Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201854 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Big D

Saint Louis, MO

#198560 Jun 28, 2013
Rosa_Winkel wrote:
<quoted text>
Sour grapes, hey.
Yes. We never did a better thing than to keep his kind away from our children, banned from our schools

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#198561 Jun 28, 2013
KiMare wrote: What hasn't changed? Ss couples are still only ever a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage. Clearly not the same.
Rosa_Winkel wrote:
<quoted text>
Sour grapes, hey.
Not at all honey,
just keeping things real.

Smile.
Big D

San Jose, CA

#198563 Jun 28, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote: What hasn't changed? Ss couples are still only ever a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage. Clearly not the same.
<quoted text>
Not at all honey,
just keeping things real.
Smile.
Well your kind will never gain "true acceptance" until you try peddling something other than hate. That is why you are not allowed around children in our schools.

That is real

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#198564 Jun 28, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote: What hasn't changed? Ss couples are still only ever a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage. Clearly not the same.
<quoted text>
Not at all honey,
just keeping things real.
Smile.
This is all you have left? Why bother?

I understand it's a method of "self comforting" for you to repeat these silly things, but it seems pointless to the rest of us.

I suggest learning to deal with reality. You will have a happier and healthier life.

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#198565 Jun 28, 2013
KiMare wrote:
What hasn't changed?
Ss couples are still only ever a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage.
Clearly not the same.
See, endless repetition of something illogical. Perhaps you might choose to seek help for this. You certainly don't seem happy.

And I can tell you that no married couple, gay or straight, is going to worry one bit about your demands that they create children for your comfort and happiness.

That's usually a personal thing, and not required by marriage law.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#198566 Jun 28, 2013
KiMare wrote:
What hasn't changed?
Ss couples are still only ever a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage.
Clearly not the same.
In those states and countries where same-gender couples can marry, their marriages are EXACTLY the same as everyone else's.

So your definitions--"marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary behavior" and "same-sex couples are still only a mutually sterile pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage"--they simply don't apply.

I'm sure that galls you to no end. Either get on board or step aside.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#198567 Jun 28, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
Still basking in yesterday's decision...
It has empowered millions of people around the country and around the world.
Whether you like the decision or not, you have to admit, it's going to go down in the history books.
So will marriage perhaps....

“It's time. . .”

Since: Jun 13

Terra Australis

#198568 Jun 28, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Well your kind will never gain "true acceptance" until you try peddling something other than hate. That is why you are not allowed around children in our schools.
That is real
Very good.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#198569 Jun 28, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
In those states and countries where same-gender couples can marry, their marriages are EXACTLY the same as everyone else's.
Sooooooo.....they're all comprised of husband and wife....all consumate their marriages through the first act of coitus....? Serious Big Red, for a man who claims to be a social worker....
So your definitions--"marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary behavior" and "same-sex couples are still only a mutually sterile pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage"--they simply don't apply.
Ahhhhh laddie....someone spiked the rainbow punch again.
I'm sure that galls you to no end. Either get on board or step aside.
On board what? The delegalization of marriage? Or how about the continued downward marriage rates both in the West, and world wide?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#198570 Jun 28, 2013
Bowser wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, yes, and yes. Just like you can :)
True, gays can marry, enter into a legally recognized union of husband and wife, anywhere in these United States of America, and it is valid in any state. The can also divorce the same as can anyone else.
Bruno

Westminster, CA

#198571 Jun 28, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
Still basking in yesterday's decision...
It has empowered millions of people around the country and around the world.
Whether you like the decision or not, you have to admit, it's going to go down in the history books.
Is this just another piece of HISTORY that will be tought in the public schools, being Gay 101 class?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#198572 Jun 28, 2013
Girls, it is clear the unchangeable reality simply being susictly spoken deeply troubles you. That is the bitter truth of denial. Deep down you know everyone knows the fallacy of your pretended identity.

Especially children.

“It's time. . .”

Since: Jun 13

Terra Australis

#198574 Jun 28, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Girls, it is clear the unchangeable reality simply being susictly spoken deeply troubles you. That is the bitter truth of denial. Deep down you know everyone knows the fallacy of your pretended identity.
Especially children.
Putting it SUCCINCTLY, you still don't know what reality is.
laughing man

UK

#198576 Jun 28, 2013
Rosa_Despondent_Five_to_Four wrote:
<quoted text>
Putting it SUCCINCTLY, you still don't know what reality is.
Please, please, by all means, would one of you fundamentalist polyp busters show us the true joys of Der SphincterŽ?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198577 Jun 28, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. We never did a better thing than to keep his kind away from our children, banned from our schools
That's what the bigots say about homosexuals. Is that how you learned it?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198578 Jun 28, 2013
Rosa_Winkel wrote:
<quoted text>
Putting it SUCCINCTLY, you still don't know what reality is.
WOW! You can spell SUCCINCTLY! We're real proud of you fruitloops! Real proud.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198579 Jun 28, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
...Ahhhhh laddie....someone spiked the rainbow punch again.
Love it!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198580 Jun 28, 2013
Rosa_Winkel wrote:
<quoted text>
Very good.
No it's not. Whenever someone says "your kind" it's not good.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#198581 Jun 28, 2013
Rock Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Idiocy 101: Demonize thy opponent, in an attempt to make them seem insignificant. Call nbames like "Racist", even thoug it is not pertinent. Names like "Fascist", also irrelevant. Well-worn, by your side, but irrelevant. Names like "Socialist", similarly mis-used. You're a fine one to mention beating a routine to death. All you little girls want is for the rest of us to accept your fraudlent claims to benefits thet were designed to help natural families, not any old pairing off of people, which is nothing more than a business arrangement. So, please dear, stop accusing old Frank of anything, as you have little room to point your finger, M'kay?
Um, dingleberry, when you can find any post of mine where I've employed the terms "racist" or "fascist" or "socialist" do get back to me. Until then, I'll dismiss your post as another example of the baseless stereotyping that your kind seems to rely on so much. M'kay?

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#198582 Jun 28, 2013
KiMare wrote:
What hasn't changed?
Ss couples are still only ever a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage.
Clearly not the same.
Would you like some cheese with your whine dear?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Jul 22 dGo mneDad lyHo i... 71,943
News Del Rey Oaks Garden Center grand opening schedu... Jul 21 Kathi Buckley Smith 1
drugs Jul 16 JayJay 2
News Sex offender Tom Pollacci pleads not guilty to ... (Mar '09) Jul 15 martin5 360
City of seaside needs to replace more than PD T... Jul 10 fed up 1
Monterey Seafood Restaurant Celebrates its 26 Y... Jul 6 cafefina58 1
News Carmel waste broker accused of bribery (Dec '08) Jun 30 ChaCha 17
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Monterey Mortgages