Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Big D]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Everything you say I should do I have done. You shout me down, accuse me of lying, ridicule me order me to go out and campaign, and then tell me I should do what I have already done again.
Priceless!

OK let me put it in very simple terms for you.

You are trying to say that one leads to another which leads to another etc

Work to get poly legal in one state, a state that already recognizes same sex marriages ( else your argument won’t work ) and then we can discuss if one led to the other.

If Utah recognizes poly, that won’t work, because Utah does not ( and will not soon ) recognize same sex marriages.

The Brown case is in a state ( I think ) which does not recognize same sex marriages so that certainly would not apply as one leading to the other.

The only way you can even start to make the case that one leads to the other is to get Poly recognized in a state that does recognize same sex marriages ( and preferably not in any state that does not ) and then you can just barely start to make the case that one leads to the other.

after that you can work on your sister, and then perhaps your goat if you really want to carry it that far.:)

But before you can make any argument that one leads to another, you need to get one state to recognize it, a state that currently recognizes same sex marriage.

So far… you got zip

Go get google glass and we will watch, it will be fun!

[Xavier Breath]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

We shouldn't have to specify opposite sex, same sex, or poly. It's all marriage. And all should be equal. They are not.
.

All should be equal? Let me know when 3 = 2.

[Xavier Breath]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

Am I too provocative for you to handle son?

Hardly. You're too stupid.

[KiMare]

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Polygamy has been far more active than calling gay couples married.
In any culture. Anywhere. At any time.
Smile.

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
Wrong
Not in the US and certainly not lately, so not anywhere and anytime. Same Sex marriage is legal in 10 states and DC, how many is Poly legal in... I will give you a hint..... none
There are today over a hundred thousand legally married gay couples in the US alone, far more than Poly marriages
I am sure I would find the same true in the 17 other countries that legally marry same sex couples.
Welcome to today
However if Poly is so “active” why has there not been more of a push to make it legal?
However if Poly is so “active” why has there not been more of a push to make it legal?

Nice try.

Polygamy has existed in cultures from start to finish throughout human history, and been fully accepted in many. Gay 'marriage' has never been fully accepted and only extremely brief and rarely observed.

And yes, polygamy showed up in the US long ago, and has never been extinguished. Only in the last decade has gay 'marriages' attempted to get a foothold. Hardly a comparison.

As many posters point out, there always has been a push, and if gay couples impose their relationship on marriage, polygamy will legally be required to be accepted. You know that.

Smile.

[Big D]

Remember the pitfalls

While you are getting those signatures for your ballot measure, if Utah suddenly recognizes Poly Marriage, you just lost your entire case, as that could not possibly have come from Same Sex marriage.

Just want you to be aware of the pitfall in your strawm..... I mean...in your argument.

[KiMare]

Jazybird58 wrote:

<quoted text>
Please indicate how property disbursement will be allocated in a poly marriage where a man has say 4 wives.
wife # 1 , married 15 years,
wife #2, married 10 years,
wife #3 Married, 5 years,
wife # 4 married 1 year,
The husband wishes to divorce wife #1. Will she get the house, and a bulk of his assets? How will that be fair to the 3 remaining wives.
He wants to divorce all 4, how will the property be split, will it be based on duration of each marriage.
The husband dies, at that point all 4 are widows, tell me who will receive his social security, will each of them receive the same?
As you can see same sex marriages will not affect any standing laws.

1. If marriage is dumbed down to a friendship as a civil right, it does not matter what laws will be affected.

2. Which brings us to your claim that gay marriage won't affect any standing laws. A silly assertion that your own example proves will require legal changes among numerous other consequences.

Smile.

[Big D]

KiMare wrote:

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Polygamy has been far more active than calling gay couples married.
In any culture. Anywhere. At any time.
Smile.
<quoted text>
Nice try.
Polygamy has existed in cultures from start to finish throughout human history, and been fully accepted in many. Gay 'marriage' has never been fully accepted and only extremely brief and rarely observed.
And yes, polygamy showed up in the US long ago, and has never been extinguished. Only in the last decade has gay 'marriages' attempted to get a foothold. Hardly a comparison.
As many posters point out, there always has been a push, and if gay couples impose their relationship on marriage, polygamy will legally be required to be accepted. You know that.
Smile.

You said "anytime, anywhere"

wrong... the time is now, the place is here in the US

[Xavier Breath]

KiMare wrote:

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Polygamy has been far more active than calling gay couples married.
In any culture. Anywhere. At any time.
Smile.

So what? Are you attempting to use an appeal to popularity to prove your point?

[Xavier Breath]

KiMare wrote:

As many posters point out, there always has been a push, and if gay couples impose their relationship on marriage, polygamy will legally be required to be accepted.
Smile.

Really? What law is that?

[Frankie Rizzo]

Xavier Breath wrote:

<quoted text>
Then why aren't the Browns asking for it?

Stupid question.

[Frankie Rizzo]

Xavier Breath wrote:

<quoted text>
Who says they were denied equal protection?

Polyamorists wishing to marry are denied equal protection Miss Thing.

The are not allowed to do it. They will go to prison if they do.

Same sex and opposite sex marriages are allowed by the feds. You can do it. You won't go to prison, you'll even get lots of free stuff!

This is not equal protection. Are you starting to get it Miss Thing?

[Frankie Rizzo]

Xavier Breath wrote:

<quoted text>
Really? What law is that?

Logic. Fairness. Equal protection.

[Frankie Rizzo]

Xavier Breath wrote:

<quoted text>Hardly. You're too stupid.

Ad hominem dopiness.

[Jazybird58]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
1. If marriage is dumbed down to a friendship as a civil right, it does not matter what laws will be affected.
2. Which brings us to your claim that gay marriage won't affect any standing laws. A silly assertion that your own example proves will require legal changes among numerous other consequences.
Smile.

How does smae sex marriage change any laws?

[Jazybird58]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Ad hominem dopiness.

Ad hominem ,Hello Frankie

[Frankie Rizzo]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
OK let me put it in very simple terms for you.
You are trying to say that one leads to another which leads to another etc
Work to get poly legal in one state, a state that already recognizes same sex marriages ( else your argument won’t work ) and then we can discuss if one led to the other.
If Utah recognizes poly, that won’t work, because Utah does not ( and will not soon ) recognize same sex marriages.
The Brown case is in a state ( I think ) which does not recognize same sex marriages so that certainly would not apply as one leading to the other.
The only way you can even start to make the case that one leads to the other is to get Poly recognized in a state that does recognize same sex marriages ( and preferably not in any state that does not ) and then you can just barely start to make the case that one leads to the other.
after that you can work on your sister, and then perhaps your goat if you really want to carry it that far.:)
But before you can make any argument that one leads to another, you need to get one state to recognize it, a state that currently recognizes same sex marriage.
So far… you got zip
Go get google glass and we will watch, it will be fun!

I am saying legalizing same sex marriage will make it much easier to legalize polygamy.

And it will, it's logical, grasshopper. Glad it makes you so silly mad. It makes me happy. I like same sex marriage being allowed I also like poly marriage being allowed.

Marriage is good for society ALL marriages. Not just Big D approved marriages. You have no say in anyone's equal rights. You don't matter. Just grin and bear it. Won't hurt you at all.

[Pietro Armando]

Xavier Breath wrote:

<quoted text>
Then why aren't the Browns asking for it?

One step at a time.

[Frankie Rizzo]

Pietro Armando wrote:

<quoted text>
One step at a time.

And Neil Andblowme or whatever his current sock is cringes with each step!

Good! He has found some people find social change very painful.

No pain for Neil Andblowme, no gain for equality.

[akpilot]

Xavier Breath wrote:

<quoted text>
You disagree with that statement?

What statement? The one where I called you an idiot?

[Frankie Rizzo]

Funny how when Jizzybirdy shows up, the judge-it rigging goes into high gear!

You gotta try and make it credible Jizzy you big stupid galoot!

Too funny. What a dope.