Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (Page 7,962)

Showing posts 159,221 - 159,240 of200,323
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#182363
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
That's because you can't get it up. It's not her fault.
I've offered to help ... I imagine that his pride would get in the way, though...
OldRocker

Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#182364
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Why even bother asking permission frm me.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#182365
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

7

OldRocker wrote:
Why even bother asking permission frm me.
I wasn't consulted, either, I think that it is an oversight ...
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#182366
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Again...crazy fluck....how are the psych evaluations going?
You're failing badly. Worse than last year. You might have to stay in the mental ward for a while until we get you stabilized.

Meanwhile, try to stay calm and don't do dopey stuff. Do not bother or annoy the other patients.

Dr. Rizzo.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#182367
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Whats up my biotch
Why don't you ask her, instead of hanging out on the gay threads?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#182368
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
ROFL!!!
I was going to answer but realized you're bath-shit crazy to begin with.
Ever figure out who you were yet?
What stupid post.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#182371
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
ROFL!!!
I was going to answer but realized you're bath-shit crazy to begin with.
Ever figure out who you were yet?
I know exactly who I am.

And you are a sissy coward.

Everyone knows it now.

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#182373
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You have nothing but ad homoan gay twirl troll attacks. Not one single rational response.
As I have noted many times before, I focus on one single aspect of gay sex for two reasons;
One, intercourse is at the heart of a union between a couple. Anal sex is an extremely poor counterfeit of nature's design.
And two, anal sex is an inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning, clearly indicating a genetic defect.
While lesbian sex is simply unhealthy and demeaning, it still is a silly attempt by duplicate genders trying to imitate the design of evolution, the 'reunion' of diverse genders to one life form.
Smile.
sheesh void of hate wrote:
<quoted text>
You really are a bit touched if you think intercourse is at the heart of every union. Or perhaps you're just shallow. Yeah, that seems to be the case. But you could be a bit touched as well. That sure appears to be so.
You've not provided anything rational to respond to rationally. You may want to try getting over yourself someday. It'll make you more apt to be able to engage in a meaningful conversation.
I really have no experience with anal sex, so I tend to not harp on about it. The notion is unappealing to me. You, OTOH, seem obsessed with it to the point I'm convinced your head is deep inside your own anal orifice.
Oh, BTW, no couple tries to duplicate evolution. That really sounds dumb. Like a lot of your commentary.
Since you think anal intercourse is a reflection of a genetic defect, do straight couples who practice anal sex get to claim that defect too?
What is it about lesbian sex that you find demeaning? Really? Oral sex? Let me guess, you only have sex for procreation in the missionary position while fully clad in your K Mart sourced PJs.
Out of touch?

I have a letter certifying that I am sane and perfectly able to live on my own. Signed by three professional psychologists.

You are afraid to ask your family and friends if they think you are sane.

As to intercourse being at the heart, you deny the primary focus of mating behavior? Or that in marriage, the culmination of union is being one in body, mind and spirit? And you call me 'out of touch'?

Then you top your stupidity off by talking about rationality???

You admit your ignorance about anal sex, and then deny the violation of design. You don't even need a brain to see mistaking a septic system for a playground, all you need is eyes!!!

Heterosexuals have an alternative. They simply expose themselves as idiots when they violate each other anally. Gays don't have that alternative to exist in their orientation, do they.

As to lesbians, while not harmful, oral sex is unhealthy, unless you view urine as lemonade and shit as chocolate pudding.

You simply express the silliness of pretending ad homoan attacks are reason. A near senile old man just kicked your ass with common sense, and you still have no straight answer (pun intended).

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#182374
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You have nothing but ad homoan gay twirl troll attacks. Not one single rational response.
As I have noted many times before, I focus on one single aspect of gay sex for two reasons;
One, intercourse is at the heart of a union between a couple. Anal sex is an extremely poor counterfeit of nature's design.
And two, anal sex is an inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning, clearly indicating a genetic defect.
LOL! Look at what is talking about a genetic defect.
KiMare wrote:
While lesbian sex is simply unhealthy and demeaning, it still is a silly attempt by duplicate genders trying to imitate the design of evolution, the 'reunion' of diverse genders to one life form.
Smile.
Look at what is talking about a 'reunion' of diverse genders to one life form!
Do you think you should have been aborted?
KiMare wrote:
Out of touch?
I have a letter certifying that I am sane and perfectly able to live on my own. Signed by three professional psychologists.
You are afraid to ask your family and friends if they think you are sane.
As to intercourse being at the heart, you deny the primary focus of mating behavior? Or that in marriage, the culmination of union is being one in body, mind and spirit? And you call me 'out of touch'?
Then you top your stupidity off by talking about rationality???
You admit your ignorance about anal sex, and then deny the violation of design.
You mean like having two sets of DNA?
LOL!
KiMare wrote:
You don't even need a brain to see mistaking a septic system for a playground, all you need is eyes!!!
Heterosexuals have an alternative. They simply expose themselves as idiots when they violate each other anally. Gays don't have that alternative to exist in their orientation, do they.
As to lesbians, while not harmful, oral sex is unhealthy, unless you view urine as lemonade and shit as chocolate pudding.
Guess the male member can't be used for sex, men urinate from them.

BTW, most people WIPE and clean up after using the restroom. I figured you didn't.
KiMare wrote:
You simply express the silliness of pretending ad homoan attacks are reason. A near senile old man just kicked your ass with common sense, and you still have no straight answer (pun intended).
Where was the common sense?
LOLSER!

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#182375
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

sheesh void of hate wrote:
<quoted text>
It makes for a stronger marriage if you actually love the person you're a fiddin' to git hitched to.
Absolutely.
That is why I asked my wife to marry me. Sex is the icing on the cake, not the entire cake. It took me a long time to find someone I was happy with. Someone I could converse with or sit in total silence just happy to be with.
As did I, that is why I asked my wife as well. Never the less, the state doesn't care if two people love each other, or just like each other. Romantic love, as any marriage counselor will state, is not the foundation for long term marital success. I'm not saying its not important, but there's a reason for the "honeymoon period", and "the honeymoon is over". That's when the real love takes place.

QUOTE]
You must be really old....
Ancient, I was actually born in the last century. Imagine that.

[QUOTE]
to be offering up the reason marriage developed as if you have authority over and access to such "facts." I'd be willing to bet there were a great number of reasons behind the development of the contractual agreement we currently call marriage. In some cultures the bond was agreed upon before the blushing bride even knew the groom. So much for your "sex is the reason for marriage" theory. Many purposes are served including the guarantee of future cooperation between family groups.
If human procreation wasn't sexual, would it matter to society, any society, who married who? Would marriage as we know it, even exist? Take away the sexual aspect of marriage, and there not much the state has any real interst in. Why prohibit sibling from marrying? If they really love each other....
You're monochromatic view of the world is just as absurd as K-Mart's. The two of you are in good company with Brian_G.
Just good old fashioned biology. We're all products of a sexual union of a man and a woman. Marriage serves as society's means of recognizing that, and protecting the products of that union. Any other aspect of marriage, as far as the state is concerned, is secondary to that.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#182376
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! Look at what is talking about a genetic defect.
<quoted text>
Look at what is talking about a 'reunion' of diverse genders to one life form!
Do you think you should have been aborted?
<quoted text>
You mean like having two sets of DNA?
LOL!
<quoted text>
Guess the male member can't be used for sex, men urinate from them.
BTW, most people WIPE and clean up after using the restroom. I figured you didn't.
<quoted text>
Where was the common sense?
LOLSER!
Is that a leg lamp or your real leg?
gokkod

Pittsburgh, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#182377
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

youtube.com/watch... ……
Whats the price? and what do you expect
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#182379
Mar 3, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
Just good old fashioned biology. We're all products of a sexual union of a man and a woman. Marriage serves as society's means of recognizing that, and protecting the products of that union. Any other aspect of marriage, as far as the state is concerned, is secondary to that.
Is that right? I didn't realize that you spoke for the State.... how exciting for you. Perhaps you can explain why we permit non-reproductive couples to marry. Must be scarey to see your influence fading away.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#182380
Mar 3, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
This is not evolution, it is sheer derailment.
Such a drama queen.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#182381
Mar 3, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Its simple biology, not a "puritanical" opinion. At what point does marriage evolve, or perhaps devolve is the better word, where its no longer recognizable? Or no longer a need or reason for state interest and/or recognition?
No longer recognizable? Marriage is a legal contract.... what's biological about THAT? Almost everybody understands what it means. It creates legal kinship between two non-related adults.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#182382
Mar 3, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
They make perfect sense. Try mouthing the words.
Oh puh-leez.... it took you three tries to respond to one post.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#182383
Mar 3, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you think your backward, puritanical opinion is going to stop the decriminalization of poly marriage? You can either adapt, or you can go extinct.
Is polygamy being decriminalized?
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#182384
Mar 3, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Honestly, and for true.
How about that.... You said it, so it MUST be true. Who needs evidence or proof when you have calumny for an excuse?
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#182385
Mar 3, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
200 businesses that have no business meddling in the affairs of the nation. These same businesses were against this exact issue 20 years ago, based on financial analysis, now, they have been infiltrated by the same lobbyists that wish to turn Amerikkka into their private experiment. They have thrown financial wisdom out the window, to accommodate personal views. It is part of why Amerikkka is dying. And, no, the majority of Amerikkka does not support SSM, spit out your venomous propaganda elsewhere, if you please. Because this is a bald-faced lie. I haven't met anyone who seems to support it, and I travel extensively. And I do ask people. On the CB radio, in stores, all over the place, just to test this theory of yours. It does not stand up to the test of reality. Most people do not seem to care one way or the other. Far cry from "supporting" it. Very few support it. Most with any feelings on the matter are against it.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/262668/d...
http://www.nomblog.com/24660/
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher...
Now, I know that my words will be ignored, or discounted, as your side finds the words of my side as easily banished, but I have tested this theory, and it does not stand up to an honest and fair test. But these links will state some of my assertion.
CB radios?

hahahahaha
ahahahahahahah
ahahahahahahahha
ahahahahhahahaha
ahahahahahahahha
ahahahahahhaha
ahahahahahahha
ahahahahahahha
ahahahahahahah
ahahahahahahahahah

A test of reality?

hahahahaha
ahhahahaha
ahhahahaha
ahhaahahha

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#182386
Mar 3, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Is polygamy being decriminalized?
Reality TV show polygamist and his four wives challenge Utah's bigamy laws - with support from their fellow 'Sister Wives'
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
PUBLISHED: 01:23 EST, 18 January 2013 | UPDATED: 08:21 EST, 18 January 2013

A federal judge heard legal arguments in a Salt Lake City court on Thursday that could potentially decriminalize polygamy in Utah, as a reality TV show polygamist and his four wives sought to overturn the state’s ban on plural marriage.
The stars of reality show ‘Sister Wives’ Kody Brown and his four wives - Meri, Janelle, Christine and Robyn - claim the law is unconstitutional.
The family fled Utah for Las Vegas last year under the threat of prosecution. They did not attend the hearing in Salt Lake City, but had support in the shape of fellow sister-wives Valerie and Vicki Darger."

They’re talking about my life,’ Valerie Darger told FOX 13.‘The thing that’s different about what we’re asking for is the right to exist and the right to be left alone. We’re not seeking marriage licenses, and so, as far as legal marriage goes, it doesn’t really pertain.’
There were also opponents at the trail including anti-polygamy activist Kristyn Decker, an ex-polygamous wife who left a relationship 11 years ago.
She runs a group opposed to polygamy and led a protest to call attention to abuses and child-bride marriages within some polygamous communities.
‘We feel like if they decriminalize polygamy, the human rights violations that have gone on for so long will just continue,’ Decker said.
The Browns were represented in court by their attorney Jonathan Turley.
He told the court that the Browns’ only sin was opening their family to the TLC hit series, which drew the attention of Utah authorities.
‘The Browns wanted to show people that a plural family is not a monstrosity,' said Turley.'The state is saying if you didn’t do this TV show, you wouldn’t have a problem.'

'They have a right to free speech and are being prosecuted for it.'
The hearing dealt with the legalities of due process and freedom of association.
U.S. District Judge Clark Waddoups peppered a state lawyer on why he shouldn’t throw out Utah’s bigamy law. It’s stricter than the laws in 49 other states - most of them prohibit people from having multiple marriage licenses.
Utah makes it illegal to even purport to be married to multiple partners or live together.
What if Kody Brown kept separate households for each wife, or was just having affairs, the judge asked.
'That would not be polygamy,' said Assistant Utah Attorney General Jerrold Jensen.
Yet Jensen argued Utah’s unique history of polygamy for more than 100 years has made victims of thousands of girls forced to marry as young as 13, and caused rampant child abuse, with boys 'kicked out on the street' to reduce competition for older men seeking multiple brides.
He said the state has an interest in preventing social harm.

Waddoups said the Browns’ 17 children are irrelevant to the case, and Turley argued that sex and child abuse was just as common in monogamous families.

Part 2 next post

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-22643...

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-22643...
Follow us:@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 159,221 - 159,240 of200,323
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
Monterey Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Monterey Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Monterey News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Monterey
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••