Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 200,974

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#174375 Jan 11, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
He is trying absolutely! Obama is already flouting the constitution all the time, just like his little judgey pal!
Really? Come up with a single real example.
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#174376 Jan 11, 2013
Randy Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
That would be about as far as you can get, in your pursuit of critical thinking skills...guesswork, blundering about, in the dark. Lost and clueless. Like when you thought you'd gotten the better of me, asking to name some of the books I'd made mention of, and i gave you about 50, or so, titles. And then you had to drop the subject, because you'd been made a fool of. And you knew...I mean, guessed it.
..and not one of those books were about what you claimed they were about: adult/child homosexual relationships. YOU lied.
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174377 Jan 11, 2013
Skippy wrote:
Skippy says: get out of towners are just pests.
Skippy is a dumbass.
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174378 Jan 11, 2013
Mikey DiRucci wrote:
Looks like the judge-it fairy is very busy this morning rigging the judge-its! Priceless!
Oh, you mean Chongo. It is what Chongles does, when it runs out of crack, and opinions...
MarginsCall

Monrovia, CA

#174379 Jan 11, 2013
Gonorrhea is fast becoming untreatable, spurring an urgent call to action by the World Health Organization.

Much like the perts who are posting here and hare out of towners.
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#174380 Jan 11, 2013
Randy Hudson wrote:
They are not to be allowed to call it a marriage, any more than being religious makes one a priest...
Where have you been for the last eight years?

Where the hell did you learn to make analogies?... from Jane Dough? LMFAO@you
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174381 Jan 11, 2013
heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
the more important question is : why are you here, in a thread regarding same sex marriage?
another question :
why don't you start a movement on your own to get polygamy legalized? go ahead - hire an attorney and take it to court. we'll read all about it in the news. i look forward to reading about the arguments presented in court. good luck.
Why are YOU here ? Let me guess, this is the part where you make your presence in here sound moral and upright, while attempting to make his presence sound invalid ? Yeah, we've heard that one before....

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#174382 Jan 11, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Plenty! Revelation will tell you! Read it yourself this time!
OK, so you can't tell me a buy-bull prophesy that has come true.
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174383 Jan 11, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>No. I mean like three does not equal two.
Do you mean "like that", or do you mean "that" ?

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#174384 Jan 11, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Which day does it say then? Gen 1:3 Do you read the bible? Do you actually have one?
It says that god said, "Let there be light". Then in the next couple of verses, there was night and day. Then plants. Night and day and plants before there is a sun (somewhere around Genesis 1:16). Absurd.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#174385 Jan 11, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
He wasn't able to see the entire earth from a mountain! It was metaphorical! You don't understand its meaning!
So, it's not all literally true? Fine.
I just don't get why so many Christians insist everything in the buy-bull is literally true when so much of it is clearly absurd.
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174386 Jan 11, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
This thread is about Prop 8. What does Prop 8 have to do with polygamy?
It refused to allow any marriage, except between man and woman. Thus excluding polygamy, as it did SSM. Any argument that defends SSM must also defend polygamy, for the exact same reasons, freedom of choice. Silly, that was easy. Go apply some make-up and think of yourself as normal. LOL As if you can...
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174387 Jan 11, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
That lame-ass excuse again?...yawn... It was laughable the first time you posted it, now it's just boring.
No, it is not bopring. It is a valid question. Answer it, as you expect your questions to be answered.
MarginsCall

Monrovia, CA

#174388 Jan 11, 2013
Workers broke into the Kurdish center in Paris after seeing bloodstains at the door.

One of the three activists killed execution-style was a founder of the PKK rebel group.
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#174389 Jan 11, 2013
Randy Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Correct your posts all you want to, It doesn't matter what the gays want, they may not appropriate a title that is not their due. They covet something that they do not rate. Period. And I am waiting for the SCOTUS to hand down the ruling that states that they have no authority to legislate marriage, as we already know. California will reinstate the ban on SSM, as the majority of its population wishes. And then, other states will follow suit.
hahahahaha
ahhahahaahah
ahahahahahahha

You're really quite clueless, aren't you?
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#174390 Jan 11, 2013
Randy Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you mean "like that", or do you mean "that" ?
Three does not equal two.

Are you arithmetically challenged?

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#174391 Jan 11, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
We know Rose don't we? I think in her ignorance she actually thought the Roman catholics were there at the time, and probably assumed in her ignorance they did wipe the romans out! And yes, the saxons were the ones who defeated the romans!
Man up. I didn't say anything about the Roman Catholics and the fall of Rome. They weren't around at the time.
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#174392 Jan 11, 2013
Randy Hudson wrote:
<quoted text> It refused to allow any marriage, except between man and woman. Thus excluding polygamy, as it did SSM. Any argument that defends SSM must also defend polygamy, for the exact same reasons, freedom of choice. Silly, that was easy. Go apply some make-up and think of yourself as normal. LOL As if you can...
hahahahaha
hahahahaha
ahahahahah

Did you learn THAT from Jane Dough, too?

So if Prop 8 is overturned, does that mean polygamy will be legal in California? Of course not. It's a completely seperate issue. Prop 8 has NOTHING to do with polygamy.
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#174393 Jan 11, 2013
Randy Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it is not bopring. It is a valid question. Answer it, as you expect your questions to be answered.
Really?

What's the question?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#174395 Jan 11, 2013
Is this thread done yet?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 22 min Eric 69,397
CA Jury reaches verdict in Oakland BART shooting t... (Jul '10) 5 hr scoop 2,273
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 18 hr zhuzhamm 5,079
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 23 hr Pizza 16,000
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) Wed Blazing saddles 7,954
The inconvenient 17-year pause in global warming (Sep '13) Sep 12 Earthling-1 123
Carmel waste broker accused of bribery (Dec '08) Sep 11 gotti jr 9
•••
•••
•••

Monterey Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Monterey News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Monterey
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••