Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201811 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170430 Dec 8, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
That nonsense floating around the cesspool of your mind does not substitute for any showing of any posts by me, approving of slavery. Do you have any post # with any text, typed by me, that shows me approving of slavery ? The fact that I'd buy you show that I would enjoy having a whipping boy around.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/gay/TH6FC2NTH...

Since: May 12

Bellevue, WA

#170431 Dec 8, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Then, pack yer bags and MOVE THERE, you traitor.
i might after i get my degree

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170435 Dec 8, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
You haven't looked at the tax code lately have you?
Considering those of us whom actually hold a job work for free until sometime in mid April just to pay our tax liability, how can you claim this country doesn't have slavery?
When the IRS comes in and murders members of your family,(If you were murdered, I'm sure they wouldn't care, in fact they would be glad), kidnaps others and sells them in far off lands, compare taxes to slavery.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170437 Dec 8, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
Feel free, to attempt, to provide, even 1, argument...
Equal rights, dummy.
Our rights should not depend on our genitals.

Since: Jan 12

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

#170440 Dec 8, 2012
This is good news. Think about it. If the US supreme court didn't hear it gay marriage would only be legal in California only. This way the US supreme court will legalize it nationwide including my state of Pennsylvania.

I believe it will be a 6 to 3 decision with Justice Roberts and Kennedy siding with the liberals.

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#170441 Dec 8, 2012
Wat the Tyler wrote:
This is good news. Think about it. If the US supreme court didn't hear it gay marriage would only be legal in California only. This way the US supreme court will legalize it nationwide including my state of Pennsylvania.
I believe it will be a 6 to 3 decision with Justice Roberts and Kennedy siding with the liberals.
A lovely thought, but I fear rather unlikely.

Since: Jan 12

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

#170443 Dec 8, 2012
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
A lovely thought, but I fear rather unlikely.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virgin...

Since: Jan 12

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

#170444 Dec 8, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
And I believe that you haven't read the Constitution, else, you'd know that the Federal Government hasn't the authority to "legalize" it, as the Constitution leaves it up to the states to decide the issue.
It is if it is a protected right in the bill of rights.

Gay marriage is protected in the 14th amendment.

The US supreme court did the same stuff with bans on interracial marriage in 1967.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virgin...

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170446 Dec 8, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not an argument, at all, your genitals do not matter, at all, it is not a gender issue. Care to try again ?
Well, stupid, if genitals don't matter when it comes to marriage laws, why can't a woman marry another woman in most states?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170447 Dec 8, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
Looks like Chongo/rose-no-hope has withered and blown away....sans admission of defeat. Chongo, I accept your surrender, I was blasting you, all to hell, and you couldn't cope. It is completely understandable.
Danth’s Law

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170448 Dec 8, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a page, on Topix...and ? Do you have a post # to go with that page ? Of course you do not, but I am being more than fair, in providing you with every opportunity to ridicule yourself, even more than you have already...
Click on the link, idiot, it takes you right to the post.
Sheesh...

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170449 Dec 8, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
Do you know what I'd do, if I owned you ? I'd buy you all the crack that you could handle, and sit you down, in front of a computer, so that you could spend all day, every day, providing everybody else unlimited access to you and your stupidity, because you are so much fun, that I couldn't deny the world the fun of handing you your black ass, endlessly...
Know what I'd do if I owned you? Just let you starve to death. You wouldn't be worth what it would cost to feed you, you are just too damn ugly and stupid.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170450 Dec 8, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
LOLSER = LOL + LOSER
LOL = Laugh Out Loud
LOSER = akpilot.
<quoted text>
It's a play on words...
Con(servative) dumb...
Condumb (condom)
Get it now?
<quoted text>
I'm just pointing out the fact that you don't have any real arguments, so you just attack me.
So, come up with a real argument.
Funny how Rose does everything in her post which she accuses others of doing.

How about you present an actual argument Rose and stop trying to be funny. You aren't any better at that than you are at sounding intelligent.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170451 Dec 8, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny how Rose does everything in her post which she accuses others of doing.
How about you present an actual argument Rose and stop trying to be funny. You aren't any better at that than you are at sounding intelligent.
Take notes this time, stupid.
Two words:
Equal rights.

You can't argue against that, so you'll just call me names.
Now, if only I were this good at predicting lottery numbers.:)

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170452 Dec 8, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Take notes this time, stupid.
Two words:
Equal rights.
You can't argue against that, so you'll just call me names.
Now, if only I were this good at predicting lottery numbers.:)
Take notes? People should completely ignore you, you are like a black hole of intellect.

BTW Rose, you have called people names in each and every one of your replies. Why do you expect different when others are replying to you?

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170453 Dec 8, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Take notes this time, stupid.
Two words:
Equal rights.
You can't argue against that, so you'll just call me names.
Now, if only I were this good at predicting lottery numbers.:)
You'd lose all your money.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170454 Dec 8, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Take notes this time, stupid.
Two words:
Equal rights.
You can't argue against that, so you'll just call me names.
Now, if only I were this good at predicting lottery numbers.:)
Exactly what name did I call you in this post?

Funny how Rose does everything in her post which she accuses others of doing.
How about you present an actual argument Rose and stop trying to be funny. You aren't any better at that than you are at sounding intelligent.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#170455 Dec 8, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
And I believe that you haven't read the Constitution, else, you'd know that the Federal Government hasn't the authority to "legalize" it, as the Constitution leaves it up to the states to decide the issue.
Actually the case before the court can indeed affect measures nationwide. It can overturn bans on it in all states. I didnt say it will, I said it can, depends on how it is worded.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170463 Dec 8, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually the case before the court can indeed affect measures nationwide. It can overturn bans on it in all states. I didnt say it will, I said it can, depends on how it is worded.
Yes. Similar to when Bill Clinton was impeached on Dec 19, 1998.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170467 Dec 8, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Know what I'd do if I owned you? Just let you starve to death. You wouldn't be worth what it would cost to feed you, you are just too damn ugly and stupid.
Nice!

I shudder to think of the horror if you were in charge of anyone.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Monterey Public Officials VIOLATING FEDERAL LAWS May 26 Un agenda 21 and ... 4
public officials violating federal laws May 24 Un agenda 21 and ... 3
the music thread (Apr '12) May 23 Musikologist 19
News Ask the Auto Doctor (Mar '06) May 23 ikestubbs 1,535
News Letters: Charter application superior (Jan '11) May 21 Yin Simons 13
News Taking extraordinary measures to wear an extrao... May 18 outtogether 2
News Police: Armed robbery at Santa Cruz sandwich sh... May 11 bump 1
More from around the web

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]