Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments
157,881 - 157,900 of 200,607 Comments Last updated 1 hr ago
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180933 Feb 22, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Godwin's law ?
Wait for it....... Wait for it.......
"sickofit wrote:
<Godwin's Law>
Not a real law...And as long as you act like a nazi will call you one."
Ahh, handled nicely, by one of your lot, er, ilk.(Thank you, Mr. Nazi)
It's "not a real law" when Rose_NoHo's friends evoke it.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180934 Feb 22, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Wouldn't dream of it.
Because here is the proof that you are the liar. Please read this cut-n-paste of the entire exchange between you and akpilot, and witness the fact that nowhere in these exchanges has he posted that he doesn't know what that 4th grade nonsense means. He has posted that there is a difference between knowing what it means and using it.
Please read:
" Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Not my fault you are ignorant.
But you could try using a search engine.
IKYABWAI
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php ...
Urban dictionary? And you are calling me ignorant?
Thanks for the laugh.
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, you are ignorant.
You don't even know what IKYABWAI means.
LOLSER.
Do you know what that means?
Knowing what it means is a far cry from actually using it.
If you are trying to make a case for your famed high level of education, you are doing a piss poor job of it.
Seriously, citing the Urban Dictionary? Put down the pipe Rose and join the rest of us in reality.
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Knowing what it means is a far cry from actually using it.
If you are trying to make a case for your famed high level of education, you are doing a piss poor job of it.
Seriously, citing the Urban Dictionary? Put down the pipe Rose and join the rest of us in reality.
You didn't know what it meant.
Why else would you have said anything about Urban Dictionary? LOL!
Must suck to be you. "
Thank you for being so easy to prove as the liar. Spin away. I already expect you to attempt to twist this into some bullshit. Save yourself some wasted time and simply admit that you got caught like a rat in a trap of your own making. Dumb-ass. And liar.
She's insane. She thinks same sex marriage is da bomb, but poly marriage is a fish.

In fact anything that challenges her dopey bullsh!t is a fish. Or a man made out of straw. Or a "logical fallacy". Easy!
TrapDoor

Covina, CA

#180935 Feb 22, 2013
Frankie they are getting your gallows with the trap door that falls away ready for you.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180936 Feb 22, 2013
TrapDoor wrote:
Frankie they are getting your gallows with the trap door that falls away ready for you.
Is that what happens to those that don't toe the party line in the land of tolerance and diversity?

Be careful! You may be next.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#180937 Feb 23, 2013
If you love diversity and hate segregation; keep marriage one man and one woman.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#180938 Feb 23, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't seem to know what "default" means, stupid. And gay people have other options. And, stupid, anal sex isn't inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.
1. It means 'another option', but includes the element of 'fault' in it.

2. Where did I say gays didn't have other default options. Or anyone for that matter. What I did say, is the that the union of body, mind and spirit by marriage can only be imitated by gays by default.

3. Intercourse violates sphincter muscles. Eat sh/t and die if it is so healthy, otherwise sit on it!

Ho, Ho, Ho.

Since: Mar 07

The entire US of A

#180939 Feb 23, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
If you love diversity and hate segregation; keep marriage one man and one woman.
This is the type of line of thinking that happens when someone finally gives up. They KNOW there is no rational argument against same sex marriage, and admit it, but they just can't stop posting.

It's sad, really. But kind of funny, too. They are proposing that the government interfere with marriage choices to an unprecedented and unsustainable level.

They are demanding "diversity" inside of each marriage, so they must also require different religions and races to be present inside each marriage. It's not just gender that receives government protection against segregation and discrimination.

Can you imagine the tax dollars and levels of governmental interference in personal lives required to implement their ideas?

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#180940 Feb 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>

This is a perfectly good marriage equality thread. If you are truly interested in MARRIAGE EQUALITY. And not more of the same. Equality for approved groups only.
Your attempts at censorship suck.
Silly me, I thought the thread was entitled "Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage". Mea culpa.

Your attempts at diversionary tactics suck.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180941 Feb 23, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Silly me, I thought the thread was entitled "Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage". Mea culpa.
Your attempts at diversionary tactics suck.
That's what they all say, poly isn't marriage equality because the judge didn't mention it.

But striking down prop 8, which mandates that marriage is between one man and a one woman, also strikes down that pesky "one" thing along with that pesky "man woman" thing. Glad it makes you mad, hypocrite! But you can't have one without the other and have equality.

Marriage equality is for everyone, not just people you approve of.
Rainbow

Covina, CA

#180942 Feb 23, 2013
And why doesn't the little pea brained GOP, Republican and tea party idiots go fly kites.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#180943 Feb 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Eat sh/t and die if it is so healthy, otherwise sit on it!
Ho, Ho, Ho.
Careful, your sock puppet is showing.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#180944 Feb 23, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
This is the type of line of thinking that happens when someone finally gives up. They KNOW there is no rational argument against same sex marriage, and admit it, but they just can't stop posting.
It's sad, really. But kind of funny, too. They are proposing that the government interfere with marriage choices to an unprecedented and unsustainable level.
They are demanding "diversity" inside of each marriage, so they must also require different religions and races to be present inside each marriage. It's not just gender that receives government protection against segregation and discrimination.
Can you imagine the tax dollars and levels of governmental interference in personal lives required to implement their ideas?
Hardly, it is in fact carrying the context of gender, rather than illogically embracing every other aspect of marriage.

The fact is, marriage has always been the reunion of genders into a genderless being. In fact, it harkens back to the very roots of life; simple, genderless life forms.

Gay couples, on the other hand, are simply duplicate unions. Always only half of what a heterosexual couple equates to.

Smile.
aLeppoo

Covina, CA

#180945 Feb 23, 2013
What took you clown "out of towners" post-toasties so long to make a come back?
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#180946 Feb 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
The subject is marriage equality, why does that upset you so much if it includes ALL MARRIAGES? Are you a hypocrite and you're mad at me for it? It's on you Miss Thing. Deal with it.
http://poly-nyc.com/
The subject is Prop 8, not marriage equality. You fail at reading comprehension....AGAIN.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#180947 Feb 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
That's what they all say, poly isn't marriage equality because the judge didn't mention it.
But striking down prop 8, which mandates that marriage is between one man and a one woman, also strikes down that pesky "one" thing along with that pesky "man woman" thing. Glad it makes you mad, hypocrite! But you can't have one without the other and have equality.
Marriage equality is for everyone, not just people you approve of.
Polygamy was illegal BEFORE Prop 8. It will reamin illegal after Prop 8. Striking down Prop 8 will NOT strike down bigamy laws. Prop 8 had NOTHING to do with polygamy. This thread is not about polygamy. The article in question is not about polygamy, nor does it mention polygamy. None of the judges made any ruling concerning polygamy.... they did NOT strike down that "pesky one thing."
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#180948 Feb 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Hardly, it is in fact carrying the context of gender, rather than illogically embracing every other aspect of marriage.
The fact is, marriage has always been the reunion of genders into a genderless being. In fact, it harkens back to the very roots of life; simple, genderless life forms.
Gay couples, on the other hand, are simply duplicate unions. Always only half of what a heterosexual couple equates to.
Smile.
So now two is half of two, eh? I figured out you are "unstable" but now I know you're off-the-deep-end nuts.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180949 Feb 23, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
The subject is Prop 8, not marriage equality. You fail at reading comprehension....AGAIN.
Yes. Prop 8 says marriage is a man and a woman. That's not fair. Not fair to homosexuals and EQUALLY unfair to polyamorists.

Striking down prop 8 strikes down the "a" part of "a" man and "a" woman as well as the "man" "woman" part.

So you see, it is very on topic. The only reason you try to spin that it's not is because you are a hypocrite. And it righfully makes you uncomfortable. That's on you Miss Thing, not me.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180950 Feb 23, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Polygamy was illegal BEFORE Prop 8. It will reamin illegal after Prop 8. Striking down Prop 8 will NOT strike down bigamy laws. Prop 8 had NOTHING to do with polygamy. This thread is not about polygamy. The article in question is not about polygamy, nor does it mention polygamy. None of the judges made any ruling concerning polygamy.... they did NOT strike down that "pesky one thing."
Yes. Polygamy will still be illegal, but it will have one more restriction removed, prop 8.

Prop 8 says marriage is a man and a woman. That's not fair. Not fair to homosexuals and EQUALLY unfair to polyamorists.

Striking down prop 8 strikes down the "a" part of "a" man and "a" woman as well as the "man" "woman" part.

So you see, it is very on topic. The only reason you try to spin that it's not is because you are a hypocrite. And it righfully makes you uncomfortable. That's on you Miss Thing, not me.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180951 Feb 23, 2013

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#180952 Feb 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Hardly, it is in fact carrying the context of gender, rather than illogically embracing every other aspect of marriage.
The fact is, marriage has always been the reunion of genders into a genderless being. In fact, it harkens back to the very roots of life; simple, genderless life forms.
Gay couples, on the other hand, are simply duplicate unions. Always only half of what a heterosexual couple equates to.
Smile.
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
So now two is half of two, eh? I figured out you are "unstable" but now I know you're off-the-deep-end nuts.
I accurately correct an attempt to divert from gender equality, and you turn around and do the same thing right off the bat (pun intended).

Here, let me school you;

We were not talking about numbers, we were talking about genders (See the very first sentence I posted for context). A gay couple represents half the available genders. A heterosexual couple is as diverse as gender possible. Both have two people, but one has only half the genders.

If I am unstable, what does that make you?

I have a letter certifying my sanity, this is a clear indication you need to pursue one. I can help you some more if you'd like.

Smile.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 1 hr JOEL 69,038
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 4 hr Brett Weir 15,965
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 8 hr Duh 5,015
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 15 hr napalmers 7,933
First City Festival 2014 Brings Ugly Rock Metal... Aug 28 JoeMama 2
Suri Cruise's dog is missing in Los Angeles Aug 28 Money 1
My fears for Doris Day: Confidante who spent 40... (Oct '13) Aug 28 marti eton square 4
•••
•••
•••

Monterey Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Monterey News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Monterey
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••