Scientific ? No. Realistic ? Yes. Control methods ? Random sampling. Margin of error ? None. Peer review ? None. How could there be ? I'll explain ...<quoted text>
...and somehow, you think your little "survey" is scientific, eh? Tell us about your control methods. What was the margin of error? Has World Nut Daily offered to publish your study? Who did the peer review, Dr. Regnerus?
You are completely clueless.
1) Was not conducted in a laboratory, was conducted in the field, utilizing spontaneous interrogations.
4) Could not be subject to peer review, due to lack of documentation.
Conclusions ? You will not recognize anything that represents denial of your false propaganda. You would tell us that the sky is gold, if it furthers your ends, and scoff at anyone that corrects you. But your propaganda does not stand up to any realistic testing..