Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Big D]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
Perhaps you would explain what you think impeachment means? Maybe we can get to the bottom of your confusion.
But of course you know you are wrong so you won't.
Impeachment is a formal process in which an official is accused of unlawful activity. Simple. Why do you not understand?

I already know, I dont care if you do or not

[Mike DiRucci]

RiccardoFire wrote:

I'm sure somehow Sandy was Bush's fault.

Of course it was. Romney was in on it too.

[Bruno]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
Marriage is good for society because it provides stability.
The bottom line is there is no harm in allowing same sex marriage. The few valid arguments against it are weak and insignificant especially when you consider the small percentage of the population involved.
Besides all that stuff, weddings are fun! The more I get invited to the better.
Loosen up Bruno! Don't be a dope.

I'm refering to a SSM you moron, not just a marriage. The few "VALID" arguments as you describe, are just that valid, just because YOU don't agree with them makes you very biased.

[Mike DiRucci]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
I already know, I dont care if you do or not

You know but you're keeping it secret?

Aw c'mon Biggy, don't be like that. I told you, now you tell me what you think it means.

Fun!

[Bruno]

DorN wrote:

<quoted text>
=---------
If homosexuals are allowed to legally marry and be accepted in society, they will "come out of the closet" and not have to marry straights in order to be respected.

I can respect a homosexual more if they just did't demand to be respected by changing rules and laws to be part of a normal society. Some will say they don't care if they are respected and that this is not about respect, but it is

[Mike DiRucci]

Bruno wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm refering to a SSM you moron, not just a marriage. The few "VALID" arguments as you describe, are just that valid, just because YOU don't agree with them makes you very biased.

Yeah I am biased. And so are you, that's why we are here jackass!

All arguments I've heard against same sex marriage are weak at best. The slippery slope I'd say is the strongest. If we allow marriage to mean everything, it will mean nothing. But in practise it will hardly be a problem due to the small percentages of people involved.

[Big D]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
You know but you're keeping it secret?
Aw c'mon Biggy, don't be like that. I told you, now you tell me what you think it means.
Fun!

You wont ever know, you can rest easy that is was a total success in your mind :)

[Mike DiRucci]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
You wont ever know, you can rest easy that is was a total success in your mind :)

Yes it was. If Clinton's impeachment wasn't successful, we wouldn't be arguing about Clinton's impeachment!

What a dope!

You think impeachment means found guilty and removed from office by the Senate. You're wrong. The House has the sole power of impeachment. Once they impeach, you're "successfully" impeached regardless of the outcome in the Senate.

It bears repeating- What a dope!

FUN!

[Big D]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes it was. If Clinton's impeachment wasn't successful, we wouldn't be arguing about Clinton's impeachment!
What a dope!
You think impeachment means found guilty and removed from office by the Senate. You're wrong. The House has the sole power of impeachment. Once they impeach, you're "successfully" impeached regardless of the outcome in the Senate.
It bears repeating- What a dope!
FUN!

Now you are a mind reader? Do you have an actual ability in mind reading or do you have a "successful" effort in mind reading regardless of the fact that you don’t actually the ability?

You have no idea what I think, you certainly have no idea of what I know ( you already demonstrated that you don’t know that )

LOL

[Mike DiRucci]

Arguing with this jackass "Big D" reminds me of playing whack a mole. He just keeps popping up insisting Clinton wasn't impeached and I gotta whack him back down again!

Whack a Dope!

It's fun!

[Mike DiRucci]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
Now you are a mind reader? Do you have an actual ability in mind reading or do you have a "successful" effort in mind reading regardless of the fact that you don’t actually the ability?
You have no idea what I think, you certainly have no idea of what I know ( you already demonstrated that you don’t know that )
LOL

Well you're keeping it a secret, so we can only guess what you think impeachment means from your arguments. And I guess that what you think it means is wrong.

You could tell us what you think it means but you won't because you know that what you think it means is wrong!

Big Fun!

[Big D]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

Arguing with this jackass "Big D" reminds me of playing whack a mole. He just keeps popping up insisting Clinton wasn't impeached and I gotta whack him back down again!
Whack a Dope!
It's fun!

You are again, demonstrably wrong, Clinton was impeached by the house

I have never ever said otherwise, you wont be able to find I post I ever made that said otherwise.

Try again...

[Mike DiRucci]

Whack-a-Dope!

Too Funny!

[Big D]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

Whack-a-Dope!
Too Funny!

I knew you couldn’t, so lying won’t help you.

Nothing will help you actually but it is fun to watch you so desperately try.

[Mike DiRucci]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
You are again, demonstrably wrong, Clinton was impeached by the house
I have never ever said otherwise, you wont be able to find I post I ever made that said otherwise.
Try again...

Yeah you got the first part right. Clinton was impeached by the House. But then you get real silly and say the impeachment "failed".

So your position seems to be "Clinton was successfully impeached and it failed."

Very silly!

But FUN for me!

[Mike DiRucci]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
You are again, demonstrably wrong, Clinton was impeached by the house
I have never ever said otherwise, you wont be able to find I post I ever made that said otherwise.
Try again...

OK.

Whack!

Fun!

[Mike DiRucci]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
I knew you couldn’t, so lying won’t help you.
Nothing will help you actually but it is fun to watch you so desperately try.

You knew I couldn't what? You're losing what little coherency your posts have.

Not nice to falsely accuse people of lying. Especially when you can't even tell us what the lie was.

It's desperation. You really need to just relax, admit you were wrong and move on.

Have fun! I am.

[Big D]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
You knew I couldn't what? You're losing what little coherency your posts have.
Not nice to falsely accuse people of lying. Especially when you can't even tell us what the lie was.
It's desperation. You really need to just relax, admit you were wrong and move on.
Have fun! I am.

You could not find a single post where I ever said Clinton was not impeached, you tell people that is what I say ( a total lie ) and then you can’t back it up.

I do read and relax, when I am not laughing that is, I figure when you lie like that you must really be desperate, and that is hilarious to me.
:)

[Altoos]

Being that they are so stupid is the reason they post on a out of town topic.

[Mike DiRucci]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
You could not find a single post where I ever said Clinton was not impeached, you tell people that is what I say ( a total lie ) and then you can’t back it up.
I do read and relax, when I am not laughing that is, I figure when you lie like that you must really be desperate, and that is hilarious to me.
:)

You say both Clinton was impeached and the impeachment "failed". That's silly! If you believe the impeachment failed, why am I lying when I say that's what you believe? If it failed, then he wasn't impeached.

Help us out here. Was Clinton impeached or not? Saying he was impeached and the impeachment failed is saying he wasn't impeached, dummy! Maybe you're saying he was un-impeached?

What a dope!

SO Funny!