Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,822

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183916 Mar 19, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Stupid, I said "IF that were the case, gay people would just marry a friend of the opposite sex." IOW, IF the only thing gay people were interested in were benefits, they would just marry friends of the opposite sex, and not fight for gay marriage.
That's funny, considering anyone could say they are married, hell they could even create a church that would perform homosexual marriages. BTW, they already exist Rose. Stop acting like this fight has nothing to do with benefits, benefits have EVERYTHING to do with it.

Your dishonesty combined with your illogical ranting are why people don't take you seriously.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183917 Mar 19, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Not in everything Rosie. Only native born citizens can becone president.
Natural- not native.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183918 Mar 19, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
If voters had their way in the South, blacks and other minorities would likely still not have equal rights.
It took federal intervention by way of physical force (The National Guard), federal laws, and Supreme Court decisions to make Southern states integrate the races, enact voting rights, etc.
All of which violated the Constitution.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183921 Mar 19, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Quick, someone help Rose, she is forgetting to breath again.
Breath again?
If you forget to breathe it would be best not to do anything.
Except laugh.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183922 Mar 19, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
That's funny, considering anyone could say they are married, hell they could even create a church that would perform homosexual marriages. BTW, they already exist Rose. Stop acting like this fight has nothing to do with benefits, benefits have EVERYTHING to do with it.
Your dishonesty combined with your illogical ranting are why people don't take you seriously.
Stupid, I never said the fight had *nothing* to do with benefits, it's just not the only thing. If it were, gay people could just marry friends, or strangers for that matter, of the opposite sex and get the benefits. Clearly something else is involved.

You take me seriously, you are fixated on me. You keep trying to "get" me. It's actually kind of funny.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183923 Mar 19, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Breath again?
If you forget to breathe it would be best not to do anything.
Except laugh.
Fail.

But that's nothing new for you.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183924 Mar 19, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Stupid, I never said the fight had *nothing* to do with benefits, it's just not the only thing. If it were, gay people could just marry friends, or strangers for that matter, of the opposite sex and get the benefits. Clearly something else is involved.
You take me seriously, you are fixated on me. You keep trying to "get" me. It's actually kind of funny.
I don't need to try very hard to get you, I just need to show up.

BTW Rose, if there were NO benefits to marriage, you wouldn't see homosexuals fighting for the "right" to marry. This most certainly is about benefits Rose, you aren't fighting for the use of a word you moron.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183925 Mar 19, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't need to try very hard to get you, I just need to show up.
BTW Rose, if there were NO benefits to marriage, you wouldn't see homosexuals fighting for the "right" to marry. This most certainly is about benefits Rose, you aren't fighting for the use of a word you moron.

You are so stupid it's funny.
Do you have some kind of point?
If the point is that you are a moron who is fixated me, that was made long time ago.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183926 Mar 19, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You are so stupid it's funny.
Do you have some kind of point?
If the point is that you are a moron who is fixated me, that was made long time ago.
You are dancing again Rose.

People present "points" to you all the time, you simply can't reply to them intelligently so you dance.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#183927 Mar 19, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, we are a Constitutional Republic. The founders did not in any way shape or form create a democracy.
split hairs, if you will, but we are most certainly NOT a theocracy.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183928 Mar 19, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
You are dancing again Rose.
People present "points" to you all the time, you simply can't reply to them intelligently so you dance.
Dance? What are you talking about?
I'm quite direct.
If you had any integrity, you'd have to admit that.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183929 Mar 19, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
split hairs, if you will, but we are most certainly NOT a theocracy.
It's not "splitting hairs" it is a very distinct difference. The founder's fought for month's through the ratification debates to show that we were not to be a "democracy" that we were not a "national" government, but that we were in fact a republic with a federal government that was restricted in its powers through the specific enumerations contained within the Constitution. Go read the State Ratification debates, hell, Madison and Hamilton devoted no less than 4 of the Federalist papers to this topic.

There are not minor things, they should be taught, and they need to be understood. Many people spend their days on this thread screaming about "Constitutional Right's" when they don't have a damn clue what the true meaning of the words contained within the document.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183930 Mar 19, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Dance?
Does that term confuse you?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#183931 Mar 19, 2013
Apollo11911 wrote:
<quoted text>No Dummy Apollo is a god.
No Dummy Apollo is a theater.
Yes yes yes

La Puente, CA

#183932 Mar 19, 2013
And the "drum of stupity" drums on.
Some Never Came Home

Tempe, AZ

#183933 Mar 19, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't need to try very hard to get you, I just need to show up.
BTW Rose, if there were NO benefits to marriage, you wouldn't see homosexuals fighting for the "right" to marry. This most certainly is about benefits Rose, you aren't fighting for the use of a word you moron.
But it's perfectly OK for tax paying gays to supplement your benefits and privileges of being married! Sure benefits are part of gays wanting to have marriage equality but not the only reasons! Gays pay taxes and should be entitled to the very same benefits that you enjoy as a married heterosexual male,but as it stands now they aren't! Hopefully that will all change when DOMA falls and Prop 8 falls this coming June! Try again,you're simply wrong!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183934 Mar 19, 2013
Some Never Came Home wrote:
<quoted text>
But it's perfectly OK for tax paying gays to supplement your benefits and privileges of being married! Sure benefits are part of gays wanting to have marriage equality but not the only reasons! Gays pay taxes and should be entitled to the very same benefits that you enjoy as a married heterosexual male,but as it stands now they aren't! Hopefully that will all change when DOMA falls and Prop 8 falls this coming June! Try again,you're simply wrong!
Welcome to the party clueless. Perhaps you should comprehend a persons position before you make an ass out of yourself.

Let me get you up to speed.

1) I am not in favor of benefits for marriage, I have made this clear many times. If ever there was an "equality" argument it is to be found in the tax laws regarding single vs marriage. Funny none of you take issue with that, you simply want your piece of the pie.

2)I have clearly statement many times as well, that Section 3 of DOMA is unconstitutional as the Federal Government lack's the enumerated power to regulate or define marriage.

3)And since the Federal Government lack's the enumerated power to regulate marriage and it is an issue left to the State (exactly what the lower court said when it tossed DOMA) said Federal Government including the Judiciary, lack the ability to toss Prop 8, for to do so would in fact be the Federal Government defining marriage.

Now crawl back under your rock.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#183935 Mar 19, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Good you know more than most Christians I have talked to, I will give you that.
And I will defend your rights to believe, and will even defend your children from being indoctrinated in a religon other than you prefer, as long as you grant me the same right and protect them from yours.
Time to let your children and Grand kids decide for themselves, you sound as controlling as those you are critical of.
Some Never Came Home

Beacon, NY

#183936 Mar 19, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Welcome to the party clueless. Perhaps you should comprehend a persons position before you make an ass out of yourself.
Let me get you up to speed.
1) I am not in favor of benefits for marriage, I have made this clear many times. If ever there was an "equality" argument it is to be found in the tax laws regarding single vs marriage. Funny none of you take issue with that, you simply want your piece of the pie.
2)I have clearly statement many times as well, that Section 3 of DOMA is unconstitutional as the Federal Government lack's the enumerated power to regulate or define marriage.
3)And since the Federal Government lack's the enumerated power to regulate marriage and it is an issue left to the State (exactly what the lower court said when it tossed DOMA) said Federal Government including the Judiciary, lack the ability to toss Prop 8, for to do so would in fact be the Federal Government defining marriage.
Now crawl back under your rock.
Ahhhhh.....poor little baby! LoL,Speak the truth and you go off on some prickish tangent! Will I see you under that rock you cock roach? How about you slither away now A-hole and STFU loser! So,I guess you'll be giving back those benefits that you enjoy that gays help supplement you on? Truth hurts now doesn't it bigot boy?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183937 Mar 19, 2013
Some Never Came Home wrote:
<quoted text>
Ahhhhh.....poor little baby! LoL,Speak the truth and you go off on some prickish tangent! Will I see you under that rock you cock roach? How about you slither away now A-hole and STFU loser! So,I guess you'll be giving back those benefits that you enjoy that gays help supplement you on? Truth hurts now doesn't it bigot boy?
I am sorry that having your ass handed to you got you this upset. You are so wound up you can't even form complete coherent sentences.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 19 hr rabbee yehoshooah... 71,707
where can I find heroin in monterey? Mar 27 Rosiedosie 7
News Homicide suspect Victor Cabrera has long histor... (Oct '08) Mar 24 mando 12
News Carmel waste broker accused of bribery (Dec '08) Mar 20 Gary 16
Review: Salazar Auto Repair (Sep '13) Mar 10 fed up 3
News Ezekiel Lopez-Figueroa at his sentencing this m... (Dec '11) Mar 5 Carlos Slim 14
News Ask the Auto Doctor (Mar '06) Mar 3 Joe Balls 1,530
Monterey Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]