Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments
152,001 - 152,020 of 200,556 Comments Last updated 21 min ago

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174161
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Technically the Bible never says 'flat'.
Which brings up the earlier assertion about 'four corners'
Here is a easy explanation of the Hebrew word and the options that were available;
http://www.christiananswers.net/
q-eden/edn-c017.html
With the internet, why does it so often seem to be the blind leading the blinder???
:-)
<quoted text>
You had a problem reading it?
Understanding it?
A Christian site isn't interested in Hebrew?
I saw a picture of you! You look exactly like Candy Crowley, blonde hair, mustache and everything...
Snicker.
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>Your link went to a home page, not to any explanation of Hebrew. By the way, I don't need no stinking "christiananswers" website to mistranslate Hebrew for me. I'm a Jew. I can read Hebrew for myself. That's how I know you're a clueless prick.
<smirk>
At this point, only your ignorance supersedes your bigotry.

What you still have not done is explain 'four corners', which exposes you are a Jew in ancestry only. A blonde one with a mustache to boot.

Snicker.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174162
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Really. How does that assertion explain the divorce rate.
However, it wasn't my point.
What is government interest in giving special rights to only certain friendships with a select number?
Smile.
<quoted text>
You didn't answer my questions.
1. What prevailing interest does the government have in granting rights and benefits to friendships?
2. On what basis does it limit those rights and benefits to only couples of any gender?
:-)
heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
1. the discussion in court doesn't involve "friendships" and has not been brought before the court. there is no answer.
2. please explain your question a bit more fully.
thanks.
1. I'm not referring to any court case. I'm asking what prevailing interest the government has in supporting and protecting friendships?

2. If the government extends support and protection to married couples and gay couples on the basis of friendship, what right does it have to limit it to only those types of friendships and two people?
heartandmind

Moline, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174165
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Really. How does that assertion explain the divorce rate.
However, it wasn't my point.
What is government interest in giving special rights to only certain friendships with a select number?
Smile.
<quoted text>
You didn't answer my questions.
1. What prevailing interest does the government have in granting rights and benefits to friendships?
2. On what basis does it limit those rights and benefits to only couples of any gender?
:-)
<quoted text>
1. I'm not referring to any court case. I'm asking what prevailing interest the government has in supporting and protecting friendships?
2. If the government extends support and protection to married couples and gay couples on the basis of friendship, what right does it have to limit it to only those types of friendships and two people?
sorry, i'm short on time right now so i'll be vrey brief.

1. if you're not referring to a court case, then there is no point in discussing as it is not a question before the court. the cases proceeding deal with Prop 8 and DOMA - and they are regarding same sex marriage, not friendship. stick to the topic.
2. friendship is not at question. legal marriage / legal binding contracts is the subject and the crux. stay on point here and focus. marriage, legally speaking, is a legally binding contract between two people.
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174167
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

The End of Days wrote:
Money, technology, big govt, the purveyors of perversion, and materiality are destroying this nation and the world. Frightingly half of this country really has no clue.
Polarizing, brainwashing, and when reality finally sets in.........
... they will come after you.
Non Psycho Mike DiDucci

Alhambra, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174170
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>... they will come after you.
.....with a giant net and a special jacket with extra long sleeves....

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174171
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
sorry, i'm short on time right now so i'll be vrey brief.
1. if you're not referring to a court case, then there is no point in discussing as it is not a question before the court. the cases proceeding deal with Prop 8 and DOMA - and they are regarding same sex marriage, not friendship. stick to the topic.
2. friendship is not at question. legal marriage / legal binding contracts is the subject and the crux. stay on point here and focus. marriage, legally speaking, is a legally binding contract between two people.
You are playing irresponsible games.

Demanding we head down a road while ignoring the destination.

Not only do you once again expose the weakness of your argument, you expose the lack of character that goes with it.

Smirk.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174172
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Mikey DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Such a liar. Anyone interested can look back and see many posts where I used that line "Polygamy is not a fish" against the "Polygamy is a red herring" argument.
Exactly. And that's because you didn't know what the term "red herring" meant until I posted the link.
Mikey DiRucci wrote:
What a dishonest jerk. You might fool some of your dopey fans but no one else.
I support marriage equality. You do not. Why are you a polyphobic hypocrite?
So, you're in favor of gay marriage.
Good.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174174
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Technically the Bible never says 'flat'...
No need to. A circle is, by definition, flat.
Mikey DiRucci

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174175
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly. And that's because you didn't know what the term "red herring" meant until I posted the link.
<quoted text>
So, you're in favor of gay marriage.
Good.
I'm sure all your fans will suspend disbelief and agree that I didn't know what a red herring is.

I repeat loud and clear. Polygamy is not a fish. It is a form of marriage that deserves the same respect and consideration as SSM.

I support marriage equality. You do not. You are a hypocrite.

So it seems "it's a fish" is your best justification for why you are a hypocrite. I suggest you try harder. Much harder.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174176
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Technically the Bible never says 'flat'...
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
No need to. A circle is, by definition, flat.
Then why didn't it say 'flat'?

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174177
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama is letting homosexuals have more than one partner. Why is that? He himself is a homosexual and knows what they really want.
Wow, he's in charge of how many partners people can have? Maybe you should ask him if you could have one.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174178
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Which day did it say the sun was created? Go on, tell me, you fool!
Read Genesis.
Non Psycho Mike DiDucci

Alhambra, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174179
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Technically the Bible never says 'flat'...
<quoted text>
Then why didn't it say 'flat'?
They did:

”The earth takes shape like clay under a seal.” Job 38:14

That would be flattend. Unless you're thinking God is a giant walrus that sat on the earth to make its shape.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174180
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
But they are becoming very common.
Even if true, so what?
Tell me a buy-bull prophesy that has come true, already.
Mikey DiRucci

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174181
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

6

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, he's in charge of how many partners people can have? Maybe you should ask him if you could have one.
Why are you a hypocrite?

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174182
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Satan can show images you fool.
Then why go up to the top of a mountain?

Face it, the story was written by people who believed the earth was flat.
Mikey DiRucci

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174183
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Read Genesis.
No.
Mikey DiRucci

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174184
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Read Genesis.
Hey Rose_NoHo. What about the children? You never answer, you just say anyone who asks is a moron.

What kind of dumbass "Law" is that?

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174185
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Homosexuality is based on the brains reaction to how well it perceives the body it is viewing is able to produce good offspring. This would make homosexuals biological errors.
What about the desire all men have to get a good BJ? They can't produce offspring that way. Are all men biological errors.

And even though you've never had sex, you've masturbated. Does that mean you are a biological error?
Oh, no!

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174186
Jan 10, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Mikey DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
No.
OK, don't.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
Monterey Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Monterey Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Monterey News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Monterey
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••