Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (Page 7,437)

Showing posts 148,721 - 148,740 of200,213
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169760
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
No one cares brother.
Add to that I'd like to see you even find a case where the Three Musketeers wanted to marry each other in a polygamist union.
LOL!!!
You're so damned stupid I begin to wonder if you have to remind yourself to raise the toilet lid before relieving yourself....LOL!!!!
There you go again with that stupid argument. "There's not enough of them to give them equal rights."

You're an idiot.

And a jackass!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169761
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
You linked the 2 together then claimed you did not and now interestingly enough are again linking polygamy and gay marriage together.
You apparently don't know who in the hell you are...LOL!!!!
Polygamy and same sex marriages are different in nature hence the separate names to each dumbass.
Of course you can play games and lay claim what if 3 women wanted to marry each other but they are viewed as separate entities.
Add to that there is no evidence that if we allow gays to marry we then must allow polygamists to marry given their separate structure which mainly deals with the fact polygamists want to have 3 or more partners married to each other.
Given you're too fucking stupid I thought I'd introduce you to that little fact.
Now if you hold a sincere fear that if we allow 2 people of the same sex to marry we in turn must allow everything from polygamists to those wanting to marry a sex doll in tow here's what may comfort your dumbass self - each are separate and will be viewed independently based on their own merits.
There are polygamists who do want to legalize polygamy but they cannot ride the coat tails of gay marriage given their individual aspects of being polygamists involve a completely different set of circumstances.
This probably will go right over your head but there you go. Facts. All in a neat row for you to absorb given your skull isn't too thick.
Facts. Like equality means equal for everyone. Like equality is for everyone. Like Dan is a dope!

FUN!
Saused

San Dimas, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169762
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

4

Prison officials in North Carolina are calling for a criminal investigation

Since: Jan 10

Lewis Center, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169763
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah that's what they say against same sex marriage too. Just because someone else believes they don't have it...not a valid reason...bla bla bla.
Equality is equality. Bigotry is bigotry.
You are against marriage equality. But you are for same sex marriage. Got it.
Truth is I donít have an opinion on polygamous or incestuous marriage rights and I donít believe that I have to in order to deserve Gay Marriage Equality. Do you believe that polygamous or incestuous marriages should be legal?
Dan C

Citrus Heights, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169764
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Why does it matter Dan? Do you support equality for people with a good social life or a bad one?
Both.

YUK YUK YUK dumbass.
Dan C

Citrus Heights, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169765
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Lend me one of your friends or even better, you be my friend, jackass!
C'mon be my friend Dan. I never had an ignorant dope like you for a friend! Might be fun. You could threaten people for me!
Too Funny!
Nah. I'll pass.

And if I remember right you were the one who said you wanted a piece of me...I just advised where I was going to be so you'd have a chance at it.

You're not for gay marriage. I see no honest support from you towards that end.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169766
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't vote out individual rights of American citizens.
Pretty simple concept and if you had an IQ above that of a snapping turtle walking off a cliff because it thought it could fly you'd get it.
You no doubt probably have freedoms and liberties you enjoy as an American but might not be wildly popular so in turn if we deny gays the ability to marry based on a vote then can we vote on your individual freedoms?
Sure you do. We just voted higher taxes for a 1% minority of our citizens! Easy! So much for the tyranny of the majority, eh Dan?

Four more years! Yes we can! But we just didn't yet. Maybe this term though...or not.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169767
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
Both.
YUK YUK YUK dumbass.
So why does it matter how mine is? Of course we know yours is very active, cool and classy and all that. But what does it matter to equal rights? It doesn't.

What a jackass!

P.S. Great arguments. YUK!YUK!YUK!
Dan C

Citrus Heights, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169768
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure you do. We just voted higher taxes for a 1% minority of our citizens! Easy! So much for the tyranny of the majority, eh Dan?
Four more years! Yes we can! But we just didn't yet. Maybe this term though...or not.
Registered troll.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169769
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
Nah. I'll pass.
And if I remember right you were the one who said you wanted a piece of me...I just advised where I was going to be so you'd have a chance at it.
You're not for gay marriage. I see no honest support from you towards that end.
Whoa, there cowboy! Keep your pants on. I never said any such thing! Jeez! Think of your wife and family.

WOW!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169770
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Dan. YUK!YUK!YUK!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169771
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

6

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
Registered troll.
Unregistered troll!

And jackass!

Nana nana nana!
Dan C

Citrus Heights, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169772
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
Truth is I donít have an opinion on polygamous or incestuous marriage rights and I donít believe that I have to in order to deserve Gay Marriage Equality. Do you believe that polygamous or incestuous marriages should be legal?
Pickerington?

I'm from Colorado...lived in California most of my life now but spent a year in Lancaster, Ohio.

Very conservative area and one in which gay marriage would seem hard to pass if left to a vote.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169773
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, yes you can. Straight people do it every day.
"straight people" aren't the ones claiming you can't, and then adding miles of footnotes to the "equal right's" claim to exclude all others but same sex and heterosexual.

What is funny is that you think you are somehow MORE for "equal right's" than another group because you want to include yourselves while excluding all others. Its cute really.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169774
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do folks like yourself and AK have such difficulty differentiating between ONE, and TWO, THREE or FOUR?
So it is OK to exclude consenting adults from the right of marriage based on the number of parties involved, yet not OK when it comes to gender?

How many other exceptions would you like to include in your- I'm for equal right's of all- claim?
WaterPistol

San Dimas, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169775
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Is it set on stun?
Dan C

Citrus Heights, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169776
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
"straight people" aren't the ones claiming you can't, and then adding miles of footnotes to the "equal right's" claim to exclude all others but same sex and heterosexual.
What is funny is that you think you are somehow MORE for "equal right's" than another group because you want to include yourselves while excluding all others. Its cute really.
What you're attempting is a play on words.

There is no aspect of gays wanting "more" in terms of equal rights. In fact the term sums it up - equal rights.

As far as the rest of your thoughts here again is why you are incorrect;

Gays pursuing equal rights in terms of marriage have never made efforts towards excluding others. They are only focused on their path towards equality when it comes to marriage mainly because of the concentrated effort it will take to make it a national reality.

Disagree??

Then find just ONE case where gays took efforts to excluding say polygamists from marrying. Just one....because if you cannot you are what I already know of you - you're a liar.
Dan C

Citrus Heights, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169777
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
So it is OK to exclude consenting adults from the right of marriage based on the number of parties involved, yet not OK when it comes to gender?
How many other exceptions would you like to include in your- I'm for equal right's of all- claim?
The poster merely pointed to the fact polygamy involved itself with a completely different set of circumstances in terms of marriage than the gay marriage issue in that polygamists are concerned with marriages involving themselves with 3 or more adults in a union.

And apparently that confused you.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169778
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
Truth is I donít have an opinion on polygamous or incestuous marriage rights and I donít believe that I have to in order to deserve Gay Marriage Equality. Do you believe that polygamous or incestuous marriages should be legal?
Yes.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169779
Dec 3, 2012
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
The poster merely pointed to the fact polygamy involved itself with a completely different set of circumstances in terms of marriage than the gay marriage issue in that polygamists are concerned with marriages involving themselves with 3 or more adults in a union.
And apparently that confused you.
Wha? Your explanation definitely confused me!

Explain it better. Maybe if you stop trying to talk so fancy.

YUK!YUK!YUK!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 148,721 - 148,740 of200,213
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••

Monterey Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Monterey News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Monterey
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••