Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments
171,321 - 171,340 of 200,564 Comments Last updated 15 hrs ago
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#196568
Jun 18, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I am cracking up at his comments, did he say we should not use religion to deny rights to others?
Who funded Prop 8 again?
( chuckle )
I didn't fund prop 8.(chuckle).

I support marriage equality and you and Jizzy do not.(chuckle).

Chuckle chuckle!
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#196569
Jun 18, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

5

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
There you go again basing rights on religion. Two words for you Jiz. First Amendment.
Gawwwd are you thick as a brick. I don't care what your religion is, worship as you see fit or don't, it matters not.

We will not change laws based on religion.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#196570
Jun 18, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Ummm lets see,
Religious organizationsThe Roman Catholic Church,[53] as well as a Roman Catholic lay fraternal organization, the Knights of Columbus,[54] firmly supported the measure. The bishops of the California Catholic Conference released a statement supporting the proposition,[55] a position met with mixed reactions among church members, including clergy.[56][57]
Rally for Yes on Prop 8 in FresnoThe Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints[58][59][60](the LDS Church or, informally, the Mormon Church), also publicly supported the proposition. The First Presidency of the church announced its support for Proposition 8 in a letter intended to be read in every congregation in California. In this letter, church members were encouraged to "do all you can to support the proposed constitutional amendment by donating of your means and time."[58] The church produced and broadcast to its congregations a program describing the support of the Proposition, and describing the timeline it proposes for what it describes as grassroots efforts to support the Proposition.[61] Local church leaders set organizational and monetary goals for their membership—sometimes quite specific—to fulfill this call.[62][63] The response of church members to their leadership's appeals to donate money and volunteer time was very supportive,[64] such that Latter-day Saints provided a significant source for financial donations in support of the proposition, both inside and outside the State of California.[65] LDS members contributed over $20 million,[66] about 45% of out-of-state contributions to ProtectMarriage.com came from Utah, over three times more than any other state.[67] ProtectMarriage, the official proponent of Proposition 8, estimates that about half the donations they received came from Mormon sources, and that LDS church members made up somewhere between 80% and 90% of the volunteers for early door-to-door canvassing.[68]
Other religious organizations that supported Proposition 8 include the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America,[69] Eastern Orthodox Church,[70] a group of Evangelical Christians led by Jim Garlow and Miles McPherson,[71] American Family Association, Focus on the Family[72] and the National Organization for Marriage.[73] Rick Warren, pastor of Saddleback Church, also endorsed the measure.[74]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Propo...
So what? How does that justify your attempt to justify the ban on polygamy with religion? You say polygamy shouldn't be allowed because some of it's adherents are religious. Then you attempt to say I am basing my support on religion. I am not. You are the one keeps bringing religion into it.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#196571
Jun 18, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Gawwwd are you thick as a brick. I don't care what your religion is, worship as you see fit or don't, it matters not.
We will not change laws based on religion.
So why do you attempt to justify yourself denying rights based on religion? You wish to deny marriage equality because you don't like the religions that practice poly.

Indeed. Thick as a brick.

If we could possibly get past your obsession with religion, what non religious reasons do you have to deny marriage equality?
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#196572
Jun 18, 2013
 

Judged:

6

5

5

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
As the faded thread hero to you clowns "Rose_NoHo" would say - Even if that were true, it would be a non-issue.
Even if I was really as Jizzy says "that damn stupid", you'd still be wrong. Cool huh?
We don't base who we give rights to on religion. Please explain that to your mentor Jizzy. He wants to deny all polygamists rights because some of them are of a religion he hates. And you back him up.
The laws in each 50 states are the same, polygamy is not allowed. Should we change the to suit religion?

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#196573
Jun 18, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Ro in San Pedro CA wrote:
I think is SUCKS, that what the people want doesnt matter!!!! What ever happen to the VOICE of the people. It was voted on and should stand!!! Shame on you JUDGE
The voice of the people is being monitored by the Great Obama.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#196574
Jun 18, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Who are the people that want polygamy? Please show me, post a link. Evrey time Frankie does, it lists religious sects. They are requesting polygamy based on religious principles.
Frankie said that another 500,000 peole where also requesting polygamy and where not doing it based on religion. He has yet to produce the documentation.
Can you?
It's a best educated estimate from the link I posted. No one knows the true number since you go to prison for polygamy and people keep it secret.

But what does it matter? If even one person is being denied rights is that OK? Since when do we deny rights based on number of people being denied them?

Please post a better answer than "blow me".
Mob Watch

UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#196575
Jun 18, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Ro in San Pedro CA wrote:
I think is SUCKS, that what the people want doesnt matter!!!! What ever happen to the VOICE of the people. It was voted on and should stand!!! Shame on you JUDGE
People overall are breathtakingly stupid, haven't you heard?

Calm down and eat another booger.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#196576
Jun 18, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Who are the people that want polygamy? Please show me, post a link. Evrey time Frankie does, it lists religious sects. They are requesting polygamy based on religious principles.
Frankie said that another 500,000 peole where also requesting polygamy and where not doing it based on religion. He has yet to produce the documentation.
Can you?
I doubt people that want poly will create a link, it would be more of a survey, I doubt they will do any survey's because the SSM movement is just about themselves.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#196577
Jun 18, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>The laws in each 50 states are the same, polygamy is not allowed. Should we change the to suit religion?
No. We should change it because we support marriage equality. Not because of religion. So stop trying to use religion to justify denying people's rights.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#196578
Jun 18, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>The voice of the people is being monitored by the Great Obama.
Despite what the polls say Obama is doing a great job! And Moochelle is so smart about telling us to eat lettuce while she munches on french fries! Woops. I didn't post that. Just a joke ha ha Michelle is very nice too. And Obama is quickly fixing the mess the last president made, woops! Obama was the last president! I mean the mess Bush made.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#196579
Jun 18, 2013
 

Judged:

6

5

5

Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Who are the people that want polygamy? Please show me, post a link. Evrey time Frankie does, it lists religious sects. They are requesting polygamy based on religious principles.
Frankie said that another 500,000 peole where also requesting polygamy and where not doing it based on religion. He has yet to produce the documentation.
Can you?
No he cannot, in case you were wondering
laughing man

UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#196580
Jun 18, 2013
 

Judged:

5

4

4

Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Ummm lets see,
Religious organizationsThe Roman Catholic Church,[53] as well as a Roman Catholic lay fraternal organization, the Knights of Columbus,[54]....
Very GOOD!

(It's best to put your link at the top, to show people up front that what's coming next aren't your words, but you did good).
Spring Thaw

Monrovia, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#196581
Jun 18, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

May you enjoy "Gorky Park" like he other's had.
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#196583
Jun 18, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
YUK!YUK!YUK! Jizzy is such a moron! And Big D backs him up!
Back away from the crack pipe, you don't have the brain cells to spare. Time for you to roll on Flunkie, unplug the Hoveround and hit the sidewalk.
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#196585
Jun 18, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
It's way past time for you to be gone moron. If you were smart you wouldn't have stuck around this long.
But I want you to stay! You're such fun.
Back away from the crack pipe, you don't have the brain cells to spare. Time for you to roll on Flunkie, unplug the Hoveround and hit the sidewalk.
sheesh

Airville, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#196586
Jun 18, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>The voice of the people is being monitored by the Great Obama.
With D*ck Cheney's approval.

Yup, D*ck won't get through the sweary filter in here.
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#196590
Jun 18, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You said that already. It was stupid the first time. I didn't follow your orders the first time. What makes you think I will the second time?
"Jizzying": Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
So Frank do you think it was right of the voters in Cali. to out law same sex marriage, after the right had been granted to gays and lesbians? Personaly I think the Judge was correct in overturning the ban based on the US Constitution. I am sure that SCOTUS will back up the Judge and reinstate same sex marriage in California. What about you?
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#196591
Jun 18, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Ummm lets see,
Religious organizationsThe Roman Catholic Church,[53] as well as a Roman Catholic lay fraternal organization, the Knights of Columbus,[54] firmly supported the measure. The bishops of the California Catholic Conference released a statement supporting the proposition,[55] a position met with mixed reactions among church members, including clergy.[56][57]
Rally for Yes on Prop 8 in FresnoThe Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints[58][59][60](the LDS Church or, informally, the Mormon Church), also publicly supported the proposition. The First Presidency of the church announced its support for Proposition 8 in a letter intended to be read in every congregation in California. In this letter, church members were encouraged to "do all you can to support the proposed constitutional amendment by donating of your means and time."[58] The church produced and broadcast to its congregations a program describing the support of the Proposition, and describing the timeline it proposes for what it describes as grassroots efforts to support the Proposition.[61] Local church leaders set organizational and monetary goals for their membership—sometimes quite specific—to fulfill this call.[62][63] The response of church members to their leadership's appeals to donate money and volunteer time was very supportive,[64] such that Latter-day Saints provided a significant source for financial donations in support of the proposition, both inside and outside the State of California.[65] LDS members contributed over $20 million,[66] about 45% of out-of-state contributions to ProtectMarriage.com came from Utah, over three times more than any other state.[67] ProtectMarriage, the official proponent of Proposition 8, estimates that about half the donations they received came from Mormon sources, and that LDS church members made up somewhere between 80% and 90% of the volunteers for early door-to-door canvassing.[68]
Other religious organizations that supported Proposition 8 include the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America,[69] Eastern Orthodox Church,[70] a group of Evangelical Christians led by Jim Garlow and Miles McPherson,[71] American Family Association, Focus on the Family[72] and the National Organization for Marriage.[73] Rick Warren, pastor of Saddleback Church, also endorsed the measure.[74]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Propo...
LOL the question was rhetorical, I am aware where the funding came from, it is the first thing I look at when considering a proposition.

For example, a few years ago there was a "Save the Horses" proposition in California, which prohibited horses raised in California for the purposes of human consumption.

Sounds like a nice Tree Hugger and PETA friendly proposition right..... NO!!!... when you looked at who was funding the proposition, it was ranchers in Arizona raising horses for human consumption that didn’t want any competition from California.

Remember all the Anti-Casino advertisements in California... you know where that funding came from right? Oh Yeah... Nevada Casinos

Always look at who is funding a proposition if you want to get to the root of what exactly is behind it.

I voted against the save the horses proposition, and voted for allowing casinos in California.
com

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#196592
Jun 18, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>You're right, it won't. Just tried it. How silly is that?
Frankie whats the biggest cock you've taken in the butt??

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 13 min JOEL 68,922
My fears for Doris Day: Confidante who spent 40... (Oct '13) 1 hr marti eton square 4
clint 20 hr ubietron 1
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 22 hr Donny B 7,922
Mills brothers face new lawsuits over loans (Nov '08) Tue Plain Simple 16
clint Tue ubietron 1
MONTEREY HERALD LOSS monterey bay, monterey cit... Tue roensoledad 2
•••
•••
Monterey Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Monterey Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Monterey News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Monterey
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••