Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments
150,781 - 150,800 of 200,565 Comments Last updated 10 hrs ago
GreenIsiles

West Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172532
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

We already took care of this so you teets can go away, now!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172533
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
I have a valid argument.
Equal rights.
Oh, wait, Mr. TTAG, before you say anything:
Equal protection.
What's yours? Wait, you don't have one, so you'll just take lame, off-target jabs at me. LOLSER!
If he did have one you would just completely ignore it and continue to claim he didn't have one because you are insane.

Too funny!

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172534
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

California doesn't ban same sex marriage; you can have a religious same sex marriage without any fear of government punishment. Polygamy is banned, but not same sex marriage.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172535
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Bobby wrote:
<quoted text>
You continually prove to us that you are truely a master of being stupid.
Speaking of "stupid"- I didn't know "truely" was a word.

I suggest you purchase a dictionary before you attempt to defame another.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172536
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
I have a valid argument.
Great, let's hear it.
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Equal rights.
That isn't an argument as equal rights to not always mean equal outcomes. And no matter how much you peddle your nonsense, currently all people are treated equally as each and every person can marry someone of the opposite sex.
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, wait, Mr. TTAG, before you say anything:
Equal protection.
What's yours? Wait, you don't have one, so you'll just take lame, off-target jabs at me. LOLSER!
The jabs don't take any effort, you make is quite easy with you consistent presentation of nonsense.

BTW Rose, you never answered the question. What are you more angry about- the color of your skin or the fact that no one cares?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172537
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Like they did with Loving v VA?
Loving v Virginia had nothing to do with same sex marriage.

"Plaintiffs' reliance on Loving v Virginia (388 US 1 [1967]) for the proposition that the US Supreme Court has established a fundamental "right to marry the spouse of one's choice" outside the male/female construct is misplaced."- Hernandez v Robles

Even the court told you that you are wrong, yet here you are.
Oshoosh

West Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172538
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Simple put, we don't really care what some out of towners thinks or posts hers at all.
Largelanguage

Chester, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172540
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

The Judge has no right to overturn the ban on same sex marriage. See what I mean about democrats flouting the constitution when it already was against same sex marriage? Obama does that a lot too.
FlatTire

West Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172541
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Oh you mean, flat-heads of the Republican and tea party, I hear they all gather at the end of the worlds flat map.
THE DEBIL

Slovenia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172542
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Q: SO, UM, HOW CAN YOU TELL THE JEWS ON TOPIX? A" THEY'RE THE GUYS HAWKING THE TEENAGED GIRLS TO THE POSTERS FO' MONEY.
THE DEBIL

Slovenia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172543
Dec 29, 2012
 
WANT TO LOOK 15 YEARS YOUNGER? TAKE YOUR PICTURE WITH A REFLECTED LIGHT INSTEAD OF A DIRECT FLASH. DUH.
THE DEBIL

Slovenia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172544
Dec 29, 2012
 
DUH!
FlatTire

West Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172545
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

You fizzled before you got off the ground Willard Mitt Romney, and to your Republican and Tea Party cheap actors.
Davis

Miami, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172546
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Great news... The next battle.... Gay divorce:)

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172547
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Loving v Virginia is US Supreme Court precedence for male/female marriage. I doubt the court would have decided the same if the Lovings were a same sex couple.
Straight Sh00ter

Lawrence, KS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172548
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

gemelk wrote:
<quoted text>
If SCOTUS declines to hear the case then the Appellate court ruling stands, and same sex marriage, again, is legal in California.
So why aren't you posting in the gay cafe, hmmm?
linus simms

Orange, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172549
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Mike DiRucci wrote:
Hey Mona! Can I get a hahahahahahahaha? A big long one?
Trade you a YUK!YUK!YUK! for it.
quiet phagg-oid. keep your mental issues to yourself.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172550
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

linus simms wrote:
<quoted text>
quiet phagg-oid. keep your mental issues to yourself.
Aw, SHUDDUP you dopey Jackass!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172551
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

YUK!YUK!YUK!

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172552
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Great, let's hear it.
<quoted text>
That isn't an argument as equal rights to not always mean equal outcomes. And no matter how much you peddle your nonsense, currently all people are treated equally as each and every person can marry someone of the opposite sex.
Well, stupid, that's like saying everyone was treated equally under Jim Crow because everyone could sit in the section assigned to their race.

The "opposite sex" isn't the same for men and women, so they are not being treated equally.
akpilot wrote:
The jabs don't take any effort, you make is quite easy with you consistent presentation of nonsense.
Obviously, since you're not capable of any real effort.
akpilot wrote:
BTW Rose, you never answered the question. What are you more angry about- the color of your skin or the fact that no one cares?
Begging the question.(Look that up.)
How can I be angry when I'm laughing at you?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••

Monterey Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Monterey News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Monterey
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••