STILL no logical counter to this fact;<quoted text>
No matter how often you post that analogy, it doesn't hold water. For a couple of reasons. One being nuts are fruits, by definition. Another being that the ability to bear fruit is part of the definition of a fruit tree, but the ability to have kids isn't part of the definition of marriage.
LOL, what a pointless statement.
Humanity wouldn't exist were it not for children.
I've never murdered any child.
Why did you make that up?
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay couples are the picture of defective failure. Mating behavior gone abusive with NOTHING to show for it.
STILL no logical counter to this fact;
A fruit tree bearing fruit.
A fruit tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A nut tree who never bears fruit wanting to be a fruit tree.
A nut tree hanging fruit on it's branches pretending to be a fruit tree.
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' fruit trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call nut trees fruit trees too!
Ho, Ho, Ho, Hilarious!!!