Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (Page 8,291)

Showing posts 165,801 - 165,820 of200,315
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
FRizzohasntslept for10days

Sacramento, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#189905
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Wtf is Rizzo? He must be in a straitjack on suicide watch again, there's no other explanation, since we all know he doesn't sleep. O wait maybe he's making more crank...my fault.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#189906
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

FRizzohasntsleptfor10days wrote:
<quoted text>
Do u post in your sleep? I noticed the other day u had atleast 1 post an hour for about 2 days straight. Proof u r a gay marriage obsessed speed freak.
See u in about 45 seconds.
Sincerely,
Frankie Rizzo hasn't slept for 10 days and counting.
Can anyone imagine what kind of jackass loser would count and time some other jackass's posts and think that's real slick and witty?

C'mon dummy, get some schtick.
FRizzohasntslept for10days

Sacramento, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#189907
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Can anyone imagine what kind of jackass loser would count and time some other jackass's posts and think that's real slick and witty?
C'mon dummy, get some schtick.
There u r I was getting worried something happened to u. Guess it doesn't take very long to cook up a batch these days does it?

But anyways what's up bro how's your day going?
FRizzohasntslept for10days

Sacramento, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#189908
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Can anyone imagine what kind of jackass loser would count and time some other jackass's posts and think that's real slick and witty?
C'mon dummy, get some schtick.
Well in all fairness, I was almost dead on.

See u in about 1 minute, 12 seconds.

Come on Rizzo, make me a winner!!

Since: Jan 10

Lewis Center, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#189909
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
Marram and Jizzy have been spotted buying backpacks, pressure cookers and a batteries at Walmart.
Why would you say such a thing? Itís not the least bit funny.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#189910
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

10

Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would you say such a thing? Itís not the least bit funny.
I know.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#189911
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
Those are all great reasons, but, you forgot the most important one. Gay Marriage should be legal because we deserve equal rights and weíre Americans.
Why do u continue to argue for a right which you already possess, but do not wish to exercise it like any other American?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#189913
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

10

.~

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#189915
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>You silly twit, the law is a mockery when it denies reality.
I do hope you're not trying to impose your reality on anyone. As it is you're dishonest about your identity, so the rest of your blathering is suspect.
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It is not my 'opinion' that ss couples will only ever be a duplicated sterile half of marriage.
Oh really? Then why do you keep repeating this opinion?
Frankie Rizzo

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#189916
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

The first time I did it, the guy told me to pretend its candy. He gave me five dollars afterwards as I wiped my mouth on my sleeve.
SOft Racing

El Monte, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#189917
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Where the Hottei ?
An observer

Mountain View, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#189918
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Huge misguding and propaganda goes around.

Marriage institute is not a personal preference and it is not about the rights or love.
It is a privilege establish by the society to the women, let her comfortable to have a child and be financially protected if man decide to live her after having sex with her.
If the married couple have love and live together they don't need a goverment to secure that living.

That institution made to share responsibility for the result of sex relationship which could end up with birth of child.
In many cultures marriage without children is annulled or could be annulled by that reason. Christian based culture more generos and not making the birth a contegency on the protection guaranties to the women.

If people want to have a protection on contract they need to write one and enforce it under regular law regardless to the fact that they have sexull intercourse or not.

But the real motive is a goverment benefits to the marriage institute.
The vote result shows that general public has no interest in sponsoring tax breaks for inheritance of individual who could not produce children. That tax break was design to protect children and women who could earn money because she was carring children.

Why are friends passing property to each other must be treated differently if they are f... or not? We all love friends, parents, siblings , children without sexual relationship and we want them the same privileges in the tax as well unfortunately we can't afford it now.(or may be we should vote on it?)

You see the question do we want to give tax brakes to rich homosectual or not, is the question for the majority and have nothing to do with human rights.
Unfortunaly the have huge money and good lobby to fix result of people vote.
SOft Racing

El Monte, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#189919
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Again 92832. The S.S. kicks.You Just dont see your BLESSING.I SO, WISH Coud LIVE THERE. I Could, But not Style... BrAmPp...
SOft Racing

El Monte, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#189920
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

9

8

8

Sk8, Worship , Devotions,, Ride moto, DEVOTIONS ....

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#189921
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

An observer wrote:
Huge misguding and propaganda goes around.
Marriage institute is not a personal preference and it is not about the rights or love.
It is a privilege establish by the society to the women, let her comfortable to have a child and be financially protected if man decide to live her after having sex with her.
If the married couple have love and live together they don't need a goverment to secure that living.
That institution made to share responsibility for the result of sex relationship which could end up with birth of child.
In many cultures marriage without children is annulled or could be annulled by that reason. Christian based culture more generos and not making the birth a contegency on the protection guaranties to the women.
If people want to have a protection on contract they need to write one and enforce it under regular law regardless to the fact that they have sexull intercourse or not.
But the real motive is a goverment benefits to the marriage institute.
The vote result shows that general public has no interest in sponsoring tax breaks for inheritance of individual who could not produce children. That tax break was design to protect children and women who could earn money because she was carring children.
Why are friends passing property to each other must be treated differently if they are f... or not? We all love friends, parents, siblings , children without sexual relationship and we want them the same privileges in the tax as well unfortunately we can't afford it now.(or may be we should vote on it?)
You see the question do we want to give tax brakes to rich homosectual or not, is the question for the majority and have nothing to do with human rights.
Unfortunaly the have huge money and good lobby to fix result of people vote.
Newsflash!

We live in US of A, procreation isn't a requirement for marriage. Ergo the rest of your comment regarding financial benefits for women with children is a bit irrelevant in the matter of the question of validating same sex marriage in the US.

The real motive for most couples in the US, apparently, is a pronouncement of love which is recognised in marriage. The legal ramifications of the contract are icing on the cake.
Realtalkdotcom

Sacramento, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#189922
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

An observer wrote:
Huge misguding and propaganda goes around.
Marriage institute is not a personal preference and it is not about the rights or love.
It is a privilege establish by the society to the women, let her comfortable to have a child and be financially protected if man decide to live her after having sex with her.
If the married couple have love and live together they don't need a goverment to secure that living.
That institution made to share responsibility for the result of sex relationship which could end up with birth of child.
In many cultures marriage without children is annulled or could be annulled by that reason. Christian based culture more generos and not making the birth a contegency on the protection guaranties to the women.
If people want to have a protection on contract they need to write one and enforce it under regular law regardless to the fact that they have sexull intercourse or not.
But the real motive is a goverment benefits to the marriage institute.
The vote result shows that general public has no interest in sponsoring tax breaks for inheritance of individual who could not produce children. That tax break was design to protect children and women who could earn money because she was carring children.
Why are friends passing property to each other must be treated differently if they are f... or not? We all love friends, parents, siblings , children without sexual relationship and we want them the same privileges in the tax as well unfortunately we can't afford it now.(or may be we should vote on it?)
You see the question do we want to give tax brakes to rich homosectual or not, is the question for the majority and have nothing to do with human rights.
Unfortunaly the have huge money and good lobby to fix result of people vote.
OMG dude r u f'ing kidding me? U have the spelling and grammar of an 8 yr old. Please tell me u r a foreigner, that is currently enrolled in an English as a second language class.
Fundamentalist

South Africa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#189923
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

7

New revelation!!!

I think the gay hype is the alien invasion the world is talking about.... The whole idea around homosexuality reality is alien even to their DNA....
The transformation the human being must go through to become gay is alien..... They take up all levels of society demanding rights that is ALIEN....
Ya I can see the invasion and yes the Aliens are here....

Well my Alien friends your fight for rights is warping society to an alienated mind-set as never before, it is foreign to the norm that society should be building values on. This alien invasion is positioned in all levels of society influenced from right on top of world influence. Well you can draw in the Bible as a consion, but the fight all across the planet for an alien reasoning is big. Yes, the aliens are calling victim as far as they go....Victims of what? Society not wanting this invasion, I know the weed with the good seed will mature until the weed can be removed, plucked out from the human heart.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#189924
Apr 23, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Fact of the matter is, the dying churches are the liberal 'open and affirming' denominations.
By 'political', you must mean selling their soul to support the desecration of marriage and family
Smile.
fact of the matter is, you're generalizing.

our " open and affirming" congregation is still growing, as are several others that I'm familiar with. our congregation is currently experiencing the highest membership since we were established in the 60's.
Butt, as usual, you know more than everyone else.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#189925
Apr 24, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>You silly twit, the law is a mockery when it denies reality.

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It is not my 'opinion' that ss couples will only ever be a duplicated sterile half of marriage.
void of a brain wrote:
<quoted text>
I do hope you're not trying to impose your reality on anyone. As it is you're dishonest about your identity, so the rest of your blathering is suspect.
<quoted text>
Oh really? Then why do you keep repeating this opinion?
Funny.

-I'm one of the rare ones on here where my identity IS known. But that hardly changes the fact that a law is corrupt when it denies reality.

-Here are the facts I state;

1. Ss couple are duplicates of one gender.

2. Ss couples are mutually incapable of procreation.

Please tell me what part of that is my opinion?

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#189926
Apr 24, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

sheesh void of hate wrote:
<quoted text>
Newsflash!
We live in US of A, procreation isn't a requirement for marriage. Ergo the rest of your comment regarding financial benefits for women with children is a bit irrelevant in the matter of the question of validating same sex marriage in the US.
The real motive for most couples in the US, apparently, is a pronouncement of love which is recognised in marriage. The legal ramifications of the contract are icing on the cake.
So you'd be fine with calling love relationships marriage, and deleting the legal ramifications?

Smile.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 165,801 - 165,820 of200,315
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••

Monterey Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Monterey News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Monterey
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••