Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,174

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170575 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
How original of you, to post like that...But you couldn't afford me, is right, besides, as I support myself, you'd never have the chance to own me, and I'd end up owning you, anyway. Natural superiority would show through, and you'd still end up on crack, using my computer to entertain the masses.
LOL! How are you superior to me? I'm much smarter and better looking than you are.
I could afford to feed you, I just said you aren't worth it. If it cost only a penny to feed you for a life time, that would be more than you are worth.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#170577 Dec 9, 2012
If you
believe denying marriage to a relationship
will prevent love

If you
demand any committed relationship
has to be called marriage

If you
claim rights and benefits can only be acquired
by a imposition on marriage

If you
equate the diversity of two genders
with the redundancy of same genders

If you
desecrate the sacred tradition of all major religions
and violate the historic practice of every single culture in history

If you
believe a fundamental change to the building block of society
will have absolutely no affect

If you
think a law can change
the reality of crucial distinctions in relationships

If you
pretend duplicating sexuality
is the same as blending masculinity and femininity

If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent

If you
ignore the design of sexual union
to manipulate a harmful act

If you
violate evolution's law of reproduction
to equate a genetic dead end

If you
risk the healthiest human relationship
to include one of the unhealthiest

If you
parallel the sole birthplace of every other relationship
with one that can reproduce none

If you
dilute all these things
down to just 'a committed relationship of two people'

Then, and only then, can you equate same-sex unions with marriage.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170578 Dec 9, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
"You can't argue against that, so you'll just call me names.
Now, if only I were this good at predicting lottery numbers.:)"
Tactic 1 and 2
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
I made up the words "equal" and "rights"?
Wow, I'm impressed with myself.
Tactic 1 and 2 again.

Misdirect as she knows damn well the terms we are talking about are LOLSER and CONDUMB not Equal and Rights. This could also fall into the "acting stupid" category.
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Since I have the ability to reach though time and space, maybe I will play that lottery!
Tactic 1
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
You don't have enough character to be embarrassed, you are a spineless nobody who think he is all that and a side of chips.
So, counter my argument, or STFU, you stupid b!tch. Deal?
Tactic's 2,3 and 7

Good work Rose, I am proud of you.

Rose tactic #1- Act stupid-(not so sure it is an act)
Rose Tactic #2- Misdirect
Rose Tactic #3- Make stupid comments until opposition is tired of replying then claim victory
Rose Tactic #4- Attack the poster- scream Racist, Bigot, Homophobe
Rose Tactic #5- Act intelligent by making silly statistical references such as- Most people who have anal sex are straight-
Rose Tactic #6- Falsely accuse others of lies- when proven wrong through links to previous posts revert back to tactics 2 and 4.
Rose Tactic #7- Claim to have made an argument, then claim others can't counter the argument that doesn't actually exist.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170579 Dec 9, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
"You can't argue against that, so you'll just call me names.
I highly doubt that I am the first, and the internet is the only place- you have been called a moron.

That is probably why you get so upset about it.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170580 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you saying that you think homosexuality is equivalent to
heterosexuality?
Actually, I didn't mention either.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170582 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't you owe AKPilot an apology ? For being wrong ? And you owe us all an explanation, for why you were wrong...And don't you owe Mike "congratulations, for correctly predicting the outcome of your false prediction ? And don't you owe me an apology, for lying about me, when you claimed to show that I approved of slavery ? When you didn't ?
But bigfoot, I was right.
Akpilot didn't say anything at all about my argument, and just called me names.
Other than that...

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170585 Dec 9, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Damn, you are as dumb as you are ugly. And that is dumb!
What you said it the laws against inter-racial marriage didn't involve race because they applied to people of all races.
If a man goes into the JP and asks to marry a man, he'll be told, "No". A woman doing the exact same thing will be told, "Yes" Why? Because of their genders (genitalia).
If Rose_NoHo goes into the JP and asks to marry someone she'll be told, "Get the hell out of here you spun out old bag!"

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170590 Dec 9, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
But bigfoot, I was right.
Akpilot didn't say anything at all about my argument, and just called me names.
Other than that...
I'm just gonna call you a name too. I got a good one!

"Old Hippo Leg".

Take that picture down now!
LowTide

Covina, CA

#170592 Dec 9, 2012
The funds are mighty low on the Republican side now days.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170593 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
And, since it is a non-gender issue, that is, truly, a display of your equal rights at work...
Stupid, if it weren't a gender issue, then you would be able to marry a person regardless of your or their gender.
GtAquarter

Covina, CA

#170596 Dec 9, 2012
Magic finger beds are the best.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170597 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Ignorant dolt, you pretend to misunderstand, but you attempting misdirection, again. You posed a question concerning women not being able to marry one another. This I explained thusly. Then you posed the same question in reverse, after adding some inter-racial nonsense, which I clarified. Now, you ask a question, based on marriage laws. I answered those, now, Answer mine. Show where I approve of slavery, if you can. State your religious beliefs. If you can speak properly. And explain why gay people should be allowed to marry. Equate heterosexuality with homosexuality.
I think that's Rose tactic #2 on AK's Rose_NoHo tactic list. Misdirect.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170598 Dec 9, 2012
Bruno wrote:
<quoted text>
Jan Brewer is the only TRUE American Politician left in this country. She is NOT afraid to stand up for the American people who believe in a moral and traditional marriage. You can sit on your boyfriends dick and spin on it yourself !!!
It's funny that you "small government" con dumb think government should be in charge of enforcing traditions. Do you think someone who gives a couple something made of china instead of cotton for their second anniversary should go to jail?

BTW, unless a non consenting party is involve, and act can't be immoral. So, unless someone is forced into a gay marriage, it can't be immoral.
WWYT club

Covina, CA

#170599 Dec 9, 2012
What were you thinking?

Are you some kind of strung out follower of FOX news or something?

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170600 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
My response was to this post:
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, stupid, if genitals don't matter when it comes to marriage laws, why can't a woman marry another woman in most states?
To which I responded that it was because SSM was illegal for men and women alike, making her posed question, in regards to this scenario, a non-gender issue.
Hmmm..
Prior to Loving v VA, black/white marriages were illegal for both blacks and whites, so it wasn't a race issue?
WWYT club

Covina, CA

#170601 Dec 9, 2012
Done cooked your own goose, has an average IQ of 80 - which is 20 points lower than the national average.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#170602 Dec 9, 2012
WWYT club wrote:
What were you thinking?
Are you some kind of strung out follower of FOX news or something?
Most people are now, didn't you know.

They wanted fair and balanced news.

And of course not having to look at Candy Crawley...

Smirk.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170603 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Says you. If we had video capability in here, I'd show you how easily I could use a $100 bill to light up one of my expensive cigars, little boy.
Well, then you would be able to afford video capability. Even cell phones have it.
Looks like you got called on your BS.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#170604 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
First, You show your inability to understand valid reasoning. Second, The 14th Amendment does not require anyone to marry. Third, homophobia is a nonsense word invented by “gay” sophists as a rhetorical weapon against its opponents. It lumps together all opponents as mentally-ill “gay bashers” and in doing so declares mainstream doctrines to be harmful and illegitimate. You'll have to define the term and the distinction between homophobia and non-homophobic opposition to homosexuality. And, finally, fourth, gay marriage isn't an institution, yet, and it won't be. It is a flash in the pan, and will disqualified soon.
mADE UP??

Homophobia encompasses a range of negative attitudes and feelings toward homosexuality or people who are identified or perceived as being lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT). It can be expressed as antipathy, contempt, prejudice, aversion, or hatred, and may be based on irrational fear.[1][2][3][4]

Homophobia is observable in critical and hostile behavior such as discrimination and violence on the basis of sexual orientations that are non-heterosexual.[1][2] According to the 2010 Hate Crimes Statistics released by the FBI National Press Office, 19.3 percent of hate crimes across the United States "were motivated by a sexual orientation bias."[5] Moreover, in a Southern Poverty Law Center 2010 Intelligence Report extrapolating data from fourteen years (1995–2008), which had complete data available at the time, of the FBI's national hate crime statistics found that LGBT people were "far more likely than any other minority group in the United States to be victimized by violent hate crime."[6]

Recognized types of homophobia include institutionalized homophobia, e.g. religious homophobia and state-sponsored homophobia,[7] and internalized homophobia, experienced by people who have same-sex attractions, regardless of how they identify. Forms of homophobia toward identifiable LGBT social groups have similar yet specific names: lesbophobia[8]– the intersection of homophobia and sexism directed against lesbians, biphobia – towards bisexuality and bisexual people, and transphobia, which targets transsexualism, transsexual and transgender people, and gender variance or gender role nonconformity.

Two words originate from homophobia: homophobic (adj.) and homophobe (n.), the latter word describing a person who displays homophobia or is thought to do so.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homophobia

NOT SO MUCH BUTTER CUP

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170607 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Ignorant dolt, you pretend to misunderstand, but you attempting misdirection, again. You posed a question concerning women not being able to marry one another.
And they can't, because of their genders. Duh, fugly.
R Hudson wrote:
This I explained thusly. Then you posed the same question in reverse, after adding some inter-racial nonsense, which I clarified. Now, you ask a question, based on marriage laws. I answered those, now, Answer mine. Show where I approve of slavery, if you can.
I've done that.(170451)You claimed slavery made America great, that sounds like approval to me.
R Hudson wrote:
State your religious beliefs. If you can speak properly. And explain why gay people should be allowed to marry. Equate heterosexuality with homosexuality.
Again, you hideous moron, gay couples should be allowed to marry because men and women should have equal rights when it comes to marriage.
Heterosexuality and homosexuality are both sexual orientations.
I'm an Orthodox Jew (like you are a Wiccan...LOL!)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 44 min Rick Moss 71,088
Carmel River diverted to allow dam removal, pre... Dec 16 Clint 1
Calif. cop may be fired for giving suicidal stu... Dec 13 John Smith 1
Kristen Scannell Saratoga Springs NY Adds New H... Dec 12 Alex Montgomery 1
Who do you think is the MOST corrupt Monterey C... Dec 9 montereyusedtobenice 1
where can I find heroin in monterey? Dec 9 montereyusedtobenice 5
Help! In need of opiates preferably boi Dec 5 Njp9080 1
Monterey Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Monterey News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Monterey

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 2:17 pm PST