for, anyway, according to your own posts. "depending on when your lived and where you lived." Untrue, nowhere in the world or history has marriage ever been between 2 of the same gender, see above point as per the revision of history. "The way it has looked has varied widely over the eons." Falsity again, it has always "looked like" 1 man and 1 woman. "Allowing same-sex partners to benefit from the laws that protect married couples in this country is a rendering of marriage." should be what you wrote, if you were actually interested in a true statement. "Denial of marriage between same-sex partners has been based on the false and long held belief that homosexuals are disordered." is another batch of hogwash. If we have had criteria in place by which to judge one another, then "disordered" is what you have been. Until you brought in some psychiatrists to make the majority seem "disordered" for having our tenets. "We no longer hold those beliefs--at least those in the medical, psychiatric, biological, and other scientific communities." is perfect proof of this point. Using the opinions of "professionals" to try and disarm us.
I would continue to dissect your posts, but I am out of room. And, I have debunked you already.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#202488 Jul 14, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You probably shouldn't ask.
My bottom is intact, much to their dismay...
:-D

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#202489 Jul 14, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:[nonsense snipped].
The crucial question remains lingering in the background. What about the O.T. laws that are conveniently ignored, but of equal weight? Biblicists act as if many did not exist. The following examples are typical:

Money cannot be lent at interest to your brother, only to foreigners (Deut. 23:19-20);
Eating pork is forbidden (Deut. 14:8);
A man must marry and have relations with his dead brother's wife (Deut. 25:5-6);
A seducer must marry an unengaged virgin whom he seduces (Ex. 22:16-17);
A raped, unengaged virgin must marry her rapist and they can never divorce (Deut. 22:28-29);
Trials for adultery are to be by ordeal (Num. 5:28-29);
Eating rare meat with blood is forbidden (Lev. 19:26);
Beards can't be rounded (Lev. 19:27);
A newly married man can't go to war or be charged with business for one year (Deut. 24:5);
A guilty man can be beaten with as many as forty blows (Deut. 25:1-3);
A garment composed of wool and linen can't be worn (Deut. 22:11);
Punishment shall be administered on the basis of an eye for an eye (Deut. 19:21, Ex. 21:24);
One's nation can lend to other nations but not borrow from them (Deut. 15:6);
Bastards can't enter the Lord's congregation (Deut. 23:2);
First-born children should sometimes be sacrificed to the Lord (Ex. 22:29); and
Debtor brothers shall be released from their obligation every seven years (Deut. 15:1-3).

All of these rules are part of the Old Covenant and of equal import. Why quote the Ten Commandments and rules against homosexuality, for example, while ignoring other tenets? A believer's obligations to one is no less than his obligation to all. In fact, if under the New Covenant Christians have stepped into the shoes of the Israelites and become, in effect, the new Chosen People, then they should inherit all the privileges and duties of that office. They seem to want the former but not the latter. Jesus said the Old Law would stand until heaven and earth passed away. Not one jot or tittle was to be changed until all was fulfilled (Matt. 5:18-19 RSV). Paul disagreed, but, then, this is not the only topic upon which they clashed.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#202490 Jul 14, 2013
Rocky Hudsony wrote:
<quoted text>
My bottom is intact, much to their dismay...
:-D
Mine too. Except for my hot Indian lady doctor. The little freak wants to stick her finger in there every year. And a few years ago she talked me into letting her and a nurse (hot Filipina) run a camera up there while we all watched on a high def screen! She got me all drugged up first.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#202491 Jul 14, 2013
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
The crucial question remains lingering in the background. What about the O.T. laws that are conveniently ignored, but of equal weight? Biblicists act as if many did not exist. The following examples are typical:
Money cannot be lent at interest to your brother, only to foreigners (Deut. 23:19-20);
Eating pork is forbidden (Deut. 14:8);
A man must marry and have relations with his dead brother's wife (Deut. 25:5-6);
A seducer must marry an unengaged virgin whom he seduces (Ex. 22:16-17);
A raped, unengaged virgin must marry her rapist and they can never divorce (Deut. 22:28-29);
Trials for adultery are to be by ordeal (Num. 5:28-29);
Eating rare meat with blood is forbidden (Lev. 19:26);
Beards can't be rounded (Lev. 19:27);
A newly married man can't go to war or be charged with business for one year (Deut. 24:5);
A guilty man can be beaten with as many as forty blows (Deut. 25:1-3);
A garment composed of wool and linen can't be worn (Deut. 22:11);
Punishment shall be administered on the basis of an eye for an eye (Deut. 19:21, Ex. 21:24);
One's nation can lend to other nations but not borrow from them (Deut. 15:6);
Bastards can't enter the Lord's congregation (Deut. 23:2);
First-born children should sometimes be sacrificed to the Lord (Ex. 22:29); and
Debtor brothers shall be released from their obligation every seven years (Deut. 15:1-3).
All of these rules are part of the Old Covenant and of equal import. Why quote the Ten Commandments and rules against homosexuality, for example, while ignoring other tenets? A believer's obligations to one is no less than his obligation to all. In fact, if under the New Covenant Christians have stepped into the shoes of the Israelites and become, in effect, the new Chosen People, then they should inherit all the privileges and duties of that office. They seem to want the former but not the latter. Jesus said the Old Law would stand until heaven and earth passed away. Not one jot or tittle was to be changed until all was fulfilled (Matt. 5:18-19 RSV). Paul disagreed, but, then, this is not the only topic upon which they clashed.
Aw fer chrissakes SHUDDUP!
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#202492 Jul 14, 2013
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>(Nonsense)
Here you are, telling other people to march to your drumbeat. Why don't you tell them what their favorite color should be, while you're at it? And, why haven't you posted a Youtube video yet? I'm waiting for the video, so that I may sleep easier, knowing that one less fool exists to breathe my air....
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#202493 Jul 14, 2013
pinky wrote:
Ah, ya sound like some kind of bottomless racists, take turns and shut up.
Quit butting in with your bottomless racism and shuudup.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#202494 Jul 14, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Mine too. Except for my hot Indian lady doctor. The little freak wants to stick her finger in there every year. And a few years ago she talked me into letting her and a nurse (hot Filipina) run a camera up there while we all watched on a high def screen! She got me all drugged up first.
Can I have their phone number?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#202495 Jul 14, 2013
I'm still here. It's just that what Rev Alan posts is so stupid I slipped into a coma for a few minutes.
laughing man

Luton, UK

#202496 Jul 14, 2013
Rocky Hudsony wrote:
<quoted text>And, why haven't you posted a Youtube video yet?
Haven't you heard? Their favorite videos are colonoscopies.

It's like their Genealogy page.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#202497 Jul 14, 2013
Mikey wrote:
<quoted text>
More of this Bigoted BS again? How can you stand yourself?
Another unsubstantiated ad homoan attack.

How do you survive without a brain?
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#202498 Jul 14, 2013
laughing man wrote:
<quoted text>
Haven't you heard? Their favorite videos are colonoscopies.
It's like their Genealogy page.
I was waiting for Reverend Elaine to post a video of him taste testing the Drano for someone..
laughing man

Luton, UK

#202499 Jul 14, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Another unsubstantiated ad homoan attack.
How do you survive without a brain?
Isn't "bigoted BS" kind of redundant?
laughing man

Luton, UK

#202500 Jul 14, 2013
Rocky Hudsony wrote:
<quoted text>
I was waiting for Reverend Elaine to post a video of him taste testing the Drano for someone..
Elaine Stain, and Joanie Baloney....
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#202501 Jul 14, 2013
laughing man wrote:
<quoted text>
Isn't "bigoted BS" kind of redundant?
It's NOT redundant, it's not, it's not, it's not, it's not, it's not, it's not....

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#202502 Jul 14, 2013
laughing man wrote:
<quoted text>
Isn't "bigoted BS" kind of redundant?
LOL

An oxymorom like 'gay marriage'.
Poof

Rock Island, IL

#202504 Jul 14, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
Looks like Mr Hudson is being censored today. He must have hurt someone's feelings. Or won an argument.
Sometimes things just go poof
Poof

Rock Island, IL

#202505 Jul 14, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
An oxymorom like 'gay marriage'.
Why is that? Oh wait there is same sex marriage.. Hey and its legal and equal.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#202507 Jul 14, 2013
Poof wrote:
<quoted text>Sometimes things just go poof
Poof? Are you a peter poofer?

http://www.hark.com/clips/ddltfsjytl-how-tall...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Sep 28 rabbee yehoshooah... 72,039
where can I find heroin in monterey? (Oct '14) Sep 27 Anonymous 65
News Ask the Auto Doctor (Mar '06) Sep 27 Fiball 1,544
News Dual language immersion program offered for kin... (Jan '10) Sep 16 Leong 31
News Weird State Laws that Affect Your Small Business Sep 4 Anita Bryant s Jihad 5
Chevy 2011 HD pick up 2500 Sep 3 Adice 2
Place to park my RV long term Aug '16 Chaoscoord 1

Monterey Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Monterey Mortgages