Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,187

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story
Micky DiRucci

Union City, CA

#174502 Jan 12, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Did he really? Its difficult to expect someone who is not honest with God and allows polygamy against the bible to be honest with us. Maybe he pretended to know, and was pretending to be sarcastic, to cover his ignorance.
Or maybe you're stupid!
Micky DiRucci

Union City, CA

#174503 Jan 12, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet you behave like a wicked hevean! You don't go against all their hypocracy and show them as a believer should how one ought ot behave by actually going against it! You are a traitor to the church, and can't accept it to fight on all sides! You are your own censor, appointing yourself saying what you should and shouldn't support! Do you believe the silly doctrines of your little pulpit claiming you are God, cherrypicking the verse that says we are one with God?
I am not a believer in fundamentalist zealotry so can it jackass.

What a dope!
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174504 Jan 12, 2013
Micky DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
And man does not equal woman.
Are you gender blind? Why not number blind too? Why is one more valid than the other?
Jane DoDo and his undeveloped mindset cannot grasp that 1 + 3 = 4 is not equal to 2 + 2 = 4.
Kippers

Monrovia, CA

#174505 Jan 12, 2013
This means Piers Morgan, the gooseStepper that just will not go away.

BoyCott CNN and it's sponsors until this union-jack waver is gone from american air waves.

Being that this UK, idiot posts here too!

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#174506 Jan 12, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Put more correctly: Things should be left alone, until need is shown for change.
With that philosophy we'd still be in the dark ages.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#174507 Jan 12, 2013
Micky DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
What is hilarious is that your post complaining of his verbosity is five times more verbose than the post you are complaining about!
Too Funny!
I like fighting fire with fire.:p
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174508 Jan 12, 2013
Micky DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Aw shuddup you silly jackass! You're a dope.
How smart! Do you try to look clever and use that claim to make it look like you refute claims? Wicked pagans and hevean liberals do exactly the same thing! You aren't loyal to God, you are God aren't you? All in one! Oh he could easily turn his back on you and kick you out like a hopeless little orphan!

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#174509 Jan 12, 2013
Micky DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
What is hilarious is that your post complaining of his verbosity is five times more verbose than the post you are complaining about!
Too Funny!
He also doesn't appear to know the meaning of the words he uses for our entertainment.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174510 Jan 12, 2013
sheesh void of hate wrote:
<quoted text>
What is hilarious is that the verbosity of your posts. You seem to have a need to sound intelligent. You're also using words with negative connotation just for the sake of throwing in negative spin. And it makes you seem really dumb. Or can you explain how permitting a small portion of the population access to marriage is "gender apartheid?"
In all honesty I don't expect an explanation. You generally aren't capable of giving one.
Gender diversity? If you count only male and female you're limited to two genders. If you include intersex, gays, lesbians, transgenders, and bisexuals you've got 5 more. That is diversity.
So what? What is wrong with trying to sound clever? At least he is willing to let his emotions flow rather than suppress who you are eagerly!
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174511 Jan 12, 2013
Micky DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
What is hilarious is that your post complaining of his verbosity is five times more verbose than the post you are complaining about!
Too Funny!
So you are a scoffer as well? Read proverbs much? God condemns the scoffer!
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174512 Jan 12, 2013
Micky DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not a believer in fundamentalist zealotry so can it jackass.
What a dope!
When did you meet God? What if you find out God to be real? He could dump you once you discover him, just like when you discovered yourself, you dumped yourself as a person.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174514 Jan 12, 2013
Kippers wrote:
This means Piers Morgan, the gooseStepper that just will not go away.
BoyCott CNN and it's sponsors until this union-jack waver is gone from american air waves.
Being that this UK, idiot posts here too!
Idiotic little man! So you try and hide from me? Are you worried because you've got little on me, so you don't want to address me outright?
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174516 Jan 12, 2013
sheesh void of hate wrote:
<quoted text>
I like fighting fire with fire.:p
Because you are an uncothe man! You are an unbeliever who likes to fight the with your own mouth that belongs to satan against the the dark satanism of a traitor to God. Mikey will still be an agnostic, never converting to theism! He wants an excuse, like a traitor to God! God let him in his Kingdom but yet mikey rebelled against him!
Kippers

Monrovia, CA

#174517 Jan 12, 2013
Rizzo's are out but Piers Morgan is close behing you.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174518 Jan 12, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Relax jackass. Your posts are stupid.
So you are the little doggie in the room are you? Have you ever connected to the church or ever known God? Are you here to debate, or simply to learn the truth, but know you don't have the ability to argue, as you go on the forum to deplete your ignorance? You don't have to learn if you don't want to! Just sit back and stick your feet up like the rich man lazarus, and hopefully soon you will die!
heartandmind

Moline, IL

#174519 Jan 12, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe the person who said you are divorced, not you.
You are a vile person, and I often find the "save marriage" folks are divorced.
And your "argument" in this post makes no sense. Even if I were the biggest lair on earth, that wouldn't be a good reason to deny US citizens basic, equal, human rights, you dumb b1tch.
he doesn't even live in the u.s. he lives in germany.

the guy talks out of....well other parts of his anatomy frequently. i've read his posts for a few yrs now. he goes in cycles, repeating the same bumpersticker comments every few months. he thinks he sound educated - we see and know differently. he has no understanding of either the constitution or what judge's have found and written. he doesn't understand what "all" means in the 14th amendment in the u.s. constitution - he thinks it just applies to men since he says women aren't mentioned in the constitution.

as bugs bunny says "what a maroon".

just sit back, have a drink & a chuckle at his posts. at least he sticks with one name. LOL.
heartandmind

Moline, IL

#174520 Jan 12, 2013
Randy Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
But, silly child, the grownups ARE talking, even if we let a few little kiddies, like you, join in. Let the poofs make up contracts, if they wish. They are not to be allowed to call it a marriage, any more than being religious makes one a priest...
not allowed to call it a marriage?

these states and countries would tell you otherwise, bub :
Connecticut, Washington DC, Iowa, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, New Hamshire, New York, Vermont, Washington. Argentina, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Iceland, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, South Africa, Spain, Sweden.

and since when do you get to define marriage for anyone else other than yourself? if that's the case, then who defined your marriage for you? and why did you let them?
heartandmind

Moline, IL

#174521 Jan 12, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Child, child, child.
Can a judge overrule reality? Commonsense?
You have no answer for two simple assertions;
1. The government has NO interest in protecting or supporting a friendship.
2. It is unconstitutional bias to selectively support friendships.
Moreover, you deny the most basic roots of marriage. A cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Snicker.
tell ya what. take it to court regarding friendships. see what the judge says. then we can talk about what the judge says, kiddo.

when you need a contract to enter into a friendship, then there's a discussion. until then, well, you lose.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174522 Jan 12, 2013
heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
he doesn't even live in the u.s. he lives in germany.
the guy talks out of....well other parts of his anatomy frequently. i've read his posts for a few yrs now. he goes in cycles, repeating the same bumpersticker comments every few months. he thinks he sound educated - we see and know differently. he has no understanding of either the constitution or what judge's have found and written. he doesn't understand what "all" means in the 14th amendment in the u.s. constitution - he thinks it just applies to men since he says women aren't mentioned in the constitution.
as bugs bunny says "what a maroon".
just sit back, have a drink & a chuckle at his posts. at least he sticks with one name. LOL.
Both genders have to be mentioned! It is meant to be a formal leaflet! And how would you have been on this thread for several years? You were probably around only 10 and would therefore not have the reading comprehension to understand him! Don't lie to me lil boy! And how come gay bath houses are only for men?
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#174523 Jan 12, 2013
heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
not allowed to call it a marriage?
these states and countries would tell you otherwise, bub :
Connecticut, Washington DC, Iowa, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, New Hamshire, New York, Vermont, Washington. Argentina, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Iceland, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, South Africa, Spain, Sweden.
and since when do you get to define marriage for anyone else other than yourself? if that's the case, then who defined your marriage for you? and why did you let them?
Propaganda?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 3 hr JOEL 70,024
Live Oak stabbing is second in two days (Jun '08) Oct 17 savvylocal 245
International CIT conference comes to Monterey Oct 14 DO Powers 1
where can I find heroin in monterey? Oct 8 thazzleb17 2
Pacific Grove Girl Chelsie Hills Law suit. Rea... Oct 3 Siding with Toyota 1
Carmel waste broker accused of bribery (Dec '08) Sep 23 Shelly 12
Suri Cruise's dog is missing in Los Angeles Sep 21 fancy 3

Beach Hazards Statement for Monterey County was issued at October 21 at 7:51PM PDT

Monterey Dating
Find my Match

Monterey Jobs

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Monterey News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Monterey

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]