Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 200,987

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198861 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Frank are you still upset because Polygamy is STILL illegal? I don't know how many times we tried to explain it to you. Next time shut your pie hole and try to listen.
Yes. Many times you morons have tried to explain to me why "marriage is a (one) man and a (one) woman only" doesn't ban polygamy but you have failed. Because prop 8 did ban polygamy. And you can't spin away that fact.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#198862 Jun 29, 2013
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
Frankie, congratulations. Way to hold up your standard of never being on topic or making a valid point.
The reality remains that existing same sex marriage bans are unconstitutional, the US Supreme Court has handed those in support of equality a powerful tool in moving forward with legal challenges, and you still don't have the ability to articulate a compelling state interest served by denying same sex couples equal protection of the law that would render such a restriction constitutional and begin to indicate that you are not an imbecile.
If they're "unconstitutional" why didn't SCOTUS", declare them null and void?

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#198863 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
No discord 'ma'am', just pointing out reality.
No reality in your statement KiMare. Facts don't start with "Maybe". So now not only are you intentionaly sowing discord, but you are lying as well. Your god despises your behavior. Enjoy hell. Smirk.

http://www.topix.com/forum/san-diego/TH6FC2NT...
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You lied. You are not married.
The state of Connecticut, and now the federal government, says I'm married. They have more say in the matter then you do. To say I'm not married is a lie. Your god hates people that lie.

Smile, and enjoy your trip to hell!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198864 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Could you supply the link that states.
"Anal sex is still inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning"...
Gets you hot eh, Jiz? YUK!YUK!YUK! Find your own porn perv. Google it.
laughing man

UK

#198865 Jun 29, 2013
Bowser wrote:
<quoted text> And do I look foolish?
Do you really want an answer to that, little girl?
racine

Los Angeles, CA

#198866 Jun 29, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
No... It's not an idiotic response. It's a perfectly reasonable observation.
If you believe that current marriage laws should be dictated by history, then maybe you think that other institutions and behaviors should also be supported by their almost constant presence in history.
You just don't agree with them because you realize how absurd it would be for you to try to support slavery, war, genocide, gender inequality, racial and ethnic inequality, etc.
But marriage inequality, you're willing to support that based on the history of marriage--even though you KNOW that marriage has never been the same in all cultures throughout history. Arranged marriage, plural marriage, same-gender marriage, interracial marriage, "ghost marriage", etc. are just a few of the many faces of marriage over the history of mankind.
It doesn't matter. Our Supreme Court Justices, having had all the facts argued before them by the best attorneys and legal teams in the country, came to the conclusion that it is unconstitutional to deny federal rights and protections to a married couple who happen to be comprised of same-gender individuals. They found it unconstitutional to deny benefits and protections to married, same-gender couples who have children.
And there you have it... The law is clearly on our side here. It's probably getting close to closing time around here on this particular thread.
The decision has been made. Your team lost. We were triumphant. The definition of marriage (of which there are many) now includes same-gender couples.
Poor ol' long-winded queer. Running your trap but no one to blow. Try going to Chuckee-Cheese Pizza Time Theater.., lots of gay men there you can do.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198867 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Not what? Acting like a 3rd grader because Polygamy is still illegal? Now post back and call me fruitloops, fruitcake or spiceboy. Thats your normal responce.
My normal responses trump your abnormal responses.

Anyone (you) who tries to argue that prop 8 didn't discriminate against polygamy too is a moron.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198868 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Wrong, listen to the link that I gave you. He is in fact impersonating the actor " Frankie Rizzo", right down to fruitloos and fruitcake.
"listen to the link" What a doofus.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#198869 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You noted, as I do, that ss couples are a duplicated gendered half of marriage.
Marriage is defined as a union and an institution. The gender of the participants don't alter that. The union has still taken place. There is no half union dear. You really should learn how the English language works.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Interracial marriage has been prevalent across human history with brief points of conflict.
Wow, there's a pointless statement. Historical prevalence is not an argument. If it were, women would still be property. It's 2013 plebe, do try and keep up.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Ss couples being called married has never been accepted across the history of a single culture.
Completely irrelevant. You seem to be hung up on acceptance. Your acceptance and the acceptance of other bitches like you is irrelevant!
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Moreover, race differences don't affect the essence of mating behavior. SS couples are a defective failure of mating behavior.
More lies from KiMare. Your god despises your behavior. The "essence of mating behavior" is irrelevant. There are no mating prerequisites as related to the institution of marriage. And gays can mate just fine. That's already been proven. Your not accepting the true definitions of mating is irrelevant.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I admitted no such thing. I simply quoted the SCOTUS assertion, and mocked it.
Hmmmm. What's another term for using mockery? Oh, I know....sowing discord.

Enjoy hell! It's where all the other hypocritical fundamentalists Christians will be plebe!

“Religion kills”

Since: Jun 13

Down Under

#198870 Jun 29, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. Many times you morons have tried to explain to me why "marriage is a (one) man and a (one) woman only" doesn't ban polygamy but you have failed. Because prop 8 did ban polygamy. And you can't spin away that fact.
I'm sure it was never banned before.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198871 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>What doctor said that anal sex is demeaning? When did having children become a requirement in marriage? Why are you clueless? Are you upset because of the rulings that SCOTUS made? Is that the problem?
Oh little Jizzy is just chock full of questions today! Bright eyed, curious and ready to learn!
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

#198872 Jun 29, 2013
Bowser wrote:
<quoted text>
That is exactly his problem. His opinion has been over-ruled by the Supreme Court and he continues to cling desperately to his opinions, trying to fabricate some "fact". And, being the fool he is, he doesn't even realize that not all gay people even engage in anal sex! So he has failed once again to make a valid point.
I have asked many times,yet he fails to answer.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#198873 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
What works???
Mating behavior sure doesn't.
This has already been disproven. Repeatedly.

You sure are hung up on other people's mating habits. It's rather creepy. One can only imagine you have a booth at your church every Sunday asking all the congregants about their mating habits, as if it were your business!! Obsession over other people's mating habits is perverted. You should speak to a counselor about that.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Anal sex is still inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.
Then don't engage in it if you feel this way. Meanwhile, a third of straight people on this planet, and many gay men on this planet, will continue to engage in it. Not a damn thing you can do about it. Know why? It's none of your f*cking business.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You still have only the duplicate HALF of marriage.
Nope. It's still a completed union. Your inability to accept that FACT is completely irrelevant. Not a damn thing you can do other than choke on it!! Smile!!
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The kids STILL will choose mom and dad.
Kids don't choose their parents idiot.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Stamp your feet and repeat all you want, your relationship isn't marriage.
The only one stamping their feet here dear, is you!! The only one repeating things ad nausea dear, is you!!!! As always, don't let facts hold you back!! You keep clinging to your half baked notions and your imaginary mating constraints!!!!

Carry on plebe!
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

#198874 Jun 29, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
My normal responses trump your abnormal responses.
Anyone (you) who tries to argue that prop 8 didn't discriminate against polygamy too is a moron.
Lets see, in Cali, its legal for two people of the same sex to marry. Now can you say the same thing for polygamy? HUH and I am the moron. Well skippy I don't think so.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#198875 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I simply point out obvious fundamental differences between ss couples and marriage.
There are two fundamental differences. Period. 1) The gender make up of the participants is different. 2) Unassisted procreation between the participants will not naturally occur.

That's it. Those are the fundamental differences. Neither of those differences alters the institution of marriage or is validity.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
There is nothing hateful about stating facts.
It is hateful when the intent of stating the facts is to try and demean. That's what you do. And yes dear, it is intended to be hateful. Using the word truth as a pretend shield when you actively seek to sow discord doesn't work. Your god hates your actions. We on the other hand just accept them as further demonstration of how ridiculously stupid you are! Smile!
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

#198876 Jun 29, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Gets you hot eh, Jiz? YUK!YUK!YUK! Find your own porn perv. Google it.
God issued a recal on you, he gave you a train, and not a brain. He is sorry.

Since: Jan 10

Westerville, OH

#198877 Jun 29, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd think the victory for equality would be "more than anything" what you liked, it is very telling that you'd like to rub detractors faces in it more than the victory itself.
You have just insisted on a tremendous social change and gotten it. Some people are wary of the change. Go easy on them. They are your fellow citizens, they'll come around, and sooner without you taunting and attempting to marginalize them. That just naturally makes them dig in and resist.
A great victory has just been won, have some class and be gracious about it.
When are you going to get it through your thick head, Gay Americans donít give a s..t how you feel? After centuries of oppression Gay People Worldwide are a force to be reckoned with and all you can do is snivel about it. Do you honestly think that the few hater mouth-pieces on this site represent the whole of non-Gay Americans? Your hate is shriveling up with you and your ilk. Your response in proof of how arrogant and entitled you and your ilk are; accept the fact that youíre powerless and impotent, and too lazy and stupid to have any importance or effect on the rights of Gay Americans. So, consider yourself slapped in the face and heartfelt f..k you, to you. ROFLMFGAO!!!!!

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#198878 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>I'm curious.
No you aren't, you are simply trying to agitate more. It's called sowing discord, that's what you like to do. You demonstrate it daily.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Since the SCOTUS ruling equating ss couples with marriage,
The SCOTUS ruling didn't equate ss couples with marriage. The SCOTUS ruling didn't state anything all about couples, it only dealt with marriage.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
does that mean duplicate gendered couples will change to diverse gendered couples, or the other way around?
The precipice for your "curiosity" wasn't a truth since SCOTUS didn't equate ss couples with marriage, thus your question is ridiculous. Like most of your statements and posts.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Will ss couples start mutually bearing children?
Will ss couples be mandated to mutually bear children?
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I can't wait to see the change!
Damn you are stupid.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, and when will a gay anus turn into a vagina?
Damn you are stupid.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#198879 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets take them one by one.
Which culture has allowed ss couples being married from start to finish?
Let's try a more important question. What difference will the answer to your question make?

Here, let me help you out. NONE.

Have a nice day!!
Ronald

Long Beach, CA

#198880 Jun 29, 2013
As Rose No_Ho would put it:

But the little puppies are always saying, What about we PEOPLE lovers? Will we grow up carrying the stigma of Big Government not permitting us to marry the man we love and respect?

Ronald

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 5 hr ForkBelly 7,962
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 11 hr Flaggstaff 5,083
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 16 hr Eric 69,427
Suri Cruise's dog is missing in Los Angeles Sun fancy 3
CA Jury reaches verdict in Oakland BART shooting t... (Jul '10) Sun theos 2,276
Dennis W (Veeser) from Krakow Wi. Sep 19 Mia 1
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) Sep 18 Pizza 16,000
•••
•••
•••

Monterey Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Monterey News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Monterey
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••