Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (Page 7,823)

Showing posts 156,441 - 156,460 of200,229
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179383
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I bet your job that you have to run off to now is very menial and low paying. Dumb labor is cheap. You should have stayed in school.
I'm not being rude, you're just insignificant.
Why are you so pissed?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179384
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>who?
Is on first.
Anonymous

Fullerton, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179385
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

recount

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179386
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

DorN wrote:
Straight parents do produce gay offspring.
They want their sons or daughts to be able to marry the person of their choice.
That's fine, marry who they wish, however it does not mean society has to legally redefine marriage for them.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179387
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Gawdd you people really are clueless. Do single couples have the same rights and privileges of marries couples?
Of course not, silly rabbit.
How about married couples VRS Civil Unions???
Lets see if YOU can find out.
How about this. A gay couple, been together for 25 years. One is involved in a horrific auto crash, leaves him brain dead, can the other ask to have the plug pulled?????( If he is even allowed in the room)
Income tax, wills, probate, the list is quite extensive
Perhaps it is.....issues that can be resolved without redefining marriage.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179388
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course not, silly rabbit.
<quoted text>
Perhaps it is.....issues that can be resolved without redefining marriage.
Excellent suggestion, we could strike the word "marriage" from all government and legal use, and everyone can have a civil unions, legally defined however they want ( would even include Frankie's obsession ), and if they want to call it "marriage" that is just a personal preference.

Works for me, that way every individual little church could define “marriage” for their own little followers and it will have no legal significance.
Neil Andblowme

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179389
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
That's fine, marry who they wish, however it does not mean society has to legally redefine marriage for them.
Aren't you whining for a "redefinition" for polygamy?
Neil Andblowme

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179390
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course not, silly rabbit.
<quoted text>
Perhaps it is.....issues that can be resolved without redefining marriage.
Let me guess.... does it involve waving a magic wand?
Neil Andblowme

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179391
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Is on first.
Nobody

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179392
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>Nobody
"Who's" on first, "What's" on second,....
Nugent lost

Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179393
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Did you see that yellow bellied ted nugent running down the road?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179394
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygamy_in_No...
Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>
Aren't you whining for a "redefinition" for polygamy?
Is it really redefining it?

Polygamy in the United States has a long history. Many Native American tribes practiced polygamy (generally polygyny)[7] and European mountain men often took native wives and adopted the practice.[8] Some tribes seem to have continued the practice into the 20th century.[8]

Scots-Irish settlers, and some Welsh emigrants, carried long-standing multiple partner traditions to the Americas from Europe.[8] Utopian and communal groups established during the mid-19th century had varying marriage systems, including group marriage and polygyny.(Loue, pp. 27–30) There is also some evidence in the American South for multiple marriage partners, particularly after the Civil War.[8]

Polygamy has also been practiced, discreetly, by some Muslims living in America.[9]

Christian polygamy is a more modern development of a polygamist culture.[10][11] They assert that the movement has no connection with Joseph Smith.

Because polygamy has been illegal throughout the United States since the mid-19th century, and in many individual states before that, sources on alternative marriage practices are limited. Consequently, it is difficult to get a clear picture of the extent of the practice in the past and at the present time.
Nugent lost

Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179395
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Some one give Ted Nugent bus-fare to get his sorry behind back home on his stuupid ranch.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179396
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Why are you so pissed?
I'm not. Why are you so stupid?
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179397
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Excellent suggestion, we could strike the word "marriage" from all government and legal use, and everyone can have a civil unions, legally defined however they want ( would even include Frankie's obsession ), and if they want to call it "marriage" that is just a personal preference.
Works for me, that way every individual little church could define “marriage” for their own little followers and it will have no legal significance.
The only obsession here is yours, Fruitcake. Your obsession with me.

Do you have a better argument against marriage equality then the Big D "You're obsessed!" Straw man? I admit it's better than your old "You're a liar!" straw man, but it's still a just a straw man designed to cover your hypocrisy.

Why are you a hypocrite against equal rights? Don't say because all poly people are criminals and child abusers, we heard that. It's ignorant and stupid.

What possible harm would a marriage of three adult committed women possibly cause your bigoted ass?
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179398
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>
Aren't you whining for a "redefinition" for polygamy?
Nope. Just make it legal. Don't redefine it.

But I am whining for a redefinition of marriage to include same sex just like you.

I have no stake in it. But you do. You're welcome ingrate. Equality is for everyone, even bigots and hypocrites like you.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179399
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Brian_G wrote:
Racial differences are tiny and unimportant but gender differences are great and essential to the survival of the human race. Loving v Virginia is US Supreme Court precedent for marriage as one man and one woman.
If you reject segregation, reject gender apartheid marriage; keep marriage integrated and gender diverse as male/female.
You said that if gay marriage became legal, then members of pro sports teams would be forced to marry each other against their wills. Have you estimated a time when you think that will start happening? Figured out who will be the first to be forced to marry? Members of the Ravens?

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179400
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
That's fine, marry who they wish, however it does not mean society has to legally redefine marriage for them.
But the current definition violates the 14th Amendment.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179401
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

7

Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>
Aren't you whining for a "redefinition" for polygamy?
http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/15...
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179402
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
But the current definition violates the 14th Amendment.
http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/15...

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 156,441 - 156,460 of200,229
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••

Monterey Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Monterey News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Monterey
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••