Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 200,976

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story
SLO drugs

Monrovia, CA

#178534 Feb 6, 2013
A detective with the San Luis Obispo Police Department was arrested by the FBI.

http://www.sanluisobispo.com/2013/02/05/23827...

Small time police departments hate it when they are found out and arrested for playing fast and lose.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#178539 Feb 6, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Protecting? I don’t understand, homosexual marriage does not attack heterosexual marriage in any way at all. There are over 18,0000 legal homosexual marriages in California now, It certainly did not hurt my marriage, how did it hurt yours?
The argument is that once we make marriage mean everything, it will mean nothing.

It is a valid argument until you consider that who marries who is self limiting. There just won't be that many gay, poly or incestuous marriages to cause that problem.

Poly and incest marriages won't hurt your marriage either.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#178545 Feb 6, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
The argument is that once we make marriage mean everything, it will mean nothing.
It is a valid argument until you consider that who marries who is self limiting. There just won't be that many gay, poly or incestuous marriages to cause that problem.
Poly and incest marriages won't hurt your marriage either.
The argument is moot, Homosexuals already can marry, in many states, hundreds of thousands are legally married now

I don’t care about poly marriage that is Frankies obsession not mine. Poly marriage is not about to be made legal in the next couple of decades, religious fanatics following that path have made certain of that.

but for same sex marriage, it is already a reality, and it has not hurt heterosexual marriages one tiny little bit.

It is a moot argument
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#178546 Feb 6, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Such steorotypes from of a country you've never been to.
I was there just last year, you didn't see me? It's such a tiny little country you should have seen me. Maybe you just don't remember.

Even if I was never there, I've seen enough of you guys fly out of there to know you're a very gay country! What with that sissy accent too!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#178547 Feb 6, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
The argument is moot, Homosexuals already can marry, in many states, hundreds of thousands are legally married now
I don’t care about poly marriage that is Frankies obsession not mine. Poly marriage is not about to be made legal in the next couple of decades, religious fanatics following that path have made certain of that.
but for same sex marriage, it is already a reality, and it has not hurt heterosexual marriages one tiny little bit.
It is a moot argument
What did I just say jackass? What a dope!

You consider poly my "obsession", and "off topic", and not reality only because you fear discussing it.

What do you have against three atheist men marrying? How will it hurt you or your marriage?

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#178551 Feb 6, 2013
Kimare, you have yet to back up a previous statement, so I'll ask again:

In which culture/s was SSM legally recognized previously? Still waiting for your answer.

Just pull down your drawers and talk to the mangina. Don't keep you internal lesbian waiting.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#178556 Feb 6, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
What did I just say jackass? What a dope!
You consider poly my "obsession", and "off topic", and not reality only because you fear discussing it.
What do you have against three atheist men marrying? How will it hurt you or your marriage?
Learn to read, poly is your obsession not mine, I could give a flip about it, and nothing is about to change with regard to law for the next couple of decades

I don’t have anything against you, but am informing you that nothing is going to come of it in the foreseeable future, religious fanatics have already made certain of that.

Not true with same sex marriage, that is a reality today, more and more states and nations are recognizing same sex marriage, and it has not hurt anyone’s heterosexual marriage at all. That argument has already been made in court, no harm was shown to heterosexual marriage whatsoever.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#178558 Feb 6, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Learn to read, poly is your obsession not mine, I could give a flip about it, and nothing is about to change with regard to law for the next couple of decades
Did I say poly was your obsession dummy? Learn to read.

So what if you don't give a flip about poly? Most people don't give a flip about SSM. What do I care what you give a flip about? So what if it might not be decades? Are these your real reasons to deny equal rights?

By what logic do you insist on the traditional, arbitrary, religious and discriminatory number of two?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#178559 Feb 6, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Did I say poly was your obsession dummy? Learn to read.
So what if you don't give a flip about poly? Most people don't give a flip about SSM. What do I care what you give a flip about? So what if it might not be decades? Are these your real reasons to deny equal rights?
By what logic do you insist on the traditional, arbitrary, religious and discriminatory number of two?
As I said, you obsession, I am not interested, and nothing whatsoever is going to come of it, as there are groups of people that have put a stain on that concept that will linger for some time.

You should be ranting at them, not me.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#178560 Feb 6, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>The statement above is untrue; I've always written there is nothing wrong with homosexuals or homosexuality. I've never discussed sin or written homosexuality is sick, those are Jazybird58'S words, not mine.
Many homosexuals believe in protecting male/female marriage too. Conservatism doesn't have a sexual orientation.
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TBQ0DHC...

So I will not find any post by you on this thread, correct?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#178562 Feb 6, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
As I said, you obsession, I am not interested, and nothing whatsoever is going to come of it, as there are groups of people that have put a stain on that concept that will linger for some time.
You should be ranting at them, not me.
If someone mentions Mars in conversations about the solar system do you whine to them that they have an "obsession" with Mars?

And so what if they do? They're not allowed to? You go out of your way to complain and censor them or filibuster religion? You'll call them liars?

What a jerk.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#178563 Feb 6, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
No child, Brain-G is a smart and creative person, if you listen to what he says. Brian-G is saying that police put in regulations to try to stop sex in prison, standard. So therefore gay marriage would be one of their ways to stop it, young turd!
Police don't put in any regulations, numpty. It ain't their job. They're not even working in prisons. That would be the prison guards jobs. To date what we've got from Brian_G on prisons and same sex marriage is some rather odd claim that it will cause FORCED marriages to occur in prisons. When aske for evidence of these FORCED marriages all he's come up with are 3, yup, three, marriages in Canadian federal prisons since 2005! Not one shred of evidence that any one of them was FORCED! Yup, smart and creative.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#178564 Feb 6, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
...as there are groups of people that have put a stain on that concept that will linger for some time...
That's ignorance and bigotry.

Some homosexuals are bad too. Does that mean we should not allow SSM? Of course not.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#178565 Feb 6, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
No, Gullibility of Hate, it is a fact that you are merely the stupid one. Is that all you call people, when you see they are far more intellectual and much more dynamic cognitively?
Jen Ewe Wine LOL!

Point out to me where Brian_G has proven, with valid evidence and argument, that same sex marriage will create FORCED marriages in prison. His evidence to date consists of 3 same sex marriages performed in Canadian federal prisons since 2005. Bubbas are just lining up to force their weak little cell mates to marry 'em aren't they?

I call people stupid when they've made it painfully clear that they are. Got it, stupid?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#178566 Feb 6, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Homosexuality is evil, I have good solid evidence to support it!
I have proof that you are an ignorant moron
Big D

Modesto, CA

#178567 Feb 6, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
That's ignorance and bigotry.
Some homosexuals are bad too. Does that mean we should not allow SSM? Of course not.
On their part, yes it is, their ignorance and bigotry has doomed your obsession for the next couple of decades at least. Not because I say so, it is the simple truth

It doesn’t matter what I think of it, or you, you can rant and scream like a little kid all day long, it wont change a thing.

However I am willing to make you a wager,( never give a sucker an even break) that nothing will come of it legally for the next couple of decades.

Not because I say so, just an observation

SSM will happen and is happening whether you like it or not, and regardless of feeble comparisons you try to make.
Candles

Monrovia, CA

#178568 Feb 6, 2013
The cathloic church took your money before and yor children's vrginity and how, Archdiocese weighs huge fund drive amid scandal.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#178569 Feb 6, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
On their part, yes it is, their ignorance and bigotry has doomed your obsession for the next couple of decades at least. Not because I say so, it is the simple truth
It doesn’t matter what I think of it, or you, you can rant and scream like a little kid all day long, it wont change a thing.
However I am willing to make you a wager,( never give a sucker an even break) that nothing will come of it legally for the next couple of decades.
Not because I say so, just an observation
SSM will happen and is happening whether you like it or not, and regardless of feeble comparisons you try to make.
So in the case of polygamy, your bigotry and ignorance is justified? Is that what you're trying to tell us?

You can scream and obsess and kick your feet but the case for polygamy is the same as the case for same sex marriage.

Polygamy may be legal in the future regardless of your feeble attempts to censor it away.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#178570 Feb 6, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
...SSM will happen and is happening whether you like it or not, and regardless of feeble comparisons you try to make.
You know I support same sex marriage, don't start lying again.

And you know I am not obsessed with polygamy. I'm real tired of your dishonest tactics.
GlendoraTimes

Monrovia, CA

#178571 Feb 6, 2013
A Southland U.S. postal worker was on unpaid leave Feburary 05, 2013 Tuesday after assaulting an 11-year-old girl.

Several witness have placed the postal worker with is hands around young girls neck.

play

Postal worker placed on leave after alleged assault
Claudia Peschiutta

00:00

Download


Villasenor, 55, of Temple City, was allegedly involved in a choking incident on Monday afternoon at a bathroom at Bristow Park in the city of Commerce, according to Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department.

When deputies from the East Los Angeles Sheriff’s Station arrived, the young girl told deputies that a postal worker had choked her with his hands for laughing at him when he tried to use the restroom facilities and inadvertently entered the women’s restroom.



U.S. Postal Service spokesman Richard Maher told Peschiutta the veteran letter carrier was on duty when he allegedly went after the girl.

“We have taken him off duty and placed him in a non-pay status while the incident is being investigated,” said Maher.

Villasenor has worked for the Postal Service since 1981.

KCAL9&#8242;s Suraya Fadel reports there was no response when she knocked at the door of Villasenor’s Temple City residence even though it was clear there were people inside the home.

Villasenor is being held at the East Los Angeles Sheriff’s Station. His bail has been set at $100,000.

The investigation is being handled by the Sheriff’s Department’s Special Victims Bureau.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 49 min free for all 5,081
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 13 hr surfs up 7,955
Suri Cruise's dog is missing in Los Angeles 18 hr bubba 69 2
Dennis W (Veeser) from Krakow Wi. 22 hr Mia 1
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Fri Eric 69,397
CA Jury reaches verdict in Oakland BART shooting t... (Jul '10) Fri scoop 2,273
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) Sep 18 Pizza 16,000
•••
•••
•••

Monterey Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Monterey News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Monterey
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••