Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 20 comments on the Aug 4, 2010, www.cnn.com story titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#186946 Apr 6, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
SS siblings, even if they were sexually intimate, would not conceive. There is no state interest in denying any as sibling pair, if they so chose, a marriage license.
I will add one thing to my response above... If incestuous marriages "might" result from allowing same-gender marriage; why is it that incestuous marriages didn't spring forth from the legalization of heterosexual marriages?
Better than Adam Steve

Justice, IL

#186947 Apr 6, 2013
It's all over. You can't go running to the Supreme Court again.

Frankly, homosexual marriage disgusted them.
Looking Stewed

Covina, CA

#186948 Apr 6, 2013
That suspension, according to documents from the Ascension Parish Sheriff's Office, is a three day suspension that is effective April 5, 2013.

His suspension is for three working days.
Lilith

Seattle, WA

#186949 Apr 6, 2013
Country-Girl22 wrote:
<quoted text>I don't spit tobacco I smoke it:)
Oooh nice... gee sweetie is that marlboro perfume you wear or camel.... Are you one of those skaanks you can smell the smoke trail on for 100 feet as you go by

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#186950 Apr 6, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no such thing as ss couples being married.
Yes there is, you monster.
Can you marry? By your own definition, you can't!
:)
You have tissue of both genders.
KiMare wrote:
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
ss couples are a direct defect contradiction to the primary purpose of evolutionary mating behavior. Literally 'unmarriage'.
You wouldn't know a rational argument if it bit you on the ass. Maybe if you lose the weight?
HO, HO, HO
It's clear from my pic I don't have to lose weight.
Do you think you should have been aborted?
What good are you?
During most of civilization, a monster like you would have just been left to die.
:)

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#186951 Apr 6, 2013
Gay marriage is on the way. There just isn't a rational argument against it.
Anonymous

Waltham, MA

#186952 Apr 6, 2013
Lilith wrote:
<quoted text>Eeeeeeeewwh just as nasty ash tray mouth
You're a nasty ash tray vag.lol. I bet that thing hangs like a wizard's sleeve and it can take a mean hog. You nastay!
Lilith

Seattle, WA

#186953 Apr 6, 2013
Country-Girl22 wrote:
<quoted text>You're a nasty ash tray vag.lol. I bet that thing hangs like a wizard's sleeve and it can take a mean hog. You nastay!
Ya whateveva!!! Least I don't gotta brush cigarette ashes off mine to use it
Foreward

Covina, CA

#186954 Apr 6, 2013
Still looking foreword
Lilith

Seattle, WA

#186955 Apr 6, 2013
Country-Girl22 wrote:
<quoted text>You're a nasty ash tray vag.lol. I bet that thing hangs like a wizard's sleeve and it can take a mean hog. You nastay!
Hey just curious... does kissing your ash tray mouth come with a surgeans generals warning about cancer
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#186956 Apr 6, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes there is, you monster.
Can you marry? By your own definition, you can't!
:)
You have tissue of both genders.
<quoted text>
It's clear from my pic I don't have to lose weight.
Do you think you should have been aborted?
What good are you?
During most of civilization, a monster like you would have just been left to die.
:)
Where's that dopey Marram, I want to point out to him his hero "Rose_NoHo's" latest "intelligent and insightful" post!

A very eloquent one today!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#186957 Apr 6, 2013
Lilith wrote:
<quoted text>Oooh nice... gee sweetie is that marlboro perfume you wear or camel.... Are you one of those skaanks you can smell the smoke trail on for 100 feet as you go by
Tobacco smoke is not as nasty smelling as your last 20 tricks. Take a bath!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#186958 Apr 6, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
Gay marriage is on the way. There just isn't a rational argument against it.
You said that already. Duh.
Lilith

Seattle, WA

#186959 Apr 6, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Tobacco smoke is not as nasty smelling as your last 20 tricks. Take a bath!
Loser I ain't like your wife... i'm an escort and I keep very clean for my clients
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#186960 Apr 6, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Here, again, is an example of "your side" creating arguments against an issue that NO ONE is supporting!
In neither of the two cases discussing same-gender marriages have attorneys argued including same-gender, incestuous marriages.
And has been REPEATEDLY pointed out, not only is incest illegal in this country, but marrying one's family is also illegal.
Why on EARTH would you even bring this issue to the table?
Are you THAT afraid?
Look, I see what you're trying to do... You're trying to show that same-gender marriage will provide a slippery slope (God I hate that term) so that all manner of bizarre marriages will be allowed to take place in the future.
But let me point out that the "slope" began with heterosexual marriage. If marriage had never been invented, then we wouldn't be having this conversation at all.
You need to realize that the courts have ruled that same-gender relationships are protected under the law. THEY ARE NOT ILLEGAL!
Science and medicine have determined that homosexuality IS NOT A DISORDER!
Science, medicine, and the legal system HAVE determined that incest is both illegal and a disorder.
There is NO REASON to believe that allowing same-gender couples to marry will result in incestuous marriages; whether they be gay or straight.
You are using unwarranted fear tactics in an attempt to win an argument. And it's time that you bring the discussion of this ridiculous idea to an end!
Some may be using fear tactics but I am not. I believe in TRUE marriage equality.

When several states have already dismissed the status quo that monogamous heterosexual marriage is the only type allowed, I fail to see the logic in continuing the prohibition against poly marriage.

What harm would a loving poly marriage of three consenting adult women cause anyone?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#186961 Apr 6, 2013
Lilith wrote:
<quoted text>Loser I ain't like your wife... i'm an escort and I keep very clean for my clients
Sure toots.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#186962 Apr 6, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Some may be using fear tactics but I am not. I believe in TRUE marriage equality.
When several states have already dismissed the status quo that monogamous heterosexual marriage is the only type allowed, I fail to see the logic in continuing the prohibition against poly marriage.
What harm would a loving poly marriage of three consenting adult women cause anyone?
Unlike gay marriage, poly marriage isn't an equal rights issue.
Why not find a forum about poly marriage?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#186963 Apr 6, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Unlike gay marriage, poly marriage isn't an equal rights issue.
Why not find a forum about poly marriage?
Is there one? Is it near the "people who should have been aborted" forum? Or the "I hate you" forum?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#186964 Apr 6, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Unlike gay marriage, poly marriage isn't an equal rights issue.
Why not find a forum about poly marriage?
http://www.secularhumanism.org/...
Ronald

Long Beach, CA

#186965 Apr 6, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Unlike gay marriage, poly marriage isn't an equal rights issue.
Why not find a forum about poly marriage?
Rose_NoHo.

Speaking on behalf of my fellow dog lovers, I can say our record speaks for itself. There is no other group of persons advocating the RIGHT of the Africans to "marry" White people as well as the RIGHT of two persons of the same SEX to "marry" one another more so than us. That much is clear. As you are a self-processed expert on these matters, I must ask you how we should respond to those who say that decent folks who engage in Homosexual "marriage" and bestiality are acting against nature?

Ronald

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Apr 19 rabbee yehoshooah... 71,942
where can I find heroin in monterey? (Oct '14) Apr 18 BrocSD 8
News Four suspects still at large in Monterey Penins... Apr 15 M JC 29 1
News Jewish-Christian charity helps Ukrainians move ... Apr 3 Azat 1
News Ask the Auto Doctor (Mar '06) Apr 2 svorpion 1,531
News Homicide suspect Victor Cabrera has long histor... (Oct '08) Mar '15 mando 12
News Carmel waste broker accused of bribery (Dec '08) Mar '15 Gary 16
More from around the web

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]