Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201864 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#198379 Jun 27, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The Supreme Court decision is based on the assertion that imposing an imposter relationship on marriage will rectify the self-esteem of homosexuals, and telling a child that duplicate genders are exactly the same as mom and dad.
The Supreme Court decision had nothing to do with the self-esteem of gays. Nor did it have anything to do with telling children things. You really should study up on how law is practiced. It's obvious from your posts you're currently clueless.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The context of this verse is no accident. Romans 1:22 (NJB)
While they claimed to be wise, in fact they were growing so stupid.
F*CK your stupid bible. It's irrelevant, just like you.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198380 Jun 27, 2013
Rose Feratu wrote:
<quoted text>
aw.......... here's a tissue.
If you don't wish to be ridiculed, stick to the topic.
I am on topic. You aren't. When all you can respond with is ridicule, you're losing.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198381 Jun 27, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
We aren't required to spin it pussy. It's been made very clear to you that it isn't an issue of interest. That does not imply or convey approval or disapproval of any type. The majority of people in this sting have made it quite clear to you. We aren't interested in a discussion about polygamy.
But, because you're a complete asshat, you continue to pretend that our lack of interest means more than it does. Because you got nothing else, and quite frankly, because it appears that stirring the kettle in Topix appears to be your only source of interaction with other human beings.
You have stated your point. You believe polygamy deserves respect. Great for you. We have stated our point - we aren't here to discuss polygamy. If we wanted to discuss polygamy, we would find a string and other Topix members that were intentionally seeking to discuss this issue. What we wouldn't do is hijack an existing string about one thing (same-sex marriage) in order to steer it to be about something else (polygamy). That would be rude.
My point is that you are a hypocrite and yes, I have made it.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#198382 Jun 27, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Under the dumbed down legal definition of marriage just issued, any number of people will be able to marry. To limit the number will be discrimination.
Moreover, according to the dissenting opinion, consenting adults, directly related (parent/child or siblings) will be able to marry.
That is simply a start.
Still making arguments based on other people's losing arguments!!! Wow. Nothing demonstrates your idiocy better than that!!

Married gay people are now recognized federally. DOMA is unconstitutional.

Smile.
Slingers

Monrovia, CA

#198383 Jun 27, 2013
I have the "Eureka" answer to California and any other states prison's over population and increased costs associated with that.

Transfer them to Texas, especially the "death row" inmates.

Texas marked a solemn moment in criminal justice Wednesday evening, executing its 500th inmate since it resumed carrying out capital punishment in 1982.

Problem solved, I should be a politician or a CPA or financial wizard.

But wait; who will lose out?

Guards and over time pay.
Construction companies building prisons.
Food service companies providing services.
Uniform companies.
Laundry service companies.
Shoe companies.
Electricity providers.
Water company providers.
Gasoline companies
Auto manufacturing companies
Repair companies.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198384 Jun 27, 2013
Prop 8 discriminated against polygamy as sure as it discriminated against same sex marriage.

To claim it is off topic here is ridiculous. And there's no reason to complain it is off topic, except and attempt to reveal your hypocrisy.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198385 Jun 27, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
F*CK your stupid bible. It's irrelevant, just like you.
Oh, you're not angry or off topic. Too funny!

P.S. Great argument!
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#198386 Jun 27, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Marriage has nothing to do with polygamy? Please tell that to a high school graduate. Do you know what "gamy" means dummy? It means marriage. So poly marriage has nothing to do with marriage? Oh boy.
No, The reason you complain so loudly and get so upset at the mere mention of polygamy is you know you are a hypocrite and your mentally ill mind blames it on me. But it's on you. Be mad at yourself, not me.
Don't shoot the messenger.
Where do you see polygamy in the article being discussed? Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

You are one hot mess, shit-for-brains.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198387 Jun 27, 2013
Broseph wrote:
<quoted text>
California is now going back with gay marriage again. You mad?
No I'm happy! I support equality. And it's one step closer to equality, but it's not done yet. There are still many good people being denied marriage. Think of them. They are just like you. But with less rights.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198388 Jun 27, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Pietro,
There are 15 countries that allow gays to marry. Some of them for over 10 years now. Please present the room with information on which of those 15 countries now accepts multiple marriages. Thanks. When you do that, we will engage in further conversation.
Oh, and just fyi, you might want to look up the meaning of the word "obviously". It's apparent from your post you currently don't know how to employ it correctly.
Here's another idea. Since you and Rizzo seem to have such a passion for the concept of multiple marriages, why don't you create a thread of your own. Find some like minded individuals, and individuals that strongly disagree, and have at it! But speaking for most of the gay folk and gay supporters in this string, most of us don't give a flying fig. Nor are we required to. If you or Rizzo would like to paint that as selfishness, knock yourself out. But calling is selfishness doesn't alter our complete disinterest in the topic.
Have a good day.
Nearly 50 (FIFTY) countries allow polygamy. Most for hundreds if not thousands of years.
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#198390 Jun 27, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
Prop 8 discriminated against polygamy as sure as it discriminated against same sex marriage.
To claim it is off topic here is ridiculous. And there's no reason to complain it is off topic, except and attempt to reveal your hypocrisy.
Prop 8 had no effect on polygamy. Prop 8 did not ban polygamy. The judge did not rule on polygamy. SCOTUS did not rule on polygamy.

Did you see all the reports on polygamists lining up to marry in California? Me neither.
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#198391 Jun 27, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
No I'm happy! I support equality. And it's one step closer to equality, but it's not done yet. There are still many good people being denied marriage. Think of them. They are just like you. But with less rights.
ahhaahahah
ahhahahahaha
ahahahahhaha

I bet you're confused by the menu at KFC.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198392 Jun 27, 2013
Rose Feratu wrote:
<quoted text>
Where do you see polygamy in the article being discussed? Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage
You are one hot mess, shit-for-brains.
Read what he overturned dummy. "In California, marriage is a man and a woman" Does that ban just SSM or does it ban SSM AND polygamy?
Think hard. Sound it out. Ask for help.
Truth 1

Norwalk, CA

#198393 Jun 27, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
No I'm happy! I support equality. And it's one step closer to equality, but it's not done yet. There are still many good people being denied marriage. Think of them. They are just like you. But with less rights.
Hello frank it is the black momma again you must go on the US 25 most dangerous cities I need some back up
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198394 Jun 27, 2013
Rose Feratu wrote:
<quoted text>
Prop 8 had no effect on polygamy. Prop 8 did not ban polygamy. The judge did not rule on polygamy. SCOTUS did not rule on polygamy.
Did you see all the reports on polygamists lining up to marry in California? Me neither.
If the other law against polygamy were repealed but prop 8 wasn't repealed would polygamy be legal Miss Thing?

No? Why not?- Because prop 8 banned it. Duh.

Don't hog all the victimhood. Why do you hate polygamists?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198395 Jun 27, 2013
Rose Feratu wrote:
<quoted text>
Prop 8 had no effect on polygamy. Prop 8 did not ban polygamy. The judge did not rule on polygamy. SCOTUS did not rule on polygamy.
Did you see all the reports on polygamists lining up to marry in California? Me neither.
Prop 8 most certainly did ban polygamy.

Just because there are just a few people being denied marriage is that OK? What is your magic number of people being denied marriage before you decide they are worthy?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198396 Jun 27, 2013
Rose Feratu wrote:
<quoted text>
ahhaahahah
ahhahahahaha
ahahahahhaha
I bet you're confused by the menu at KFC.
More ad hominem drivel from the peanut gallery.

But you know I like that insane cackle! Creepy.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#198397 Jun 27, 2013
Truth 1 wrote:
<quoted text>Hello frank it is the black momma again you must go on the US 25 most dangerous cities I need some back up
I'll check it out. But I'm under a deluge of dunces here! Let me calm down these clowns first.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#198398 Jun 27, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
I see. So to you, mating is a medical procedure. Got it. Why am I surprised.
Oh, and hon, yes, your definitions were taken from medical dictionaries, but you intentionally left out all the accompanying definitions that didn't support your lies. You have no integrity whatsoever. You are dishonest and conniving. That is why no one takes you seriously.
Dishonest and conniving are simply different ways of describing "sowing of discord". Something you love to do despite the fact that your Sky Santa has informed you that he despises that type of behavior.
Typical fundie hypocrite.
<quoted text>
LIE. You pretended that a word had only one definition when in fact it had several applicable definitions. Your Sky Santa hates liars KiMare. I hope you are ready to rot in hell.
<quoted text>
I posted NOTHING out of context plebe. And while your definition may stand, it does NOT stand alone. You tried to make it stand alone because you are a deceptive hypocrite.
<quoted text>
I have a husband, not a partner. And he is my mate, according to the very dictionaries that you presented as credible. Choke on that FACT bitch. You stating that I don't mate means about as much as if you stated the sky is red. The statements of the deceptively insignificant like you have no merit or meaning.
Feel free to present more of your intentional deceptions KiMare. Exposing you for the filthy, lying sack of shyt that you are makes my day!
Lookout, he's going postal!!!
Big D

Saint Louis, MO

#198399 Jun 27, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, I guess the GOP and the Democrats can rely on you guys in your white sheets and hoods to show us all "the way".
Teeter out into the streets and shake your fist at the sky, little man. It continues to make SUCH a difference in the real world.
Actually I expect the GOP to be doing limp twisted backflips to get on the same sex marriage bandwagon now...they cannot allow themselves to be backing yet another minority opinion.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Aug 27 Norbert of Norview 71,944
News SD-area man gets 14 years for abusing wife (Jan '11) Aug 22 dGo mnaDde lyHo i... 5
News Fear mongering in Spreckels will have been in vain Aug 7 I am sorry 1
Monterey Public Officials VIOLATING FEDERAL LAWS Aug 7 Un agenda 21 and ... 6
News Del Rey Oaks Garden Center grand opening schedu... Jul '15 Kathi Buckley Smith 1
drugs Jul '15 JayJay 2
News Sex offender Tom Pollacci pleads not guilty to ... (Mar '09) Jul '15 martin5 360
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Monterey Mortgages