Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments
157,901 - 157,920 of 200,576 Comments Last updated 9 hrs ago
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180953 Feb 23, 2013
If anyone sees "Xavier Breath" stick a fork in him. I think he's done.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#180954 Feb 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

I have a letter certifying my sanity, this is a clear indication you need to pursue one. I can help you some more if you'd like.
Smile.
You claim to have 3, and you also claimed to lie to friends in order to obtain them.

Why are you so boastful about this?

Inner lesbian remembers things.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180955 Feb 23, 2013
Marriage. There is no one right way.
PooMobila

Covina, CA

#180956 Feb 23, 2013
Look another paving job over the "out of towners" stupid postings.

It's reported that the pope commissioned a two-volume, 300-page document that ended up exposing a network of gay bishops within the Vatican.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#180957 Feb 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180958 Feb 23, 2013
PooMobila wrote:
Look another paving job over the "out of towners" stupid postings.
It's reported that the pope commissioned a two-volume, 300-page document that ended up exposing a network of gay bishops within the Vatican.
Some Big Cardinal muckety muck who will be among those choosing a new pope said it's time the church came in to the 21st century (Having skipped the twentieth!) and letting priests marry. He thinks it will make them less randy, but it won't. Ask any married man!
Walking

Covina, CA

#180959 Feb 23, 2013
The pile of Dungs are adding up, Communist China, Russia and now.

Iranís (blowHards) powerful or is that less? Revolutionary Guard says it has captured a foreign unmanned aircraft during a military exercise in southern Iran.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#180960 Feb 23, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would Diana Ross rule on that?:)
My thoughts exactly!

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#180961 Feb 23, 2013
GOP idiots wrote:
Whats even more shameful is the facts this lousy piece of DUNG and his party of idiots will be shutting down the government and the VA because they are just plain stupid.
They have and are ruining this country.
U.S. House Speaker John Boehner (BAY'-nur) is a pathtic piece of DUNG and he can't learn to shut his stinking mouth.
Boehner also says the compensation claims backlog remains alarmingly high nationally and in Ohio. He says system failures reported by Ohio veterans are shameful, like his filthy mouth shameful.
As a registered democrat I have to say it ain't just the GOP. Last count there are 535 over paid uncooperative whiny ignorant self absorbed loud mouthed spoiled little rich brats in Congress.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#180962 Feb 23, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
If you love diversity and hate segregation; keep marriage one man and one woman.
If you're stupid and you know it post again!
If you're stupid and wanna show it post again!
If you're stupid we should know it, post again!
If you're stupid, wanna show it, just hit send!
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#180963 Feb 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. Polygamy will still be illegal, but it will have one more restriction removed, prop 8.
Prop 8 says marriage is a man and a woman. That's not fair. Not fair to homosexuals and EQUALLY unfair to polyamorists.
Striking down prop 8 strikes down the "a" part of "a" man and "a" woman as well as the "man" "woman" part.
So you see, it is very on topic. The only reason you try to spin that it's not is because you are a hypocrite. And it righfully makes you uncomfortable. That's on you Miss Thing, not me.
Look, dummy. Prop 8 does NOT strike down the "a" thing. It was in effect BEFORE Prop 8 and it will continue to be in effect AFTER Prop 8. The "a" thing was NOT struck down.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#180964 Feb 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Hardly, it is in fact carrying the context of gender, rather than illogically embracing every other aspect of marriage.
The fact is, marriage has always been the reunion of genders into a genderless being. In fact, it harkens back to the very roots of life; simple, genderless life forms.
Gay couples, on the other hand, are simply duplicate unions. Always only half of what a heterosexual couple equates to.
Smile.
<quoted text>
I accurately correct an attempt to divert from gender equality, and you turn around and do the same thing right off the bat (pun intended).
Here, let me school you;
We were not talking about numbers, we were talking about genders (See the very first sentence I posted for context). A gay couple represents half the available genders. A heterosexual couple is as diverse as gender possible. Both have two people, but one has only half the genders.
If I am unstable, what does that make you?
I have a letter certifying my sanity, this is a clear indication you need to pursue one. I can help you some more if you'd like.
Smile.
...yawn...
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#180965 Feb 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
If anyone sees "Xavier Breath" stick a fork in him. I think he's done.
It's no secret that what you think has little value, but why in the world would you say that?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180966 Feb 23, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Look, dummy. Prop 8 does NOT strike down the "a" thing. It was in effect BEFORE Prop 8 and it will continue to be in effect AFTER Prop 8. The "a" thing was NOT struck down.
You have to do a little thinking here dummy, but it will be worth it. If Prop 8 stood as law of the land it will be even harder to make poly legal. The federal law would be gone but prop 8 would still be saying "a man and a woman!"

Not only will polyamorists have to strike down the federal law, but Prop 8 as well. But that won't happen, you're doing a fine job of getting rid of it for them! Even if that is not your intention, I'm sure they appreciate it. By the way most polyamorists support same sex marriage, why do you alienate them? Let me answer. Because you're an ignorant hypocrite!

Do you understand now, Miss Thing?

Marriage. There is no one right way.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180968 Feb 23, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
It's no secret that what you think has little value, but why in the world would you say that?
Because you are a loss for a cogent argument and all you do is post dopey ad hominem against me and others.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180969 Feb 23, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
...yawn...
>>>FART!<<<
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180970 Feb 23, 2013
sheesh void of hate wrote:
<quoted text>
As a registered democrat I have to say it ain't just the GOP. Last count there are 535 over paid uncooperative whiny ignorant self absorbed loud mouthed spoiled little rich brats in Congress.
Here here! Refreshing post! Thank you.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#180971 Feb 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Because you are a loss for a cogent argument and all you do is post dopey ad hominem against me and others.
What's cogent about being off topic, dumbass?
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#180972 Feb 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
>>>FART!<<<
How mature. I bet you still watch cartoons and read comic books.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#180973 Feb 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You have to do a little thinking here dummy, but it will be worth it. If Prop 8 stood as law of the land it will be even harder to make poly legal. The federal law would be gone but prop 8 would still be saying "a man and a woman!"
Not only will polyamorists have to strike down the federal law, but Prop 8 as well. But that won't happen, you're doing a fine job of getting rid of it for them! Even if that is not your intention, I'm sure they appreciate it. By the way most polyamorists support same sex marriage, why do you alienate them? Let me answer. Because you're an ignorant hypocrite!
Do you understand now, Miss Thing?
Marriage. There is no one right way.
Oh, I understand that you THINK you know what you're talking about, but you don't. Prop 8 did not affect polygamy in any way. It was already illegal. DO YOU UNDERSTAND? PROP 8 DIDN'T MAKE POLYGAMY DOUBLE ILLEGAL.

I don't give a flying fuck what polygamists support. It is a total non-issue, except in your damaged brain.... you're like a stuck vinyl record... time to make the move to mp3.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 42 min Macko mono 5,000
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 2 hr JOEL 68,955
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 9 hr Tank ever 7,926
First City Festival 2014 Brings Ugly Rock Metal... 16 hr JoeMama 2
Suri Cruise's dog is missing in Los Angeles 18 hr Money 1
Mills brothers face new lawsuits over loans (Nov '08) Tue Plain Simple 16
MONTEREY HERALD LOSS monterey bay, monterey cit... Aug 26 roensoledad 2
•••
•••

Monterey Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Monterey News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Monterey
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••