Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Mike DiRucci]

"Dances with Men"!

HAR!HAR!HAR!

I got a million!

[FiveVotes]

If you want to find a inbreed bunch of Republican&Tea Party members then go on doen to this arm pit of a hole in teh brain community.

The most anti-Obama place in the U.S.
King County, Texas, where President Obama won only five votes.

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
There you go. Don't be shy, let all that homphobia out toots! Call your opponent gay! That'll fix him. What a bigot!
What did the Indians call the gay cowboy?

oh hes no opponant... just a dumbazz with a lonely hand

[Mike DiRucci]

Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:

<quoted text>nope i fully accept lgbt.... just pointing out that you and hudson seem to have a budding relationship and i hope you two find the marriage with one another in your future... its a wonderful thing... besides he only has his nicateen stained hand

We're not gay.

But tell us why do you continually bring up two men having a sexual relationship? What's your point? It seems to be that we're iceholes so we must be gay. Is that what you're saying toots?

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
You talk like a baby....

what???? so you fondle little baby girls then... is that what you desire... eeeeeeeeeeewwwwh what pedophile creap you are

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

R Hudson wrote:

Who's got the bigger dick, you or Jerry ?

oh sorry don't have one of those and never have... but he does have a nice thick one

[Mike DiRucci]

Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:

<quoted text>oh hes no opponant... just a dumbazz with a lonely hand

So he's not an opponent but he is a gay?

He's not gay. You know that. Calling people gay because you don't like them is homophobic and stupid.

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

R Hudson wrote:

Who's got the bigger dick, you or Jerry ?

tell us about you skinny calused nicoteen stained one ...lol

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
So he's not an opponent but he is a gay?
He's not gay. You know that. Calling people gay because you don't like them is homophobic and stupid.

so tell me why would a "hetero man" spend all day when not driving a dirty truck on a gay topix.... hhhmmm.... i'm here because i have a trans child... he is here why??????? everyday???? really... hell im not here but a short period each week

[Mike DiRucci]

Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:

<quoted text>tell us about you skinny calused nicoteen stained one ...lol

You mean his dick is smokin'? HAR!HAR!HAR!

At least you didn't call him gay!

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
If you like to fondle little girls, you should be arrested (again)...

your the one that brought up little girls morazz.... oh guess that relates to the rape charges you had that jerry found

[PeSized]

Still not good enough, so pass it on or pass it through your pea sized brain.

[Mike DiRucci]

FiveVotes wrote:

If you want to find a inbreed bunch of Republican&Tea Party members then go on doen to this arm pit of a hole in teh brain community.
The most anti-Obama place in the U.S.
King County, Texas, where President Obama won only five votes.

There are many precincts where Romney got zero votes. Zero! Mostly non tax paying urban hellholes.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57548626/...

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Isn't it amusing, how he claims to be LBGT friendly, and then uses "gay", as an insult ? I'm surprised that gay community hasn't chided her about that, yet ....I would expect even Chongo to have an opinion about that....

hey shouldnt you two be in church... hmmmmm not very christian

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Again, with the "I'm here because it's OK, but it's not OK, for you" theme. How does your presence, here, become justified by the presence of a twisted wreck of a child ? A fragile child, that cannot help itself, in any way, as per your boast, to be ready to cut anyone who messes with it ? You know that you screwed up with your EMO, don't you ?

i'd cut your azz from head to toe if you messed with my kiddo.... never waver on that

[Mike DiRucci]

Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:

<quoted text>so tell me why would a "hetero man" spend all day when not driving a dirty truck on a gay topix.... hhhmmm.... i'm here because i have a trans child... he is here why??????? everyday???? really... hell im not here but a short period each week

So time spent on Topix is directly proportional to gayness? Is that what you're saying toots?

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
So time spent on Topix is directly proportional to gayness? Is that what you're saying toots?

your beeting a dead horse dumbazz

sweet my verification number was 6666

[Mike DiRucci]

Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:

<quoted text>your beeting a dead horse dumbazz
sweet my verification number was 6666

I'm not afraid of your sillyass imaginary boss toots.

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
I would take that knife from you, reach down through your throat, and pull that knife up, through your ass, and cut you all, the way up, on the inside, if you ever tried to get near me with a knife.

oh i'm so worried about you... not!!!!!!!!!!

[Winston Smiths dog]

KiMare wrote:

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
So you want to equate the rare exceptions to procreation in marriage to the absolute desolation of procreation in ss unions???
Really?
Kind of silly stupid, don't you think???
Smirk.
<quoted text>
Nothing you said addressed the facts I stated.
They certainly did not disqualify my facts;
1. Heterosexual couples who do not procreate are still a large minority.
You simply argue that heterosexual couples are delaying or may not at this time choose to have children (those 'decisions' change all the time). Minor fluctuations in rates does not change my facts.
2. Gay couples are 'absolutely desolate' by mutual procreation.
You blatantly attempt to make the same idiotic, deceitful comparison.
-The unnatural barrenness of heterosexual couples to the absolute mutual desolation of every single gay couple.
-Even worse, your 'solution' leaves the child always absent one parent and one gender! A horrible and cruel deprivation of a child's well-being. Something that is diabolical and should be criminal. Anyone deliberately perpetrating this on a child is despicable.
This is a example of what evil consequences the attempt to equate duplicate couples to marriage leads to...
Your denial is sick and dangerous!

In your first post you started with a massive lie. You're still promoting that porkie, bub. The fact is that more than half of all married couples do not have children according to the data in the census report from 1990 to 2000. Yes, I know that doesn't mean they will never have children, but the numbers are much higher than I thought they'd be.

article wrote:

Younger couples also are making the childless choice. A 2011 study by the Center for Work-Life Policy finds that a surprisingly large number of Generation Xers – people born between 1965 and 1978 – are delaying parenthood or forgoing it completely.

The center reported that 43 percent of Gen-X women and 32 percent of Gen-X men did not have kids.

That is huge! Not a tiny fraction as you claimed initially. Gen Xers are nearing the end of their reproductive lives. This doesn't equate to delaying so much as simply opting out. One out of 5 women don't have kids compared to 1 out of 10 in the 70s. You can lump a huge number of men into that stat somewhere as they're kind of important in terms of creating a baby.

You go on at the close of the above quoted post to make the mistake of asserting your opinion is fact. Your nattering on about depriving children of one parent is horseshit. That happens regularly in the heterosexual world. Where's your outrage? If it is criminal why aren't we arresting single parents rampantly?

Where is your proof that having a married gay couple raising a child will harm the child? Oh, yeah, you don't have any because gay marriage isn't something that has been around very long.