Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Big D]

Frankie RIzzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Off topic. Go start a woman in the military thread. this is a thread about MARRIAGE.

No thanks poly boy we will talk about whatever we want to

[Big D]

Jazybird58 wrote:

<quoted text>Islamics? Crap did we declare war on the Muslims?

He personally is at war with a religion, the US is not.

[Frankie RIzzo]

sheesh void of hate wrote:

<quoted text>
Good point. You'd think polygamists would be opposed to themselves!

It certainly would make me think twice, or three times...

[Frankie RIzzo]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
No thanks poly boy we will talk about whatever we want to

You pull the off topic card on me, I pull it on you. Equal.

[Jazybird58]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
He personally is at war with a religion, the US is not.

Thanks for clearing that up

[Frankie RIzzo]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
He personally is at war with a religion, the US is not.

You are personally at war with Mormons. But not Islamists. They've both polygamists (according to your bigotry). Yet you only hate the Mormons. Funny that.

[Frankie RIzzo]

Jazybird58 wrote:

<quoted text>Thanks for clearing that up

Says the jackass geek who worships an imaginary bowl of frikkin spaghetti that flies!

[Frankie RIzzo]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
He personally is at war with a religion, the US is not.

Ever since I began researching the topic of polygamy, I have been bothered by the idea that this practice is justifiably criminalized because it is associated with the ills of child exploitation, abuse of women and children, etc.

But, within the criminal code, we have clear and specific provisions to target these offences, which are clearly harmful, and which any reasonable person considers intolerable and deserving of criminal sanction. So why does the law banning polygamy remain, a provision which, by the way, is almost never invoked and when it has been used, has led to few convictions that carried relatively minimal sentences?

If someone commits a crime, prosecute the hell out of them NO MATTER THE TYPE OF MARRIAGE THEY CHOOSE.

[Big D]

Frankie RIzzo wrote:

<quoted text>
You are personally at war with Mormons. But not Islamists. They've both polygamists (according to your bigotry). Yet you only hate the Mormons. Funny that.

Not at all, again you have not comprehended posts others make, you are like a little kid in the back seat that only understands every 5th word said.

[Jazybird58]

Frankie RIzzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Says the jackass geek who worships an imaginary bowl of frikkin spaghetti that flies!

Why is The FSM imiginary? Why do you hate him? Do you feel the same towards the mean god in your book? What a maroon

[Jazybird58]

Frankie RIzzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Ever since I began researching the topic of polygamy, I have been bothered by the idea that this practice is justifiably criminalized because it is associated with the ills of child exploitation, abuse of women and children, etc.
But, within the criminal code, we have clear and specific provisions to target these offences, which are clearly harmful, and which any reasonable person considers intolerable and deserving of criminal sanction. So why does the law banning polygamy remain, a provision which, by the way, is almost never invoked and when it has been used, has led to few convictions that carried relatively minimal sentences?
If someone commits a crime, prosecute the hell out of them NO MATTER THE TYPE OF MARRIAGE THEY CHOOSE.

Wow you cant read. That not what Dan was talking about. What a maroon

[Frankie RIzzo]

Jazybird58 wrote:

<quoted text>Thanks for clearing that up

Hey Jizy Birdy! You're wife is over my house! I'll be busy for about 10 minutes! She's calling me!

http://www.rleeermey.com/sounds/horney.wav

[Frankie RIzzo]

Jazybird58 wrote:

<quoted text>Why is The FSM imiginary? Why do you hate him? Do you feel the same towards the mean god in your book? What a maroon

I don't hate things that are not real, that's your schtick.

Your fake god is no different from the god you and he mock, dummy.

[Frankie RIzzo]

Jazybird58 wrote:

<quoted text>Wow you cant read. That not what Dan was talking about. What a maroon

That's one of his bigoted reasons for denying equality.

That polygamists are child abusers, welfare cheats and all around scum bags.

What's yours?

[Big D]

Frankie RIzzo wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't hate things that are not real, that's your schtick.
Your fake god is no different from the god you and he mock, dummy.

FSM is as valid as every other religon in the world

[RiccardoFire]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
They already are, you just are ignorant of the fact

Are you ignorant? or just plain dumb? I asked you if it was a good idea to have women on the front lines fighting Islamics that would love to rape and use for trophy? Wake up old man.

[Frankie RIzzo]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
Not at all, again you have not comprehended posts others make, you are like a little kid in the back seat that only understands every 5th word said.

You lie so casually. Need I re-post some of your ignorant hate?

Or perhaps I cannot read as you insist. Explain it very slowly for me. Do you support legalizing polygamy for religious freedom and why or why not?

[Frankie RIzzo]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
FSM is as valid as every other religon in the world

My point exactly dumbass. And you accuse me of poor comprehension!

What you mean is it's as invalid as every other religion. Which is what I said.

What a dope!

[Frankie RIzzo]

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>Are you ignorant? or just plain dumb? I asked you if it was a good idea to have women on the front lines fighting Islamics that would love to rape and use for trophy? Wake up old man.

Big D is already angry today and it's still morning. He gets flustered and silly stupid.

[Frankie RIzzo]

Jazybird58 wrote:

<quoted text>Wow you cant read. That not what Dan was talking about. What a maroon

Dan, eh? Very interesting.

Perhaps you should check with Dan before you speak for him?