Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments
159,261 - 159,280 of 200,587 Comments Last updated 6 hrs ago
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#182413 Mar 3, 2013
Ronald wrote:
<quoted text>
Se Questers.
Yes. But you are a taxpayer supported schizophrenic. If many of your fellow schizoids can save taxpayer money by spending their time mumbling to themselves on the public streets, why do you feel yourself privy to the hard earned taxpayer money that is needed to stand the cost of supplying you with Government drugs that enable you to use your taxpayer funded computer to post annoying and inane remarks that have the purpose of being disruptive? Shouldn't hard earned taxpayer money be better used to further feather the nest of revolutionary Councils and other "pro increased California tax" advocates who now control the failed "Liberal" State of California?
Ronald
Good Morning Ronald!

I always enjoy your eloquent posts.

Say hello to your honey! Arf!

Frankie.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#182414 Mar 3, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that right? I didn't realize that you spoke for the State.... how exciting for you. Perhaps you can explain why we permit non-reproductive couples to marry. Must be scarey to see your influence fading away.
I can;

The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;
A apple tree bearing fruit.
A apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A walnut tree who never bears any fruit wanting to be a apple tree.
A walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.

Even funnier?

The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too!

Smile.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#182415 Mar 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I can;
The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;
A apple tree bearing fruit.
A apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A walnut tree who never bears any fruit wanting to be a apple tree.
A walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.
Even funnier?
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too!
Smile.
In addition to a pathetic analogy we've got an adult that doesn't recognise "a" and "an" when typing his simpleton responses.
Smackoes

Covina, CA

#182417 Mar 3, 2013
Keep a close eye on the SKANKS running sgvCOG.
What an embarrassment each and every delegate is to the communities they serve.
I will bet the discussion on the beauty pageant selection will be more in depth than any discussion ever had about the possible misuse of public funds by Nick Conway.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#182418 Mar 3, 2013
sheesh void of hate wrote:
<quoted text>
In addition to a pathetic analogy we've got an adult that doesn't recognise "a" and "an" when typing his simpleton responses.
On purpose, I've posted it both ways.

Keeping track on who avoids addressing the analogy because they have no answer.

You lose.

Smirk.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#182419 Mar 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
On purpose, I've posted it both ways.
Keeping track on who avoids addressing the analogy because they have no answer.
You lose.
Smirk.
Why bother addressing your analogy? Oh wait, I already did. I called it out for being dumb. Just like you. I eagerly await your next bumper sticker of no substance.
Dan

Roseville, CA

#182420 Mar 3, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Never had surgery for it until late last year. And again last week. You're a loudmouthed liar.
Maybe you'll list those million things I claimed to be jackass?
P.S. I didn't see your draft dodging ass over there coward.
Hope that helps Danny boy.
Draft dodging?

LOL!!

And for someone to make claims within the safety of the anonymous internet is up for criticism and doubt my little friend. You've been in here daily far before your supposed surgery last year. You're some lonely fucktard who likes to mix it up with gays working for a basic civil right gor God knows what reason. You're just some lonely antagonist who'd rather talk shit i9n an anonymous forum. You're worthless buddy.
Erasers

Covina, CA

#182421 Mar 3, 2013
George Ogden's racists bating articles he writes are filled with the real filth that floats around in his nasty fat head of his.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#182422 Mar 3, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Draft dodging?
LOL!!
And for someone to make claims within the safety of the anonymous internet is up for criticism and doubt my little friend. You've been in here daily far before your supposed surgery last year. You're some lonely fucktard who likes to mix it up with gays working for a basic civil right gor God knows what reason. You're just some lonely antagonist who'd rather talk shit i9n an anonymous forum. You're worthless buddy.
Same to you tough guy!
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#182423 Mar 3, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Reality TV show polygamist and his four wives challenge Utah's bigamy laws - with support from their fellow 'Sister Wives'
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
PUBLISHED: 01:23 EST, 18 January 2013 | UPDATED: 08:21 EST, 18 January 2013
A federal judge heard legal arguments in a Salt Lake City court on Thursday that could potentially decriminalize polygamy in Utah, as a reality TV show polygamist and his four wives sought to overturn the state’s ban on plural marriage.
The stars of reality show ‘Sister Wives’ Kody Brown and his four wives - Meri, Janelle, Christine and Robyn - claim the law is unconstitutional.
The family fled Utah for Las Vegas last year under the threat of prosecution. They did not attend the hearing in Salt Lake City, but had support in the shape of fellow sister-wives Valerie and Vicki Darger."
They’re talking about my life,’ Valerie Darger told FOX 13.‘The thing that’s different about what we’re asking for is the right to exist and the right to be left alone. We’re not seeking marriage licenses, and so, as far as legal marriage goes, it doesn’t really pertain.’
There were also opponents at the trail including anti-polygamy activist Kristyn Decker, an ex-polygamous wife who left a relationship 11 years ago.
She runs a group opposed to polygamy and led a protest to call attention to abuses and child-bride marriages within some polygamous communities.
‘We feel like if they decriminalize polygamy, the human rights violations that have gone on for so long will just continue,’ Decker said.
The Browns were represented in court by their attorney Jonathan Turley.
He told the court that the Browns’ only sin was opening their family to the TLC hit series, which drew the attention of Utah authorities.
‘The Browns wanted to show people that a plural family is not a monstrosity,' said Turley.'The state is saying if you didn’t do this TV show, you wouldn’t have a problem.'
'They have a right to free speech and are being prosecuted for it.'
The hearing dealt with the legalities of due process and freedom of association.
U.S. District Judge Clark Waddoups peppered a state lawyer on why he shouldn’t throw out Utah’s bigamy law. It’s stricter than the laws in 49 other states - most of them prohibit people from having multiple marriage licenses.
Utah makes it illegal to even purport to be married to multiple partners or live together.
What if Kody Brown kept separate households for each wife, or was just having affairs, the judge asked.
'That would not be polygamy,' said Assistant Utah Attorney General Jerrold Jensen.
Yet Jensen argued Utah’s unique history of polygamy for more than 100 years has made victims of thousands of girls forced to marry as young as 13, and caused rampant child abuse, with boys 'kicked out on the street' to reduce competition for older men seeking multiple brides.
He said the state has an interest in preventing social harm.
Waddoups said the Browns’ 17 children are irrelevant to the case, and Turley argued that sex and child abuse was just as common in monogamous families.
Part 2 next post
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-22643...
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-22643...
Follow us:@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
You do realize that the Brown's lawsuit is NOT asking for legal recognition of polygamy, don't you? It's not about decriminalizing polygamy, either. Geez, pal..... do some research and stop listening to idots like Rush and Glenn.
Erasers

Covina, CA

#182424 Mar 3, 2013
George has slective hearing, anything thing he can turn around to attack a minority he will do in a heart beat. His article in the SGVexaminer, Feb. 14 - 20, 2013 page B2 is a real piece of "skinhead" trash.

In this same article Steve Herferd a employee of SoCal Edison and a West Covina city council member is make statment so how much better "white men" are?

Along with is racist buddy George Ogden they made sure is was printed in a racist newsppaer called the SGVexaminer.com

George Ogden's racists bating articles he writes are filled with the real filth that floats around in his nasty fat head of his.

Along with Steve Hefert and Mike Touhey they all belong to a racists club known as West Covina KKK chapter. Or the old-boy-racists-club.

George Ogden hides behind the freedom of the press, much like communist stil do today. Keep away from George Odgen he seems a little off balanced with his race bating comments under his breath and threathing appearance of a filthy mental case.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#182425 Mar 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
On purpose, I've posted it both ways.
Keeping track on who avoids addressing the analogy because they have no answer.
You lose.
Smirk.
Your anaolgy is SO stupid it doesn't need to be addressed for the 50th time. The first time you used it I LAUGHED at "like a walnut tree trying to hang apples" so hard. When have you ever seen a walnut tree try to hang apples? Are you on some bad acid or something? That's not an analogy... it's an abomination of intellect.

And you don't even have enough sense to be embarrassed for writing it.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#182426 Mar 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too!
Smile.
Right.... because everyone knows its illegal to discriminate against apple trees....

You are a pompous ass..
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#182427 Mar 3, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes.
There will be one less law against it when Prop 8 is gone.
That's nice, dear.
Erasers

Covina, CA

#182428 Mar 3, 2013
George has selective hearing, anything thing he can turn around to attack a minority he will do in a heart beat. His article in the SGVexaminer, Feb. 14 - 20, 2013 page B2 is a real piece of "skinhead" trash.

In this same article Steve Herfert a employee of SoCal Edison and a West Covina city council member is make statement so how much better "white men" are?

I understood SoCal Edision has a anti-racists policy? then why can the idiot Steve Herfert say this kinds of things to minorities? Steve calims to be a scientist? what kind?

Along with is racist buddy George Ogden they made sure is was printed in a racist newspaper called the SGVexaminer.com

George Ogden's racists bating articles he writes are filled with the real filth that floats around in his nasty fat head of his.

Along with Steve Hefert and Mike Touhey they all belong to a racists club known as West Covina KKK chapter. Or the old-boy-racists-club.

George Ogden hides behind the freedom of the press, much like communist still do today. Keep away from George Odgen he seems a little off balanced with his race bating comments under his breath and threat appearance of a filthy mental case.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#182429 Mar 3, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Um, yes. After you get done with the loonie laughter, I will point out that I, at least, put this to a real test, instead of relying on fictitious propaganda, found on internet sites. This shows that I am willing to entertain the notion that your side MIGHT be right, although in the face of reality, your lies do not hold up. Most Americans do NOT "suppor" SSM. Laugh at that.
...and somehow, you think your little "survey" is scientific, eh? Tell us about your control methods. What was the margin of error? Has World Nut Daily offered to publish your study? Who did the peer review, Dr. Regnerus?

You are completely clueless.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#182430 Mar 3, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Legal matters such as those that can apply to all sorts of relationships, and the would have the same interest. Siblings can own property together, and may have inheritance issues or concerns, yet are not allowed to marry. Again remove the sexual aspect and what is left. What makes marriage a distinct relationship worthy of state recognition?
Beat that dead horse! Beat it good. Get it all out.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#182431 Mar 3, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Why does it matter if two men/women are married? Are they "living in sin"? Will there be accidental pregnancies? Please explain how we as a society survived into the 21st century with the quaint notion that marriage is a union of husband and wife?
Gee.... how did we ever survive the quaint notion that disease is caused by bad air and witches?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#182432 Mar 3, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
That's nice, dear.
Yes it is!

But I think you're fibbing. You don't really think it's nice.
Cookker

Covina, CA

#182433 Mar 3, 2013
A USA economist Robert Reich has written a op-ed exposing the Tea Party of "treason."

The Party's stated aim of "drowning government in the bathtub," as Tea Party icon Grover Norquist, a devout Muslim lover. Parties like the GOP and Republicans are also on board fopr the drowning.

There aim is to undermine the government of the United States, to destroy much of its capacity to do the public's business, and to sow distrust among the population.

There goal and of the muslims is to infiltrate Congress and state governments, reshape their districts to give them disproportionate influence in Washington, and use the media to spread big lies about the government.

This type of plan is being used by the local GOP, Republican and Tea Party member's to destroy the city of Glendora, California also.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 6 hr dannytome 15,962
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 7 hr J RULES 68,991
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) Fri Macko mono 5,000
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) Thu Tank ever 7,926
First City Festival 2014 Brings Ugly Rock Metal... Thu JoeMama 2
Suri Cruise's dog is missing in Los Angeles Thu Money 1
My fears for Doris Day: Confidante who spent 40... (Oct '13) Thu marti eton square 4
•••
•••
•••

Monterey Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Monterey News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Monterey
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••