Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[akpilot]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>

And I'm not getting into some nit-picky argument with you about that, Mr. TTAG.

Because you lack the intellect to do so.

[akpilot]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL.
The Constitution is law.
And I'm not getting into some nit-picky argument with you about that, Mr. TTAG.

Since you seem to like Wiki so much, I will make it easy on you rather than attempting to explain it to you by getting into an in depth conversation about our founding which I KNOW you aren't intellectually prepared to engage in.

"The Constitution doesn't have laws, it has enumerated powers or guaranteed rights. Laws are created based upon their Constitutional basis. There are limited and enumerated powers given to the government, and the guaranteed rights citizens have throughout all states."- http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_laws_does_...

[akpilot]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
This country doesn't have slavery now...
Um, duh.

You haven't looked at the tax code lately have you?

Considering those of us whom actually hold a job work for free until sometime in mid April just to pay our tax liability, how can you claim this country doesn't have slavery?

[Rose_NoHo]

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
Isn't it cute, the queen of calling people- Bigots, LOLSERS

LOLSER = LOL + LOSER
LOL = Laugh Out Loud
LOSER = akpilot.

akpilot wrote:

(Whatever that is), Condumbs (Whatever they are),

It's a play on words...
Con(servative) dumb...
Condumb (condom)
Get it now?

akpilot wrote:

racist, and homophobes- is crying about being attacked.
You poor little baby Rose.

I'm just pointing out the fact that you don't have any real arguments, so you just attack me.
So, come up with a real argument.

[Rose_NoHo]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
That nonsense floating around the cesspool of your mind does not substitute for any showing of any posts by me, approving of slavery. Do you have any post # with any text, typed by me, that shows me approving of slavery ? The fact that I'd buy you show that I would enjoy having a whipping boy around.

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/gay/TH6FC2NTH...

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Then, pack yer bags and MOVE THERE, you traitor.

i might after i get my degree

[Rose_NoHo]

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
You haven't looked at the tax code lately have you?
Considering those of us whom actually hold a job work for free until sometime in mid April just to pay our tax liability, how can you claim this country doesn't have slavery?

When the IRS comes in and murders members of your family,(If you were murdered, I'm sure they wouldn't care, in fact they would be glad), kidnaps others and sells them in far off lands, compare taxes to slavery.

[Rose_NoHo]

R Hudson wrote:

Feel free, to attempt, to provide, even 1, argument...

Equal rights, dummy.
Our rights should not depend on our genitals.

[Wat the Tyler]

This is good news. Think about it. If the US supreme court didn't hear it gay marriage would only be legal in California only. This way the US supreme court will legalize it nationwide including my state of Pennsylvania.

I believe it will be a 6 to 3 decision with Justice Roberts and Kennedy siding with the liberals.

[Quest]

Wat the Tyler wrote:

This is good news. Think about it. If the US supreme court didn't hear it gay marriage would only be legal in California only. This way the US supreme court will legalize it nationwide including my state of Pennsylvania.
I believe it will be a 6 to 3 decision with Justice Roberts and Kennedy siding with the liberals.

A lovely thought, but I fear rather unlikely.

[Wat the Tyler]

Quest wrote:

<quoted text>
A lovely thought, but I fear rather unlikely.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virgin...

[Wat the Tyler]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
And I believe that you haven't read the Constitution, else, you'd know that the Federal Government hasn't the authority to "legalize" it, as the Constitution leaves it up to the states to decide the issue.

It is if it is a protected right in the bill of rights.

Gay marriage is protected in the 14th amendment.

The US supreme court did the same stuff with bans on interracial marriage in 1967.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virgin...

[Rose_NoHo]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
That's not an argument, at all, your genitals do not matter, at all, it is not a gender issue. Care to try again ?

Well, stupid, if genitals don't matter when it comes to marriage laws, why can't a woman marry another woman in most states?

[Rose_NoHo]

R Hudson wrote:

Looks like Chongo/rose-no-hope has withered and blown away....sans admission of defeat. Chongo, I accept your surrender, I was blasting you, all to hell, and you couldn't cope. It is completely understandable.

Danth’s Law

[Rose_NoHo]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
That's a page, on Topix...and ? Do you have a post # to go with that page ? Of course you do not, but I am being more than fair, in providing you with every opportunity to ridicule yourself, even more than you have already...

Click on the link, idiot, it takes you right to the post.
Sheesh...

[Rose_NoHo]

R Hudson wrote:

Do you know what I'd do, if I owned you ? I'd buy you all the crack that you could handle, and sit you down, in front of a computer, so that you could spend all day, every day, providing everybody else unlimited access to you and your stupidity, because you are so much fun, that I couldn't deny the world the fun of handing you your black ass, endlessly...

Know what I'd do if I owned you? Just let you starve to death. You wouldn't be worth what it would cost to feed you, you are just too damn ugly and stupid.

[akpilot]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
LOLSER = LOL + LOSER
LOL = Laugh Out Loud
LOSER = akpilot.
<quoted text>
It's a play on words...
Con(servative) dumb...
Condumb (condom)
Get it now?
<quoted text>
I'm just pointing out the fact that you don't have any real arguments, so you just attack me.
So, come up with a real argument.

Funny how Rose does everything in her post which she accuses others of doing.

How about you present an actual argument Rose and stop trying to be funny. You aren't any better at that than you are at sounding intelligent.

[Rose_NoHo]

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
Funny how Rose does everything in her post which she accuses others of doing.
How about you present an actual argument Rose and stop trying to be funny. You aren't any better at that than you are at sounding intelligent.

Take notes this time, stupid.
Two words:
Equal rights.

You can't argue against that, so you'll just call me names.
Now, if only I were this good at predicting lottery numbers.:)

[akpilot]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Take notes this time, stupid.
Two words:
Equal rights.
You can't argue against that, so you'll just call me names.
Now, if only I were this good at predicting lottery numbers.:)

Take notes? People should completely ignore you, you are like a black hole of intellect.

BTW Rose, you have called people names in each and every one of your replies. Why do you expect different when others are replying to you?

[Mike DiRucci]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Take notes this time, stupid.
Two words:
Equal rights.
You can't argue against that, so you'll just call me names.
Now, if only I were this good at predicting lottery numbers.:)

You'd lose all your money.