Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201847 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#183680 Mar 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Same question.
If you don't know the cause how can you assert the result?
The epi-marker defect is all but proved. What does that say about the APA?
Snicker.
Speaking of defects:
"creating chimeras with human stem cells led to the decision that embryos would be allowed to be made in laboratories, given that they would be destroyed within the first 14 days."

:)

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183681 Mar 17, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL. Con dumb parroting. You don't even know what socialism is! Why are you against the Constitution and equal rights?
I love how someone who screams,"I don't give a damn what a bunch of racist white people wrote about the meaning of the Constitution over 200 years ago" now has the nerve to ask someone, "Why are you against the Constitution."

Thanks for the laugh dimwit.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183682 Mar 17, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! Just admit you are a bigot!
You first.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183683 Mar 17, 2013
Randy-Rock-Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
So, you have a hard time remembering your posts, eh?
"
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL. Con dumb parroting. You don't even know what socialism is! Why are you against the Constitution and equal rights?"
I believe that you were trying, yet again, to sound superior to someone....
Rose has the memory and attention span of a goldfish. Damn near the IQ of one too, though I think the fish has her on that one.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#183684 Mar 17, 2013
Yes sir re wrote:
<quoted text>
It does not deny you anything.
A legal definition under can deny you anything, it's a definition and status given under that definition, it does not deny you in any way shape or form to get married or to your personal happiness. What you are seeking is to change a definition to what you would like it to mean and disregard what the majority of society says it is. It has nothing to do with this status or definition but that would befall a gay couple. It's the insurance policies you need to change not the publics view of a definition!
Fk the majority of society. The Constitution promises all equal rights. Do you understand that so far? And you morons keep saying it's just about "the benefits and insurance benefits". Well, if that were the case, gay people would just marry a friend of the opposite sex.
Cracks Appear

La Puente, CA

#183685 Mar 17, 2013
Still a hot topic down here in West Covina, California.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#183686 Mar 17, 2013
Garland wrote:
<quoted text>The average male homosexual consumes 22.68lbs of fecal matter on an annual basis, rather sickenging if you ask me.
Speaking of fecal matter, that stat is a piece of it.
Remember POWs And MIAs

Beacon, NY

#183687 Mar 17, 2013
Robsan5 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yup, you're obviously gay also. If someone keeps calling you out on it, there's usually a good reason. I don't change my name, unlike you. How many different names do you use? A bunch, I'm sure. All you closet cases love to hide your true self. It's ok for you to endorse homosexuality but not good enough for you to admit you're also gay. You're sad and pathetic.
Robert
And you are using another's name you stole as you wrote this drivel and you steal others profile names frequently! So Ok,what ever you say you nut job!You're a Flaming hypocrite who suffers from anti-social personality disorder and a hatred complex! YOU are no better than the next human gay or straight,as a matter of fact worse from the idiosy that you post!LOL
ARGUING with IDIOTS

Redding, CA

#183688 Mar 17, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>Fk the majority of society. The Constitution promises all equal rights. Do you understand that so far? And you morons keep saying it's just about "the benefits and insurance benefits". Well, if that were the case, gay people would just marry a friend of the opposite sex.
You have bigger issues if you want to Fk the majority of a population.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#183689 Mar 17, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sorry that you don't agree with the court. Nor do you agree with the historical facts regarding the legislation and regulation of civil marriage in this country.
But it really doesn't matter if you agree or you don't, it doesn't change fact, and that is what pisses you off so.
You're claiming you do have to be able to procreate in order to marry? LOL!
What pisses you off is that gay marriage has now been passed by popular vote, and you are on the losing side. Well, you are a loser.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#183690 Mar 17, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
I doubt you need one either way.
Telling me my D cups are so firm I don't need a bra...
You're another idiot who needs to work on his insults.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#183691 Mar 17, 2013
akaidiot wrote:
<quoted text>
I love how someone who screams,"I don't give a damn what a bunch of racist white people wrote about the meaning of the Constitution over 200 years ago" now has the nerve to ask someone, "Why are you against the Constitution."
Thanks for the laugh dimwit.
Writing *about the meaning* of the Constitution and the Constitution are two different things. Thanks for the laugh, idiot. Also, the 14th Amendment wasn't around for them to write about over 200 years ago. LOLSER!

And you've yet to come up with a rational argument against ga marriage.

More laughs!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183692 Mar 17, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You're claiming you do have to be able to procreate in order to marry?
I'll wait while you cite the specific post where I made that statement.

but we all know, this is simply more of your rhetorical nonsense.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183693 Mar 17, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Telling me my D cups are so firm I don't need a bra...
You're another idiot who needs to work on his insults.
If that is how you comprehended that post, you truly are a giant among the mindless.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#183695 Mar 17, 2013
ARGUING with IDIOTS wrote:
<quoted text>
You have bigger issues if you want to Fk the majority of a population.
OK, just the cute ones.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183696 Mar 17, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>

What pisses you off is that gay marriage has now been passed by popular vote, and you are on the losing side. Well, you are a loser.
That's interesting, considering I have voted against a state constitutional amendment which would limit marriage to one man and one woman.

Tell me again what I have lost?
Fred

United States

#183697 Mar 17, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>Telling me my D cups are so firm I don't need a bra...
You're another idiot who needs to work on his insults.
Unless you have D cups on your balls, you're Sh!t out of luck. Queers don't need bras. Get a life queer

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183698 Mar 17, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Writing *about the meaning* of the Constitution and the Constitution are two different things. Thanks for the laugh, idiot. Also, the 14th Amendment wasn't around for them to write about over 200 years ago. LOLSER!
And you've yet to come up with a rational argument against ga marriage.
More laughs!
Your ignorance knows no bounds.

You do realize the opinions of those whom drafted and ratified said Constitution and its subsequent Amendment's are the only opinions which matter don't you?

BTW, your ignorance of the 14th Amendment shows that you haven't read the opinion of those whom drafted and ratified said Amendment either. You wouldn't like what you read, and like everything else that runs counter to your little fantasy world you dismiss it as irrelevant.

Go get an education Rose, then we can talk. Until then your irrational retorts are all we will be graced with, and they are becoming quite repetitive as you are obviously running out of material.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183699 Mar 17, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>

And you've yet to come up with a rational argument against ga marriage.
Why would I present a rational argument against Georgia marriage?

Do you have something against GA Rose?

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#183700 Mar 17, 2013
akaidiot wrote:
<quoted text>
That's interesting, considering I have voted against a state constitutional amendment which would limit marriage to one man and one woman.
Yeah, right. And that's why you attack people in favor of gay marriage, and tea bag those against it.
akaidiot wrote:
Tell me again what I have lost?
I said you are on the losing side.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
where can I find heroin in monterey? (Oct '14) 5 hr CLEANnSOBERMF 37
Two BASE Jumpers Got Kilt Fri Redneck 2
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Feb 1 rabbee yehoshooah... 72,023
drugs (Jun '15) Jan '16 mtry831 3
News Snapchat Selfie Helps ID Suspect Jan '16 DILF 2
News Some Mexicans leaving US, planning never to return (Dec '08) Dec '15 Fitus T Bluster 15,730
News Ask the Auto Doctor (Mar '06) Dec '15 jayy 1,541
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Monterey Mortgages