Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,356

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#198927 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote: I haven't given an opinion, I'm only mocking. SCOTUS ruled that ss couples are equal to marriage. Reality is not listening. Ss couples are still ever only a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage. Maybe SCOTUS needs a unanimous decision??? Think that will work??? Smirk.
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>So if a man and woman are both sterile, its only half a marriage.
Hardly.

This isn't rocket science, are you really that stupid?

Sterility in opposite sex couples indicates a injury or birth defect.

Mutually sterility in ss couples is a design conflict. Simply impossible.

However, the bottom line is still this;

Reality is disobeying SCOTUS!!! What is Obama going to do now??? Someone needs to file suit.

VV, where are you?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198928 Jun 29, 2013
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course, Frank wouldn't prevail, because they seem to suffer from the delusion that a union of three or more people seeks equal, not greater, protection of the law.
Frank is seriously at odds with reality.
By your idiotic logic equal rights for Asians seeks greater protection than equal rights for Inuits, because Asians out number Inuits.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#198929 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>One must ask, what is marriage?
The legal, cultural, social, historical, sexual, and/or religious union of husband and wife.
A lawful contract between two consenting adults.
If that's all it is, there's no reason to deny ANY two consenting adults.
So how does the names of the two affect the contract, Bill and Sam, Sue and Jill? Husband and Husband wife and wife.
Or the prior relationship or blood ties between the two, to carry your reasoning further.
YouJipped

Monrovia, CA

#198930 Jun 29, 2013
Egypt has a low boiling point now that another summer festival with guns and bullet are in the air..
Bowser

Long Beach, CA

#198931 Jun 29, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I am discussing it. It seems to bother you a lot. Why?
Huh? It doesn't bother me in the leaset. I have never said anything disparaging about poly. There is a difference between discussing and posting the same thing over and over in an attempt to stir up drama. Discuss. Do you have points to make? Please make them. I am listening.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#198932 Jun 29, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
So you're comparing the institution of marriage, the union of husband and wife, to those things?
No, I'm comparing marriage inequality to those things. And I'll go further and add heterosexism to that list.

The institution of open and legal slavery has all but disappeared from the planet. Compare that to how prevalent slavery has been throughout time and in different cultures. The earliest indication of slavery was in 1760 BC.

"David P. Forsythe wrote:'The fact remained that at the beginning of the nineteenth century an estimated three-quarters of all people alive were trapped in bondage against their will either in some form of slavery or serfdom'".

However, in 1981 the country Mauritania abolished legal slavery--the last country on the planet to do so.

An institution that existed legally for nearly 4,000 years; maybe longer, came to an end.

Societies simply stopped tolerating it.

Societies around the globe have stopped tolerating marriage inequality as well. They're stopping heterosexist ideology as well.

Openly LGBT individuals are seeking and getting equal rights. The days of discrimination and prejudice are fading away.

In a few generations folks will look back at these times and say, "Why did our ancestors make such a big deal about being gay? It's just another characteristic like being blond or being tall or being Caucasian or being left-handed, etc."
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198933 Jun 29, 2013
Bowser wrote:
<quoted text>
Huh? It doesn't bother me in the leaset. I have never said anything disparaging about poly. There is a difference between discussing and posting the same thing over and over in an attempt to stir up drama. Discuss. Do you have points to make? Please make them. I am listening.
You haven't been listening so far, what's changed?

All I've seen is a moronic troll trashing Ronald and his innocent dog's name and reputation.
laughing man

UK

#198934 Jun 29, 2013
very enlightened vegetable wrote:
<quoted text>
Societies simply stopped tolerating it.
We are long overdue tolerating Der Sphincter!!!!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198935 Jun 29, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I'm comparing marriage inequality to those things. And I'll go further and add heterosexism to that list.
The institution of open and legal slavery has all but disappeared from the planet. Compare that to how prevalent slavery has been throughout time and in different cultures. The earliest indication of slavery was in 1760 BC.
"David P. Forsythe wrote:'The fact remained that at the beginning of the nineteenth century an estimated three-quarters of all people alive were trapped in bondage against their will either in some form of slavery or serfdom'".
However, in 1981 the country Mauritania abolished legal slavery--the last country on the planet to do so.
An institution that existed legally for nearly 4,000 years; maybe longer, came to an end.
Societies simply stopped tolerating it.
Societies around the globe have stopped tolerating marriage inequality as well. They're stopping heterosexist ideology as well.
Openly LGBT individuals are seeking and getting equal rights. The days of discrimination and prejudice are fading away.
In a few generations folks will look back at these times and say, "Why did our ancestors make such a big deal about being gay? It's just another characteristic like being blond or being tall or being Caucasian or being left-handed, etc."
Except for poly and incest marriage, right?

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#198936 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote: I haven't given an opinion, I'm only mocking. SCOTUS ruled that ss couples are equal to marriage. Reality is not listening. Ss couples are still ever only a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage. Maybe SCOTUS needs a unanimous decision??? Think that will work??? Smirk.
<quoted text>
Hardly.
This isn't rocket science, are you really that stupid?
Sterility in opposite sex couples indicates a injury or birth defect.
Mutually sterility in ss couples is a design conflict. Simply impossible.
However, the bottom line is still this;
Reality is disobeying SCOTUS!!! What is Obama going to do now??? Someone needs to file suit.
VV, where are you?
Sterility is to marriage as a tennis racket is to a bicycle. Both are loosely related, but not dependent on the other.

A union between heterosexual couples--married or unmarried--MAY result in offspring. There isn't a guarantee that when an opposite-gender couple gets together they will create children. They may decide for whatever reason that they don't want children.

This isn't a design conflict. It's a matter making a conscious decision.

These couples married one another for reasons OTHER than procreation.

Most same-gender couples want to marry for reasons OTHER than procreation. Keep in mind, this doesn't mean that a same-gender couple is incapable of adopting children, if that's something they wish to do.

You keep throwing an opposite-gender couple's ability to procreate into the argument.

But that's disingenuous. And you know it. You only keep using it because it's basically the only thing you've got.

You don't want to throw religion into this argument because you know you'll lose both the argument and the support of some of the others in this forum.

Same-gender couples fall in love, just like opposite-gender couples. They wish to tie their lives together, legally, emotionally, physically, etc.

And that's the crux of the Supreme Court's decision. There is no difference in the eyes of the law. You cannot treat one couple different than another couple simply because the gender composition isn't the same.

Stop using children to defend your obvious hatred and fear of homosexuality.

For whatever reason, you want homosexuality to disappear from the planet. And that's not going to happen.

It's time you stopped trying to live in a make-believe world where gays shouldn't exist. To continue to live in such a world is indicative of delusional thought processes.

Go get some help to deal with your obvious hatred and/or fear of homosexuality. You'll be a happier person and I know those of us who come to this room will be happier as well.
Bowser

Long Beach, CA

#198937 Jun 29, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You haven't been listening so far, what's changed?
All I've seen is a moronic troll trashing Ronald and his innocent dog's name and reputation.
Did you miss the post where I indicated that I was behaving like you, to demonstrate how idiotic some of your squawking was coming across? If you think I was behaving like a troll, look in the mirror. I was making a point. I'm sorry you were unable to see that.
Bowser

Long Beach, CA

#198938 Jun 29, 2013
By the way Frankie, I didn't see any additional points made about poly. I anxiously await any new discussion points you may have.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#198939 Jun 29, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Sterility is to marriage as a tennis racket is to a bicycle. Both are loosely related, but not dependent on the other.
A union between heterosexual couples--married or unmarried--MAY result in offspring. There isn't a guarantee that when an opposite-gender couple gets together they will create children. They may decide for whatever reason that they don't want children.
This isn't a design conflict. It's a matter making a conscious decision.
These couples married one another for reasons OTHER than procreation.
Most same-gender couples want to marry for reasons OTHER than procreation. Keep in mind, this doesn't mean that a same-gender couple is incapable of adopting children, if that's something they wish to do.
You keep throwing an opposite-gender couple's ability to procreate into the argument.
But that's disingenuous. And you know it. You only keep using it because it's basically the only thing you've got.
You don't want to throw religion into this argument because you know you'll lose both the argument and the support of some of the others in this forum.
Same-gender couples fall in love, just like opposite-gender couples. They wish to tie their lives together, legally, emotionally, physically, etc.
And that's the crux of the Supreme Court's decision. There is no difference in the eyes of the law. You cannot treat one couple different than another couple simply because the gender composition isn't the same.
Stop using children to defend your obvious hatred and fear of homosexuality.
For whatever reason, you want homosexuality to disappear from the planet. And that's not going to happen.
It's time you stopped trying to live in a make-believe world where gays shouldn't exist. To continue to live in such a world is indicative of delusional thought processes.
Go get some help to deal with your obvious hatred and/or fear of homosexuality. You'll be a happier person and I know those of us who come to this room will be happier as well.
Brushing aside the gay twirl pontification,

I'm not stopping anyone from loving another person, or establishing a contract or rights.

I'm simply and accurately saying the ss couples do not equate to marriage. Either in make-up or result.

Clearly, the ruling by SCOTUS has been unable to adjudicate those differences.

Even the gay hordes in adamant denial have been unable to rectify those distinctions.

Who do I believe, you, or my eyes???
Bowser

Long Beach, CA

#198940 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Brushing aside the gay twirl pontification,
I'm not stopping anyone from loving another person, or establishing a contract or rights.
I'm simply and accurately saying the ss couples do not equate to marriage. Either in make-up or result.
Clearly, the ruling by SCOTUS has been unable to adjudicate those differences.
Even the gay hordes in adamant denial have been unable to rectify those distinctions.
Who do I believe, you, or my eyes???
In Internet slang, a troll is a person who sows discord on the Internet by trying to start arguments and upset people. They may do this by posting deliberately inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#198941 Jun 29, 2013
Interesting, the SCOTUS just told the citizens that they have no right to seek a redress of grievances against their political overlords.

Good work guys..
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198942 Jun 29, 2013
Bowser wrote:
<quoted text>
In Internet slang, a troll is a person who sows discord on the Internet by trying to start arguments and upset people. They may do this by posting deliberately inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.
Even worse that a troll is a troll like you who impersonates other posters and their honeys.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#198943 Jun 29, 2013
Bowser wrote:
<quoted text>
In Internet slang, a troll is a person who sows discord on the Internet by trying to start arguments and upset people. They may do this by posting deliberately inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.
I, on the other hand, am keeping all the facts on the table.

In so doing, I am doing the loving and courageous act of confronting denial.

The truth of this is evident by your inability to directly address my points.

It is further evidenced by the fact that a near senile, old jack ass with simple common sense has a bunch of girls in a hissy fit.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198944 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Then stop saying that we are stopping you. Dang son, you are not to bright.
Produce a post where I said you were stopping me young lad.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198945 Jun 29, 2013
Bowser wrote:
By the way Frankie, I didn't see any additional points made about poly. I anxiously await any new discussion points you may have.
Wait in one hand sh!t in the other and see which fills up faster, troll. Let us know. Have fun. No I'm not mad, are you?
Bowser

Long Beach, CA

#198958 Jun 29, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Wait in one hand sh!t in the other and see which fills up faster, troll. Let us know. Have fun. No I'm not mad, are you?
No, I'm not mad about anything. You seem to be. And still have not added any new "conversation" points. I though you were here to discuss something? It seems you are here for some other reason:

In Internet slang, a troll is a person who sows discord on the Internet by trying to start arguments and upset people. They may do this by posting deliberately inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Wed END TIMES UPDATE 71,553
Ask the Auto Doctor (Mar '06) Feb 23 Joe Balls 1,528
Beware of Monterey Audi. Feb 4 Dave 1
Multiple suspects in custody for Seaside shootings Jan '15 Anonymous 1
Peninsula high school students arrested in 'fig... (Sep '09) Jan '15 trey 108
Other border states shun Arizona's immigration law (May '10) Jan '15 colton case 9,053
Kristen Scannell Saratoga Springs NY Adds New H... Dec '14 Kristen Scannell ... 2
Monterey Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 9:17 am PST