Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Read more: www.cnn.com 201,862

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#170991 Dec 12, 2012
Big D wrote:
I love all this "definition of marriage" talk
It is a joke
I am not about to let any religious organization define words for me, no more than you would allow the word "Jihad" replace the word "preemptive strike" in our language ( chuckle )
I donít care what any religious book says
I donít care what someone thinks is "normal" and I am not about to let anyone else define the word "normal" for me.
Marriage is not about procreation, I know many married couples that can no or do not have children, I am not about to belittle their marriage because of that. Marriages is about a commitment between 2 people to live their lives in support of one another.
My wife is not my property, she is my partner in life, my support, my very best friend, and dearest love.
Marriage has nothing to do with any single religion, I know couples of many different religions and I am not about to belittle any one of them depending on which religion they happen to believe in, or none at all for that matter.
What I do care about is equality, and justice
Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. Gay unions are a violent, defective contradiction on fundamental evolutionary principles.

There, no religion.

Smile.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170993 Dec 12, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Stop lying and I wont :)
I don't lie and you just admitted that you do punk. The End.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170994 Dec 12, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You have yet to retracted your statement that I said he was not impeached, you remain a liar
As you are a liar on that score, and so giddy and obsessive about saying what a glorious triumph it was, it is a pretty easy assumption that you are lying about other things as well
You said the impeachment failed. I'm not lying.

You say I wanted Clinton impeached, you're lying.
Bamboo

Covina, CA

#170995 Dec 12, 2012
Why are small businesses leaving Glendora?

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170996 Dec 12, 2012
Bamboo wrote:
Why are small businesses leaving Glendora?
Because you live there.
On My Knees

Santa Cruz, CA

#170997 Dec 12, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. Gay unions are a violent, defective contradiction on fundamental evolutionary principles.
There, no religion.
Smile.
That's really stupid.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#170998 Dec 12, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. Gay unions are a violent, defective contradiction on fundamental evolutionary principles.
There, no religion.
Smile.
On My Knees wrote:
<quoted text>
That's really stupid.
No, your response is a really stupid attempt to evade the truth.

Smirk.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170999 Dec 12, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You protest too much, you are accusing me of what you do.
Still have not found a post where I said he wasnít impeached have you? Yet you are still standing by your lying about that?
There are many posts where you said Clinton's impeachment failed. I'm not lying. You are.
Dan C

Roseville, CA

#171004 Dec 12, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
1) Wrong, because legislated recognition is not the same as universal recognition.
2) I though it was YOU who had the tubba-blubba that earned the moniker of "pocchari", as you had the mistaken idea of posting your lardass in here, for all to laugh at...
3) Having some people ignore common sense arguments does not invalidate the truth.
4) Who said that abusive foster care was better ? You, perhaps, have some evidence that I said that, as you are attacking me for it ?
5) This is a proven and time-tested truth, as well, as Chongo like to drone on about morons worrying about children. It is also the opinion of others, not just me.
6) Your idea seems to be that one kind of broken home is better than another type of broken home...interesting. Fallacious, but interesting.
7) Why should they be given a second rate home, at all ? There are many loving heterosexual couples wishing to adopt, not merely foster. Wake up, moron. And the voice of reason and sanity will not be silenced by an idiotic "STFU" from you.
8) You spend a lot of time there, must be a living nightmare for you.
9) Many things make them unequal. Do you, perhaps, have anything to offer to prove that they are not unequal ? My most unshakeable offering is empirical evidence.
10) Thinking will not give me any aneurysm, perhaps your stupid ass should not use words that you cannot spell ?
1) Everyone is allowed an opinion. There are some people who hate chocolate ice cream, doesn't mean we should stop making it.

2) I don't even know what a "pocchari" is Ace.

3) Truth in what? Some people think little green men from UFOs exist idiot. It does not spell out they have a handle on common sense.

4) http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/news/20051...

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php...

5) Prove it.

6) Gay famlies don't automatically constitute a "broken home" moron. That's your opinion and not fact.

7) Afgain it's your opinion gay famlies are "second rate". Find one article which has the same cllaim dumbshit. Add to that thousands of kids are left in foster care and as orphans despite the number of heterosexual and gay couples who adopt so your ignorant "point" is moot.

8)??? Time where?

9) You've provided no evidence to back even one of your claims. Liar. Wear the sign. LOL!

10) Myself I think you react and not think. Like an amoeba. Just a note.
Dan C

Roseville, CA

#171006 Dec 12, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Sheesh, again with misspelled words....Confucius would say "Do not try to use 5th grade words, when 4th grade words are beyond your scope", as well as "Do not misspell my name" LOL
I gotta ask...

....kAn yU rEeD ThIS DuMfUK?

LOL!!!

I could write the truth out in multicolored CRAYONS dumbass but it would still be the truth.

You unfortunately think your dime sized world should be the law of the land and it must just eat your sorry ass up that it's not.
Dan C

Roseville, CA

#171009 Dec 12, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, the biggest flaw that i can see is that you are trying to reason, at all. And your silly analogies are not effective, either. Donkeys and zebra have nought to do with the topic at hand.
Now, you typed this: "And if you don't believe heterosexual couples and same sexed couples are "not equal at all" ", and, the fact is that I DO believe that are unequal, as they have neither balance, nor procreational abilities, nor do they have the same recognition that heterosexual couples have. They have no place in society. Not to say that they cannot be couples, just no valid reason to call themselves "married". If gaining rights is the point of SSM marriage, they covet something that they do not rate. If the game is rights of inheritance, they can use power of attorney. There is simply NO REASON for a mismatched set of lovers to lay false claim to an honor that isn't theirs to enjoy. SSM is a fruitless endeavor. Empirical evidence is all that you need, to see that. Any further questions are pointless, as the issue is invalid. We are biologically designed to mate as opposite, I don't care if the genitalia is being misused, it is not the proper format, for marriage to be bestowed.
Now, if you have any questions, or wish to explore common sense any further than this, I suggest that you call 1-800-I-AM-A-DUMBASS...Don't forget to call me names and use an analogy that makes little to no sense. If you think that you are Don Rickles, guess again...
Don't forget genius....this is merely your opinion.

By the way....since you're so much into grammar you need to capatilize "I" when referring to yourself.

"...fact is that I DO believe that are unequal..." - Did you mean 'they' perhaps?

"...just no valid reason to call themselves "married"." - Did you mean to say 'there is just no valid reason to call themselves "married".???

---Next time remember....you suck at grammar as much as anyone in here and your opinion does not designate fact.

Just an FYI friend.
Dan C

Roseville, CA

#171011 Dec 12, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, it's quite plain that you have a limited supply of grey matter, but if you think that you are smarter than I am, have I got some heartbreaking news for you...No, you are not. You cannot even spell correctly, even though mis-spelt words are flag with red underscores, or was the purpose of the red squigglies a mystery to you ?
"mis-spelt"???

ROFL!!!!

You mean mis-spelled perhaps??

I wouldn't go for your English teaching degree any time soon Einstein.
Dan C

Roseville, CA

#171013 Dec 12, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
It is even less beneficial, for the majority of us, to waste U.S. Government resources, attempting to re-define the term "marriage", for the benefit of less than 10% of the population. Way to go, chump...
Exactly how are 'US. Government resources' going to be allotted towards allowing gays to marry?

What a load of bullshit.

If anything else it's a waste of time and resources to deny them marriage given you and others spend time and efforts to stop them over nothing given you can find no viable harm in it.

You're a moron buddy.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#171014 Dec 12, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Sheesh, again with misspelled words....Confucius would say "Do not try to use 5th grade words, when 4th grade words are beyond your scope", as well as "Do not misspell my name" LOL
Confucius say "Dan is a jackass".

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#171016 Dec 12, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
You should call the court and let them know they got it wrong in Loving V Virginia when they used the precedent set forth in Skinner v Oklahoma that marriage is a "right" when they made their decision.
I am sure they would love to hear from ya Rose.
Stupid, my claim was: Skinner v OK was not a case about marriage. And it wasn't. It was a case about using forced sterilization as a means of punishment. Were any marriage laws changed because of Skinner?
Dan C

Roseville, CA

#171017 Dec 12, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
"Your take" is erroneous. You are witnessing the phenomenon of common sense refusing to be buried. You, surely, cannot expect 90% of us to clam up, so as to allow 10% of the population to take control ? How about simply speaking for your end of the spectrum, the "lower than 56 IQ points" crowd, and not attempting to identify with the smart ones of us that have the real grasp of the situation ?
You mean to to say those who don't agree with your opinion.

Sorry bud.....it's not your world and there's a lot of thinking adults out there.

Too bad for you.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#171018 Dec 12, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Really Rose? Where is the check on the court?
You would know the answer to this if you actually studied the writings of the founder's. But since you haven't you will simply reply with more of your nonsense that has no meaning or relevance to the argument.
You're claiming we don't have checks and balances in our system of government? That was what I said, dummy.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#171019 Dec 12, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
...bla bla bla... lots of dumb Dan stuff...bla bla bla...You gotta remember....just because you saw a zebra at the zoo doesn't mean your favorite donkey Ol' Bessie was fooling around with the dalmation 2 houses down the street.
LOL!!!
It doesn't mean she wasn't either.

YUK!YUK!YUK!
Dan C

Roseville, CA

#171020 Dec 12, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
...I swear, this boy is a real "Class A" fool....Nothing second rate about his density. And, just out of curiosity, just how portly was his wife, exactly ?
:-D
My wife could weigh in at a whopping 428 pounds and 3 ounces but I'd bet my Pez collection she'd beat anyhthing your lost ass could attract in both intelligence and beauty.....LOL!!!!!

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#171021 Dec 12, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually Loving V Virginia did NOT state that marriage was a "right"-
Yes it did. Anybody can look.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/histori...
akpilot wrote:
Skinner v Oklahoma did, they just affirmed it. Not once does the court say "Marriage is a Right" outside of the reference to Skinner v Oklahoma Rose.
That's why they cited Skinner v Oklahoma. Stop trying to act as if you understand law because you watch Judge Judy.
Whatever, b1tch.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 12 hr Concerned 71,938
News Four suspects still at large in Monterey Penins... Wed M JC 29 1
News Jewish-Christian charity helps Ukrainians move ... Apr 3 Azat 1
News Ask the Auto Doctor (Mar '06) Apr 2 svorpion 1,531
where can I find heroin in monterey? (Oct '14) Mar 27 Rosiedosie 7
News Homicide suspect Victor Cabrera has long histor... (Oct '08) Mar 24 mando 12
News Carmel waste broker accused of bribery (Dec '08) Mar 20 Gary 16
More from around the web

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]