Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201810 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Zoro

Cambridge, IL

#198872 Jun 29, 2013
Bowser wrote:
<quoted text>
That is exactly his problem. His opinion has been over-ruled by the Supreme Court and he continues to cling desperately to his opinions, trying to fabricate some "fact". And, being the fool he is, he doesn't even realize that not all gay people even engage in anal sex! So he has failed once again to make a valid point.
I have asked many times,yet he fails to answer.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#198873 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
What works???
Mating behavior sure doesn't.
This has already been disproven. Repeatedly.

You sure are hung up on other people's mating habits. It's rather creepy. One can only imagine you have a booth at your church every Sunday asking all the congregants about their mating habits, as if it were your business!! Obsession over other people's mating habits is perverted. You should speak to a counselor about that.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Anal sex is still inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.
Then don't engage in it if you feel this way. Meanwhile, a third of straight people on this planet, and many gay men on this planet, will continue to engage in it. Not a damn thing you can do about it. Know why? It's none of your f*cking business.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You still have only the duplicate HALF of marriage.
Nope. It's still a completed union. Your inability to accept that FACT is completely irrelevant. Not a damn thing you can do other than choke on it!! Smile!!
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The kids STILL will choose mom and dad.
Kids don't choose their parents idiot.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Stamp your feet and repeat all you want, your relationship isn't marriage.
The only one stamping their feet here dear, is you!! The only one repeating things ad nausea dear, is you!!!! As always, don't let facts hold you back!! You keep clinging to your half baked notions and your imaginary mating constraints!!!!

Carry on plebe!
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

#198874 Jun 29, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
My normal responses trump your abnormal responses.
Anyone (you) who tries to argue that prop 8 didn't discriminate against polygamy too is a moron.
Lets see, in Cali, its legal for two people of the same sex to marry. Now can you say the same thing for polygamy? HUH and I am the moron. Well skippy I don't think so.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#198875 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I simply point out obvious fundamental differences between ss couples and marriage.
There are two fundamental differences. Period. 1) The gender make up of the participants is different. 2) Unassisted procreation between the participants will not naturally occur.

That's it. Those are the fundamental differences. Neither of those differences alters the institution of marriage or is validity.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
There is nothing hateful about stating facts.
It is hateful when the intent of stating the facts is to try and demean. That's what you do. And yes dear, it is intended to be hateful. Using the word truth as a pretend shield when you actively seek to sow discord doesn't work. Your god hates your actions. We on the other hand just accept them as further demonstration of how ridiculously stupid you are! Smile!
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

#198876 Jun 29, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Gets you hot eh, Jiz? YUK!YUK!YUK! Find your own porn perv. Google it.
God issued a recal on you, he gave you a train, and not a brain. He is sorry.

Since: Jan 10

Westerville, OH

#198877 Jun 29, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd think the victory for equality would be "more than anything" what you liked, it is very telling that you'd like to rub detractors faces in it more than the victory itself.
You have just insisted on a tremendous social change and gotten it. Some people are wary of the change. Go easy on them. They are your fellow citizens, they'll come around, and sooner without you taunting and attempting to marginalize them. That just naturally makes them dig in and resist.
A great victory has just been won, have some class and be gracious about it.
When are you going to get it through your thick head, Gay Americans donít give a s..t how you feel? After centuries of oppression Gay People Worldwide are a force to be reckoned with and all you can do is snivel about it. Do you honestly think that the few hater mouth-pieces on this site represent the whole of non-Gay Americans? Your hate is shriveling up with you and your ilk. Your response in proof of how arrogant and entitled you and your ilk are; accept the fact that youíre powerless and impotent, and too lazy and stupid to have any importance or effect on the rights of Gay Americans. So, consider yourself slapped in the face and heartfelt f..k you, to you. ROFLMFGAO!!!!!

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#198878 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>I'm curious.
No you aren't, you are simply trying to agitate more. It's called sowing discord, that's what you like to do. You demonstrate it daily.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Since the SCOTUS ruling equating ss couples with marriage,
The SCOTUS ruling didn't equate ss couples with marriage. The SCOTUS ruling didn't state anything all about couples, it only dealt with marriage.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
does that mean duplicate gendered couples will change to diverse gendered couples, or the other way around?
The precipice for your "curiosity" wasn't a truth since SCOTUS didn't equate ss couples with marriage, thus your question is ridiculous. Like most of your statements and posts.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Will ss couples start mutually bearing children?
Will ss couples be mandated to mutually bear children?
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I can't wait to see the change!
Damn you are stupid.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, and when will a gay anus turn into a vagina?
Damn you are stupid.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#198879 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets take them one by one.
Which culture has allowed ss couples being married from start to finish?
Let's try a more important question. What difference will the answer to your question make?

Here, let me help you out. NONE.

Have a nice day!!
Ronald

Long Beach, CA

#198880 Jun 29, 2013
As Rose No_Ho would put it:

But the little puppies are always saying, What about we PEOPLE lovers? Will we grow up carrying the stigma of Big Government not permitting us to marry the man we love and respect?

Ronald
laughing man

Anonymous Proxy

#198881 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>God issued a recal on you, he gave you a train, and not a brain. He is sorry.
No cartoons on Saturday, so this is the best that GLAAD could recruit.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198882 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Lets see, in Cali, its legal for two people of the same sex to marry. Now can you say the same thing for polygamy? HUH and I am the moron. Well skippy I don't think so.
Jizzy, you keep insisting that prop 8 didn't discriminate against polygamy and you are still WRONG. It did. If it didn't, prove it.
Do you think if you try to tell me a few hundred more times reality will change for you?.

Prop 8 banned polygamy as surely as it banned SSM. Sure, there are still laws against it but that's not the point. The point is prop 8 discriminated against polygamy too yet you insist it didn't. Why?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198883 Jun 29, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
When are you going to get it through your thick head, Gay Americans donít give a s..t how you feel? After centuries of oppression Gay People Worldwide are a force to be reckoned with and all you can do is snivel about it. Do you honestly think that the few hater mouth-pieces on this site represent the whole of non-Gay Americans? Your hate is shriveling up with you and your ilk. Your response in proof of how arrogant and entitled you and your ilk are; accept the fact that youíre powerless and impotent, and too lazy and stupid to have any importance or effect on the rights of Gay Americans. So, consider yourself slapped in the face and heartfelt f..k you, to you. ROFLMFGAO!!!!!
Well, I gave a sh!t how you felt and supported same sex marriage. If it was just for you I wouldn't have, but I know many gay people and they are generally wonderful people. I did it for them.

You are being very stupid to believe I am against marriage equality. The fact is I support it and you don't. You are a hypocrite
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198884 Jun 29, 2013
laughing man wrote:
<quoted text>
No cartoons on Saturday, so this is the best that GLAAD could recruit.
LMAO! Yep. Jizzy is fun.
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

#198886 Jun 29, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, I gave a sh!t how you felt and supported same sex marriage. If it was just for you I wouldn't have, but I know many gay people and they are generally wonderful people. I did it for them.
You are being very stupid to believe I am against marriage equality. The fact is I support it and you don't. You are a hypocrite
You did what for Gay people? Belittle them, nice job.
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

#198887 Jun 29, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Jizzy, you keep insisting that prop 8 didn't discriminate against polygamy and you are still WRONG. It did. If it didn't, prove it.
Do you think if you try to tell me a few hundred more times reality will change for you?.
Prop 8 banned polygamy as surely as it banned SSM. Sure, there are still laws against it but that's not the point. The point is prop 8 discriminated against polygamy too yet you insist it didn't. Why?
No in each 50 states there are but one. If Prop 8 was tied to polygamy, why didn't SCOTUS address it?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#198888 Jun 29, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
The state of Connecticut, and now the federal government, says I'm married. They have more say in the matter then you do. To say I'm not married is a lie. Your god hates people that lie.
Smile, and enjoy your trip to hell!
Did the state of Connecticut declare you, and your partner, "husband and wife"?
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

#198890 Jun 29, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Did the state of Connecticut declare you, and your partner, "husband and wife"?
Does it matter husband and husband, wife and wife? He is still married, under state law. Next up , Pietro screams its not right gay people cant reproduce.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198891 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>No in each 50 states there are but one. If Prop 8 was tied to polygamy, why didn't SCOTUS address it?
Used to be two in CA. But now there is only the old one since prop 8 was struck down. That's progress towards true marriage equality. That you would spin it otherwise speaks volumes. Why are you a hypocrite?

What harm would a marriage of three women cause you? If polygamy were legal it would still be so rare you would probably never have to be offended by the sight of a happy poly family.

Marriage. there is no one right way.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198892 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Does it matter husband and husband, wife and wife? He is still married, under state law. Next up , Pietro screams its not right gay people cant reproduce.
Yes it matters to you, or else why would you not accept civil unions?

If SSM is the right thing to do, so is polygamy and incest marriage. If SSM is not the right thing to do neither is poly or incest marriage.

I support marriage equality and you don't. Spin that.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198893 Jun 29, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>God issued a recal on you, he gave you a train, and not a brain. He is sorry.
Dopey ad hominem due to lack of an argument. Make it funny at least Jizxy you dope.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
public officials violating federal laws 18 hr Un agenda 21 and ... 3
the music thread (Apr '12) Sat Musikologist 19
News Ask the Auto Doctor (Mar '06) Sat ikestubbs 1,535
News Letters: Charter application superior (Jan '11) May 21 Yin Simons 13
News Taking extraordinary measures to wear an extrao... May 18 outtogether 2
News Police: Armed robbery at Santa Cruz sandwich sh... May 11 bump 1
News Business on hold for P.G. pot club (Mar '10) May 9 Mike 8
More from around the web

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]