Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,187

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183975 Mar 20, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Too bad your parents weren't huh?
They were.
They chose to have me.

Too bad the attempt to abort you didn't succeed, and just left you seriously brain damaged.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183976 Mar 20, 2013
Bernard wrote:
Peer reviewed studies have concluded the typical male queer consumes 22.46 lbs of fecal matter on an annual basis.
Peer reviewed studies have concluded Bernard (who also posts under several other aliases) posts 22.46 lbs of fecal matter on a daily basis.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183977 Mar 20, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
I edited out the part of your post that was irrelevant, I damn near had to delete the whole thing!!!
You have no integrity, and no point to make.
LOLSER!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183979 Mar 20, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
They were.
They chose to have me.
Too bad the attempt to abort you didn't succeed, and just left you seriously brain damaged.
Oh Rose, still living on the playground I see.

Do you have anything intelligent to say- EVER?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183980 Mar 20, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You have no integrity, and no point to make.
LOLSER!
I will worry about it when you find some integrity Rose.

BTW, are you still confused as to why I presented quotes from the founders regarding their position on slavery when you asked about their feeling on the overturn of Loving v Virginia and the end of slavery?

Or are you still claiming that you said something about the 14th Amendment in your rant?
FoolsParade

La Puente, CA

#183981 Mar 20, 2013
You can find George Ogden at the city of West Covian as a commissioner and at sgvexaminer.com

Besure to get a look at Sterve Hrfert the racist fool who with Mike Touhey and George Ogden have harrased minorities in West Covian, California.

http://www.westcovina.org/cityhall/council/ma ...

Feb. 05, 2013 during a West Covian city council meetng.

Since: Nov 11

Fukushima

#183982 Mar 20, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you understand how evil this type of thing is? How your blind pursuit of justifying homosexual behavior has darkened and perverted your thinking and spirit in every way?
Do you understand? Heck, I have seen you on other threads trashing gays, advancing your false religion. How much time do you spend here doing that? And then you call others darkened and perverted?

Look in the mirror.

Since: Nov 11

Fukushima

#183983 Mar 20, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
I will worry about it when you find some integrity Rose.
She has a lot more integrity than you do.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#183984 Mar 20, 2013
commonpeeps wrote:
<quoted text>Smells like religious bigotry to me, and cumming from someone who claims to treat prople equally. Slurp!
well said, big d is only here to show us his hate for anyone that believes in a higher power, but then spits his equality rants about others.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183985 Mar 20, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
I will worry about it when you find some integrity Rose.
I have plenty of integrity. Remember, you are the one who edited my post to try to make it seem like I didn't know something.
akpilot wrote:
BTW, are you still confused as to why I presented quotes from the founders regarding their position on slavery when you asked about their feeling on the overturn of Loving v Virginia and the end of slavery?
Again, you lie. I never said anything about their feelings on the end of slavery. It's easy to show how dishonest you are!
akpilot wrote:
Or are you still claiming that you said something about the 14th Amendment in your rant?

Yeah, stupid, when I mention Loving v VA, I'm saying something about the 14th Amendment. Study the case:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/histori...
"This case presents a constitutional question never addressed by this Court: whether a statutory scheme adopted by the State of Virginia to prevent marriages between persons solely on the basis of racial classifications violates the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment."

Grow a pair, admit you made a mistake.
Your continued dishonesty just makes you look...dishonest.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183986 Mar 20, 2013
Tzunammi wrote:
<quoted text>
She has a lot more integrity than you do.
Like Rose, you make meaningless statements with no substantiating evidence to back it up.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#183987 Mar 20, 2013
Tzunammi wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you understand? Heck, I have seen you on other threads trashing gays, advancing your false religion. How much time do you spend here doing that? And then you call others darkened and perverted?
Look in the mirror.
You've seen no such thing.

Moreover you defend what you falsely judge.

Smirk.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183988 Mar 20, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>

Again, you lie. I never said anything about their feelings on the end of slavery. It's easy to show how dishonest you are!
Do I really need to post a link for you again?

Your entire post was a rant about slavery, woman's right to vote, and Loving v Virginia, culminating in you asking how the founders would feel about the decision.

Why don't you just admit you are out of gas. But the good news is you are still full of sh%%.

Since: Nov 11

Fukushima

#183989 Mar 20, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You've seen no such thing.
Yes I have.
Moreover you defend what you falsely judge.
Smirk.
No I don't.

Since: Nov 11

Fukushima

#183990 Mar 20, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Like Rose, you make meaningless statements with no substantiating evidence to back it up.
What a whiner you are.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183991 Mar 20, 2013
Tzunammi wrote:
<quoted text>
What a whiner you are.
Your spelling isn't very good. You spell it- winner.

But I'll give you a C for effort.

Since: Nov 11

Fukushima

#183992 Mar 20, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Your spelling isn't very good. You spell it- winner.
But I'll give you a C for effort.
You need glasses.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183993 Mar 20, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Do I really need to post a link for you again?
IOW, you got caught in a lie.
akpilot wrote:
<
Your entire post was a rant about slavery, woman's right to vote, and Loving v Virginia, culminating in you asking how the founders would feel about the decision.
BS. And you know it.
I mentioned how they would have felt about Loving v. VA.
You have no integrity.
Funny really.
akpilot wrote:
Why don't you just admit you are out of gas. But the good news is you are still full of sh%%.
LOL. You are upset because I called you on a lie. And you just don't have the 'nads to say, "My bad". You don't even have to give me the apology you owe me.
You're pathetic!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#183994 Mar 20, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Can any of you read? I have already stated my position on DOMA.
One more time since you and your clan seem a bit slow- SEC 3 of DOMA is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Got it?
<quoted text>
Prop 8 is a very distinct issue. CA is currently the only State where one can make the argument that the 14th Amendment has been violated. This is due to the fact that there are currently homosexuals in CA whom are legally marriage and will continue to be so even with prop 8. This creates a "special class" of homosexual citizen within the State- one class which can and is legally married, and another second class which cannot.
I fully expect the SCOTUS to uphold the Walker decision, I also fully expect them to limit that decision to the State of California. It is in fact the correct and Constitutional thing to do.
<quoted text>
Now this is a wide net. There is no enumerated power within the Constitution for the Federal Government to regulate or otherwise define marriage, thus under the 10th Amendment this falls to the State. This is the exact logic the court used when it ruled DOMA unconstitutional. I feel the court won't touch the issue of same sex marriage on a national level.
Here is what I think will come out of the SCOTUS with these cases, and what also would be the Constitutional thing for the court to do.
First- Rule that Prop 8 is a violation of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment for the reasons I stated above. They will limit this ruling strictly to California and the Prop 8 Issue.
Second- They will Rule that Section 3 of DOMA is unconstitutional for the same reasons as the lower court ruling- The Federal Government Lack's the enumerated power to define or regulate marriage- thus this power lies with the States to define and choose on their own. This will serve a dual purpose:
1) It will prevent the Federal Government from limiting, removing, or denying equal rights to homosexual couples whom are legally married by a State which allows such unions. They will be required to treat them exactly the same in regards to all regulations, benefits, and tax laws.
2) It will leave the States free to decide on their own what constitutes a marriage within their own boarders, as it should be based on the 9th and 10th Amendments of the Constitution. Now I really don't think it's going to be long before all State legalize same sex marriage, public opinion is moving in that direction, and most people really don't care. But based on our founding as a republic and union of individual sovereign State's, it is up to each to decide.
Now you may not like that, and that may not even be the way the SCOTUS rules, as just like the entire Federal Government they are in a power grab, and if they can find a way to give the Federal Government purview over the regulation and control of marriage they most certainly will. But you should ask yourself, is the the "freedom" you are looking for?
You forgot #4

after the ruling it will make in incredibly easy for any state to have its exclusion of same sex marriages overturned for similar reasons.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183995 Mar 20, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Your spelling isn't very good. You spell it- winner.
But I'll give you a C for effort.
Whiner:
"a person who makes frequent complaints usually about little things"
"an irritable and complaining person"
http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/whin...

Tzunammi was right.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 3 hr J RULES 71,225
Kristen Scannell Saratoga Springs NY Adds New H... Tue Kristen Scannell ... 2
Carmel River diverted to allow dam removal, pre... Dec 16 Clint 1
Calif. cop may be fired for giving suicidal stu... Dec 13 John Smith 1
Who do you think is the MOST corrupt Monterey C... Dec 9 montereyusedtobenice 1
where can I find heroin in monterey? Dec 9 montereyusedtobenice 5
Help! In need of opiates preferably boi Dec 5 Njp9080 1
Monterey Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Monterey News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Monterey

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 6:28 pm PST