Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201822 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#180413 Feb 20, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, the surrender argument. But losing a father isn't as great a loss as losing a mother, in terms of demographics..........
Tell that to his wife and kids.

The bottom line is that, like so many other things in life, it should not be up to you to choose. It's up to the people involved, people making well reasoned choices, based on their abilities, goals and dreams.

Would I make that choice? No Way. Unless there was no other way. I would not have the physical ability to do it, but I know men and women who do.

And you cannot choose for THEM.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#180414 Feb 20, 2013
Quest wrote:
Tell that to his wife and kids.
Let's be clear, you want more husbands and children to be told of the loss or injury of a woman combat soldier; this is where we differ.

.
Quest wrote:
The bottom line is that, like so many other things in life, it should not be up to you to choose.
Leadership is choosing; I choose life. It is up to each of you to choose right over wrong, no matter personal preference.

.
Quest wrote:
It's up to the people involved, people making well reasoned choices, based on their abilities, goals and dreams.
Once they volunteer, they are part of the organization and share group goals. It's up to leadership to make sure those goals are focused.

I support women combat troops only in segregated units, to preserve life and get objective data.

.
Quest wrote:
Would I make that choice?
We all make a choice, if you choose not to serve, I'm OK with that. You aren't a bad person if you don't serve, you aren't unpatriotic.

Very few qualify, less have the physical attributes for training and advancement. Women can't pass the physical fitness tests, when they are unisex. The scores are adjusted by gender and age.

.
Quest wrote:
No Way. Unless there was no other way.
Which is it? Lead, follow or get out of the way.

.
Quest wrote:
I would not have the physical ability to do it, but I know men and women who do.
Please name any women that's passed a combat course without injury. Please name one that passed without injury. They don't exist because the training is too physically strenuous.

.
Quest wrote:
And you cannot choose for THEM.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180415 Feb 20, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, except for the simple fact that the majority of gay folks don't engage in it, and the majority of straight folks have tried it.
And how would you go about identifying who is gay by this factor?
By this standard, the majority of folks would be gay, wouldn't they?
I think that means you are completely surrounded.
I'm not saying there is anything wrong with anal sex. But your "simple fact" is spin.

The "simple fact" is that most gay men engage in anal sex and most straight men don't.

Sex is fun! With whatever consenting adult partner(s) you like. Enjoy! But be safe.
sid

Brisbane, Australia

#180416 Feb 20, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, except for the simple fact that the majority of gay folks don't engage in it, and the majority of straight folks have tried it.
And how would you go about identifying who is gay by this factor?
By this standard, the majority of folks would be gay, wouldn't they?
I think that means you are completely surrounded.


Plenty but that's bye the bye.

(The Fixers "inquiring minds" we & all that .... will keep asking)

Your choice. If you want to continue your cowardly, yellow-bellied ways that's up to you.

We will ask you the same questions day after day as in the past until you either piss off or answer them,

Get that into your thick MalbarCACa dunce head.

Who is "we" ti IndoMauritian pilon IMPOSTOR (ID #1 Port Melbourne, Australia Gesundheit!! Pillock Patron5 the mullet *I* had #201
deleted because it was unforgivably offensive of The ADELAIDEANs)

How do you know this JB?

Where do you go to read his posts online?

What other names does this JB have?

What other names do you have?

Why do you come here?

How much do they pay you?

Then:

You have unfinished business, reply to this by adding to the beginning of each one of these sentences: We all the ADELAIDEANs and Neville Benders:

Condemn, reprehend, admonish Julie chamberpot WORLD People (Iford Romford UK) in all her guises for her abusive actions, conduct and behaviour in all Topix forums.

Condemn Julie chamberpot WORLD People (Iford Romford UK) for her racist, bigoted and prejudiced opinions,views,comments and remarks.

Reprehend Julie chamberpot WORLD People(Iford Romford UK) for being a black dalit sewer rat chharchhobi transvestite
MalbarKAKALatrine FUCKTARD and his cohorts for causing irreparable damage to the Australian and Mauritian forums.

Admonish Julie chamberpot WORLD People(IfordRomford UK) for being an ignorant buffoon and a worthless vermin scumbags and VERMIN.

Condemn, Reprehend, admonish Real Indian PoonJABI Sikh The Anti-Muhammad Singh The Aggrolite for being a lunatic, madman, deranged, demented, crazy, ROMEO TINY Real Indian inferior midget turd, Rupert PIN DICK FOOFTER The Maniac Psycho Anti-Muhammad Greensborough Insane Lunatic Nutcase, a SPAMalot IDENTITY THIEF, PLAGIARIZER, ROBBER and IMPOSTOR Ringwood, Australia SPASTIC FUCKTURD PHAGGOT SHEMALE F*CKWIT.

Condemn, Reprehend, admonish cute Real Indian levi, LEVI, Levi boy ti IndoMauritian pilon IMPOSTOR (ID #13 United States, Australia chickyladyrentboy monkey of The ADELAIDEANs) for being deranged, obssessed and delusional and Not only dumb but a fraud, a liar, an impostor, a fraudster, a troll for hire and rent by his own admission but more importantly a farcical clown and jerk and a total doorknob Stupif DICKHEAD.

Condemn, Reprehend, admonish MALBARcaca shapeshifters, The Beady Banger, Beadys Brother Atlanta, GA, MALBAR CACA shirt lifter, MalbarCACA Bum Bandit, punjabi sid, SAD,for having given a whole new meaning to the expression "A race to the bottom" and for being Go suck on dogshit sid's castrated genitals idiotic black dalit sewer rat chharchhobi transvestite MalbarKAKALatrine FUCKTARD sIndians.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#180417 Feb 20, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not saying there is anything wrong with anal sex. But your "simple fact" is spin.
The "simple fact" is that most gay men engage in anal sex and most straight men don't.
Sex is fun! With whatever consenting adult partner(s) you like. Enjoy! But be safe.
Anal Sex More Popular Than Possibly Expected Among Heterosexual Couples: Center for Disease Control and Prevention Report
Though its practice is frequently assumed to be confined to the gay male population, anal intercourse appears to be more popular than possibly expected among heterosexual couples under 45, according to a Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report.

The report, titled "Sexual Behavior, Sexual Attraction and Sexual Identity in the United States," which reportedly polled thousands of people between the ages of 15 and 44 from 2006 through 2008, found that 44 percent of straight men and 36 percent of straight women admitted to having had anal sex at least once in their lives.
http://www.google.com/url...

From the CDC

http://www.google.com/url...
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180418 Feb 20, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>
Anal Sex More Popular Than Possibly Expected Among Heterosexual Couples: Center for Disease Control and Prevention Report
Though its practice is frequently assumed to be confined to the gay male population, anal intercourse appears to be more popular than possibly expected among heterosexual couples under 45, according to a Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report.
The report, titled "Sexual Behavior, Sexual Attraction and Sexual Identity in the United States," which reportedly polled thousands of people between the ages of 15 and 44 from 2006 through 2008, found that 44 percent of straight men and 36 percent of straight women admitted to having had anal sex at least once in their lives.
http://www.google.com/url...
From the CDC
http://www.google.com/url...
Sure. But the fact is most straight men don't routinely do anal sex and most gay men do.

Like I said, noting wrong with it. Just be safe! OK Fruitloops?

If you're gonna ask the answer is yes I do! My lady likes it. And I aim to please!
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#180419 Feb 20, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps you are even more ignorant than I think you are
BINGO!
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#180420 Feb 20, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Anal sex is the key identifying factor of gays. It is the most intimate act between gays. You know I'm talking about the essence of homosexuality when I bring up anal sex.
As to it' inherent harm, unhealthiness and demeaning nature, I simply post a medical site that labels it a violation of design, THE MOST DANGEROUS SEXUAL ACT OF ALL, and REQUIRING an anal condom and lubrication to even begin to bring it into a risky behavior! You never mention the issue of playing in fecal matter, because even denial has a hard time getting past that. Moreover, you prove the demeaning nature by your forklift backing up when anyone addresses the issue.
Instead you throw out the gay twirl mantra,'everybody does it', as if that makes it okay. Childish reasoning at the most.
All of this denies the obvious. If the anus had evolved for intercourse, it would be a vagina. Instead, it ends up being a default hole because gays have no option for a vagina.
As to epi-marker mistakes, thank you for a the reference to study.
Your defense however is silly. Nature does have it's reasons, and the study is an example of humans understanding them.
In this case, epi-marker 'notes' are accidentally left on the genetic code of opposite gender children of a parent. They have even identified situations where the accident most often occurs.
It is quickly becoming obvious that reality will require GLBT's to face the fact that they are in the ranks of the genetically handicapped. I would suggest you will find far less opposition developing rights by operating from a basis of reality, that historically people know by intuition, rather than demanding that people accept your denial.
Think about it.
"Anal sex is the key identifying factor of gays."

hahahaahah
ahahahhahaha
ahhaahahahah
ahahahahahahahah

The rest of your post is equally laughable.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#180423 Feb 20, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure. But the fact is most straight men don't routinely do anal sex and most gay men do.
Like I said, noting wrong with it. Just be safe! OK Fruitloops?
If you're gonna ask the answer is yes I do! My lady likes it. And I aim to please!
Sure, but like I said you cant read.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180424 Feb 20, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Sure, but like I said you cant read.
Great argument Fruitcake! One of your best yet.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180425 Feb 20, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
"Anal sex is the key identifying factor of gays."
hahahaahah
ahahahhahaha
ahhaahahahah
ahahahahahahahah
The rest of your post is equally laughable.
There's that insane Aida Lott cackle! Woo HOOO!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#180426 Feb 20, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>There is no gender equality right, combat is strenuous and women don't meet the standard, most men don't meet the standards, of combat unit physical fitness. I respect reality, gender equality doesn't exist.
That doesn't mean you can behave unfairly or neglect valuable assets; if the administration insists on women in combat, let it be in segregated units, for everyone's safety.
.
<quoted text>None have shown they can pass infantry or any combat MOS's physical fitness standards; that's why they don't qualify. Most men can't meet those physical fitness standards either; and our military strives for excellence. Lowering standards is a step backwards, toward defeat.
.
<quoted text>I support equal rights for gay people, just not special rights to rewrite marriage law. I'm pro gay because I always write, there is nothing wrong with homosexuals or homosexuality. Also note, many gays and lesbians agree with us, bisexuals too!
Keep marriage as is because radical social change can be very bad. Very, very bad.
You are incredibly behind the times, you are wrong in every single statement you made.

They have already passed fitness requirements, they have already served on the front lines they have already fought and died under enemy fire.

You are just ignorant of the fact.

I understand you donít like laws to change, get over it, we changed the laws that allowed slaves, we changed the laws that denied women the vote, we changed the laws that kept people of color in a lower class, and this law will change too, regardless of your fear of it.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180427 Feb 20, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>BINGO!
Great argument! Proves your point well.

P.S. What's your point?

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#180428 Feb 20, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Great argument Fruitcake! One of your best yet.
Hey Dumbflucker, the CDC posted the numbers. Its not my fault that you don't understand percentages. Let me help 50% means half of 100%
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180429 Feb 20, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You are incredibly behind the times, you are wrong in every single statement you made.
They have already passed fitness requirements, they have already served on the front lines they have already fought and died under enemy fire.
You are just ignorant of the fact.
I understand you donít like laws to change, get over it, we changed the laws that allowed slaves, we changed the laws that denied women the vote, we changed the laws that kept people of color in a lower class, and this law will change too, regardless of your fear of it.
And the laws against polygamy will change too regardless of "everyone else's" (not yours of course!) fear of it.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180430 Feb 20, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Hey Dumbflucker, the CDC posted the numbers. Its not my fault that you don't understand percentages. Let me help 50% means half of 100%
More gay men practice anal sex than straight men. Spin that skippy. Prove me wrong.

Nothing wrong with anal sex, don't be so defensive! Just be safe. Have fun!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#180431 Feb 20, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
And the laws against polygamy will change too regardless of "everyone else's" (not yours of course!) fear of it.
Not if no one goes and gets the signatures to put it on a ballot or makes a court challenge about it.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180432 Feb 20, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
More gay men practice anal sex than straight men. Spin that skippy. Prove me wrong.
Nothing wrong with anal sex, don't be so defensive! Just be safe. Have fun!
Of course I mean percentage-wise in case you're thinking you've found a loophole to exploit, Jizzybirdy.

The best estimates are 34% of straight men do anal sex routinely. And about 62% of gay men do anal sex routinely. That's 2 to 1 Fruitcake.

There is no reason to defend the practice, it's fun! Enjoy it. Gays don't need you to defend them on this. Relax. Go root out some secret homophobes!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180433 Feb 20, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Not if no one goes and gets the signatures to put it on a ballot or makes a court challenge about it.
Right.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180434 Feb 20, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Not if no one goes and gets the signatures to put it on a ballot or makes a court challenge about it.
While the justifications have changed over the years, the most common argument today in favor of a criminal ban is that underage girls have been coerced into polygamist marriages. There are indeed such cases. However, banning polygamy is no more a solution to child abuse than banning marriage would be a solution to spousal abuse. The country has laws to punish pedophiles and there is no religious exception to those laws.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
drugs Sun jacobjarrard76 1
where can I find heroin in monterey? (Oct '14) Sun jacobjarrard76 12
News Ask the Auto Doctor (Mar '06) Jun 19 Dalton 1,538
legit pain P.I.L.L.S n m/ar.iju/an.a Jun 16 Monterey delivery 1
Migraine help Jun 13 Jaybarn 1
public officials violating federal laws Jun 5 Time for accounta... 4
Monterey Public Officials VIOLATING FEDERAL LAWS Jun 3 Un agenda 21 and ... 5
More from around the web

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Monterey Mortgages