Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (Page 7,473)

Showing posts 149,441 - 149,460 of199,087
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170748
Dec 10, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, now you are insulting my bf, too.
WTF are you blabbing about now Rose?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170749
Dec 10, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>

Loving v VA stated marriage is a right.
Why lie? It's so easy to look it up.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/histori...
Yes Rose, it's easy to look up, not so easy for you to comprehend.

You do realize why Loving V Virginia referenced Skinner V Oklahoma when making the statement that marriage was a "right" don't you? Because that was the SOURCE..

It's OK puppet, we don't expect much from you.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170750
Dec 10, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes Rose, it's easy to look up, not so easy for you to comprehend.
You do realize why Loving V Virginia referenced Skinner V Oklahoma when making the statement that marriage was a "right" don't you? Because that was the SOURCE..
It's OK puppet, we don't expect much from you.
Um, stupid, are you trying to deny Loving v VA states marriage is a right?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170751
Dec 10, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
WTF are you blabbing about now Rose?
Dummy, you said I wanted a cracker. So, you are trying to insult my bf. Do you know what "bf" stands for? Guess not, it stands for "boy friend".

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170752
Dec 10, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Looks like you are the one avoiding Rose. You failed to answer for your lies.
I didn't lie, dummy.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170753
Dec 10, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Um, stupid, are you trying to deny Loving v VA states marriage is a right?
No moron, I am stating the fact that it merely upheld the previous precedent established in Skinner v Oklahoma.

I am sorry that you don't know how to read the opinion of the court.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170754
Dec 10, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't lie, dummy.
Tactic 7

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170755
Dec 10, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Tactic 7
Only tactic

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170756
Dec 10, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

6

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Only tactic
Only? No, you have 7 of them..
LurnaDoones

Baldwin Park, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170757
Dec 10, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Still stalking people, I see.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170758
Dec 10, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Only? No, you have 7 of them..
Stupid, I was talking about your only tactic.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170759
Dec 10, 2012
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Stupid, I was talking about your only tactic.
Pot, meet kettle.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170760
Dec 10, 2012
 

Judged:

8

8

8

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Pot, meet kettle.
Do you think Rose_NoHo maybe had a stroke or something? Maybe she's over medicated?

Seriously, she used to be almost credible with some decent arguments. For quite a while she's just been a blathering idiot. What do you think is up with the old girl? I can't ask her. She won't talk to me.

“TAKIA AND TA TONKA”

Since: Aug 08

HAPPY TOGETHER!!!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170761
Dec 10, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no debating with single celled tranny ho's.......
There's no debating with single-cell brainless idiots like yourself who have nothing to being to the discussion except insults towards a poster who has obviously kicked your azz on more than one occasion......lol!!!

“TAKIA AND TA TONKA”

Since: Aug 08

HAPPY TOGETHER!!!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170762
Dec 10, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Pot, meet kettle.
Another one who just has to hurdle insults towards Rose because obviously she has gotten under your skin........why don't you simply ignore her if ya don't like her comments? or maybe that's just it......you need to insult her in order to make yourself feel better.......either way your tactics only make you look small.....and I don't believe you are!!!!

“TAKIA AND TA TONKA”

Since: Aug 08

HAPPY TOGETHER!!!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170763
Dec 10, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes Rose, it's easy to look up, not so easy for you to comprehend.
You do realize why Loving V Virginia referenced Skinner V Oklahoma when making the statement that marriage was a "right" don't you? Because that was the SOURCE..
It's OK puppet, we don't expect much from you.
But Skinner vs Oklahoma wasn't about the right to marry, it was about the right to procreate and that the right couldn't be taken away just like the right to marry can't be taken away!!!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170764
Dec 10, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
Another one who just has to hurdle insults towards Rose because obviously she has gotten under your skin........why don't you simply ignore her if ya don't like her comments? or maybe that's just it......you need to insult her in order to make yourself feel better.......either way your tactics only make you look small.....and I don't believe you are!!!!
Yawn..

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170765
Dec 10, 2012
 

Judged:

8

8

8

NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
There's no debating with single-cell brainless idiots like yourself who have nothing to being to the discussion except insults towards a poster who has obviously kicked your azz on more than one occasion......lol!!!
She says while insulting the poster and bringing nothing to the discussion.

Priceless!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170766
Dec 10, 2012
 

Judged:

8

7

7

NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
But Skinner vs Oklahoma wasn't about the right to marry, it was about the right to procreate and that the right couldn't be taken away just like the right to marry can't be taken away!!!
Time for an Education:

"Marriage and procreation are fundamental to the very existence and survival of the race." Skinner v. Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson - 316 U.S. 535 (1942)

Note that there is no citation- Why? Because it is the SOURCE!!

What is different about Loving v Virginia?

"Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival. Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535, 541 (1942). "

Oh, look at that, a citation. Imagine that, the SCOTUS referenced Skinner v Oklahoma when establishing a "right" to marriage.

And you explanation in regards to the meaning of the Skinner v Oklahoma is lacking as well.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170767
Dec 10, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Time for an Education:
"Marriage and procreation are fundamental to the very existence and survival of the race." Skinner v. Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson - 316 U.S. 535 (1942)
Note that there is no citation- Why? Because it is the SOURCE!!
What is different about Loving v Virginia?
"Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival. Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535, 541 (1942). "
Oh, look at that, a citation. Imagine that, the SCOTUS referenced Skinner v Oklahoma when establishing a "right" to marriage.
And you explanation in regards to the meaning of the Skinner v Oklahoma is lacking as well.
Nonsense. There is no marriage license required for procreation. Skinner was a 40s court decision about mandatory sterilization of a mentally disabled individual. What's more, procreation is not a legal requirement of marriage. Procreation is a fundamental right and so is the right to marry the person of your choice.

Are you trying to be funny?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 149,441 - 149,460 of199,087
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
Monterey Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Monterey Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••