Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,151

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#182214 Mar 1, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Says Buttered Pancakes!
Watch out, Frank, he'll beat your ass in a Home Depot parking lot...Use that Japanese Martial Art he's been learning...Sushi-Fu.
MedowLand

Covina, CA

#182215 Mar 1, 2013
And they are of an runing forget the spelling it's just pavingmaterial to cover up BS being posted by out of towners.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#182216 Mar 1, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Hey Frank come on tell us all about jumping out of a Chopper in Nam.
Why don't you tell us what YOU'VE done ? Besides avoiding service ?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#182217 Mar 1, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I was scared and pumped on adrenaline. I jumped too soon. I misjudged how high we were. Maybe 12 feet. It hurt for a while and a little ever since but nothing debilitating until recently. Now I cannot walk and the docs aren't giving me a good prognosis. I had another surgery yesterday. Laposcopic surgery. Modern medicine is a blessing.
My age and the old injury combined, and here I am.
You're a real jerk and a creep, but I wouldn't wish it on you or anyone, Well maybe my ex wife...naaah. No one. Not even you or her.
Not being able to stand or walk is a life changing challenge. I'm up for it. I follow docs orders religiously.
Why are you even gracing that little turd with an answer ?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#182218 Mar 1, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
You should look up the definition of CHANGE. You just said nothing changing but.... which means it changed.
And I am not that quick at calling people idiots, I have been here quite some time as have the others, I guess the fact that you just arrived to the party has confused you.
BTW, none of the items I mentioned that require changes in the law are "rights".
Frigging FNG's ...LOL Noobs rock....except in here ...
:-D
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#182219 Mar 1, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
It should make no difference to you, I'm FINE! Enjoying my life maybe even a bit more than I did before. And I have always enjoyed it. It's another challenge. I'm good at challenges.
Don't want or need any sympathy. Fire away, I can't walk but I still have my wits about me. And a sense of humor.
As far as the war, glad I went, glad I came back after two tours. I went there a boy and came back a man with goals. I used the GI bill to earn a masters in geology, and spent 30 years as a research geologist.
And I got lots of HOT SEX with the little brown ladies "take two, they're small"! In between the hard times. And GOOD DRUGS and cheap alcohol! No taxes!
Amen. And, S.M.I.B.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#182220 Mar 1, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
Can you imagine the loser who rates Rose_NoHo's posts "Brilliant"?
Anyone?
I found one.
http://images.search.yahoo.com/images/view;_y...
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#182221 Mar 1, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Prop 8 banned any marriage save that of one man and one woman.
I thought you wanted to deal with "what is?"
Not when it gets in his/her way...
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#182222 Mar 1, 2013
Edgar wrote:
<quoted text>
(Also, the fact that you focus so much on aspects of gay sex really makes me wonder...)
Oh ? What about ?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#182223 Mar 1, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Is it "gay sex" if lots of straight people do it, and most gay people don't? I believe it's called anal sex.
If you want the government to directly intervene and prevent all anal sex, then wouldn't that apply to straight folks as well? What kind of testing and regulation would you require the government to engage in to deny marriage license to any anal sex practitioners? Who would run it?
Who would pay for it?
And most importantly, who else but you would support it?
It is not a valid reason to grant a title of legitimacy. To a defunct, and clearly perilous, coupling.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#182224 Mar 1, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course, that's patently absurd, since of COURSE gay men and lesbian women are disproportional disadvantages and burdened by such bans.
This reasoning counted only exist if there were no such thing as people who can only be attracted to the same gender.
Try proving that one.
That's why this type of reasoning has fallen out of favor legally.
Deal with it.
Did you mean "disproportionately disadvantaged and burdened by such" disqualifications to lay claim to a title of legitimacy ?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#182225 Mar 1, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean like there was no discrimination in preventing interracial marriages, since all black and white people could already marry someone of the same race?
Did you read my post? The court explained the difference, and why Loving v Virgina as well as the race argument is not the same.

I am sorry that you have comprehension problems.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#182226 Mar 1, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Sorry to hear that. Was it a hot LZ? Where you in the 101, or 82nd
Don't even speak to him about it. You have no right to do so. "Was it a hot LZ?"....What the hell do you think, you moron ? That he was jumping for fun ?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#182227 Mar 1, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course, that's patently absurd, since of COURSE gay men and lesbian women are disproportional disadvantages and burdened by such bans.
This reasoning counted only exist if there were no such thing as people who can only be attracted to the same gender.
Try proving that one.
That's why this type of reasoning has fallen out of favor legally.
Deal with it.
I don't need to prove anything you moron, that was the decision of the COURT..

I'm sorry that you don't like it.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#182228 Mar 1, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe.
Maybe not.
I might be Superman who wanders the land for days given there are so few phone booths anymore.
Go back to Japan. We do not need you to add add to our "Dumb-ass" problem. And, cast no aspersions on a veteran. You should be so brave, as to enlist....punk.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#182229 Mar 1, 2013
Edgar wrote:
<quoted text>
But this is factually untrue in some states, akpilot, and soon to be so in more. Gay marriage is expanding.
Civil rights movements throughout history do not have a history of being snuffed out easily, at least in this country. Maybe in North Korea or China they do, but not here.
Sorry.
Again, that was the decision of the court, I am sorry you don't like it.

And as far as same sex marriage spreading through the State's, it just may, but it should do so the correct way. The way our founders intended it, through the will of the people.

Funny how marriage is somehow a "right" that cannot be infringed when marriage is found nowhere in the Constitution, yet the right to bear arms which is in the Constitution can be trampled at will.

Interesting.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#182230 Mar 1, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>Polygamy was already banned.
So?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#182231 Mar 1, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
No need to look at any links.
Loser punks like you spouting off ignorant statements have more "detractors" than a stray dog in Detroit has fleas little buddy.
Jesus H Christ wannabe, pedalling around Sacramento in a clown car with garish paint, and a calliope in the background, looking for gay blond men to blo, are you still here ?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#182232 Mar 1, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Dumb?
LOL!!!
Everyone from the President to Clint Eastwood want that bullshit ruling stricken.
Funny thing. We don't have racial segregation in schools anymore either.
Evolution my little cro-magnon. Happens.
You've got more lies than a Chongo, on crack, on a Friday "Gubmint check came today" night. Not everyone. Stop your lies, little man.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#182233 Mar 1, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>On February 7, 2012, in a 21 decision, a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel affirmed Walker's decision declaring the Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional.
That ruling said nothing of or about polygamy, now did it?
Funny, I don't remember there being anything in Obama-care about a "tax", yet the SCOTUS said there was?

I guess reality doesn't really matter when dealing with the liberal social agenda?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 14 hr JOEL 70,988
Carmel River diverted to allow dam removal, pre... Tue Clint 1
Calif. cop may be fired for giving suicidal stu... Dec 13 John Smith 1
Kristen Scannell Saratoga Springs NY Adds New H... Dec 12 Alex Montgomery 1
Who do you think is the MOST corrupt Monterey C... Dec 9 montereyusedtobenice 1
where can I find heroin in monterey? Dec 9 montereyusedtobenice 5
Help! In need of opiates preferably boi Dec 5 Njp9080 1
Monterey Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Monterey News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Monterey

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 10:24 am PST