Marriage is defined as a union and an institution. The gender of the participants don't alter that. The union has still taken place. There is no half union dear. You really should learn how the English language works.<quoted text>
You noted, as I do, that ss couples are a duplicated gendered half of marriage.
Wow, there's a pointless statement. Historical prevalence is not an argument. If it were, women would still be property. It's 2013 plebe, do try and keep up.<quoted text>
Interracial marriage has been prevalent across human history with brief points of conflict.
Completely irrelevant. You seem to be hung up on acceptance. Your acceptance and the acceptance of other bitches like you is irrelevant!<quoted text>
Ss couples being called married has never been accepted across the history of a single culture.
More lies from KiMare. Your god despises your behavior. The "essence of mating behavior" is irrelevant. There are no mating prerequisites as related to the institution of marriage. And gays can mate just fine. That's already been proven. Your not accepting the true definitions of mating is irrelevant.<quoted text>
Moreover, race differences don't affect the essence of mating behavior. SS couples are a defective failure of mating behavior.
Hmmmm. What's another term for using mockery? Oh, I know....sowing discord.<quoted text>
I admitted no such thing. I simply quoted the SCOTUS assertion, and mocked it.
Enjoy hell! It's where all the other hypocritical fundamentalists Christians will be plebe!