Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 200,969

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story
Dan

Roseville, CA

#169561 Dec 2, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Welcome back Dan! How was Japan you lucky dog!
Hope you didn't threaten to beat anyone up behind the dumpster in the Tokyo Home Depot parking lot!
You didn't, did you Dan?
Funny stuff!
Why would I?

Funny it is how you cannot apply yourself to the topic at hand.

Can't find that inherent harm in gay marriage and it's been what....months?

LOL!!!
Da Point

Covina, CA

#169562 Dec 2, 2012
Did ya see it, two gay ladies getting married at West Point?

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169563 Dec 2, 2012
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
The unions are evidence of that.
Most recently organized labor tried to use it's methods based on legalized extortion to an ailing company, Hostess, only to take them down.
Good job.
Uh-oh! Mona Lott says it was not the union's fault, it was Romney's fault! You'll probably be hearing from him soon.

Fun!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169564 Dec 2, 2012
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would I?
Funny it is how you cannot apply yourself to the topic at hand.
Can't find that inherent harm in gay marriage and it's been what....months?
LOL!!!
I support gay marriage you big silly dope!

What a jackass!
Dan

Roseville, CA

#169565 Dec 2, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
No they don't. What's the harm in 3 men marrying? How does it hurt you or anyone else?
And modern science has disproven the supposed medical dangers of close relatives breeding. Besides, marriage has nothing to do with reproduction, right Dan?
FUN!
Ask the government.

They're the ones who determined harm based on past occurances of underage marriage and the effects of cults in polygamy.

As far as reproduction it often takes place outside of marriage and there are many marriages which exist in which no children are involved not to mention is is not a requirement of marriage.

Facts must sting your sorry ass.

LOL!!!
Dan

Roseville, CA

#169566 Dec 2, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
I support gay marriage you big silly dope!
What a jackass!
Nah....you mock it.

Easy enough to see and identify.
Dan

Roseville, CA

#169567 Dec 2, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh-oh! Mona Lott says it was not the union's fault, it was Romney's fault! You'll probably be hearing from him soon.
Fun!
I'm not Mona Lott.
Dan

Roseville, CA

#169568 Dec 2, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Right. Equality is equality. If you exclude anyone, it's not equality. It's a simple concept really.
Really.

So then you also support incestuous marriage and those involving itself with beastiality.

Wow.
Dan

Roseville, CA

#169569 Dec 2, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
See, there you go again, being facetious... Of course it is a scam. Pretending to be a valid couple, without the proper components, is pretense.
We were not talking about marriage, we were talking about "gay" marriage, which is not marriage at all. It is the coupling of a same sex couple which is bogus. The parts are not meant to go where they are being put, in a gay marriage.
I thought the same way until I realized we as humans can be attracted to an adult of the same sex, find love, attraction and a willingness to commit to a marriage.

Being straight myself it was at first a little odd but it's true. What's also true is that those elements are present in marriage.

Some men like fat, obese women in terms of attraction. Never got that one either given I was never attracted to overweight women but they like gays should be able to marry the adult of their choice without your *opinion* being in the way if we're to claim we live in a free country.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169570 Dec 2, 2012
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Ask the government.
They're the ones who determined harm based on past occurances of underage marriage and the effects of cults in polygamy.
As far as reproduction it often takes place outside of marriage and there are many marriages which exist in which no children are involved not to mention is is not a requirement of marriage.
Facts must sting your sorry ass.
LOL!!!
"Ask the government" is not an answer as to how three consenting adults marrying would harm you. Answer the question Danny.

"They're the ones who determined harm based on past occurances of underage marriage and the effects of cults in polygamy." -Of course we're talking about consenting adults stupid, same as in gay or straight marriage. What a dope!

"As far as reproduction it often takes place outside of marriage and there are many marriages which exist in which no children are involved not to mention is is not a requirement of marriage." -Right, reproduction has nothing to do with marriage equality so why shouldn't brother and sister marry?

"Facts must sting your sorry ass." -Facts must sting your sorry ass

"LOL!!!" -YUCK!YUCK!YUCK!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169571 Dec 2, 2012
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Really.
So then you also support incestuous marriage and those involving itself with beastiality.
Wow.
Incest yes. Bestiality no. Animals cannot enter into contracts.

What a dope!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169572 Dec 2, 2012
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not Mona Lott.
But he's one of your heroes. And Rose_NoHo is your leader!

Funny stuff!
Dan

Roseville, CA

#169573 Dec 2, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
"Ask the government" is not an answer as to how three consenting adults marrying would harm you. Answer the question Danny.
"They're the ones who determined harm based on past occurances of underage marriage and the effects of cults in polygamy." -Of course we're talking about consenting adults stupid, same as in gay or straight marriage. What a dope!
"As far as reproduction it often takes place outside of marriage and there are many marriages which exist in which no children are involved not to mention is is not a requirement of marriage." -Right, reproduction has nothing to do with marriage equality so why shouldn't brother and sister marry?
"Facts must sting your sorry ass." -Facts must sting your sorry ass
"LOL!!!" -YUCK!YUCK!YUCK!
On a personal note there are so few polygamists out there I could care less unless they improvise cultist methods or include underage members.

Find one brother and sister who wants to marry you ignorant twit. LOL!!!
Dan

Roseville, CA

#169574 Dec 2, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Incest yes. Bestiality no. Animals cannot enter into contracts.
What a dope!
Pretty disturbing shit there Junior....the fact you'd be open to marry your underage daughter or something akin to that.

Ooooof!

LOL!!!!
Dan

Roseville, CA

#169575 Dec 2, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
But he's one of your heroes. And Rose_NoHo is your leader!
Funny stuff!
Funny....if he was you'd think I'd have mentioned it.
Temple

Covina, CA

#169576 Dec 2, 2012
Two Gays getting married at West Point really set off the idiotss.

Happy December to yOu too!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169577 Dec 2, 2012
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Pretty disturbing shit there Junior....the fact you'd be open to marry your underage daughter or something akin to that.
Ooooof!
LOL!!!!
What don't you understand about consenting adults dummy?

And no, I don't want to marry my daughter. Do you want to marry someone of the same sex as you?

What a dope!

YUK!YUK!YUK!
Dan

Roseville, CA

#169579 Dec 2, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
What don't you understand about consenting adults dummy?
And no, I don't want to marry my daughter. Do you want to marry someone of the same sex as you?
What a dope!
YUK!YUK!YUK!
Hey Ace....it's you who's wanting to expand "equality" to everything and anything.

Not me.

LOL!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169580 Dec 2, 2012
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
On a personal note there are so few polygamists out there I could care less unless they improvise cultist methods or include underage members.
Find one brother and sister who wants to marry you ignorant twit. LOL!!!
Again, consenting adults just like gay or straight marriage you ignorant buffoon. And religion is irrelevant to civil marriage.

I doubt there are many siblings wishing to marry. Does that mean we should ban it? How many is enough for you Dan? How many homosexuals wanting to marry would be too little justifying keeping it banned?

What a jackass!

FUNNY!
Dan

Roseville, CA

#169581 Dec 2, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
First of all, I did not link polygamy to gay marriage, I linked polygamy to marital freedom, so you have just received your first "F" for your weak ploy. Secondly, love and attraction may exist, but we are not discussing love and attraction, we are discussing legislation of new definitions for old traditions and formality, so, your second "F", again, for a weak attempt at misdirection. Third, the idea of linking killing to gay marriage is, indeed, absurd. I didn't link the 2, you did. I showed that nature cannot be used as validation for abhorrent behavior, moron. Another "F" (you sure are racking up abysmal failures here). Fourth, the Founding Fathers never intended for a twisting of their ideals to be used to validate gay marriage, they never dreamed that Americans would be so mixed up, else they would have provided clauses protecting the normality of societal propriety. The Founders never gave unlimited freedoms, they just laid a groundwork, to be used sensibly. Another "F" for you, and my hatchet work on your idiotic post is done.
Post #169550 paints you the liar.

"The argument that homosexual behavior exist in nature hold no validity, because killing also exist in nature, and rape, and these are not accepted, either. And polygamy, also, can be found in nature, also a "no-no", so the argument that nature validates homosexual behavior is invalid."

---Your words, not mine.

And mentioning polygamy in the same context as gay marriage within the confines of that same post does provide proof of your effort to link the 2 liar.

The Founding Fathers did lay out a groundwork which we apply our freedoms to dumbass.

And in that groundwork we as Americans are due a full set of liberties providing those liberties do not produce viable harm.

As of yet you nor others can provide viable harm in gay marriage.

Your "hatchet" is pretty dull there genius.

LOL!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
CA Jury reaches verdict in Oakland BART shooting t... (Jul '10) 21 min Laissez Faire Club 2,271
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 3 hr Eric 69,387
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 10 hr zhuzhamm 5,079
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 15 hr Pizza 16,000
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) Wed Blazing saddles 7,954
The inconvenient 17-year pause in global warming (Sep '13) Sep 12 Earthling-1 123
Carmel waste broker accused of bribery (Dec '08) Sep 11 gotti jr 9
•••
•••
•••

Monterey Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Monterey News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Monterey
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••